Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 89 79 Anchorage, AK............................... 110 113 Atlanta, GA................................. 103 106 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 97 91 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 96 92 Birmingham, AL.............................. 95 92 Bloomington, IN............................. 94 98 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 112 112 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 81 83 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 103 89 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 92 91 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 97 94 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 108 108 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 100 99 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 100 92 Columbus, OH................................ 101 108 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 87 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 99 103 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 98 101 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 101 96 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 106 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 98 102 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 96 91 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 103 99 Great Falls, MT............................. 89 92 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 99 103 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 97 100 Hartford, CT................................ 112 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 97 91 Honolulu, HI................................ 103 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 97 100 Huntsville, AL.............................. 95 99 Indianapolis, IN............................ 99 93 Iowa City, IA............................... 101 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 90 89 Anchorage, AK............................... 106 125 Atlanta, GA................................. 104 100 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 105 95 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 97 97 Birmingham, AL.............................. 95 104 Bloomington, IN............................. 93 97 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 111 118 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 101 80 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 96 113 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 98 89 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 97 102 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 111 110 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 103 105 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 103 101 Columbus, OH................................ 100 102 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 96 86 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 106 98 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 98 100 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 107 102 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 111 107 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 104 97 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 98 95 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 101 109 Great Falls, MT............................. 88 97 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 96 102 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 95 99 Hartford, CT................................ 113 126 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 100 96 Honolulu, HI................................ 112 110 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 105 90 Huntsville, AL.............................. 100 96 Indianapolis, IN............................ 102 105 Iowa City, IA............................... 104 110 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 93 89 Anchorage, AK............................... 109 108 Atlanta, GA................................. 103 106 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 86 100 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 104 99 Birmingham, AL.............................. 100 97 Bloomington, IN............................. 97 90 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 116 117 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 88 79 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 107 100 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 103 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 87 99 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 110 111 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 111 102 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 100 102 Columbus, OH................................ 120 101 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 94 87 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 110 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 102 93 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 106 104 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 104 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 99 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 101 97 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 115 101 Great Falls, MT............................. 92 83 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 106 100 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 93 99 Hartford, CT................................ 116 113 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 99 101 Honolulu, HI................................ 103 99 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 101 99 Huntsville, AL.............................. 97 97 Indianapolis, IN............................ 98 99 Iowa City, IA............................... 97 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 73 84 Anchorage, AK............................... 105 107 Atlanta, GA................................. 88 104 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 71 99 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 81 97 Birmingham, AL.............................. 72 89 Bloomington, IN............................. 71 97 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 101 111 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 61 79 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 92 97 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 70 87 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 82 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 106 110 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 75 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 87 107 Columbus, OH................................ 87 97 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 67 79 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 76 94 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 92 105 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 82 109 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 96 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 86 86 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 83 101 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 104 95 Great Falls, MT............................. 107 102 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 82 97 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 70 87 Hartford, CT................................ 101 106 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 71 89 Honolulu, HI................................ 91 109 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 78 96 Huntsville, AL.............................. 83 89 Indianapolis, IN............................ 82 101 Iowa City, IA............................... 89 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 92 84 Anchorage, AK............................... 113 101 Atlanta, GA................................. 97 100 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 100 83 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 96 83 Birmingham, AL.............................. 90 85 Bloomington, IN............................. 96 96 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 106 102 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 72 70 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 108 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 91 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 98 93 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 104 94 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 100 90 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 106 93 Columbus, OH................................ 96 88 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 86 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 87 91 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 107 86 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 97 94 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 116 94 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 96 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 99 92 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 104 92 Great Falls, MT............................. 98 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 99 93 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 101 90 Hartford, CT................................ 106 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 98 96 Honolulu, HI................................ 94 90 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 97 83 Huntsville, AL.............................. 94 84 Indianapolis, IN............................ 103 89 Iowa City, IA............................... 93 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA............................... 89 92 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 97 95 Knoxville, TN............................... 92 97 Lincoln, NE................................. 89 92 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 105 105 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 99 103 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 91 96 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 94 94 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 95 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 101 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 108 107 Mobile, AL.................................. 94 105 New Orleans, LA............................. 92 101 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 112 114 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 93 93 Ocala, FL................................... 90 92 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 91 99 Orlando, FL................................. 93 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 106 110 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 100 96 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 96 95 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 101 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 108 117 Reading, PA................................. 103 124 Reno, NV.................................... 97 94 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 102 101 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 98 100 Rochester, NY............................... 98 98 Rockford, IL................................ 101 89 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 107 109 Salinas, CA................................. 113 116 San Antonio, TX............................. 90 93 San Diego, CA............................... 105 101 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 117 113 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA............................... 92 95 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 95 99 Knoxville, TN............................... 94 93 Lincoln, NE................................. 90 94 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 113 112 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 102 105 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 86 97 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 91 91 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 98 96 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 97 108 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 107 124 Mobile, AL.................................. 96 89 New Orleans, LA............................. 101 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 118 119 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 98 96 Ocala, FL................................... 89 95 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 89 93 Orlando, FL................................. 95 92 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 114 111 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 106 101 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 98 101 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 98 116 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 114 120 Reading, PA................................. 102 104 Reno, NV.................................... 99 103 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 100 116 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 101 101 Rochester, NY............................... 101 109 Rockford, IL................................ 103 104 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 111 120 Salinas, CA................................. 127 121 San Antonio, TX............................. 97 87 San Diego, CA............................... 114 118 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 122 128 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA............................... 91 85 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 99 100 Knoxville, TN............................... 102 93 Lincoln, NE................................. 83 88 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 111 107 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 97 98 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 97 88 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 99 97 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 97 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 113 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 111 107 Mobile, AL.................................. 105 94 New Orleans, LA............................. 109 93 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 111 114 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 97 95 Ocala, FL................................... 96 92 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 89 87 Orlando, FL................................. 103 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 102 108 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 110 103 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 95 99 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 109 101 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 107 108 Reading, PA................................. 104 100 Reno, NV.................................... 103 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 110 98 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 100 99 Rochester, NY............................... 95 97 Rockford, IL................................ 103 93 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 111 105 Salinas, CA................................. 122 105 San Antonio, TX............................. 100 91 San Diego, CA............................... 109 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 116 122 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA............................... 78 97 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 82 100 Knoxville, TN............................... 72 88 Lincoln, NE................................. 73 100 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 97 106 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 91 98 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 80 99 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 76 105 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 72 100 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 94 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 94 108 Mobile, AL.................................. 83 92 New Orleans, LA............................. 72 91 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 109 111 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 75 95 Ocala, FL................................... 67 88 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 78 98 Orlando, FL................................. 74 96 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 91 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 76 99 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 83 93 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 102 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 88 94 Reading, PA................................. 92 101 Reno, NV.................................... 79 105 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 90 90 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 74 100 Rochester, NY............................... 77 85 Rockford, IL................................ 96 102 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 85 113 Salinas, CA................................. 102 116 San Antonio, TX............................. 76 88 San Diego, CA............................... 87 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 105 111 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA............................... 86 74 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 102 87 Knoxville, TN............................... 87 91 Lincoln, NE................................. 88 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 97 87 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 96 84 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 92 90 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 95 85 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 95 85 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 101 92 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 111 98 Mobile, AL.................................. 92 85 New Orleans, LA............................. 89 81 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 101 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 86 83 Ocala, FL................................... 86 89 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 92 88 Orlando, FL................................. 89 89 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 103 96 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 93 92 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 93 88 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 93 88 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 102 95 Reading, PA................................. 101 93 Reno, NV.................................... 93 89 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 92 87 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 94 94 Rochester, NY............................... 96 91 Rockford, IL................................ 103 92 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 102 100 Salinas, CA................................. 100 86 San Antonio, TX............................. 96 80 San Diego, CA............................... 100 87 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 107 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 107 97 Springfield, MA............................. 97 107 Springfield, MO............................. 90 88 Tallahassee, FL............................. 87 77 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 92 94 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 95 87 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 106 103 York, PA.................................... 97 106 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 95 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 104 126 Springfield, MA............................. 117 112 Springfield, MO............................. 95 90 Tallahassee, FL............................. 91 93 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 94 94 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 102 103 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 113 111 York, PA.................................... 103 102 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 98 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 111 108 Springfield, MA............................. 111 112 Springfield, MO............................. 91 88 Tallahassee, FL............................. 95 89 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 92 99 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 92 96 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 103 112 York, PA.................................... 96 96 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 100 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 96 104 Springfield, MA............................. 94 107 Springfield, MO............................. 73 95 Tallahassee, FL............................. 77 85 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 82 94 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 79 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 87 111 York, PA.................................... 80 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 82 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the St. Louis, MO-IL metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 110 95 Springfield, MA............................. 114 65 Springfield, MO............................. 93 82 Tallahassee, FL............................. 88 94 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 90 87 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 97 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 110 88 York, PA.................................... 90 89 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 101 98 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.