Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 80 71 Anchorage, AK............................... 98 101 Atlanta, GA................................. 92 95 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 87 82 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 86 83 Birmingham, AL.............................. 85 82 Bloomington, IN............................. 85 88 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 73 74 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 92 79 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 82 81 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 87 84 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 97 97 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 89 88 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 90 82 Columbus, OH................................ 90 97 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 78 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 89 92 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 88 90 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 91 85 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 95 91 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 88 91 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 86 82 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 93 88 Great Falls, MT............................. 80 82 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 89 92 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 87 89 Hartford, CT................................ 100 96 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 87 81 Honolulu, HI................................ 92 90 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 87 89 Huntsville, AL.............................. 85 88 Indianapolis, IN............................ 89 83 Iowa City, IA............................... 90 85 Johnstown, PA............................... 80 82 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 81 76 Anchorage, AK............................... 96 106 Atlanta, GA................................. 94 85 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 94 80 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 87 83 Birmingham, AL.............................. 86 88 Bloomington, IN............................. 84 82 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 91 68 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 86 96 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 88 75 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 87 87 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 94 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 92 89 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 93 86 Columbus, OH................................ 90 87 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 86 73 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 95 84 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 88 85 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 96 87 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 99 91 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 93 82 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 88 80 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 91 93 Great Falls, MT............................. 79 82 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 86 86 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 85 84 Hartford, CT................................ 101 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 90 81 Honolulu, HI................................ 100 94 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 94 77 Huntsville, AL.............................. 90 81 Indianapolis, IN............................ 92 89 Iowa City, IA............................... 93 93 Johnstown, PA............................... 83 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 80 77 Anchorage, AK............................... 94 92 Atlanta, GA................................. 89 91 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 75 86 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 89 85 Birmingham, AL.............................. 86 83 Bloomington, IN............................. 83 77 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 76 67 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 93 86 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 89 83 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 75 85 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 95 96 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 96 88 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 87 88 Columbus, OH................................ 104 86 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 82 74 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 95 85 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 88 80 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 91 90 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 90 89 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 86 79 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 87 83 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 100 87 Great Falls, MT............................. 80 71 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 92 86 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 80 85 Hartford, CT................................ 100 97 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 86 86 Honolulu, HI................................ 89 85 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 87 85 Huntsville, AL.............................. 84 83 Indianapolis, IN............................ 85 85 Iowa City, IA............................... 84 89 Johnstown, PA............................... 78 73 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 72 76 Anchorage, AK............................... 104 96 Atlanta, GA................................. 87 94 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 70 90 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 80 88 Birmingham, AL.............................. 71 81 Bloomington, IN............................. 70 88 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 61 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 91 87 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 69 78 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 81 88 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 105 99 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 74 88 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 86 97 Columbus, OH................................ 86 88 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 66 71 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 75 85 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 90 95 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 81 99 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 95 92 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 85 78 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 82 92 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 103 86 Great Falls, MT............................. 106 92 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 81 87 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 69 78 Hartford, CT................................ 100 96 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 70 81 Honolulu, HI................................ 90 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 77 87 Huntsville, AL.............................. 82 81 Indianapolis, IN............................ 81 91 Iowa City, IA............................... 88 81 Johnstown, PA............................... 77 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 86 82 Anchorage, AK............................... 107 100 Atlanta, GA................................. 91 98 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 94 82 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 90 81 Birmingham, AL.............................. 85 84 Bloomington, IN............................. 91 94 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 68 69 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 101 93 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 86 95 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 92 91 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 98 92 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 94 88 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 99 91 Columbus, OH................................ 90 86 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 81 77 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 82 89 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 100 85 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 91 92 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 109 92 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 90 99 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 93 91 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 98 90 Great Falls, MT............................. 92 76 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 93 92 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 95 88 Hartford, CT................................ 100 98 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 92 94 Honolulu, HI................................ 89 88 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 91 82 Huntsville, AL.............................. 89 82 Indianapolis, IN............................ 97 88 Iowa City, IA............................... 88 90 Johnstown, PA............................... 81 73 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 87 85 Knoxville, TN............................... 82 87 Lincoln, NE................................. 80 83 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 94 94 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 89 92 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 82 86 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 84 84 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 85 88 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 91 92 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 97 96 Mobile, AL.................................. 84 93 New Orleans, LA............................. 83 90 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 100 102 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 83 83 Ocala, FL................................... 81 82 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 81 88 Orlando, FL................................. 84 84 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 95 99 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 89 86 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 86 85 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 91 92 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 97 105 Reading, PA................................. 92 111 Reno, NV.................................... 87 84 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 91 90 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 88 89 Rochester, NY............................... 88 88 Rockford, IL................................ 90 80 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 96 97 Salinas, CA................................. 101 104 San Antonio, TX............................. 81 83 San Diego, CA............................... 94 90 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 105 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 86 84 Knoxville, TN............................... 84 79 Lincoln, NE................................. 81 80 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 102 95 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 92 89 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 78 82 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 82 78 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 88 81 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 87 92 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 96 105 Mobile, AL.................................. 86 76 New Orleans, LA............................. 90 76 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 106 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 88 82 Ocala, FL................................... 80 80 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 80 79 Orlando, FL................................. 85 78 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 102 94 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 95 86 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 88 86 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 88 99 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 103 102 Reading, PA................................. 92 88 Reno, NV.................................... 88 87 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 90 98 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 86 Rochester, NY............................... 91 93 Rockford, IL................................ 92 89 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 99 102 Salinas, CA................................. 114 103 San Antonio, TX............................. 87 74 San Diego, CA............................... 102 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 109 109 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 85 86 Knoxville, TN............................... 88 80 Lincoln, NE................................. 72 76 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 96 92 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 83 84 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 84 75 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 86 83 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 84 84 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 97 88 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 96 92 Mobile, AL.................................. 91 81 New Orleans, LA............................. 94 80 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 96 98 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 83 82 Ocala, FL................................... 83 79 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 77 75 Orlando, FL................................. 89 81 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 88 93 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 95 89 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 82 85 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 94 87 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 92 93 Reading, PA................................. 90 85 Reno, NV.................................... 89 81 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 95 84 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 86 85 Rochester, NY............................... 82 83 Rockford, IL................................ 89 80 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 96 90 Salinas, CA................................. 105 90 San Antonio, TX............................. 87 78 San Diego, CA............................... 95 88 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 100 104 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 81 90 Knoxville, TN............................... 71 79 Lincoln, NE................................. 72 90 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 96 96 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 90 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 79 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 75 95 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 71 90 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 93 90 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 93 98 Mobile, AL.................................. 82 83 New Orleans, LA............................. 71 82 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 108 100 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 74 86 Ocala, FL................................... 66 79 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 77 89 Orlando, FL................................. 74 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 90 95 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 75 89 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 82 84 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 100 93 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 87 85 Reading, PA................................. 91 91 Reno, NV.................................... 78 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 89 81 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 73 91 Rochester, NY............................... 76 76 Rockford, IL................................ 95 92 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 84 102 Salinas, CA................................. 101 105 San Antonio, TX............................. 75 80 San Diego, CA............................... 86 93 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 104 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 96 86 Knoxville, TN............................... 82 89 Lincoln, NE................................. 82 80 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 91 85 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 90 83 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 86 88 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 89 83 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 89 84 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 95 91 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 104 97 Mobile, AL.................................. 86 83 New Orleans, LA............................. 84 80 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 95 99 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 81 82 Ocala, FL................................... 81 88 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 87 86 Orlando, FL................................. 83 88 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 97 95 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 87 90 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 88 87 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 88 86 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 96 94 Reading, PA................................. 95 92 Reno, NV.................................... 88 87 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 87 85 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 88 93 Rochester, NY............................... 91 90 Rockford, IL................................ 97 91 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 96 99 Salinas, CA................................. 94 84 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 79 San Diego, CA............................... 94 85 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 101 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 96 87 Springfield, MA............................. 87 95 Springfield, MO............................. 80 78 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 90 89 Tallahassee, FL............................. 78 69 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 83 84 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 85 78 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 95 92 York, PA.................................... 87 94 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 85 78 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 93 107 Springfield, MA............................. 105 95 Springfield, MO............................. 86 77 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 90 85 Tallahassee, FL............................. 82 79 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 84 80 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 92 88 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 101 94 York, PA.................................... 92 87 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 88 77 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 96 93 Springfield, MA............................. 96 96 Springfield, MO............................. 79 75 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 86 86 Tallahassee, FL............................. 82 76 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 79 85 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 80 82 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 89 96 York, PA.................................... 83 82 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 86 75 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 95 94 Springfield, MA............................. 93 96 Springfield, MO............................. 72 86 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 99 90 Tallahassee, FL............................. 76 76 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 81 85 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 78 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 86 100 York, PA.................................... 79 89 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 81 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 103 93 Springfield, MA............................. 107 64 Springfield, MO............................. 88 80 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 94 98 Tallahassee, FL............................. 83 92 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 84 86 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 91 83 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 104 87 York, PA.................................... 85 87 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 95 97 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.