CONTACT:
Media Interviews (415) 625-2270
Internet address: http://www.bls.gov/ro9/news.htm

BLS 09-84
FOR RELEASE:
Thursday, September 10, 2009

COUNTY EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES IN CALIFORNIA
FOURTH QUARTER 2008

All of California’s 27 largest counties reported decreases in their employment levels from December 2007 to December 2008 according to preliminary data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor. (Large counties are defined was those with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2007 annual average employment.) Regional Commissioner Richard J. Holden noted that three counties posted employment declines of greater than five percent. Riverside County had the largest decrease with a loss of 7.0 percent, followed by Placer and San Bernardino Counties, down 5.9 percent and 5.8 percent, respectively.

Nationally, employment fell 2.3 percent during this 12-month period, as only 37 of the 334 large counties nationwide added jobs. Elkhart County, Ind., located about 100 miles east of Chicago, posted the largest percentage decline, at 17.8 percent. Montgomery County, Texas, experienced the fastest growth at 2.7 percent.

Among the 27 largest counties in California, employment was highest in Los Angeles County (4,152,900) in December 2008. Two other counties, Orange and San Diego had employment levels exceeding 1,000,000. Together, California’s large counties accounted for 93.5 percent of total employment within the State. Nationwide, the 334 largest counties made up 71.3 percent of total U.S. employment.

The average weekly wage in Butte County rose 4.6 percent from the fourth quarter of 2007 to the fourth quarter of 2008; this increase was among the largest in the State which included Kern County, up 4.5 percent. Santa Clara County had the highest average weekly wage among the largest counties in California at $1,566, but also posted the largest wage decline at 7.8 percent. (See table 1.) Nationally, the average weekly wage rose 2.2 percent over the year to $918 in the fourth quarter of 2008.

Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 31 counties in California with employment below 75,000. Thirty of these 31 smaller counties had average weekly wages below the national average. (See table 2.)

Large County Wage Changes

Twelve of California’s 27 large counties recorded wage growth at or above the national increase of 2.2 percent from the fourth quarter of 2007 to the fourth quarter of 2008. (See table 1.) Five of the 27 largest counties had wage gains above 3.5 percent. Butte County ranked 45th out of the 334 largest counties in the U.S. in wage growth, followed by Kern (48th), and Solano (71st). Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties placed near the bottom, at 322nd and 320th, respectively.

Among the largest counties, St. Louis City, Mo., led the nation in growth in average weekly wages with an increase of 56.8 percent from the fourth quarter of 2007. Clayton, Ga. was second with growth of 9.9 percent, followed by the counties of Calcasieu, La. (9.0 percent), and East Baton Rouge, La. and Jefferson, Texas (8.0 percent each).

Forty-two large counties in the United States experienced over-the-year declines in average weekly wages. Pulaski County, Arkansas, had the largest decrease in the nation and was the only county to experience a double-digit decline (-14.3 percent). The next largest declines were recorded in Lake, Ill. (-9.9 percent), Santa Clara, Calif. (-7.8 percent), and Douglass, Colo. (-5.9 percent).

Large County Average Weekly Wages

Average weekly wages in 15 of California’s 27 large counties placed in the top half of the national ranking among the 334 largest counties in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2008. The 3 highest-paid counties in the State—Santa Clara, San Francisco, and San Mateo—were all above the U.S. average of $918 and ranked in the top 10 nationwide. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, and Los Angeles Counties ranked in the top 50 of all large counties.

Nationally, average weekly wages were higher than average in 106 of the largest 334 counties. New York, N.Y., held the top position with an average weekly wage of $1,856. Fairfield, Conn., was second with a wage of $1,596, followed by Washington, D.C. ($1,570), Suffolk, Mass. ($1,568), and Santa Clara, Calif. ($1,566).

Of the 10 counties with the highest wages in the United States, 3 were located in the greater New York metropolitan area (New York, N.Y., Fairfield, Conn., and Somerset, N.J.), 3 others were located in or around the San Francisco area (Santa Clara, San Francisco, and San Mateo), and 2 were located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area (Washington, D.C., and Arlington, Va.). Rounding out the top 10 was Suffolk County, Mass., part of the Boston metropolitan area, and St. Louis City County, Mo.

Among the 228 counties with an average weekly wage below the U.S. average in the fourth quarter of 2008, Hidalgo, Texas ($574), reported the lowest wage, followed by the counties of Horry, S.C., ($581), Cameron County, Texas ($584), Webb, Texas ($600), and Yakima, Wash. ($624). Wages in these lowest-ranked counties were less than 35 percent of the average weekly wage reported for the highest-ranked county, New York.

Average Weekly Wages in California’s Smaller Counties

Thirty of 31 counties in California with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages lower than the national average of $918. These smaller counties are widely distributed across the State. (See table 2.)

When all 58 counties were considered, all but 12 had wages below the national average of $918. One reported average weekly wages under $600, 19 reported wages from $600 to $699, and 25 had wages from $700 to $900. Seven of the 12 counties with above-average wages are located in the metropolitan area of San Francisco. The lowest paid county, with wages under $600, is located in the Mother Lode Region of California.

Additional Statistics and Other Information

Quarterly data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit the QCEW Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/

An annual bulletin, Employment and Wages, features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2007 edition of this bulletin contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the third quarter 2008 version of the news release. Tables and additional content from the 2007 Employment and Wages Annual Bulletin are now available online at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn07.htm

These tables present final 2007 annual averages. The tables are included on the CD which accompanies the hardcopy version of the Annual Bulletin. Employment and Wages Annual Averages, 2007 is available for sale as a chartbook from the United States Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250, telephone (866) 512-1800, outside Washington, D.C. Within Washington, D.C., the telephone number is (202) 512-1800. The fax number is (202) 512-2104.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral phone number: 1-800-877-8339.

For personal assistance or further information on the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages Program, as well as other Bureau programs, contact the Western Information Office in San Francisco at (415) 625-2270 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. PT.

TECHNICAL NOTE

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 9.1 million employer reports cover 136.6 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.

QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons—some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.


Table 1. Covered(1) employment and wages in the United States and the 27 largest counties in California, fourth quarter 2008(2)
Area Employment Average Weekly Wage (3)
December 2008 (thousands) Percent change, December 2007-08 (4) National ranking by percent change (5) Average weekly wage National ranking by level (5) Percent change, fourth quarter 2007-08 (4) National ranking by percent change (5)

United States (6)

133,870.4 -2.3 -- $918 -- 2.2 --

California

15,288.5 -3.2 -- 1,042 6 0.7 48

Alameda, Calif.

669.9 -4.0 267 1,161 25 0.1 277

Butte, Calif.

74.4 -3.1 222 698 312 4.6 45

Contra Costa, Calif.

335.8 -3.6 252 1,135 32 1.7 209

Fresno, Calif.

345.9 -1.6 118 737 283 1.7 209

Kern, Calif.

285.6 -1.2 92 794 232 4.5 48

Los Angeles, Calif.

4,152.9 -3.4 241 1,075 44 1.8 204

Marin, Calif.

108.6 -2.0 145 1,152 26 -2.0 310

Monterey, Calif.

152.3 -3.4 241 801 222 3.4 95

Orange, Calif.

1,451.2 -4.8 286 1,043 52 1.4 235

Placer, Calif.

130.5 -5.9 311 892 128 1.8 204

Riverside, Calif.

593.2 -7.0 317 745 278 2.2 181

Sacramento, Calif.

610.8 -3.6 252 1,006 61 3.2 107

San Bernardino, Calif.

640.3 -5.8 305 788 238 3.0 122

San Diego, Calif.

1,309.1 -3.0 208 981 68 2.0 192

San Francisco, Calif.

574.0 -0.9 76 1,491 9 -2.4 314

San Joaquin, Calif.

214.5 -4.4 282 796 229 3.2 107

San Luis Obispo, Calif.[

101.8 -2.8 196 765 260 1.7 209

San Mateo, Calif.

342.4 -1.6 118 1,439 10 -5.4 320

Santa Barbara, Calif.

180.5 -2.0 145 868 147 1.6 218

Santa Clar, Calif.

901.1 -1.7 126 1,566 5 -7.8 322

Santa Cruz, Calif.

90.0 -4.2 273 821 195 -2.3 312

Solano, Calif.

124.8 -3.1 222 903 119 3.9 71

Sonoma, Calif.

185.8 -4.9 291 896 122 3.0 122

Stanislaus, Calif.

166.7 -4.3 278 759 267 3.8 77

Tulare, Calif.

147.6 -3.0 208 651 328 3.7 81

Ventura, Calif.

310.4 -3.4 241 926 97 -5.1 318

Yolo, Calif.

99.1 -2.2 160 883 133 3.2 107

Footnotes:
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(5) Ranking does not include the county of San Juan, Puerto Rico.
(6) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(7) Data do not meet BLS or State agency disclosure standards.

Table 2. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and all counties in California, 4th quarter 2008 (2)
Area Employment December 2008 Average Weekly Wage (3)

United States (4)

133,870,395 $918

  California

15,288,461 $1,042

    Alameda

669,856 $1,161

    Alpine

526 $642

    Amador

12,397 $773

    Butte

74,427 $698

    Calaveras

8,511 $669

    Colusa

7,626 $700

    Contra Costa

335,801 $1,135

    Del Norte

8,553 $642

    El Dorado

51,844 $814

    Fresno

345,851 $737

    Glenn

8,042 $656

    Humboldt

49,072 $663

    Imperial

59,242 $659

    Inyo

7,615 $725

    Kern

285,567 $794

    Kings

42,790 $703

    Lake

14,641 $665

    Lassen

10,559 $758

    Los Angeles

4,152,870 $1,075

    Madera

45,546 $696

    Marin

108,636 $1,152

    Mariposa

5,026 $594

    Mendocino

30,969 $663

    Merced

67,634 $686

    Modoc

2,669 $606

    Mono

7,495 $645

    Monterey

152,280 $801

    Napa

64,528 $928

    Nevada

28,915 $779

    Orange

1,451,249 $1,043

    Placer

130,518 $892

    Plumas

6,168 $708

    Riverside

593,223 $745

    Sacramento

610,832 $1,006

    San Benito

13,989 $763

    San Bernardino

640,293 $788

    San Diego

1,309,081 $981

    San Francisco

574,001 $1,491

    San Joaquin

214,521 $796

    San Luis Obispo

101,849 $765

    San Mateo

342,401 $1,439

    Santa Barbara

180,477 $868

    Santa Clara

901,098 $1,566

    Santa Cruz

89,964 $821

    Shasta

63,940 $709

    Sierra

598 $670

    Siskiyou

13,387 $619

    Solano

124,762 $903

    Sonoma

185,832 $896

    Stanislaus

166,729 $759

    Sutter

26,625 $686

    Tehama

16,836 $654

    Trinity

2,664 $612

    Tulare

147,581 $651

    Tuolumne

17,206 $738

    Ventura

310,412 $926

    Yolo

99,088 $883

    Yuba

16,620 $830

Footnotes:
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(5) Data not included in the national ranking.

Table 3. Covered (1) employment and wages by state, fourth quarter 2008(2)
State Employment Average weekly wage (3)
December 2008 (thousands) Percent change, December 2007-08 Average weekly wage National ranking by level Percent change, fourth quarter 2007-08 National ranking by percent change

United States (4)

133,870.4 -2.3 $918 - 2.2 -

Alabama

1,909.8 -3.1 790 33 3.5 16

Alaska

303.9 1.6 927 14 5.7 4

Arizona

2,557.9 -5.1 848 23 2.7 25

Arkansas

1,168.2 -1.5 706 47 -1.0 50

California

15,288.5 -3.2 1,042 6 0.7 48

Colorado

2,295.8 -1.5 932 13 0.5 49

Connecticut

1,688.0 -1.7 1,164 3 1.2 44

Delaware

416.8 -3.0 943 10 1.9 36

District of Columbia

687.5 0.3 1,570 1 5.1 6

Florida

7,586.6 -5.3 824 26 1.6 39

Georgia

3,970.3 -3.5 853 21 2.3 33

Hawaii

614.7 -3.5 821 28 3.5 16

Idaho

634.1 -3.9 693 48 1.0 45

Illinois

5,795.8 -2.3 985 8 1.0 45

Indiana

2,831.3 -3.4 764 38 2.7 25

Iowa

1,483.7 -1.0 756 39 3.1 19

Kansas

1,370.2 -0.2 769 36 3.1 19

Kentucky

1,783.2 -2.6 754 41 3.0 21

Louisiana

1,907.5 0.1 829 25 5.9 3

Maine

595.3 -2.1 735 42 4.0 11

Maryland

2,531.8 -1.9 1,010 7 2.4 31

Massachusetts

3,239.6 -1.1 1,154 4 1.8 38

Michigan

3,993.3 -4.9 903 17 3.6 15

Minnesota

2,658.8 -1.9 907 16 2.6 27

Mississippi

1,117.2 -2.8 679 49 3.8 13

Missouri

2,700.9 -1.7 842 24 7.9 1

Montana

433.8 -1.5 678 50 2.9 23

Nebraska

923.1 -0.3 730 45 1.0 45

Nevada

1,206.5 -6.5 862 20 -1.1 51

New Hampshire

626.2 -2.0 936 11 2.2 34

New Jersey

3,927.7 -2.4 1,123 5 2.8 24

New Mexico

821.2 -1.2 768 37 3.9 12

New York

8,677.4 -1.0 1,169 2 1.4 40

North Carolina

4,003.8 -3.0 793 31 1.9 36

North Dakota

354.4 1.9 725 46 5.1 6

Ohio

5,167.5 -3.2 816 29 2.6 27

Oklahoma

1,559.8 0.0 755 40 4.9 8

Oregon

1,676.6 -3.7 808 30 1.3 43

Pennsylvania

5,645.8 -1.3 897 18 2.6 27

Rhode Island

464.3 -3.4 887 19 5.7 4

South Carolina

1,837.1 -3.5 731 44 2.1 35

South Dakota

395.2 0.4 663 51 2.5 30

Tennessee

2,695.7 -3.3 824 26 1.4 40

Texas

10,510.8 0.4 933 12 2.4 31

Utah

1,215.0 -2.1 770 35 1.4 40

Vermont

304.4 -1.7 774 34 4.3 9

Virginia

3,656.8 -1.3 953 9 3.3 18

Washington

2,885.0 -1.8 918 15 3.7 14

West Virginia

713.8 -0.1 735 42 7.1 2

Wisconsin

2,753.2 -1.9 793 31 3.0 21

Wyoming

284.5 1.5 850 22 4.3 9

Puerto Rico

1,028.5 -2.9 528 (5) 2.3 (5)

Virgin Islands

45.5 -1.4 731 (5) -0.8 (5)

Footnotes:
(1) Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
(2) Data are preliminary.
(3) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(5) Data not included in the national ranking.

Average Weekly Wages

 

Last Modified Date: September 10, 2009