Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis, IN............................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 90 85 Anchorage, AK............................... 111 121 Atlanta, GA................................. 104 114 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 98 98 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 97 99 Birmingham, AL.............................. 95 98 Bloomington, IN............................. 95 105 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 112 120 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 82 89 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 103 95 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 93 97 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 98 101 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 109 116 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 100 106 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 101 98 Columbus, OH................................ 101 116 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 88 94 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 100 110 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 99 108 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 102 103 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 106 110 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 99 110 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 96 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 104 106 Great Falls, MT............................. 90 98 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 100 111 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 97 107 Hartford, CT................................ 113 115 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 98 97 Honolulu, HI................................ 104 108 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 97 107 Huntsville, AL.............................. 96 106 Iowa City, IA............................... 102 102 Johnstown, PA............................... 90 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Indianapolis, IN............................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 88 85 Anchorage, AK............................... 104 119 Atlanta, GA................................. 102 96 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 103 90 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 95 93 Birmingham, AL.............................. 93 99 Bloomington, IN............................. 91 92 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 109 112 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 99 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 94 108 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 96 84 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 94 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 109 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 101 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 101 96 Columbus, OH................................ 98 97 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 93 82 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 103 94 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 96 95 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 105 97 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 108 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 101 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 96 90 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 99 104 Great Falls, MT............................. 86 92 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 94 97 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 93 94 Hartford, CT................................ 110 120 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 98 91 Honolulu, HI................................ 109 105 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 103 86 Huntsville, AL.............................. 98 91 Iowa City, IA............................... 101 105 Johnstown, PA............................... 90 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis, IN............................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 95 90 Anchorage, AK............................... 111 109 Atlanta, GA................................. 105 107 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 88 101 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 106 100 Birmingham, AL.............................. 102 98 Bloomington, IN............................. 98 91 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 118 118 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 89 80 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 109 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 105 98 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 89 100 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 112 113 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 113 104 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 102 104 Columbus, OH................................ 123 102 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 96 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 112 100 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 104 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 108 106 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 106 105 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 101 93 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 103 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 117 103 Great Falls, MT............................. 94 84 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 108 102 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 95 100 Hartford, CT................................ 118 114 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 101 102 Honolulu, HI................................ 104 100 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 103 100 Huntsville, AL.............................. 99 98 Iowa City, IA............................... 99 104 Johnstown, PA............................... 93 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis, IN............................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 89 83 Anchorage, AK............................... 128 106 Atlanta, GA................................. 107 104 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 86 99 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 99 97 Birmingham, AL.............................. 88 89 Bloomington, IN............................. 86 97 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 123 110 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 75 78 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 112 96 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 86 86 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 100 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 129 109 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 91 97 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 106 106 Columbus, OH................................ 106 97 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 82 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 92 93 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 112 104 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 99 108 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 117 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 105 85 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 102 101 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 127 94 Great Falls, MT............................. 131 101 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 101 96 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 85 86 Hartford, CT................................ 123 106 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 87 89 Honolulu, HI................................ 112 108 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 95 95 Huntsville, AL.............................. 101 89 Iowa City, IA............................... 109 90 Johnstown, PA............................... 95 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Indianapolis, IN............................ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 89 94 Anchorage, AK............................... 110 113 Atlanta, GA................................. 94 112 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 97 93 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 93 93 Birmingham, AL.............................. 87 95 Bloomington, IN............................. 93 107 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 103 114 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 70 79 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 104 106 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 88 108 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 95 104 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 101 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 97 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 102 104 Columbus, OH................................ 93 98 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 83 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 85 101 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 103 97 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 93 105 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 112 105 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 93 113 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 96 103 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 101 103 Great Falls, MT............................. 94 86 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 96 104 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 98 100 Hartford, CT................................ 103 112 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 95 107 Honolulu, HI................................ 91 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 94 93 Huntsville, AL.............................. 91 94 Iowa City, IA............................... 90 103 Johnstown, PA............................... 84 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 98 102 Knoxville, TN............................... 92 104 Lincoln, NE................................. 90 99 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 106 113 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 100 110 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 92 103 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 95 100 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 95 105 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 102 111 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 109 115 Mobile, AL.................................. 94 112 New Orleans, LA............................. 93 108 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 113 123 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 93 100 Ocala, FL................................... 91 99 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 91 106 Orlando, FL................................. 94 101 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 107 118 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 101 103 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 97 102 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 102 110 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 109 125 Reading, PA................................. 104 133 Reno, NV.................................... 97 100 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 103 108 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 99 107 Rochester, NY............................... 99 105 Rockford, IL................................ 101 96 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 108 116 Salinas, CA................................. 114 124 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 100 San Diego, CA............................... 106 108 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 118 121 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 108 104 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 93 94 Knoxville, TN............................... 92 89 Lincoln, NE................................. 88 89 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 111 107 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 100 100 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 85 92 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 89 87 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 96 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 95 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 105 118 Mobile, AL.................................. 94 85 New Orleans, LA............................. 98 85 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 116 113 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 96 91 Ocala, FL................................... 87 90 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 87 89 Orlando, FL................................. 92 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 111 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 104 96 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 96 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 96 111 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 112 115 Reading, PA................................. 100 99 Reno, NV.................................... 96 98 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 98 110 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 99 96 Rochester, NY............................... 99 104 Rockford, IL................................ 100 100 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 108 115 Salinas, CA................................. 124 115 San Antonio, TX............................. 95 83 San Diego, CA............................... 111 112 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 119 122 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 101 120 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 101 102 Knoxville, TN............................... 104 94 Lincoln, NE................................. 85 89 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 113 108 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 98 99 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 99 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 101 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 99 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 115 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 113 108 Mobile, AL.................................. 107 95 New Orleans, LA............................. 111 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 113 115 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 98 96 Ocala, FL................................... 97 93 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 91 88 Orlando, FL................................. 105 95 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 104 110 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 112 104 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 97 100 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 111 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 109 109 Reading, PA................................. 106 101 Reno, NV.................................... 105 96 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 112 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 102 100 Rochester, NY............................... 97 98 Rockford, IL................................ 104 94 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 113 106 Salinas, CA................................. 124 106 San Antonio, TX............................. 102 92 San Diego, CA............................... 112 104 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 118 123 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 113 109 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 100 99 Knoxville, TN............................... 88 87 Lincoln, NE................................. 89 99 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 118 105 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 111 97 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 97 98 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 93 104 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 88 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 114 99 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 114 108 Mobile, AL.................................. 102 91 New Orleans, LA............................. 88 90 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 133 110 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 91 94 Ocala, FL................................... 82 87 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 95 98 Orlando, FL................................. 91 96 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 112 104 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 93 98 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 101 92 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 124 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 108 93 Reading, PA................................. 112 100 Reno, NV.................................... 96 104 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 110 89 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 100 Rochester, NY............................... 94 84 Rockford, IL................................ 117 101 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 104 113 Salinas, CA................................. 124 115 San Antonio, TX............................. 93 88 San Diego, CA............................... 107 102 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 129 111 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 117 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 99 98 Knoxville, TN............................... 84 101 Lincoln, NE................................. 85 91 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 94 97 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 93 94 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 89 100 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 91 95 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 92 95 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 97 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 107 110 Mobile, AL.................................. 89 95 New Orleans, LA............................. 86 91 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 98 113 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 84 93 Ocala, FL................................... 84 100 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 89 98 Orlando, FL................................. 86 100 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 100 108 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 90 103 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 90 99 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 90 98 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 99 107 Reading, PA................................. 98 105 Reno, NV.................................... 90 99 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 89 97 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 105 Rochester, NY............................... 93 102 Rockford, IL................................ 100 103 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 99 112 Salinas, CA................................. 97 96 San Antonio, TX............................. 93 89 San Diego, CA............................... 97 97 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 104 112 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 107 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 98 115 Springfield, MO............................. 90 94 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 101 107 Tallahassee, FL............................. 88 83 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 93 101 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 96 93 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 107 110 York, PA.................................... 97 113 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 96 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 114 107 Springfield, MO............................. 93 86 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 98 95 Tallahassee, FL............................. 89 88 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 92 90 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 100 99 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 110 106 York, PA.................................... 101 97 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 96 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 113 114 Springfield, MO............................. 93 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 102 101 Tallahassee, FL............................. 96 90 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 93 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 94 97 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 105 114 York, PA.................................... 98 97 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 101 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 115 106 Springfield, MO............................. 89 94 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 122 99 Tallahassee, FL............................. 94 84 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 100 93 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 96 93 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 106 110 York, PA.................................... 97 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 100 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Indianapolis, IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 110 73 Springfield, MO............................. 90 91 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 97 112 Tallahassee, FL............................. 85 105 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 87 98 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 94 95 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 107 99 York, PA.................................... 87 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 98 110 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.