Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Hartford, CT................................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 80 74 Anchorage, AK............................... 98 106 Atlanta, GA................................. 92 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 87 85 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 86 86 Birmingham, AL.............................. 85 86 Bloomington, IN............................. 84 92 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 104 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 72 78 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 92 83 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 82 85 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 87 88 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 97 101 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 89 92 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 89 86 Columbus, OH................................ 90 101 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 78 82 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 88 96 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 88 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 91 89 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 95 96 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 88 96 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 86 85 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 93 92 Great Falls, MT............................. 80 85 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 89 97 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 87 93 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 87 85 Honolulu, HI................................ 92 94 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 86 93 Huntsville, AL.............................. 85 92 Indianapolis, IN............................ 89 87 Iowa City, IA............................... 90 89 Johnstown, PA............................... 80 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Hartford, CT................................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 80 71 Anchorage, AK............................... 94 100 Atlanta, GA................................. 93 80 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 93 75 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 86 78 Birmingham, AL.............................. 85 83 Bloomington, IN............................. 83 77 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 99 94 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 89 64 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 85 90 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 87 71 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 86 81 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 99 88 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 91 84 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 91 81 Columbus, OH................................ 89 81 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 85 68 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 94 78 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 87 79 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 95 81 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 98 85 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 92 77 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 87 75 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 90 87 Great Falls, MT............................. 78 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 85 81 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 84 79 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 89 76 Honolulu, HI................................ 99 88 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 93 72 Huntsville, AL.............................. 89 76 Indianapolis, IN............................ 91 84 Iowa City, IA............................... 92 88 Johnstown, PA............................... 82 76 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Hartford, CT................................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 80 79 Anchorage, AK............................... 94 95 Atlanta, GA................................. 89 94 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 75 88 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 89 87 Birmingham, AL.............................. 86 86 Bloomington, IN............................. 83 80 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 103 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 76 70 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 92 89 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 89 85 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 75 88 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 95 99 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 95 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 87 91 Columbus, OH................................ 104 89 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 81 77 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 95 88 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 88 82 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 91 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 90 92 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 86 82 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 87 86 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 99 90 Great Falls, MT............................. 79 73 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 92 89 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 80 87 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 86 89 Honolulu, HI................................ 88 88 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 87 88 Huntsville, AL.............................. 84 86 Indianapolis, IN............................ 85 88 Iowa City, IA............................... 84 92 Johnstown, PA............................... 78 75 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Hartford, CT................................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 72 79 Anchorage, AK............................... 104 100 Atlanta, GA................................. 87 98 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 70 93 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 80 91 Birmingham, AL.............................. 71 84 Bloomington, IN............................. 70 92 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 104 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 61 74 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 91 91 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 69 81 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 81 92 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 105 103 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 74 92 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 86 101 Columbus, OH................................ 86 92 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 66 74 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 75 88 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 91 98 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 81 102 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 95 96 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 85 81 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 83 95 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 103 89 Great Falls, MT............................. 106 96 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 82 91 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 69 81 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 71 84 Honolulu, HI................................ 91 102 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 77 90 Huntsville, AL.............................. 82 84 Indianapolis, IN............................ 81 95 Iowa City, IA............................... 88 85 Johnstown, PA............................... 77 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Hartford, CT................................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 87 84 Anchorage, AK............................... 107 102 Atlanta, GA................................. 92 100 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 94 83 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 91 83 Birmingham, AL.............................. 85 85 Bloomington, IN............................. 91 96 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 102 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 68 70 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 102 95 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 86 97 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 92 93 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 98 94 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 95 90 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 100 93 Columbus, OH................................ 90 88 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 81 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 82 91 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 101 87 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 91 94 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 109 94 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 90 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 94 93 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 98 92 Great Falls, MT............................. 92 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 93 94 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 96 90 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 92 96 Honolulu, HI................................ 89 90 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 91 84 Huntsville, AL.............................. 89 84 Indianapolis, IN............................ 97 90 Iowa City, IA............................... 88 92 Johnstown, PA............................... 82 74 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 87 89 Knoxville, TN............................... 82 90 Lincoln, NE................................. 80 86 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 94 98 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 89 96 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 81 90 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 84 87 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 85 92 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 91 96 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 97 100 Mobile, AL.................................. 84 98 New Orleans, LA............................. 83 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 100 107 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 83 87 Ocala, FL................................... 80 86 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 81 92 Orlando, FL................................. 83 88 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 95 103 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 89 90 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 86 89 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 91 96 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 97 109 Reading, PA................................. 92 115 Reno, NV.................................... 87 88 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 91 94 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 88 93 Rochester, NY............................... 88 92 Rockford, IL................................ 90 83 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 96 101 Salinas, CA................................. 101 108 San Antonio, TX............................. 81 87 San Diego, CA............................... 94 95 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 104 106 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 96 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 85 79 Knoxville, TN............................... 83 74 Lincoln, NE................................. 80 75 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 100 89 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 91 83 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 77 77 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 81 73 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 87 76 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 86 86 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 95 99 Mobile, AL.................................. 85 71 New Orleans, LA............................. 89 71 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 105 94 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 87 76 Ocala, FL................................... 79 75 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 79 74 Orlando, FL................................. 84 73 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 101 88 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 94 80 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 87 80 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 87 92 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 101 96 Reading, PA................................. 90 83 Reno, NV.................................... 87 82 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 89 92 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 90 81 Rochester, NY............................... 90 87 Rockford, IL................................ 91 83 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 98 96 Salinas, CA................................. 112 96 San Antonio, TX............................. 86 69 San Diego, CA............................... 101 94 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 108 102 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 92 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 85 89 Knoxville, TN............................... 88 82 Lincoln, NE................................. 72 78 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 96 95 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 83 87 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 83 78 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 86 86 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 83 87 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 97 91 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 96 95 Mobile, AL.................................. 91 83 New Orleans, LA............................. 94 82 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 95 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 83 84 Ocala, FL................................... 82 82 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 77 77 Orlando, FL................................. 89 83 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 88 96 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 95 92 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 82 88 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 94 89 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 92 96 Reading, PA................................. 90 88 Reno, NV.................................... 89 84 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 95 87 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 86 88 Rochester, NY............................... 82 86 Rockford, IL................................ 88 83 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 96 93 Salinas, CA................................. 105 93 San Antonio, TX............................. 87 81 San Diego, CA............................... 94 91 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 100 108 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 96 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 81 94 Knoxville, TN............................... 71 83 Lincoln, NE................................. 72 94 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 96 99 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 90 92 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 79 93 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 75 99 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 71 94 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 93 94 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 93 102 Mobile, AL.................................. 83 86 New Orleans, LA............................. 71 85 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 108 104 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 74 89 Ocala, FL................................... 67 82 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 77 92 Orlando, FL................................. 74 91 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 91 99 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 75 93 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 82 87 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 101 97 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 88 88 Reading, PA................................. 91 94 Reno, NV.................................... 78 98 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 89 85 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 74 94 Rochester, NY............................... 76 79 Rockford, IL................................ 95 96 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 84 106 Salinas, CA................................. 101 109 San Antonio, TX............................. 75 83 San Diego, CA............................... 87 96 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 104 105 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 95 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 96 88 Knoxville, TN............................... 82 91 Lincoln, NE................................. 83 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 92 87 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 90 84 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 86 90 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 89 85 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 90 85 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 95 93 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 104 99 Mobile, AL.................................. 87 85 New Orleans, LA............................. 84 82 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 95 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 82 84 Ocala, FL................................... 81 90 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 87 88 Orlando, FL................................. 84 90 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 97 97 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 87 92 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 88 89 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 88 88 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 96 96 Reading, PA................................. 95 94 Reno, NV.................................... 88 89 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 87 87 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 89 95 Rochester, NY............................... 91 91 Rockford, IL................................ 98 93 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 96 101 Salinas, CA................................. 95 86 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 80 San Diego, CA............................... 94 87 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 101 100 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 104 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 87 100 Springfield, MO............................. 80 82 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 90 93 Tallahassee, FL............................. 78 72 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 83 88 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 85 81 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 95 96 York, PA.................................... 86 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 85 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 104 89 Springfield, MO............................. 85 72 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 89 80 Tallahassee, FL............................. 81 74 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 83 75 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 91 82 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 100 88 York, PA.................................... 91 81 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 87 72 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 95 100 Springfield, MO............................. 79 78 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 86 89 Tallahassee, FL............................. 82 78 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 79 88 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 80 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 89 100 York, PA.................................... 83 85 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 86 78 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 93 100 Springfield, MO............................. 72 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 99 94 Tallahassee, FL............................. 77 79 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 81 88 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 78 88 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 86 104 York, PA.................................... 79 92 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 81 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Hartford, CT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 107 66 Springfield, MO............................. 88 82 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 94 100 Tallahassee, FL............................. 83 94 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 85 88 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 92 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 104 89 York, PA.................................... 85 89 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 95 99 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.