Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 94 80 Anchorage, AK............................... 116 115 Atlanta, GA................................. 109 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 103 93 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 102 94 Birmingham, AL.............................. 100 93 Bloomington, IN............................. 100 100 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 118 114 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 85 84 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 108 90 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 97 92 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 102 96 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 114 110 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 105 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 106 93 Columbus, OH................................ 106 110 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 92 89 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 104 105 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 103 103 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 107 97 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 112 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 104 104 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 101 93 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 109 101 Great Falls, MT............................. 95 93 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 105 105 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 102 102 Hartford, CT................................ 118 109 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 103 92 Honolulu, HI................................ 109 102 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 102 101 Huntsville, AL.............................. 101 101 Indianapolis, IN............................ 105 95 Iowa City, IA............................... 107 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 92 93 Anchorage, AK............................... 109 131 Atlanta, GA................................. 106 105 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 107 99 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 99 102 Birmingham, AL.............................. 97 109 Bloomington, IN............................. 95 101 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 113 123 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 103 84 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 98 119 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 100 93 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 98 107 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 113 115 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 105 110 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 105 106 Columbus, OH................................ 102 107 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 97 90 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 108 103 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 100 104 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 109 107 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 113 112 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 106 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 100 99 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 103 114 Great Falls, MT............................. 89 101 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 98 106 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 97 103 Hartford, CT................................ 115 131 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 102 100 Honolulu, HI................................ 114 115 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 107 94 Huntsville, AL.............................. 102 100 Indianapolis, IN............................ 104 110 Iowa City, IA............................... 106 115 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 96 91 Anchorage, AK............................... 112 110 Atlanta, GA................................. 106 109 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 89 102 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 107 101 Birmingham, AL.............................. 103 100 Bloomington, IN............................. 100 92 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 120 119 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 91 81 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 111 102 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 106 99 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 90 102 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 114 114 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 114 105 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 104 105 Columbus, OH................................ 124 103 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 98 89 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 114 102 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 105 95 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 109 107 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 108 107 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 103 94 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 104 99 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 119 104 Great Falls, MT............................. 95 85 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 110 103 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 96 101 Hartford, CT................................ 120 116 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 103 103 Honolulu, HI................................ 106 102 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 104 101 Huntsville, AL.............................. 100 99 Indianapolis, IN............................ 101 101 Iowa City, IA............................... 100 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 101 84 Anchorage, AK............................... 146 107 Atlanta, GA................................. 122 105 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 98 99 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 113 97 Birmingham, AL.............................. 100 89 Bloomington, IN............................. 98 98 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 141 111 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 85 79 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 128 97 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 97 87 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 114 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 147 110 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 104 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 121 107 Columbus, OH................................ 121 98 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 93 79 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 105 94 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 127 105 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 113 109 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 134 103 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 119 86 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 116 102 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 145 95 Great Falls, MT............................. 149 102 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 115 97 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 97 87 Hartford, CT................................ 140 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 99 89 Honolulu, HI................................ 127 109 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 108 96 Huntsville, AL.............................. 115 89 Indianapolis, IN............................ 114 101 Iowa City, IA............................... 124 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 97 98 Anchorage, AK............................... 119 119 Atlanta, GA................................. 102 117 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 105 97 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 101 97 Birmingham, AL.............................. 95 100 Bloomington, IN............................. 101 113 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 112 119 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 76 82 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 113 111 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 96 113 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 103 109 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 110 110 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 106 105 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 111 109 Columbus, OH................................ 101 103 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 91 92 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 92 106 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 112 101 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 102 110 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 122 110 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 101 119 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 104 108 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 110 108 Great Falls, MT............................. 103 90 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 104 109 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 107 105 Hartford, CT................................ 112 117 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 103 112 Honolulu, HI................................ 99 105 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 102 98 Huntsville, AL.............................. 99 98 Indianapolis, IN............................ 109 105 Iowa City, IA............................... 98 108 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA............................... 94 93 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 102 97 Knoxville, TN............................... 97 99 Lincoln, NE................................. 94 94 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 111 107 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 105 104 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 96 98 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 99 95 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 107 105 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 115 109 Mobile, AL.................................. 99 106 New Orleans, LA............................. 98 103 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 118 116 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 98 95 Ocala, FL................................... 95 94 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 96 100 Orlando, FL................................. 98 96 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 112 112 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 105 98 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 101 97 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 107 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 114 119 Reading, PA................................. 109 126 Reno, NV.................................... 102 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 108 103 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 104 102 Rochester, NY............................... 104 100 Rockford, IL................................ 106 91 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 113 110 Salinas, CA................................. 120 118 San Antonio, TX............................. 95 95 San Diego, CA............................... 111 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 123 115 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 113 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA............................... 94 99 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 97 104 Knoxville, TN............................... 96 97 Lincoln, NE................................. 92 98 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 115 117 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 104 109 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 88 101 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 93 96 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 99 113 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 109 130 Mobile, AL.................................. 98 93 New Orleans, LA............................. 103 93 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 121 124 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 100 100 Ocala, FL................................... 91 99 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 91 97 Orlando, FL................................. 96 96 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 116 116 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 108 106 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 100 105 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 100 121 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 116 126 Reading, PA................................. 104 109 Reno, NV.................................... 100 108 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 102 121 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 103 106 Rochester, NY............................... 103 114 Rockford, IL................................ 105 109 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 113 126 Salinas, CA................................. 129 127 San Antonio, TX............................. 99 91 San Diego, CA............................... 116 123 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 124 134 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 106 131 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA............................... 94 87 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 102 103 Knoxville, TN............................... 106 95 Lincoln, NE................................. 86 90 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 114 110 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 100 100 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 100 90 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 103 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 116 105 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 115 109 Mobile, AL.................................. 109 96 New Orleans, LA............................. 112 95 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 114 116 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 100 98 Ocala, FL................................... 99 94 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 92 89 Orlando, FL................................. 106 96 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 105 111 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 113 106 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 99 101 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 112 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 110 111 Reading, PA................................. 107 102 Reno, NV.................................... 106 97 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 113 101 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 103 102 Rochester, NY............................... 98 99 Rockford, IL................................ 106 96 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 114 108 Salinas, CA................................. 126 108 San Antonio, TX............................. 104 93 San Diego, CA............................... 113 106 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 120 125 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 115 111 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA............................... 109 98 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 114 100 Knoxville, TN............................... 100 88 Lincoln, NE................................. 101 100 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 135 106 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 126 98 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 111 99 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 106 105 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 130 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 130 109 Mobile, AL.................................. 116 92 New Orleans, LA............................. 100 91 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 152 111 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 104 95 Ocala, FL................................... 93 88 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 108 99 Orlando, FL................................. 103 97 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 127 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 106 99 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 115 93 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 141 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 123 94 Reading, PA................................. 128 101 Reno, NV.................................... 109 105 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 126 90 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 103 101 Rochester, NY............................... 107 85 Rockford, IL................................ 133 102 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 118 113 Salinas, CA................................. 142 116 San Antonio, TX............................. 106 88 San Diego, CA............................... 122 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 147 112 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 134 104 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA............................... 91 87 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 107 103 Knoxville, TN............................... 91 106 Lincoln, NE................................. 92 95 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 102 102 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 101 99 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 97 105 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 99 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 106 108 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 116 115 Mobile, AL.................................. 97 100 New Orleans, LA............................. 94 96 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 107 119 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 91 98 Ocala, FL................................... 91 105 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 97 103 Orlando, FL................................. 93 105 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 108 113 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 97 108 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 98 104 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 98 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 108 112 Reading, PA................................. 106 110 Reno, NV.................................... 98 104 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 97 102 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 99 111 Rochester, NY............................... 101 107 Rockford, IL................................ 109 108 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 107 118 Salinas, CA................................. 106 100 San Antonio, TX............................. 101 94 San Diego, CA............................... 105 102 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 113 117 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 116 111 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 103 109 Springfield, MO............................. 95 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 106 102 Tallahassee, FL............................. 92 78 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 98 96 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 101 88 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 112 104 York, PA.................................... 102 107 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 100 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 119 117 Springfield, MO............................. 97 94 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 102 105 Tallahassee, FL............................. 93 97 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 96 98 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 104 108 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 115 116 York, PA.................................... 105 107 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 100 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 114 115 Springfield, MO............................. 95 90 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 103 102 Tallahassee, FL............................. 98 91 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 95 101 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 96 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 106 115 York, PA.................................... 100 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 103 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 131 107 Springfield, MO............................. 101 95 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 139 100 Tallahassee, FL............................. 107 85 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 114 94 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 109 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 121 111 York, PA.................................... 111 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 114 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 120 77 Springfield, MO............................. 98 96 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 105 117 Tallahassee, FL............................. 93 110 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 94 103 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 102 99 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 116 104 York, PA.................................... 95 104 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 106 115 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.