Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 85 75 Anchorage, AK............................... 105 108 Atlanta, GA................................. 98 101 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 93 87 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 92 88 Birmingham, AL.............................. 90 87 Bloomington, IN............................. 90 93 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 106 106 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 77 79 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 98 84 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 88 86 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 92 89 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 103 103 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 95 93 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 95 87 Columbus, OH................................ 96 103 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 83 83 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 94 97 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 93 96 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 97 91 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 101 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 94 97 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 91 87 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 98 94 Great Falls, MT............................. 85 87 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 95 98 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 92 95 Hartford, CT................................ 106 102 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 93 86 Honolulu, HI................................ 98 96 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 92 94 Huntsville, AL.............................. 91 94 Indianapolis, IN............................ 95 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 80 79 Anchorage, AK............................... 94 112 Atlanta, GA................................. 92 90 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 93 84 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 86 87 Birmingham, AL.............................. 84 93 Bloomington, IN............................. 82 86 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 98 105 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 89 72 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 85 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 86 79 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 85 91 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 98 99 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 91 94 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 91 90 Columbus, OH................................ 88 91 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 84 76 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 93 88 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 87 89 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 95 91 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 98 95 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 91 86 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 87 84 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 89 97 Great Falls, MT............................. 77 86 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 85 91 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 84 88 Hartford, CT................................ 100 112 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 88 85 Honolulu, HI................................ 99 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 93 80 Huntsville, AL.............................. 88 85 Indianapolis, IN............................ 90 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 84 83 Anchorage, AK............................... 98 101 Atlanta, GA................................. 93 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 78 93 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 93 92 Birmingham, AL.............................. 90 91 Bloomington, IN............................. 87 84 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 104 109 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 79 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 97 93 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 93 90 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 79 93 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 104 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 100 96 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 91 96 Columbus, OH................................ 109 94 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 85 81 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 99 93 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 92 87 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 95 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 94 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 90 86 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 91 90 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 104 95 Great Falls, MT............................. 83 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 96 94 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 84 92 Hartford, CT................................ 105 105 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 90 94 Honolulu, HI................................ 93 93 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 91 92 Huntsville, AL.............................. 88 90 Indianapolis, IN............................ 89 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 75 79 Anchorage, AK............................... 109 101 Atlanta, GA................................. 91 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 73 94 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 84 92 Birmingham, AL.............................. 74 84 Bloomington, IN............................. 73 92 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 105 105 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 63 75 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 95 91 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 72 82 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 85 92 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 109 104 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 77 92 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 90 101 Columbus, OH................................ 90 92 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 69 75 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 78 89 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 95 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 84 103 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 99 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 89 81 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 86 96 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 108 90 Great Falls, MT............................. 110 96 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 85 91 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 72 82 Hartford, CT................................ 104 101 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 74 84 Honolulu, HI................................ 94 103 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 80 91 Huntsville, AL.............................. 86 84 Indianapolis, IN............................ 85 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 95 96 Anchorage, AK............................... 117 117 Atlanta, GA................................. 100 115 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 103 96 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 99 95 Birmingham, AL.............................. 93 98 Bloomington, IN............................. 99 111 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 110 117 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 74 81 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 111 109 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 94 111 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 101 107 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 108 108 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 103 103 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 109 107 Columbus, OH................................ 99 101 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 89 90 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 90 105 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 110 100 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 99 108 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 119 108 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 99 116 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 102 106 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 108 106 Great Falls, MT............................. 101 89 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 102 107 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 104 103 Hartford, CT................................ 109 115 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 101 110 Honolulu, HI................................ 97 104 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 100 96 Huntsville, AL.............................. 97 96 Indianapolis, IN............................ 106 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA............................... 96 91 Johnstown, PA............................... 85 87 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 92 90 Knoxville, TN............................... 87 92 Lincoln, NE................................. 85 88 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 95 97 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 87 91 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 90 89 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 90 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 97 98 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 103 102 Mobile, AL.................................. 89 99 New Orleans, LA............................. 88 96 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 107 109 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 88 88 Ocala, FL................................... 86 87 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 86 94 Orlando, FL................................. 89 89 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 101 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 95 91 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 92 90 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 96 97 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 103 111 Reading, PA................................. 98 117 Reno, NV.................................... 92 89 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 97 96 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 94 95 Rochester, NY............................... 94 93 Rockford, IL................................ 96 85 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 102 103 Salinas, CA................................. 108 110 San Antonio, TX............................. 86 88 San Diego, CA............................... 100 96 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 111 107 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA............................... 92 98 Johnstown, PA............................... 81 85 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 84 88 Knoxville, TN............................... 83 83 Lincoln, NE................................. 80 84 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 90 93 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 76 86 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 81 82 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 87 85 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 86 97 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 95 111 Mobile, AL.................................. 85 80 New Orleans, LA............................. 89 79 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 104 106 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 86 86 Ocala, FL................................... 79 84 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 79 83 Orlando, FL................................. 83 82 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 100 99 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 94 90 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 87 90 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 87 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 101 107 Reading, PA................................. 90 93 Reno, NV.................................... 87 92 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 88 103 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 89 90 Rochester, NY............................... 90 98 Rockford, IL................................ 91 93 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 98 107 Salinas, CA................................. 112 108 San Antonio, TX............................. 86 78 San Diego, CA............................... 101 105 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 108 114 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA............................... 88 96 Johnstown, PA............................... 82 79 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 89 94 Knoxville, TN............................... 92 87 Lincoln, NE................................. 75 82 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 87 92 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 87 82 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 90 90 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 87 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 102 96 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 101 100 Mobile, AL.................................. 95 88 New Orleans, LA............................. 98 87 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 100 106 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 87 89 Ocala, FL................................... 86 86 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 81 81 Orlando, FL................................. 93 88 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 92 101 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 99 96 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 86 92 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 98 94 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 96 101 Reading, PA................................. 94 93 Reno, NV.................................... 93 88 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 99 92 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 90 93 Rochester, NY............................... 86 91 Rockford, IL................................ 93 87 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 100 98 Salinas, CA................................. 110 98 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 85 San Diego, CA............................... 99 96 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 105 114 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA............................... 92 85 Johnstown, PA............................... 81 92 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 85 94 Knoxville, TN............................... 74 83 Lincoln, NE................................. 75 94 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 94 92 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 82 93 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 79 99 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 74 94 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 97 94 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 97 103 Mobile, AL.................................. 86 87 New Orleans, LA............................. 74 86 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 113 105 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 77 89 Ocala, FL................................... 69 83 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 81 93 Orlando, FL................................. 77 91 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 94 99 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 79 93 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 85 88 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 105 97 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 91 89 Reading, PA................................. 95 95 Reno, NV.................................... 81 99 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 93 85 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 77 95 Rochester, NY............................... 80 80 Rockford, IL................................ 99 96 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 88 107 Salinas, CA................................. 105 110 San Antonio, TX............................. 79 83 San Diego, CA............................... 90 97 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 109 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA............................... 96 106 Johnstown, PA............................... 89 86 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 105 101 Knoxville, TN............................... 89 104 Lincoln, NE................................. 90 93 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 99 97 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 94 103 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 97 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 98 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 104 106 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 114 113 Mobile, AL.................................. 95 98 New Orleans, LA............................. 92 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 104 116 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 89 96 Ocala, FL................................... 89 103 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 95 101 Orlando, FL................................. 91 103 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 106 111 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 95 106 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 96 102 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 96 101 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 105 110 Reading, PA................................. 104 108 Reno, NV.................................... 96 102 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 95 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 97 109 Rochester, NY............................... 99 105 Rockford, IL................................ 107 107 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 105 116 Salinas, CA................................. 103 99 San Antonio, TX............................. 99 92 San Diego, CA............................... 103 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 110 115 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 102 92 Springfield, MA............................. 93 101 Springfield, MO............................. 86 83 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 95 95 Tallahassee, FL............................. 83 73 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 88 89 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 91 82 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 101 97 York, PA.................................... 92 100 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 90 82 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 91 112 Springfield, MA............................. 103 100 Springfield, MO............................. 84 80 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 88 89 Tallahassee, FL............................. 81 83 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 83 84 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 90 92 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 100 99 York, PA.................................... 91 91 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 86 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 100 101 Springfield, MA............................. 100 105 Springfield, MO............................. 83 82 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 90 93 Tallahassee, FL............................. 85 83 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 83 92 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 83 89 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 93 105 York, PA.................................... 87 89 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 90 82 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 99 98 Springfield, MA............................. 97 101 Springfield, MO............................. 75 90 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 103 94 Tallahassee, FL............................. 80 80 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 84 88 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 81 88 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 90 104 York, PA.................................... 82 93 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 85 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 113 109 Springfield, MA............................. 117 75 Springfield, MO............................. 96 94 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 103 115 Tallahassee, FL............................. 91 108 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 92 101 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 100 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 114 102 York, PA.................................... 93 102 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 104 113 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.