| Internet: www.bls.gov/ro5/ |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
| GENERAL INFORMATION: (312)
353-1880 |
Tuesday, May 20, 2008 |
| MEDIA CONTACT: Paul
LaPorte |
|
(312) 353-1138 |
|
County Employment and Wages in Wisconsin, Third Quarter 2007
The average weekly wage in Outagamie County increased 4.9 percent from
the third quarter of 2006 to the third quarter of 2007, the largest advance
among Wisconsin’s seven counties with employment of 75,000 or more as
measured by 2006 annual average employment. Winnebago County had the
second-highest wage growth at 3.9 percent, followed by Racine County at 3.2
percent. Waukesha County had the highest average weekly wage level in the
State at $814, followed by the counties of Milwaukee ($802) and Dane ($783).
(See table 1.) Regional Commissioner Jay A. Mousa noted that among Wisconsin’s
seven largest counties, only Outagamie reported wage growth above the
national rate of 4.3 percent and none had average weekly wages above the
national average of $818.
Among the seven largest counties in Wisconsin, employment was highest in
Milwaukee County (497,800) and lowest in Racine County (76,400) in September
2007. Only one of the State’s large counties—Outagamie—recorded an
employment gain greater than the national average of 0.9 percent.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also
available for the 65 counties in Wisconsin with employment below 75,000. All
of the State’s smaller counties had average weekly wages below the
national level. (See table 2.)
Wage Levels in Large Counties
The average weekly wage levels in the counties of Waukesha, Milwaukee,
Dane, and Winnebago placed in the top half of the national ranking among the
328 largest counties in the United States. Waukesha County’s average
weekly wage ranked 114th; Milwaukee’s, 127th; Dane’s,
138th; and Winnebago’s, 161st. While none of these
counties had average weekly wages above that for the nation, Waukesha,
Milwaukee, and Dane Counties were within 5 percent of the U.S. average.
The average weekly wages in Wisconsin’s three other large counties
placed in the bottom half of the national rankings: Outagamie ($712/229th),
Brown ($719/216th), and Racine ($738/193rd).
Across the country, average weekly wages were higher than the national
average in 112 of the largest 328 U.S. counties. Santa Clara, Calif., held
the top position among the highest-paid large counties with an average
weekly wage of $1,585. New York County, N.Y., was second with an average
weekly wage of $1,544, followed by Washington, D.C. ($1,376), Arlington, Va.
($1,364), and San Mateo, Calif. ($1,322).
Nationwide, there were 215 counties with an average weekly wage below the
national average in the third quarter of 2007. The lowest average weekly
wage was reported in Cameron County, Texas ($518), followed by the counties
of Hidalgo, Texas ($529), Horry, S.C. ($536), Webb, Texas ($548), and
Yakima, Wash. ($568).
Wage Changes in Large Counties
Only one of Wisconsin’s seven large counties recorded wage growth above
the national increase of 4.3 percent from the third quarter of 2006 to the
third quarter of 2007. (See table 1.) As mentioned, Outagamie County’s
4.9-percent wage gain was the largest increase in the State and ranked 71st
in the nation. Winnebago, at 3.9 percent, placed 134th. Brown
County had the State’s smallest wage increase, 1.8 percent and ranked 272nd
among the nation’s largest counties.
Among the largest counties in the nation, Clayton County, Ga., led the
nation in growth in average weekly wages, with an increase of 23.9 percent
from the third quarter of 2006 to the third quarter of 2007. Muscogee, Ga.,
was second with growth of 12.1 percent, followed by the counties of Santa
Clara, Calif. (11.8 percent), Rock Island, Ill. (11.5 percent), and
Davidson, Tenn. (9.1 percent).
Over the year, 10 large counties experienced declines in average weekly
wages. Among the five largest decreases in wages, Trumbull, Ohio, had the
greatest decline (-10.6 percent), followed by the counties of Vanderburgh,
Ind. (-6.1 percent), Genesee, Mich. (-4.0 percent), Saginaw, Mich. (-3.1
percent), and Montgomery, Ohio (-3.0 percent).
Wage Levels in Wisconsin’s Smaller Counties
All of the 65 counties in Wisconsin with employment below 75,000 had
average weekly wages below the national level. Florence County reported the
lowest wage at $389 in the third quarter of 2007. The highest wage among
Wisconsin’s small counties was $767 in Wood, followed by $722 in Ozaukee.
(See table 2.)
When all 72 counties in Wisconsin were considered, 12 counties in the
State reported average weekly wages ranging from $400 to $499 and 50, or
nearly three-quarters, reported average weekly wages in the $500 to $699
range. Among the higher-paid counties, Waukesha and Milwaukee were the only
counties with average weekly wages above $800. These better-paid counties
were located in the Milwaukee-Racine metropolitan area.
State Average Weekly Wages
At the state level, the average weekly wage in Wisconsin was $705, $113
below the nationwide figure, ranking 33rd among the 50 states and
the District of Columbia. (See table 3.) The five highest wage levels in the
nation were in the District of Columbia ($1,376), Connecticut ($1,021), New
York ($1,009), Massachusetts ($1,002) and New Jersey ($965). All had wages
at least 18 percent higher than the national average. Three states had
average earnings of less than 75 percent of the national average: South
Dakota ($598), Mississippi ($607), and Montana ($608).
Wisconsin experienced wage growth of 2.6 percent from the third quarter
of 2006 to the third quarter of 2007, ranking 47th among the 50
states and District of Columbia. Wage gains in the neighboring states of
Minnesota (4.6 percent), Iowa (4.2 percent), and Illinois (4.0 percent) were
all considerably larger, while Michigan (2.4 percent) experienced similar
wage growth. (See table 3.) Nationwide, the highest over-the-year wage gains
in the third quarter of 2007 were recorded by Washington (6.7 percent),
Connecticut (6.6 percent), and New York (6.1 percent). The only state to
report a decline in average weekly wages was Rhode Island, where wages edged
down 0.1 percent.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly
Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202
program. The data are derived from reports submitted by employers subject to
state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) laws. The 9.0 million employer
reports cover 136.2 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly
wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average
of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The
result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be
noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may
reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and
such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties,
metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average
wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs),
counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/;
however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised (see Technical Note
below) and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
Additional statistics and other information
An annual bulletin, Employment and Wages, features comprehensive
information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages
for the nation and all states. The 2006 edition of this bulletin contains
selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains
and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2007 version of
this news release. This edition includes the data on a CD for enhanced
access and usability. As a result of this change, the printed booklet
contains only selected graphic representation of QCEW data; the data tables
themselves are published exclusively in electronic formats as PDF and
fixed-width text files. Employment and Wages Annual Averages, 2006 is
now available for sale from the United States Government Printing Office,
Superintendent of Documents. On-line ordering information is available at
http://bookstore.gpo.gov/. The 2006 bulletin is available in a portable
document format (PDF) on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn06.htm.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired
individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral
phone number: 1-800-877-8339.
For personal assistance or further information on the Quarterly Census of
Employment and Wages Program, as well as other Bureau programs, contact the
Midwest Information Office in Chicago at (312) 353-1880 from 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. CT.
TECHNICAL NOTE
QCEW data are the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the
number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in
time. For this reason, county and industry data are not designed to be used
as a time series.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data
released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the
BLS Web site. The potential differences result from several causes.
Differences between BLS and state published data may be due to the
continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other
hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS
Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year
comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic)
changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry
classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to
more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving
from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a
12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press
releases.
Table 1. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and the
7 largest counties
in Wisconsin, third quarter 2007 (2)
| Area |
Employment |
Average Weekly Wage (3) |
| September 2007 (thousands) |
Percent change, third quarter 2006-07 (5) |
Average weekly wage |
National ranking by level (4) |
Percent change, third quarter 2006-07 (5) |
National ranking by percent change (4) |
United States (6) |
136,246.9 |
0.9 |
$818 |
-- |
4.3 |
-- |
Wisconsin |
2,802.3 |
-0.1 |
705 |
33 |
2.6 |
47 |
Brown, Wis. |
150.4 |
0.0 |
719 |
216 |
1.8 |
272 |
Dane, Wis. |
306.2 |
(7) |
783 |
138 |
(7) |
- |
Milwaukee, Wis. |
497.8 |
0.0 |
802 |
127 |
2.8 |
223 |
Outagamie, Wis. |
104.8 |
1.7 |
712 |
229 |
4.9 |
71 |
Racine, Wis. |
76.4 |
-1.1 |
738 |
193 |
3.2 |
199 |
Waukesha, Wis. |
236.4 |
-0.6 |
814 |
114 |
3.0 |
211 |
Winnebago, Wis. |
90.4 |
0.4 |
765 |
161 |
3.9 |
134 |
|
Table 2. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and all
of the counties in Wisconsin, third quarter 2007 (2)
| Area |
Employment September 2007 |
Average weekly wage (3) |
United States (4) |
136,246,900 |
$818 |
Wisconsin |
2,802,342 |
705 |
Adams |
5,003 |
496 |
Ashland |
8,921 |
594 |
Barron |
21,380 |
534 |
Bayfield |
4,238 |
442 |
Brown |
150,398 |
719 |
Buffalo |
5,355 |
692 |
Burnett |
4,818 |
489 |
Calumet |
13,136 |
538 |
Chippewa |
21,966 |
604 |
Clark |
10,432 |
558 |
Columbia |
21,441 |
595 |
Crawford |
8,747 |
480 |
Dane |
306,182 |
783 |
Dodge |
35,162 |
668 |
Door |
14,811 |
493 |
Douglas |
15,691 |
581 |
Dunn |
16,377 |
595 |
Eau Claire |
56,474 |
643 |
Florence |
1,101 |
389 |
Fond Du Lac |
46,837 |
661 |
Forest |
3,466 |
490 |
Grant |
16,956 |
526 |
Green |
15,230 |
540 |
Green Lake |
7,387 |
574 |
Iowa |
10,574 |
562 |
Iron |
1,987 |
469 |
Jackson |
8,630 |
626 |
Jefferson |
34,809 |
596 |
Juneau |
9,379 |
579 |
Kenosha |
55,301 |
662 |
Kewaunee |
7,445 |
681 |
La Crosse |
66,062 |
627 |
Lafayette |
3,767 |
484 |
Langlade |
8,047 |
508 |
Lincoln |
11,474 |
608 |
Manitowoc |
35,356 |
637 |
Marathon |
71,312 |
682 |
Marinette |
19,888 |
584 |
Marquette |
4,208 |
482 |
Menominee |
2,128 |
504 |
Milwaukee |
497,849 |
802 |
Monroe |
20,241 |
584 |
Oconto |
9,526 |
502 |
Oneida |
17,905 |
542 |
Outagamie |
104,819 |
712 |
Ozaukee |
39,408 |
722 |
Pepin |
2,256 |
518 |
Pierce |
9,213 |
553 |
Polk |
15,448 |
553 |
Portage |
33,687 |
605 |
Price |
6,373 |
558 |
Racine |
76,366 |
738 |
Richland |
6,079 |
543 |
Rock |
68,084 |
692 |
Rusk |
5,402 |
483 |
Sauk |
38,047 |
556 |
Sawyer |
7,986 |
599 |
Shawano |
13,047 |
517 |
Sheboygan |
62,977 |
684 |
St. Croix |
29,295 |
610 |
Taylor |
8,408 |
570 |
Trempealeau |
13,265 |
561 |
Vernon |
8,079 |
505 |
Vilas |
8,963 |
450 |
Walworth |
40,729 |
586 |
Washburn |
5,864 |
507 |
Washington |
53,103 |
653 |
Waukesha |
236,367 |
814 |
Waupaca |
20,939 |
572 |
Waushara |
6,913 |
499 |
Winnebago |
90,413 |
765 |
Wood |
44,712 |
767 |
Table 3. Covered (1) employment and wages by state, third quarter
2007 (2)
| State |
Employment |
Average weekly wage (3) |
| September 2007 (thousands) |
Percent change, third quarter 2006-07 |
Average weekly wage |
National ranking by level |
Percent change, third quarter 2006-07 |
National ranking by percent change |
United States (4) |
136,246.9 |
0.9 |
$818 |
- |
4.3 |
- |
Alabama |
1,959.0 |
1.1 |
707 |
32 |
3.7 |
37 |
Alaska |
327.3 |
0.7 |
840 |
13 |
5.4 |
9 |
Arizona |
2,644.9 |
0.5 |
783 |
20 |
4.1 |
25 |
Arkansas |
1,184.5 |
0.3 |
629 |
46 |
4.1 |
25 |
California |
15,755.0 |
0.7 |
932 |
6 |
4.5 |
18 |
Colorado |
2,314.3 |
2.4 |
844 |
12 |
3.2 |
42 |
Connecticut |
1,696.9 |
1.0 |
1,021 |
2 |
6.6 |
2 |
Delaware |
425.2 |
0.1 |
860 |
10 |
1.2 |
50 |
District of Columbia |
679.0 |
0.6 |
1,376 |
1 |
5.3 |
12 |
Florida |
7,879.9 |
-0.9 |
741 |
26 |
4.1 |
25 |
Georgia |
4,089.4 |
1.2 |
782 |
21 |
4.1 |
25 |
Hawaii |
624.4 |
0.3 |
760 |
22 |
5.4 |
9 |
Idaho |
675.5 |
2.2 |
634 |
45 |
3.4 |
41 |
Illinois |
5,917.6 |
0.6 |
866 |
9 |
4.0 |
32 |
Indiana |
2,937.4 |
0.5 |
702 |
34 |
2.2 |
49 |
Iowa |
1,494.5 |
0.9 |
668 |
40 |
4.2 |
22 |
Kansas |
1,368.7 |
1.7 |
680 |
38 |
2.7 |
46 |
Kentucky |
1,814.3 |
1.0 |
676 |
39 |
3.0 |
44 |
Louisiana |
1,880.8 |
2.7 |
716 |
31 |
4.5 |
18 |
Maine |
615.3 |
0.7 |
660 |
44 |
3.9 |
35 |
Maryland |
2,563.7 |
0.7 |
892 |
7 |
4.1 |
25 |
Massachusetts |
3,261.0 |
1.0 |
1,002 |
4 |
5.5 |
5 |
Michigan |
4,218.2 |
-1.4 |
808 |
16 |
2.4 |
48 |
Minnesota |
2,713.3 |
0.9 |
822 |
15 |
4.6 |
16 |
Mississippi |
1,142.2 |
0.6 |
607 |
50 |
3.8 |
36 |
Missouri |
2,746.7 |
0.8 |
719 |
29 |
4.2 |
22 |
Montana |
446.1 |
2.7 |
608 |
49 |
4.6 |
16 |
Nebraska |
922.7 |
1.7 |
666 |
41 |
5.4 |
9 |
Nevada |
1,286.4 |
-0.1 |
792 |
19 |
5.5 |
5 |
New Hampshire |
637.2 |
0.3 |
799 |
18 |
3.2 |
42 |
New Jersey |
3,985.2 |
0.1 |
965 |
5 |
3.7 |
37 |
New Mexico |
830.4 |
0.8 |
682 |
37 |
4.1 |
25 |
New York |
8,585.3 |
1.3 |
1,009 |
3 |
6.1 |
3 |
North Carolina |
4,104.1 |
2.4 |
719 |
29 |
3.5 |
40 |
North Dakota |
347.4 |
1.5 |
621 |
48 |
5.8 |
4 |
Ohio |
5,331.9 |
-0.2 |
745 |
25 |
2.8 |
45 |
Oklahoma |
1,548.2 |
1.8 |
666 |
41 |
5.5 |
5 |
Oregon |
1,751.7 |
1.2 |
750 |
24 |
4.2 |
22 |
Pennsylvania |
5,673.4 |
0.5 |
802 |
17 |
4.4 |
20 |
Rhode Island |
486.1 |
-1.0 |
759 |
23 |
-0.1 |
51 |
South Carolina |
1,904.7 |
1.7 |
664 |
43 |
3.6 |
39 |
South Dakota |
397.5 |
2.0 |
598 |
51 |
4.7 |
15 |
Tennessee |
2,774.4 |
0.5 |
728 |
28 |
4.3 |
21 |
Texas |
10,304.9 |
2.9 |
825 |
14 |
5.0 |
13 |
Utah |
1,231.6 |
3.6 |
696 |
36 |
5.5 |
5 |
Vermont |
305.2 |
-0.2 |
699 |
35 |
4.0 |
32 |
Virginia |
3,686.6 |
1.0 |
857 |
11 |
5.0 |
13 |
Washington |
2,976.5 |
2.1 |
878 |
8 |
6.7 |
1 |
West Virginia |
713.8 |
0.3 |
623 |
47 |
4.0 |
32 |
Wisconsin |
2,802.3 |
-0.1 |
705 |
33 |
2.6 |
47 |
Wyoming |
284.3 |
3.6 |
734 |
27 |
4.1 |
25 |
Puerto Rico |
1,008.0 |
-1.1 |
453 |
(5) |
2.5 |
(5) |
Virgin Islands |
45.0 |
0.7 |
682 |
(5) |
-0.3 |
(5) |
Last Modified Date: May 20, 2008
|