Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Anchorage, AK............................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 81 70 Atlanta, GA................................. 94 94 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 89 81 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 88 82 Birmingham, AL.............................. 86 81 Bloomington, IN............................. 86 87 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 102 99 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 74 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 94 78 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 84 80 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 88 83 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 99 95 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 91 87 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 91 81 Columbus, OH................................ 92 96 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 79 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 90 91 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 89 89 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 92 84 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 96 90 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 89 90 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 87 81 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 94 87 Great Falls, MT............................. 82 81 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 91 91 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 88 88 Hartford, CT................................ 102 95 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 89 80 Honolulu, HI................................ 94 89 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 88 88 Huntsville, AL.............................. 87 87 Indianapolis, IN............................ 90 82 Iowa City, IA............................... 92 84 Johnstown, PA............................... 81 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Anchorage, AK............................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 85 71 Atlanta, GA................................. 98 80 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 99 75 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 91 78 Birmingham, AL.............................. 89 83 Bloomington, IN............................. 88 77 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 105 94 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 95 64 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 90 91 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 92 71 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 91 81 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 104 88 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 97 84 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 97 81 Columbus, OH................................ 94 81 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 90 68 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 99 79 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 92 79 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 101 82 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 104 85 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 97 77 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 92 76 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 95 87 Great Falls, MT............................. 82 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 90 81 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 89 79 Hartford, CT................................ 106 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 94 76 Honolulu, HI................................ 105 88 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 99 72 Huntsville, AL.............................. 94 76 Indianapolis, IN............................ 96 84 Iowa City, IA............................... 97 88 Johnstown, PA............................... 87 76 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Anchorage, AK............................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 85 83 Atlanta, GA................................. 95 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 79 93 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 95 92 Birmingham, AL.............................. 92 90 Bloomington, IN............................. 89 84 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 106 108 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 81 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 98 93 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 94 90 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 80 92 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 101 104 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 102 95 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 92 95 Columbus, OH................................ 110 94 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 87 80 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 101 92 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 93 86 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 97 97 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 96 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 91 85 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 93 90 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 106 94 Great Falls, MT............................. 85 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 98 93 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 85 92 Hartford, CT................................ 107 105 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 91 93 Honolulu, HI................................ 94 92 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 92 92 Huntsville, AL.............................. 89 90 Indianapolis, IN............................ 90 92 Iowa City, IA............................... 89 96 Johnstown, PA............................... 83 79 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Anchorage, AK............................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 69 78 Atlanta, GA................................. 84 98 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 67 93 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 77 91 Birmingham, AL.............................. 68 84 Bloomington, IN............................. 67 91 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 96 104 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 58 74 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 88 91 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 67 81 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 78 91 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 101 103 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 71 92 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 83 100 Columbus, OH................................ 83 91 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 64 74 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 72 88 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 87 98 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 78 102 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 91 96 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 82 80 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 79 95 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 99 89 Great Falls, MT............................. 102 96 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 78 91 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 66 81 Hartford, CT................................ 96 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 68 84 Honolulu, HI................................ 87 102 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 74 90 Huntsville, AL.............................. 79 84 Indianapolis, IN............................ 78 94 Iowa City, IA............................... 85 84 Johnstown, PA............................... 74 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Anchorage, AK............................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 81 83 Atlanta, GA................................. 86 98 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 88 82 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 85 82 Birmingham, AL.............................. 79 84 Bloomington, IN............................. 85 95 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 94 100 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 63 69 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 95 93 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 80 95 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 86 92 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 92 93 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 88 89 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 93 92 Columbus, OH................................ 85 87 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 76 77 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 77 90 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 94 85 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 85 92 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 102 92 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 84 100 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 88 91 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 92 90 Great Falls, MT............................. 86 76 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 87 92 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 89 88 Hartford, CT................................ 94 98 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 86 94 Honolulu, HI................................ 83 89 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 85 82 Huntsville, AL.............................. 83 83 Indianapolis, IN............................ 91 88 Iowa City, IA............................... 82 91 Johnstown, PA............................... 76 73 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 88 84 Knoxville, TN............................... 84 85 Lincoln, NE................................. 81 82 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 96 93 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 90 91 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 83 85 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 86 83 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 86 87 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 92 91 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 99 95 Mobile, AL.................................. 85 92 New Orleans, LA............................. 84 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 102 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 84 82 Ocala, FL................................... 82 81 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 83 87 Orlando, FL................................. 85 83 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 97 97 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 91 85 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 88 84 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 92 91 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 99 103 Reading, PA................................. 94 109 Reno, NV.................................... 88 83 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 93 89 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 90 88 Rochester, NY............................... 90 87 Rockford, IL................................ 92 79 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 97 96 Salinas, CA................................. 103 102 San Antonio, TX............................. 82 82 San Diego, CA............................... 96 89 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 106 100 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 98 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 90 79 Knoxville, TN............................... 88 74 Lincoln, NE................................. 85 75 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 106 89 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 96 84 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 81 77 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 86 73 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 92 76 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 91 86 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 101 99 Mobile, AL.................................. 90 71 New Orleans, LA............................. 95 71 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 111 95 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 92 77 Ocala, FL................................... 84 75 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 84 74 Orlando, FL................................. 89 73 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 107 88 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 100 81 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 92 80 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 92 93 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 107 96 Reading, PA................................. 96 83 Reno, NV.................................... 93 82 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 94 93 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 95 81 Rochester, NY............................... 95 87 Rockford, IL................................ 96 83 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 104 96 Salinas, CA................................. 119 97 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 70 San Diego, CA............................... 107 94 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 114 102 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 97 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 91 93 Knoxville, TN............................... 94 86 Lincoln, NE................................. 76 82 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 102 99 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 89 91 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 89 82 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 91 90 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 89 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 104 96 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 102 99 Mobile, AL.................................. 97 87 New Orleans, LA............................. 100 86 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 102 106 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 89 89 Ocala, FL................................... 88 86 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 82 81 Orlando, FL................................. 95 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 93 101 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 101 96 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 88 92 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 100 94 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 98 100 Reading, PA................................. 96 93 Reno, NV.................................... 95 88 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 101 91 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 92 92 Rochester, NY............................... 88 90 Rockford, IL................................ 94 87 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 102 98 Salinas, CA................................. 112 98 San Antonio, TX............................. 92 84 San Diego, CA............................... 101 96 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 106 113 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 102 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 78 93 Knoxville, TN............................... 68 82 Lincoln, NE................................. 69 93 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 92 99 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 86 92 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 76 93 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 72 99 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 68 94 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 89 93 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 89 102 Mobile, AL.................................. 79 86 New Orleans, LA............................. 68 85 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 104 104 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 71 89 Ocala, FL................................... 64 82 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 74 92 Orlando, FL................................. 71 90 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 87 99 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 72 92 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 78 87 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 97 96 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 84 88 Reading, PA................................. 87 94 Reno, NV.................................... 75 98 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 86 84 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 71 94 Rochester, NY............................... 73 79 Rockford, IL................................ 91 96 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 81 106 Salinas, CA................................. 97 109 San Antonio, TX............................. 72 83 San Diego, CA............................... 83 96 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 100 104 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 92 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 90 86 Knoxville, TN............................... 76 89 Lincoln, NE................................. 77 80 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 86 86 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 84 83 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 81 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 83 84 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 84 84 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 89 91 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 98 97 Mobile, AL.................................. 81 84 New Orleans, LA............................. 79 80 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 89 100 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 76 82 Ocala, FL................................... 76 88 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 81 87 Orlando, FL................................. 78 88 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 91 95 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 82 91 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 82 87 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 82 87 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 90 94 Reading, PA................................. 89 92 Reno, NV.................................... 82 88 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 81 86 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 83 93 Rochester, NY............................... 85 90 Rockford, IL................................ 91 91 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 90 99 Salinas, CA................................. 89 85 San Antonio, TX............................. 85 79 San Diego, CA............................... 88 86 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 95 99 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 97 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 89 94 Springfield, MO............................. 82 77 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 91 88 Tallahassee, FL............................. 80 68 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 84 83 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 87 77 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 97 90 York, PA.................................... 88 93 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 86 77 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 110 89 Springfield, MO............................. 90 72 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 94 80 Tallahassee, FL............................. 86 74 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 88 75 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 96 83 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 106 89 York, PA.................................... 97 82 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 92 72 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 102 104 Springfield, MO............................. 84 81 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 92 93 Tallahassee, FL............................. 87 82 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 84 92 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 85 89 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 95 104 York, PA.................................... 89 89 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 91 82 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 90 100 Springfield, MO............................. 69 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 95 94 Tallahassee, FL............................. 74 79 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 78 88 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 75 88 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 83 104 York, PA.................................... 76 92 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 78 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Anchorage, AK metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 100 65 Springfield, MO............................. 82 81 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 88 99 Tallahassee, FL............................. 78 92 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 79 86 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 86 84 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 97 87 York, PA.................................... 79 88 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 89 97 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.