Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 82 73 Anchorage, AK............................... 101 105 Atlanta, GA................................. 95 98 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 90 84 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 89 85 Birmingham, AL.............................. 87 85 Bloomington, IN............................. 87 91 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 103 104 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 75 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 95 82 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 85 84 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 89 87 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 92 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 92 85 Columbus, OH................................ 93 100 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 80 81 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 91 95 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 90 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 94 88 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 98 95 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 91 95 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 88 84 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 95 91 Great Falls, MT............................. 83 85 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 92 96 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 89 93 Hartford, CT................................ 103 99 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 90 84 Honolulu, HI................................ 95 93 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 89 92 Huntsville, AL.............................. 88 91 Indianapolis, IN............................ 92 86 Iowa City, IA............................... 93 88 Johnstown, PA............................... 82 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 81 80 Anchorage, AK............................... 96 113 Atlanta, GA................................. 94 91 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 94 86 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 87 88 Birmingham, AL.............................. 86 94 Bloomington, IN............................. 84 87 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 107 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 91 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 87 103 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 88 80 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 87 92 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 93 95 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 93 92 Columbus, OH................................ 90 92 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 86 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 95 89 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 89 90 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 96 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 100 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 93 88 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 88 86 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 91 99 Great Falls, MT............................. 79 87 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 87 92 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 86 89 Hartford, CT................................ 101 114 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 90 87 Honolulu, HI................................ 101 100 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 95 82 Huntsville, AL.............................. 90 87 Indianapolis, IN............................ 92 95 Iowa City, IA............................... 93 100 Johnstown, PA............................... 83 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 84 80 Anchorage, AK............................... 99 97 Atlanta, GA................................. 93 95 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 78 90 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 94 88 Birmingham, AL.............................. 90 87 Bloomington, IN............................. 88 81 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 105 105 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 79 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 97 90 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 93 87 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 79 89 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 100 92 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 91 92 Columbus, OH................................ 109 90 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 86 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 100 89 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 92 83 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 96 94 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 95 93 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 90 83 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 92 87 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 104 91 Great Falls, MT............................. 83 74 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 96 90 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 84 88 Hartford, CT................................ 105 101 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 90 90 Honolulu, HI................................ 93 89 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 91 89 Huntsville, AL.............................. 88 87 Indianapolis, IN............................ 89 89 Iowa City, IA............................... 88 93 Johnstown, PA............................... 82 76 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 69 76 Anchorage, AK............................... 99 97 Atlanta, GA................................. 83 95 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 67 90 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 77 88 Birmingham, AL.............................. 68 81 Bloomington, IN............................. 67 89 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 96 101 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 58 72 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 87 88 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 66 79 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 78 89 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 71 89 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 82 97 Columbus, OH................................ 82 89 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 63 72 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 72 85 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 87 95 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 77 99 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 91 93 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 81 78 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 79 92 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 98 86 Great Falls, MT............................. 101 93 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 78 88 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 66 79 Hartford, CT................................ 95 97 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 67 81 Honolulu, HI................................ 86 99 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 74 87 Huntsville, AL.............................. 79 81 Indianapolis, IN............................ 77 92 Iowa City, IA............................... 84 82 Johnstown, PA............................... 74 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 88 89 Anchorage, AK............................... 109 108 Atlanta, GA................................. 93 106 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 96 88 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 92 88 Birmingham, AL.............................. 86 91 Bloomington, IN............................. 92 102 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 102 108 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 69 75 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 103 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 87 103 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 94 99 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 96 95 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 101 99 Columbus, OH................................ 92 94 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 82 83 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 84 97 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 102 92 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 92 100 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 111 100 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 92 108 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 95 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 100 98 Great Falls, MT............................. 94 82 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 95 99 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 97 95 Hartford, CT................................ 102 106 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 94 102 Honolulu, HI................................ 90 96 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 93 89 Huntsville, AL.............................. 91 89 Indianapolis, IN............................ 99 95 Iowa City, IA............................... 89 98 Johnstown, PA............................... 83 79 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 89 88 Knoxville, TN............................... 85 90 Lincoln, NE................................. 82 85 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 97 98 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 92 95 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 84 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 87 87 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 87 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 94 96 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 100 99 Mobile, AL.................................. 86 97 New Orleans, LA............................. 85 93 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 103 106 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 86 86 Ocala, FL................................... 83 85 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 84 91 Orlando, FL................................. 86 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 98 102 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 92 89 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 89 88 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 93 95 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 100 108 Reading, PA................................. 95 114 Reno, NV.................................... 89 87 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 94 94 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 93 Rochester, NY............................... 91 91 Rockford, IL................................ 93 83 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 99 100 Salinas, CA................................. 104 107 San Antonio, TX............................. 83 86 San Diego, CA............................... 97 94 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 108 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 86 90 Knoxville, TN............................... 85 84 Lincoln, NE................................. 81 85 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 102 101 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 92 95 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 78 87 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 82 83 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 88 87 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 87 98 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 96 112 Mobile, AL.................................. 86 81 New Orleans, LA............................. 91 81 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 107 107 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 88 87 Ocala, FL................................... 81 86 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 80 84 Orlando, FL................................. 85 83 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 102 100 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 96 91 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 88 91 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 88 105 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 103 109 Reading, PA................................. 92 94 Reno, NV.................................... 89 93 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 90 105 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 92 Rochester, NY............................... 91 99 Rockford, IL................................ 92 95 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 99 109 Salinas, CA................................. 114 110 San Antonio, TX............................. 87 79 San Diego, CA............................... 103 107 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 110 116 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 90 90 Knoxville, TN............................... 93 83 Lincoln, NE................................. 75 79 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 100 96 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 88 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 88 79 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 90 87 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 88 88 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 102 92 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 101 96 Mobile, AL.................................. 95 85 New Orleans, LA............................. 99 83 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 100 102 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 88 85 Ocala, FL................................... 87 83 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 81 78 Orlando, FL................................. 93 84 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 92 97 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 100 93 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 87 89 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 98 91 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 97 97 Reading, PA................................. 94 89 Reno, NV.................................... 93 85 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 99 88 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 89 Rochester, NY............................... 86 87 Rockford, IL................................ 93 84 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 100 94 Salinas, CA................................. 111 94 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 82 San Diego, CA............................... 99 93 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 105 109 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 78 91 Knoxville, TN............................... 68 80 Lincoln, NE................................. 69 91 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 92 96 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 86 89 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 75 90 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 72 96 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 68 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 89 91 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 89 99 Mobile, AL.................................. 79 83 New Orleans, LA............................. 68 83 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 103 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 71 86 Ocala, FL................................... 64 80 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 74 89 Orlando, FL................................. 70 88 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 86 96 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 72 90 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 78 85 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 96 93 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 84 85 Reading, PA................................. 87 91 Reno, NV.................................... 74 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 85 82 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 70 91 Rochester, NY............................... 73 77 Rockford, IL................................ 91 93 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 81 103 Salinas, CA................................. 96 106 San Antonio, TX............................. 72 80 San Diego, CA............................... 83 93 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 100 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 98 93 Knoxville, TN............................... 83 96 Lincoln, NE................................. 84 86 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 93 92 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 92 89 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 88 95 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 91 90 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 91 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 96 98 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 106 105 Mobile, AL.................................. 88 90 New Orleans, LA............................. 85 87 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 97 108 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 83 89 Ocala, FL................................... 83 95 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 88 93 Orlando, FL................................. 85 95 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 99 102 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 89 98 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 89 94 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 89 93 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 98 102 Reading, PA................................. 97 99 Reno, NV.................................... 89 94 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 88 92 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 90 100 Rochester, NY............................... 92 97 Rockford, IL................................ 99 98 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 98 107 Salinas, CA................................. 96 91 San Antonio, TX............................. 92 85 San Diego, CA............................... 96 92 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 103 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 99 90 Springfield, MA............................. 90 99 Springfield, MO............................. 83 81 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 92 92 Tallahassee, FL............................. 81 71 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 85 87 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 88 80 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 98 95 York, PA.................................... 89 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 88 80 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 93 114 Springfield, MA............................. 105 102 Springfield, MO............................. 86 82 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 90 91 Tallahassee, FL............................. 82 84 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 85 85 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 92 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 102 101 York, PA.................................... 93 93 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 88 82 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 101 97 Springfield, MA............................. 100 101 Springfield, MO............................. 83 79 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 91 90 Tallahassee, FL............................. 86 79 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 83 89 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 84 86 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 93 101 York, PA.................................... 87 86 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 90 79 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 91 95 Springfield, MA............................. 89 97 Springfield, MO............................. 69 86 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 95 91 Tallahassee, FL............................. 73 77 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 77 85 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 74 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 82 100 York, PA.................................... 76 89 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 78 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 105 101 Springfield, MA............................. 109 70 Springfield, MO............................. 90 87 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 96 107 Tallahassee, FL............................. 84 100 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 86 93 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 93 90 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 106 94 York, PA.................................... 86 94 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 97 105 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.