Technical information: (202) 691-6467 USDL 04-82 http://www.bls.gov/bdm/ For release: 10:00 A.M. EST Media contact: 691-5902 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 BUSINESS EMPLOYMENT DYNAMICS: SECOND QUARTER 2003 From March to June 2003, the number of job gains from opening and ex- panding establishments was 7.5 million, and the number of job losses from closing and contracting establishments was 7.7 million, according to pre- liminary data released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor. Expanding and contracting establishments accounted for most of the jobs gained and lost. The change in the employment level over time is the net result of gross job gains and gross job losses that occur at establishments throughout the economy. Business Employment Dynamics statistics track these changes in employment at private business establishments from the third month of one quarter to the third month of the next. In this data series, gross job gains are defined as increases in employment resulting from expansions of employment at existing establishments or from the opening of establishments. Gross job losses are defined as declines in employment at existing establish- ments or from the closing of establishments. The difference between the num- ber of gross jobs gained and the number of gross jobs lost is the net change in employment. The data series on Business Employment Dynamics are derived from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), also known as the ES-202 program. This program is a quarterly census of all establishments covered under state and federal unemployment insurance programs, representing about 98 percent of employment on nonfarm payrolls. Trends in Gross Job Gains and Job Losses Opening and expanding private sector business establishments gained 7.5 million jobs in the second quarter of 2003, or 69,000 more than in the first quarter of 2003. This is the first over-the-quarter increase in gross job gains since the first quarter of 2002. Over the quarter, expanding establish- ments added 6.0 million jobs, while opening establishments added 1.5 million. Gross job losses totaled 7.7 million in the second quarter of 2003, 229,000 fewer than in the first quarter of 2003. This is a return to the downward trend in gross job losses that was interrupted by a slight increase in the first quarter. In the second quarter of 2003, contracting establish- ments lost 6.1 million jobs, while closing establishments accounted for a loss of 1.6 million jobs. (See table A.) - 2 - Table A. 3-month private sector gross job gains and losses, seasonally adjusted (In thousands) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 3 months ended Category |-------------------------------------- | June | Sept. | Dec. | Mar. | June | 2002 | 2002 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | Gross job gains...................| 8,010 | 7,922 | 7,746 | 7,441 | 7,510 At expanding establishments.....| 6,223 | 6,208 | 6,114 | 5,904 | 5,988 At opening establishments.......| 1,787 | 1,714 | 1,632 | 1,537 | 1,522 |-------------------------------------- Gross job losses..................| 8,091 | 7,851 | 7,816 | 7,919 | 7,690 At contracting establishments...| 6,372 | 6,257 | 6,189 | 6,361 | 6,140 At closing establishments.......| 1,719 | 1,594 | 1,627 | 1,558 | 1,550 |-------------------------------------- Net employment change 1/..........| -81 | 71 | -70 | -478 | -180 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ The net employment change is the difference between total gross job gains and total gross job losses. See the Technical Note for further information. Rates of Gross Job Gains and Gross Job Losses From March to June 2003, gross job gains represented 7.0 percent of private sector employment, while gross job losses represented 7.3 percent of private sector employment. (See table B.) These gross job gain and loss statistics demonstrate that a sizable number of jobs appear and disappear in the relatively short time frame of one quarter. Table B. 3-month private sector gross job gains and losses as a percent of employment, seasonally adjusted (Percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 3 months ended Category |-------------------------------------- | June | Sept. | Dec. | Mar. | June | 2002 | 2002 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | Gross job gains...................| 7.5 | 7.4 | 7.2 | 6.9 | 7.0 At expanding establishments.....| 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 5.6 At opening establishments.......| 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 |-------------------------------------- Gross job losses..................| 7.5 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 7.3 At contracting establishments...| 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.8 At closing establishments.......| 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |-------------------------------------- Net employment change 1/..........| 0.0 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -0.5 | -0.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ The net employment change is the difference between total gross job gains and total gross job losses. See the Tecnhical Note for further information. Number of Establishments Gaining and Losing Employment Out of 6.4 million active private sector establishments, a total of 1.8 million establishments gained jobs from March to June 2003. (See table C.) Of these, 1.5 million were expanding establishments and 332,000 were opening establishments. During the second quarter of 2003, 1.8 million establishments lost jobs. Of these, 1.5 million were contracting establishments and 337,000 were closing establishments. The statistics from tables A and C indicate that the average expanding establishment added 4.1 jobs during the quarter and the average contracting establishment lost 4.2 jobs during the quarter. - 3 - Table C. Number of private sector establishments by direction of employ- ment change, seasonally adjusted (In thousands) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 3 months ended Category |-------------------------------------- | June | Sept. | Dec. | Mar. | June | 2002 | 2002 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | Establishments gaining jobs.......| 1,794 | 1,805 | 1,798 | 1,756 | 1,783 Expanding establishments........| 1,447 | 1,460 | 1,453 | 1,420 | 1,451 Opening establishments..........| 347 | 345 | 345 | 336 | 332 |-------------------------------------- Establishments losing jobs .......| 1,825 | 1,781 | 1,809 | 1,859 | 1,802 Contracting establishments......| 1,484 | 1,474 | 1,476 | 1,519 | 1,465 Closing establishments..........| 341 | 307 | 333 | 340 | 337 |-------------------------------------- Net establishment change 1/.......| 6 | 38 | 12 | -4 | -5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1/ The net establishment change is the difference between the number of opening establishments and the number of closing establishments. See the Technical Note for further information. More Information For updates of the Business Employment Dynamics series, please refer to the BLS Web site at http://www.bls.gov. For more information, please see the Technical Note of this release or the Business Employment Dynamics Web page at the BLS Web site http://www.bls.gov/bdm. Additional information about the Business Employment Dynamics data may be obtained by e-mailing BDMinfo@bls.gov. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Comparing Business Employment Dynamics Data with Current | | Employment Statistics and Quarterly Census of Employment | | and Wages Data | | | | The net change in employment from Business Employment Dynamics | | (BED) data series will not match the net change in employment from | | the monthly Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey. The CES | | estimates are based on monthly surveys from a sample of establishments, | | while gross job gains and gross job losses are based on a quarterly | | census of administrative records. In addition, the CES has a different | | coverage, excluding the agriculture sector but including establishments | | not covered by the unemployment insurance program. The net over-the- | | quarter changes derived by aggregating component series in the BED data | | may be different from the net employment change estimated from the CES | | seasonally adjusted total employment series. The intended use of the | | BED statistics is to show the dynamic labor market flows that underlie | | the net changes in aggregate employment levels; data users who want | | to track net changes in aggregate employment levels over time should | | refer to CES data. | | | | BED data have a more limited scope than the Quarterly Census of | | Employment and Wages (QCEW) data. The data in this release, in con- | | trast to QCEW data, exclude government employees, private households | | (NAICS 814110), and establishments with zero employment. See the | | Technical Note for further information. | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 4 - Technical Note The Business Employment Dynamics (BED) data are a product of a federal- state cooperative program known as Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), or the ES-202 program. The BED data are compiled by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) from existing quarterly state unemployment insurance (UI) records. Most employers in the U.S. are required to file quarterly reports on the employment and wages of workers covered by UI laws, and to pay quarterly UI taxes. The quarterly UI reports are sent by the State Employment Security Agencies (SESAs) to BLS and form the basis of the Bureau's establishment universe sampling frame. These reports also are used to produce the quarterly QCEW data on total employment and wages and the longitudinal BED data on gross job gains and losses. Other important Bureau uses of the UI reports are in the Current Employment Statistics (CES) program. (See table below for differences between QCEW, CES, and BED.) In the BED program, the quarterly UI records are linked across quarters to provide a longitudinal history for each establishment. The linkage process allows the tracking of net employment changes at the establishment level, which in turn allows the estimation of jobs gained at opening and expanding establishments and jobs lost at closing and contracting establish- ments. Differences between QCEW, BED, and CES employment measures The Bureau publishes three different establishment-based employment mea- sures for any given quarter. Each of these measures--QCEW, BED, and CES-- makes use of the quarterly UI employment reports in producing data; how- ever, each measure has a somewhat different universe coverage, estimation procedure, and publication product. Differences in coverage and estimation methods can result in somewhat different measures of over-the-quarter employment change. It is important to understand program differences and the intended uses of the program products. (See table below.) Additional information on each program can be obtained from the program Web sites shown in the table below. - 5 - Summary of Major Differences between QCEW, BED, and CES Employment Measures -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | QCEW | BED | CES -----------|---------------------|----------------------|----------------------- Source |--Count of UI admini-|--Count of longitudi- |--Sample survey: | strative records | nally-linked UI ad- | 400,000 employers | submitted by 8.2 | ministrative records| | million employers | submitted by 6.4 | | | million private sec-| | | tor employers | -----------|---------------------|----------------------|----------------------- Coverage |--UI and UCFE cover- |--UI Coverage, exclud-|Nonfarm wage and sal- | age: all employers| ing: government, | ary jobs: | subject to state | private households, |--UI Coverage, exclud- | and federal UI Laws| and establishments | ing agriculture, pri- | | with zero employment| vate households, and | | | self-employed | | |--Other employment, in- | | | cluding railroads, | | | religious organiza- | | | tions, and other non- | | | UI-covered jobs -----------|---------------------|----------------------|----------------------- Publication|--Quarterly |--Quarterly |--Monthly frequency | -7 months after the| -8 months after the | -Usually first Friday | end of each quar- | end of each quarter| of following month | ter | | -----------|---------------------|----------------------|----------------------- Use of UI |--Directly summarizes|--Links each new UI |--Uses UI file as a sam- file | and publishes each | quarter to longitu- | pling frame and annu- | new quarter of UI | dinal database and | ally realigns (bench- | data | directly summarizes | marks) sample esti- | | gross job gains and | mates to first quar- | | losses | ter UI levels -----------|---------------------|----------------------|------------------------ Principal |--Provides a quarter-|--Provides quarterly |--Provides current month- products | ly and annual uni- | employer dynamics | ly estimates of employ- | verse count of es- | data on establish- | ment, hours, and earn- | tablishments, em- | ment openings, clos-| ings at the MSA, state, | ployment, and wages| ings, expansions, | and national level by | at the county, MSA,| and contractions at | industry | state, and national| the national level | | levels by detailed |--Future expansions | | industry | will include data at| | | the county, MSA, and| | | state level by in- | | | dustry and size of | | | establishment | -----------|---------------------|----------------------|-------------------------- Principal |--Major uses include:|--Major uses include: |--Major uses include: uses | -Detailed locality | -Business cycle | -Principal national | data | analysis | economic indicator | -Periodic universe | -Analysis of employ-| -Official time series | counts for bench- | er dynamics under- | for employment change | marking sample | lying economic ex- | measures | survey estimates | pansions and con- | -Input into other ma- | -Sample frame for | traction by size of| jor economic indi- | BLS establishment | establishment | cators | survey | | -----------|---------------------|----------------------|-------------------------- Program |--www.bls.gov/cew/ |--www.bls.gov/bdm/ |--www.bls.gov/ces/ Web sites | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 6 - Coverage Employment and wage data for workers covered by state UI and Unemployment Compensation for Federal employees (UCFE) laws are compiled from quarterly contribution reports submitted to the SESAs by employers. In addition to the quarterly contribution reports, employers who operate multiple establishments within a state complete a questionnaire, called the "Multiple Worksite Report," which provides detailed information on the location of their establishments. These reports are based on place of employment rather than place of residence. UI and UCFE coverage is broad and basically comparable from state to state. Major exclusions from UI coverage are self-employed workers, religious or- ganizations, most agricultural workers on small farms, all members of the Armed Forces, elected officials in most states, most employees of railroads, some domestic workers, most student workers at schools, and employees of cer- tain small nonprofit organizations. Gross job gains and gross job losses in this release are derived from lon- gitudinal histories of over 6.4 million private sector employer reports out of 8.2 million total reports of employment and wages submitted by states to BLS in the first quarter of 2003. Gross job gains and gross job losses data in this release do not report estimates for government employees or private households (NAICS 814110), and do not include establishments with zero employ- ment over three quarters. Data from Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands also are excluded from the national data. As an illustration, the table below shows, in millions of establishments, the number of establishments excluded from the gross job gains and gross job losses data in the fourth quarter 2002: Number of active establishments included in Business Employment Dynamics data Millions Total establishments ES-202 program..................................8.2 Excluded: Public sector.........................................0.3 Private households....................................0.5 Zero employment.......................................1.0 Establishments in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands..............................0.0* Total establishments included in Business Employment Dynamics data...........................................6.4 *Approximately 48,000 establishments. Concepts and methodology The Business Employment Dynamics data measure the net change in employment at the establishment level. These changes come about in one of four ways. A net increase in employment can come from either opening establishments or ex- panding establishments. A net decrease in employment can come from either closing establishments or contracting establishments. Gross job gains include the sum of all jobs added at either opening or expanding establishments. Gross job losses include the sum of all jobs lost in either closing or contracting establishments. The net change in employment is the difference between gross job gains and gross job losses. The formal definitions of establishment-level employment changes are as follows: Openings. These are either establishments with positive third month em- ployment for the first time in the current quarter, with no links to the prior quarter, or with positive third month employment in the current quarter following zero employment in the previous quarter. - 7 - Expansions. These are establishments with positive employment in the third month in both the previous and current quarters, with a net increase in employ- ment over this period. Closings. These are either establishments with positive third month employ- ment in the previous quarter, with no employment or zero employment reported in the current quarter. Contractions. These are establishments with positive employment in the third month in both the previous and current quarters, with a net decrease in employment over this period. All establishment-level employment changes are measured from the third month of each quarter. Not all establishments change their employment levels; these establishments count towards estimates of total employment, but not for levels of gross job gains and gross job losses. Gross job gains and gross job losses are expressed as rates by dividing their levels by the average of employment in the current and previous quarters. This provides a symmetric growth rate. The rates are calculated for the com- ponents of gross job gains and gross job losses and then summed to form their respective totals. These rates can be added and subtracted just as their levels can. For instance, the difference between the gross job gains rate and the gross job losses rate is the net growth rate. The linkage process matches establishments' unique SESA identification numbers (SESA-ID). Between 95 to 97 percent of establishments identified as continuous from quarter to quarter are matched by SESA-ID. The rest are linked in one of three ways. The first method uses predecessor and successor information, identified by the states, which relates records with different SESA-IDs across quarters. Predecessor and successor relations can come about for a variety of reasons, including a change in ownership, a firm restructur- ing, or a UI account restructuring. If a match cannot be attained in this manner, a probability-based match is used. This match attempts to identify two establishments with different SESA-IDs as continuous. The match is based upon comparisons such as the same name, address, and phone number. Third, an analyst examines unmatched records individually and makes a possible match. In order to ensure the highest possible quality of data, SESAs verify with employers and update, if necessary, the industry, location, and ownership classification of all establishments on a 3-year cycle. Changes in establish- ment classification codes resulting from the verification process are intro- duced with the data reported for the first quarter of the year. Changes re- sulting from improved employer reporting also are introduced in the first quarter. Seasonal adjustment Over the course of a year, the levels of employment and the associated job flows undergo sharp fluctuations due to such seasonal events as changes in the weather, reduced or expanded production, harvests, major holidays, and the opening and closing of schools. The effect of such seasonal variation can be very large. Because these seasonal events follow a more or less regular pattern each year, their influence can be eliminated by adjusting these statistics from quarter to quarter. These adjustments make nonseasonal developments, such as declines in economic activity, easier to recognize. For example, the large number of youths taking summer jobs is likely to obscure other changes that have taken place in June relative to March, making it difficult to determine if the level of economic activity has risen or declined. However, because the effect of students finishing school in previous years is known, the statistics for the current year can be adjusted to allow for a comparable change. The adjusted figures provide a more useful tool with which to analyze changes in economic activity. - 8 - The employment data series for opening, expanding, closing, and contract- ing establishments are independently seasonally adjusted; net changes are calculated based on the difference between gross job gains and gross job losses. Similarly, the establishment counts data series for opening, expanding, closing, and contracting establishments are independently adjusted, and the net changes are calculated based on the difference between the number of open- ing and closing establishments. Additionally, establishment and employment levels are independently seasonally adjusted to calculate the seasonally ad- justed rates. Concurrent seasonal adjustment is run using X-12 ARIMA. The net over-the-quarter change derived by summing the BED component series will differ from the net employment change estimated from the seasonally ad- justed total private employment series from the CES program. The intended use of BED statistics is to show the dynamic labor market changes that underlie the net employment change statistic. As such, data users interested particu- larly in the net employment change and not in the gross job flows underlying this change should refer to CES data for over-the-quarter net employment changes. Reliability of the data Since the data series on Business Employment Dynamics are based on admini- strative rather than sample data, there are no issues related to sampling error. Nonsampling error, however, still exists. Nonsampling errors can oc- cur for many reasons, such as the employer submitting corrected employment data after the end of the quarter or typographical errors made by businesses when providing information. Such errors, however, are likely to be distri- buted randomly throughout the dataset. Changes in administrative data sometimes create complications for the linkage process. This can result in overstating openings and closings while understating expansions and contractions. The BLS continues to refine methods for improving the linkage process to alleviate the effects of these compli- cations. Additional statistics and other information Several other programs within BLS produce closely related information. The QCEW program, also known as the ES-202 program, provides both quarterly and annual estimates of employment by state, county, and detailed industry. News releases on quarterly county employment and wages and average annual pay by state and industry are available upon request from the Division of Admin- istrative Statistics and Labor Turnover, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20212; telephone 202-691-6567; (http://www.bls.gov/cew/); (e-mail: CEWInfo@bls.gov). The CES program produces monthly estimates of employment, its net change, and earnings by detailed industry. These estimates are part of the Employ- ment Situation report put out monthly by BLS. The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) program provides month- ly measures of job openings, as well as employee hires and separations. Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired in- dividuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral number: 1-800-877-8339. Table 1. Private sector gross job gains and job losses, seasonally adjusted (In thousands) Gross job gains Gross job losses Year 3 months ended Net change (1) Total Expanding Opening Total Contracting Closing establishments establishments establishments establishments 1992 September 276 7,233 5,528 1,705 6,957 5,362 1,595 December 344 7,162 5,504 1,658 6,818 5,428 1,390 1993 March 534 7,511 5,532 1,979 6,977 5,318 1,659 June 636 7,290 5,757 1,533 6,654 5,260 1,394 September 709 7,383 5,770 1,613 6,674 5,322 1,352 December 754 7,481 5,876 1,605 6,727 5,357 1,370 1994 March 643 7,502 5,880 1,622 6,859 5,401 1,458 June 880 7,761 6,033 1,728 6,881 5,400 1,481 September 1,025 7,838 6,121 1,717 6,813 5,493 1,320 December 614 7,682 6,044 1,638 7,068 5,602 1,466 1995 March 830 7,858 6,180 1,678 7,028 5,647 1,381 June 307 7,705 6,020 1,685 7,398 5,934 1,464 September 673 7,873 6,211 1,662 7,200 5,667 1,533 December 570 8,023 6,287 1,736 7,453 5,916 1,537 1996 March 432 7,980 6,262 1,718 7,548 6,030 1,518 June 594 8,111 6,329 1,782 7,517 5,961 1,556 September 590 8,146 6,285 1,861 7,556 5,988 1,568 December 827 8,267 6,390 1,877 7,440 5,906 1,534 1997 March 823 8,305 6,463 1,842 7,482 5,886 1,596 June 627 8,139 6,386 1,753 7,512 5,924 1,588 September 876 8,608 6,674 1,934 7,732 5,972 1,760 December 642 8,673 6,674 1,999 8,031 6,098 1,933 1998 March 777 8,829 6,668 2,161 8,052 6,120 1,932 June 677 8,739 6,601 2,138 8,062 6,191 1,871 September 759 8,587 6,600 1,987 7,828 6,123 1,705 December 619 8,482 6,704 1,778 7,863 6,115 1,748 1999 March 401 8,804 6,720 2,084 8,403 6,454 1,949 June 587 8,806 6,803 2,003 8,219 6,383 1,836 September 752 8,938 6,931 2,007 8,186 6,335 1,851 December 950 9,066 7,046 2,020 8,116 6,303 1,813 2000 March 719 8,847 6,938 1,909 8,128 6,414 1,714 June 534 8,723 6,938 1,785 8,189 6,463 1,726 September 407 8,854 6,930 1,924 8,447 6,620 1,827 December 301 8,680 6,867 1,813 8,379 6,594 1,785 2001 March -281 8,474 6,700 1,774 8,755 6,883 1,872 June -782 8,217 6,413 1,804 8,999 7,115 1,884 September -1,080 7,898 6,104 1,794 8,978 7,060 1,918 December -808 7,902 6,083 1,819 8,710 6,930 1,780 2002 March -276 8,013 6,200 1,813 8,289 6,545 1,744 June -81 8,010 6,223 1,787 8,091 6,372 1,719 September 71 7,922 6,208 1,714 7,851 6,257 1,594 December -70 7,746 6,114 1,632 7,816 6,189 1,627 2003 March -478 7,441 5,904 1,537 7,919 6,361 1,558 June -180 7,510 5,988 1,522 7,690 6,140 1,550 1 Net change is the difference between total gross job gains and total gross job losses. Table 2. Private sector gross job gains and job losses, not seasonally adjusted (In thousands) Gross job gains Gross job losses Year 3 months ended Net change (1) Total Expanding Opening Total Contracting Closing establishments establishments establishments establishments 1992 September 32 6,695 5,186 1,509 6,663 5,253 1,410 December 141 7,017 5,547 1,470 6,876 5,573 1,303 1993 March -1,673 6,817 4,706 2,111 8,490 6,319 2,171 June 3,266 8,712 6,929 1,783 5,446 4,234 1,212 September 412 6,832 5,408 1,424 6,420 5,223 1,197 December 580 7,345 5,921 1,424 6,765 5,483 1,282 1994 March -1,573 6,762 5,027 1,735 8,335 6,423 1,912 June 3,606 9,244 7,237 2,007 5,638 4,354 1,284 September 664 7,236 5,726 1,510 6,572 5,401 1,171 December 477 7,551 6,097 1,454 7,074 5,705 1,369 1995 March -1,400 7,133 5,327 1,806 8,533 6,718 1,815 June 3,062 9,135 7,182 1,953 6,073 4,807 1,266 September 295 7,238 5,786 1,452 6,943 5,581 1,362 December 492 7,913 6,371 1,542 7,421 5,990 1,431 1996 March -1,878 7,297 5,430 1,867 9,175 7,173 2,002 June 3,375 9,575 7,520 2,055 6,200 4,861 1,339 September 134 7,433 5,822 1,611 7,299 5,901 1,398 December 809 8,181 6,508 1,673 7,372 5,951 1,421 1997 March -1,448 7,650 5,630 2,020 9,098 6,986 2,112 June 3,342 9,577 7,565 2,012 6,235 4,875 1,360 September 346 7,809 6,149 1,660 7,463 5,885 1,578 December 727 8,621 6,830 1,791 7,894 6,118 1,776 1998 March -1,613 8,204 5,819 2,385 9,817 7,247 2,570 June 3,543 10,266 7,823 2,443 6,723 5,129 1,594 September 150 7,741 6,045 1,696 7,591 6,049 1,542 December 774 8,474 6,873 1,601 7,700 6,109 1,591 1999 March -2,032 8,186 5,881 2,305 10,218 7,621 2,597 June 3,485 10,362 8,076 2,286 6,877 5,311 1,566 September 62 8,023 6,317 1,706 7,961 6,278 1,683 December 1,097 9,032 7,208 1,824 7,935 6,298 1,637 2000 March -1,607 8,208 6,097 2,111 9,815 7,532 2,283 June 3,443 10,307 8,269 2,038 6,864 5,385 1,479 September -332 7,917 6,285 1,632 8,249 6,583 1,666 December 400 8,628 6,986 1,642 8,228 6,622 1,606 2001 March -2,622 7,880 5,924 1,956 10,502 8,018 2,484 June 2,173 9,735 7,671 2,064 7,562 5,936 1,626 September -1,734 7,040 5,519 1,521 8,774 7,023 1,751 December -828 7,795 6,147 1,648 8,623 7,026 1,597 2002 March -2,363 7,506 5,512 1,994 9,869 7,560 2,309 June 2,704 9,512 7,463 2,049 6,808 5,317 1,491 September -618 7,059 5,605 1,454 7,677 6,223 1,454 December -148 7,629 6,151 1,478 7,777 6,318 1,459 2003 March -2,669 6,868 5,187 1,681 9,537 7,483 2,054 June 2,537 8,985 7,230 1,755 6,448 5,093 1,355 1 See footnote 1, table 1. Table 3. Private sector gross job gains and losses, as a percent of employment, (1) seasonally adjusted (Percent) Gross job gains Gross job losses Year 3 months ended Net change (2) Total Expanding Opening Total Contracting Closing establishments establishments establishments establishments 1992 September 0.3 8.1 6.2 1.9 7.8 6.0 1.8 December 0.2 7.9 6.1 1.8 7.7 6.1 1.6 1993 March 0.6 8.3 6.1 2.2 7.7 5.9 1.8 June 0.8 8.1 6.4 1.7 7.3 5.8 1.5 September 0.8 8.1 6.3 1.8 7.3 5.8 1.5 December 0.8 8.1 6.4 1.7 7.3 5.8 1.5 1994 March 0.7 8.1 6.3 1.8 7.4 5.8 1.6 June 0.9 8.3 6.5 1.8 7.4 5.8 1.6 September 1.1 8.3 6.5 1.8 7.2 5.8 1.4 December 0.6 8.0 6.3 1.7 7.4 5.9 1.5 1995 March 0.8 8.1 6.4 1.7 7.3 5.9 1.4 June 0.3 7.9 6.2 1.7 7.6 6.1 1.5 September 0.7 8.1 6.4 1.7 7.4 5.8 1.6 December 0.5 8.2 6.4 1.8 7.7 6.1 1.6 1996 March 0.6 8.2 6.4 1.8 7.6 6.1 1.5 June 0.6 8.2 6.4 1.8 7.6 6.0 1.6 September 0.6 8.2 6.3 1.9 7.6 6.0 1.6 December 0.9 8.3 6.4 1.9 7.4 5.9 1.5 1997 March 0.8 8.2 6.4 1.8 7.4 5.8 1.6 June 0.6 8.0 6.3 1.7 7.4 5.8 1.6 September 0.9 8.4 6.5 1.9 7.5 5.8 1.7 December 0.6 8.4 6.5 1.9 7.8 5.9 1.9 1998 March 0.7 8.5 6.4 2.1 7.8 5.9 1.9 June 0.6 8.3 6.3 2.0 7.7 5.9 1.8 September 0.8 8.2 6.3 1.9 7.4 5.8 1.6 December 0.5 8.0 6.3 1.7 7.5 5.8 1.7 1999 March 0.4 8.3 6.3 2.0 7.9 6.1 1.8 June 0.6 8.3 6.4 1.9 7.7 6.0 1.7 September 0.7 8.3 6.4 1.9 7.6 5.9 1.7 December 0.9 8.4 6.5 1.9 7.5 5.8 1.7 2000 March 0.6 8.1 6.4 1.7 7.5 5.9 1.6 June 0.4 7.9 6.3 1.6 7.5 5.9 1.6 September 0.3 8.0 6.3 1.7 7.7 6.0 1.7 December 0.2 7.8 6.2 1.6 7.6 6.0 1.6 2001 March -0.2 7.7 6.1 1.6 7.9 6.2 1.7 June -0.8 7.4 5.8 1.6 8.2 6.5 1.7 September -1.1 7.2 5.6 1.6 8.3 6.5 1.8 December -0.7 7.3 5.6 1.7 8.0 6.4 1.6 2002 March -0.2 7.5 5.8 1.7 7.7 6.1 1.6 June 0.0 7.5 5.8 1.7 7.5 5.9 1.6 September 0.1 7.4 5.8 1.6 7.3 5.8 1.5 December -0.1 7.2 5.7 1.5 7.3 5.8 1.5 2003 March -0.5 6.9 5.5 1.4 7.4 5.9 1.5 June -0.3 7.0 5.6 1.4 7.3 5.8 1.5 1 The rates measure gross job gains and job losses as a percentage of the average of the previous and current employment. 2 See footnote 1, table 1. Table 4. Private sector gross job gains and losses, as a percent of employment, (1) not seasonally adjusted (Percent) Gross job gains Gross job losses Year 3 months ended Net change (2) Total Expanding Opening Total Contracting Closing establishments establishments establishments establishments 1992 September 0.1 7.5 5.8 1.7 7.4 5.8 1.6 December 0.2 7.8 6.2 1.6 7.6 6.2 1.4 1993 March -1.8 7.7 5.3 2.4 9.5 7.1 2.4 June 3.7 9.7 7.7 2.0 6.0 4.7 1.3 September 0.4 7.4 5.9 1.5 7.0 5.7 1.3 December 0.6 7.9 6.4 1.5 7.3 5.9 1.4 1994 March -1.7 7.4 5.5 1.9 9.1 7.0 2.1 June 3.9 10.0 7.8 2.2 6.1 4.7 1.4 September 0.7 7.6 6.0 1.6 6.9 5.7 1.2 December 0.5 7.9 6.4 1.5 7.4 6.0 1.4 1995 March -1.5 7.5 5.6 1.9 9.0 7.1 1.9 June 3.2 9.5 7.5 2.0 6.3 5.0 1.3 September 0.3 7.4 5.9 1.5 7.1 5.7 1.4 December 0.5 8.1 6.5 1.6 7.6 6.1 1.5 1996 March -2.0 7.5 5.6 1.9 9.5 7.4 2.1 June 3.5 9.8 7.7 2.1 6.3 4.9 1.4 September 0.1 7.4 5.8 1.6 7.3 5.9 1.4 December 0.9 8.2 6.5 1.7 7.3 5.9 1.4 1997 March -1.5 7.6 5.6 2.0 9.1 7.0 2.1 June 3.4 9.5 7.5 2.0 6.1 4.8 1.3 September 0.4 7.6 6.0 1.6 7.2 5.7 1.5 December 0.7 8.3 6.6 1.7 7.6 5.9 1.7 1998 March -1.6 7.9 5.6 2.3 9.5 7.0 2.5 June 3.4 9.8 7.5 2.3 6.4 4.9 1.5 September 0.1 7.3 5.7 1.6 7.2 5.7 1.5 December 0.8 8.0 6.5 1.5 7.2 5.7 1.5 1999 March -1.9 7.8 5.6 2.2 9.7 7.2 2.5 June 3.2 9.7 7.6 2.1 6.5 5.0 1.5 September 0.0 7.4 5.8 1.6 7.4 5.8 1.6 December 1.0 8.3 6.6 1.7 7.3 5.8 1.5 2000 March -1.5 7.5 5.6 1.9 9.0 6.9 2.1 June 3.2 9.5 7.6 1.9 6.3 4.9 1.4 September -0.2 7.2 5.7 1.5 7.4 5.9 1.5 December 0.4 7.8 6.3 1.5 7.4 6.0 1.4 2001 March -2.4 7.2 5.4 1.8 9.6 7.3 2.3 June 2.0 8.9 7.0 1.9 6.9 5.4 1.5 September -1.6 6.4 5.0 1.4 8.0 6.4 1.6 December -0.8 7.2 5.7 1.5 8.0 6.5 1.5 2002 March -2.2 7.1 5.2 1.9 9.3 7.1 2.2 June 2.5 8.9 7.0 1.9 6.4 5.0 1.4 September -0.6 6.5 5.2 1.3 7.1 5.8 1.3 December -0.2 7.1 5.7 1.4 7.3 5.9 1.4 2003 March -2.4 6.5 4.9 1.6 8.9 7.0 1.9 June 2.4 8.5 6.8 1.7 6.1 4.8 1.3 1 See footnote 1, table 3. 2 See footnote 1, table 1. Table 5. Number of private sector establishments by direction of employment change, seasonally adjusted (In thousands) Establishments gaining jobs Establishments losing jobs Year 3 months ended Net change (1) Total Expanding Opening Total Contracting Closing establishments establishments establishments establishments 1992 September 11 1,576 1,287 289 1,541 1,263 278 December 24 1,591 1,294 297 1,534 1,261 273 1993 March 32 1,614 1,310 304 1,537 1,265 272 June 26 1,631 1,337 294 1,521 1,253 268 September 37 1,647 1,348 299 1,530 1,268 262 December 23 1,655 1,365 290 1,544 1,277 267 1994 March 13 1,644 1,356 288 1,576 1,301 275 June 29 1,700 1,390 310 1,570 1,289 281 September 38 1,715 1,404 311 1,579 1,306 273 December 13 1,693 1,394 299 1,613 1,327 286 1995 March 31 1,717 1,411 306 1,616 1,341 275 June 26 1,697 1,390 307 1,640 1,359 281 September 7 1,715 1,412 303 1,649 1,353 296 December 23 1,726 1,409 317 1,656 1,362 294 1996 March 15 1,736 1,424 312 1,663 1,366 297 June 22 1,745 1,426 319 1,674 1,377 297 September 36 1,762 1,432 330 1,675 1,381 294 December 35 1,787 1,455 332 1,673 1,376 297 1997 March 31 1,801 1,471 330 1,683 1,384 299 June 18 1,783 1,463 320 1,702 1,400 302 September 17 1,810 1,482 328 1,706 1,395 311 December 9 1,818 1,482 336 1,736 1,409 327 1998 March 19 1,814 1,469 345 1,738 1,412 326 June 56 1,841 1,487 354 1,706 1,408 298 September 22 1,824 1,488 336 1,744 1,430 314 December 2 1,831 1,512 319 1,730 1,413 317 1999 March 11 1,827 1,493 334 1,766 1,443 323 June -1 1,847 1,506 341 1,785 1,443 342 September 16 1,860 1,510 350 1,783 1,449 334 December 36 1,903 1,539 364 1,758 1,430 328 2000 March 24 1,882 1,525 357 1,810 1,477 333 June 20 1,876 1,526 350 1,819 1,489 330 September 23 1,879 1,520 359 1,821 1,485 336 December 12 1,863 1,512 351 1,831 1,492 339 2001 March 5 1,849 1,502 347 1,841 1,499 342 June -3 1,811 1,473 338 1,861 1,520 341 September -8 1,774 1,435 339 1,878 1,531 347 December 6 1,775 1,429 346 1,856 1,516 340 2002 March 4 1,786 1,444 342 1,834 1,496 338 June 6 1,794 1,447 347 1,825 1,484 341 September 38 1,805 1,460 345 1,781 1,474 307 December 12 1,798 1,453 345 1,809 1,476 333 2003 March -4 1,756 1,420 336 1,859 1,519 340 June -5 1,783 1,451 332 1,802 1,465 337 1 Net change is the difference between the number of opening establishments and the number of closing establishments. Table 6. Number of private sector establishments by direction of employment change, not seasonally adjusted (In thousands) Establishments gaining jobs Establishments losing jobs Year 3 months ended Net change (1) Total Expanding Opening Total Contracting Closing establishments establishments establishments establishments 1992 September 15 1,497 1,235 262 1,581 1,334 247 December 37 1,577 1,282 295 1,514 1,256 258 1993 March -61 1,481 1,189 292 1,735 1,382 353 June 103 1,857 1,522 335 1,304 1,072 232 September 37 1,565 1,295 270 1,572 1,339 233 December 36 1,643 1,354 289 1,525 1,272 253 1994 March -79 1,513 1,236 277 1,774 1,418 356 June 110 1,928 1,575 353 1,349 1,106 243 September 36 1,630 1,350 280 1,623 1,379 244 December 27 1,683 1,384 299 1,594 1,322 272 1995 March -61 1,585 1,291 294 1,812 1,457 355 June 108 1,925 1,575 350 1,414 1,172 242 September 6 1,627 1,355 272 1,694 1,428 266 December 38 1,720 1,402 318 1,636 1,356 280 1996 March -82 1,605 1,304 301 1,864 1,481 383 June 108 1,975 1,612 363 1,446 1,191 255 September 29 1,664 1,370 294 1,726 1,461 265 December 52 1,787 1,451 336 1,650 1,366 284 1997 March -67 1,669 1,351 318 1,884 1,499 385 June 105 2,014 1,651 363 1,470 1,212 258 September 9 1,706 1,415 291 1,761 1,479 282 December 31 1,823 1,481 342 1,706 1,395 311 1998 March -85 1,682 1,348 334 1,949 1,530 419 June 145 2,077 1,678 399 1,472 1,218 254 September 9 1,713 1,416 297 1,808 1,520 288 December 29 1,842 1,514 328 1,695 1,396 299 1999 March -92 1,695 1,372 323 1,978 1,563 415 June 93 2,083 1,700 383 1,540 1,250 290 September -4 1,742 1,434 308 1,854 1,542 312 December 70 1,917 1,541 376 1,719 1,413 306 2000 March -82 1,751 1,406 345 2,022 1,595 427 June 114 2,113 1,721 392 1,570 1,292 278 September -5 1,757 1,442 315 1,901 1,581 320 December 53 1,878 1,512 366 1,791 1,478 313 2001 March -104 1,720 1,386 334 2,050 1,612 438 June 91 2,045 1,668 377 1,607 1,321 286 September -38 1,654 1,357 297 1,964 1,629 335 December 50 1,788 1,426 362 1,819 1,507 312 2002 March -102 1,659 1,330 329 2,034 1,603 431 June 101 2,029 1,642 387 1,577 1,291 286 September 4 1,685 1,383 302 1,865 1,567 298 December 58 1,811 1,448 363 1,776 1,471 305 2003 March -113 1,621 1,300 321 2,075 1,641 434 June 86 2,021 1,652 369 1,558 1,275 283 1 See footnote 1, table 5. Table 7. Private sector establishments by direction of employment change, as a percent of total establishments, (1) seasonally adjusted (Percent) Establishments gaining jobs Establishments losing jobs Year 3 months ended Net change (2) Total Expanding Opening Total Contracting Closing establishments establishments establishments establishments 1992 September 0.2 29.5 24.1 5.4 28.8 23.6 5.2 December 0.4 29.6 24.1 5.5 28.6 23.5 5.1 1993 March 0.6 29.8 24.2 5.6 28.4 23.4 5.0 June 0.5 29.9 24.5 5.4 27.9 23.0 4.9 September 0.6 30.0 24.6 5.4 27.9 23.1 4.8 December 0.4 29.9 24.7 5.2 27.9 23.1 4.8 1994 March 0.2 29.6 24.4 5.2 28.4 23.4 5.0 June 0.6 30.5 24.9 5.6 28.1 23.1 5.0 September 0.6 30.5 25.0 5.5 28.2 23.3 4.9 December 0.2 30.0 24.7 5.3 28.6 23.5 5.1 1995 March 0.6 30.3 24.9 5.4 28.4 23.6 4.8 June 0.5 29.7 24.3 5.4 28.7 23.8 4.9 September 0.1 29.9 24.6 5.3 28.8 23.6 5.2 December 0.4 30.0 24.5 5.5 28.8 23.7 5.1 1996 March 0.3 30.0 24.6 5.4 28.7 23.6 5.1 June 0.4 30.1 24.6 5.5 28.8 23.7 5.1 September 0.7 30.2 24.5 5.7 28.6 23.6 5.0 December 0.5 30.4 24.8 5.6 28.5 23.4 5.1 1997 March 0.5 30.5 24.9 5.6 28.5 23.4 5.1 June 0.3 30.0 24.6 5.4 28.7 23.6 5.1 September 0.3 30.3 24.8 5.5 28.6 23.4 5.2 December 0.1 30.4 24.8 5.6 29.0 23.5 5.5 1998 March 0.3 30.2 24.5 5.7 28.9 23.5 5.4 June 1.0 30.5 24.6 5.9 28.2 23.3 4.9 September 0.3 30.0 24.5 5.5 28.7 23.5 5.2 December 0.0 30.0 24.8 5.2 28.4 23.2 5.2 1999 March 0.2 29.9 24.4 5.5 28.9 23.6 5.3 June 0.0 30.2 24.6 5.6 29.2 23.6 5.6 September 0.3 30.3 24.6 5.7 29.0 23.6 5.4 December 0.6 30.9 25.0 5.9 28.5 23.2 5.3 2000 March 0.4 30.4 24.6 5.8 29.2 23.8 5.4 June 0.3 30.1 24.5 5.6 29.2 23.9 5.3 September 0.3 30.0 24.3 5.7 29.1 23.7 5.4 December 0.2 29.7 24.1 5.6 29.2 23.8 5.4 2001 March 0.1 29.4 23.9 5.5 29.2 23.8 5.4 June 0.0 28.8 23.4 5.4 29.5 24.1 5.4 September -0.1 28.2 22.8 5.4 29.8 24.3 5.5 December 0.1 28.2 22.7 5.5 29.5 24.1 5.4 2002 March 0.0 28.3 22.9 5.4 29.1 23.7 5.4 June 0.1 28.4 22.9 5.5 28.8 23.4 5.4 September 0.6 28.4 23.0 5.4 28.0 23.2 4.8 December 0.2 28.2 22.8 5.4 28.3 23.1 5.2 2003 March 0.0 27.5 22.2 5.3 29.0 23.7 5.3 June -0.1 27.8 22.6 5.2 28.2 22.9 5.3 1 The rates measure establishments gaining or losing jobs as a percentage of the average of previous and current quarter total number of establishments. 2 See footnote 1, table 5. Table 8. Private sector establishments by direction of employment change, as percent of total establishments, (1) not seasonally adjusted (Percent) Establishments gaining jobs Establishments losing jobs Year 3 months ended Net change (2) Total Expanding Opening Total Contracting Closing establishments establishments establishments establishments 1992 September 0.3 27.9 23.0 4.9 29.4 24.8 4.6 December 0.7 29.2 23.7 5.5 28.1 23.3 4.8 1993 March -1.2 27.5 22.1 5.4 32.3 25.7 6.6 June 1.9 34.3 28.1 6.2 24.1 19.8 4.3 September 0.7 28.4 23.5 4.9 28.5 24.3 4.2 December 0.6 29.6 24.4 5.2 27.5 22.9 4.6 1994 March -1.4 27.4 22.4 5.0 32.0 25.6 6.4 June 2.0 34.8 28.4 6.4 24.3 19.9 4.4 September 0.7 28.9 23.9 5.0 28.8 24.5 4.3 December 0.5 29.7 24.4 5.3 28.1 23.3 4.8 1995 March -1.1 28.0 22.8 5.2 32.1 25.8 6.3 June 1.9 33.9 27.7 6.2 24.9 20.6 4.3 September 0.1 28.2 23.5 4.7 29.4 24.8 4.6 December 0.7 29.8 24.3 5.5 28.3 23.5 4.8 1996 March -1.5 27.8 22.6 5.2 32.4 25.7 6.7 June 1.9 34.2 27.9 6.3 25.0 20.6 4.4 September 0.5 28.4 23.4 5.0 29.4 24.9 4.5 December 0.9 30.3 24.6 5.7 27.9 23.1 4.8 1997 March -1.1 28.3 22.9 5.4 31.9 25.4 6.5 June 1.7 34.0 27.9 6.1 24.9 20.5 4.4 September 0.2 28.5 23.6 4.9 29.4 24.7 4.7 December 0.5 30.3 24.6 5.7 28.4 23.2 5.2 1998 March -1.4 28.1 22.5 5.6 32.6 25.6 7.0 June 2.4 34.5 27.9 6.6 24.4 20.2 4.2 September 0.2 28.1 23.2 4.9 29.6 24.9 4.7 December 0.5 30.1 24.7 5.4 27.7 22.8 4.9 1999 March -1.5 27.8 22.5 5.3 32.4 25.6 6.8 June 1.5 34.2 27.9 6.3 25.3 20.5 4.8 September -0.1 28.3 23.3 5.0 30.2 25.1 5.1 December 1.2 31.0 24.9 6.1 27.7 22.8 4.9 2000 March -1.3 28.3 22.7 5.6 32.7 25.8 6.9 June 1.8 34.0 27.7 6.3 25.3 20.8 4.5 September -0.1 28.0 23.0 5.0 30.3 25.2 5.1 December 0.8 29.8 24.0 5.8 28.5 23.5 5.0 2001 March -1.7 27.4 22.1 5.3 32.7 25.7 7.0 June 1.4 32.6 26.6 6.0 25.7 21.1 4.6 September -0.6 26.2 21.5 4.7 31.1 25.8 5.3 December 0.8 28.3 22.6 5.7 28.7 23.8 4.9 2002 March -1.6 26.3 21.1 5.2 32.3 25.5 6.8 June 1.6 32.1 26.0 6.1 25.0 20.5 4.5 September 0.0 26.4 21.7 4.7 29.3 24.6 4.7 December 0.9 28.3 22.6 5.7 27.8 23.0 4.8 2003 March -1.8 25.4 20.4 5.0 32.5 25.7 6.8 June 1.4 31.7 25.9 5.8 24.4 20.0 4.4 1 See footnote 1, table 7. 2 See footnote 1, table 5.