Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Louisville, KY-IN........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 90 77 Anchorage, AK............................... 111 110 Atlanta, GA................................. 104 104 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 98 89 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 97 90 Birmingham, AL.............................. 95 89 Bloomington, IN............................. 95 96 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 112 109 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 82 81 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 103 86 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 93 88 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 98 92 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 109 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 100 96 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 101 89 Columbus, OH................................ 101 106 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 88 86 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 99 100 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 99 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 102 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 106 100 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 99 100 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 96 89 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 104 96 Great Falls, MT............................. 90 89 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 100 101 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 97 98 Hartford, CT................................ 112 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 98 88 Honolulu, HI................................ 104 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 97 97 Huntsville, AL.............................. 96 96 Indianapolis, IN............................ 100 91 Iowa City, IA............................... 102 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Louisville, KY-IN........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 88 85 Anchorage, AK............................... 104 120 Atlanta, GA................................. 102 96 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 102 90 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 95 93 Birmingham, AL.............................. 93 99 Bloomington, IN............................. 91 92 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 109 112 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 99 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 94 108 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 96 85 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 94 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 109 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 101 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 101 97 Columbus, OH................................ 98 97 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 93 82 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 103 94 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 96 95 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 105 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 108 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 101 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 96 90 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 99 104 Great Falls, MT............................. 86 92 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 94 97 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 93 94 Hartford, CT................................ 110 120 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 97 91 Honolulu, HI................................ 109 105 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 103 86 Huntsville, AL.............................. 98 91 Indianapolis, IN............................ 100 100 Iowa City, IA............................... 101 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Louisville, KY-IN........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 96 91 Anchorage, AK............................... 113 110 Atlanta, GA................................. 107 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 90 102 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 107 101 Birmingham, AL.............................. 103 99 Bloomington, IN............................. 100 92 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 120 119 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 91 80 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 111 102 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 106 98 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 90 101 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 114 114 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 115 105 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 104 104 Columbus, OH................................ 124 103 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 98 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 114 101 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 105 95 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 109 107 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 108 106 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 103 94 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 105 99 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 119 104 Great Falls, MT............................. 95 84 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 110 103 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 96 101 Hartford, CT................................ 120 115 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 103 103 Honolulu, HI................................ 106 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 104 101 Huntsville, AL.............................. 101 99 Indianapolis, IN............................ 102 101 Iowa City, IA............................... 101 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Louisville, KY-IN........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 80 86 Anchorage, AK............................... 116 109 Atlanta, GA................................. 97 107 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 78 101 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 90 99 Birmingham, AL.............................. 79 91 Bloomington, IN............................. 78 100 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 112 113 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 68 81 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 102 99 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 77 89 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 90 99 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 117 112 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 82 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 96 109 Columbus, OH................................ 96 100 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 74 81 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 84 96 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 101 107 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 90 111 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 106 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 95 88 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 92 103 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 115 97 Great Falls, MT............................. 118 104 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 91 99 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 77 89 Hartford, CT................................ 111 109 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 79 91 Honolulu, HI................................ 101 111 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 86 98 Huntsville, AL.............................. 92 91 Indianapolis, IN............................ 90 103 Iowa City, IA............................... 98 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Louisville, KY-IN........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 96 99 Anchorage, AK............................... 118 121 Atlanta, GA................................. 102 119 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 104 99 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 100 99 Birmingham, AL.............................. 94 101 Bloomington, IN............................. 101 114 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 111 121 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 75 84 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 112 112 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 95 115 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 102 110 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 109 112 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 105 107 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 110 111 Columbus, OH................................ 100 105 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 90 93 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 91 108 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 111 103 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 101 111 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 121 111 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 100 120 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 104 110 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 109 109 Great Falls, MT............................. 102 92 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 103 111 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 106 107 Hartford, CT................................ 111 119 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 102 114 Honolulu, HI................................ 99 107 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 101 99 Huntsville, AL.............................. 99 99 Indianapolis, IN............................ 108 106 Iowa City, IA............................... 98 109 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA............................... 90 89 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 98 93 Knoxville, TN............................... 92 94 Lincoln, NE................................. 90 90 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 106 103 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 92 93 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 95 91 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 95 96 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 102 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 109 104 Mobile, AL.................................. 94 102 New Orleans, LA............................. 93 98 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 113 112 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 93 91 Ocala, FL................................... 90 90 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 91 96 Orlando, FL................................. 94 92 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 107 107 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 101 94 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 97 93 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 102 100 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 109 114 Reading, PA................................. 104 121 Reno, NV.................................... 97 91 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 103 99 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 99 98 Rochester, NY............................... 99 96 Rockford, IL................................ 101 87 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 108 106 Salinas, CA................................. 114 113 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 91 San Diego, CA............................... 106 99 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 117 110 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 108 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA............................... 90 91 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 93 95 Knoxville, TN............................... 92 89 Lincoln, NE................................. 88 89 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 111 107 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 84 92 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 89 87 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 96 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 95 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 105 118 Mobile, AL.................................. 94 85 New Orleans, LA............................. 98 85 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 116 113 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 95 92 Ocala, FL................................... 87 90 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 87 89 Orlando, FL................................. 92 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 111 106 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 104 96 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 96 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 96 111 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 112 115 Reading, PA................................. 100 99 Reno, NV.................................... 96 98 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 98 111 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 99 97 Rochester, NY............................... 99 105 Rockford, IL................................ 100 100 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 108 115 Salinas, CA................................. 124 116 San Antonio, TX............................. 95 83 San Diego, CA............................... 111 113 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 119 122 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 101 120 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA............................... 94 86 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 102 103 Knoxville, TN............................... 106 95 Lincoln, NE................................. 86 90 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 115 109 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 100 90 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 103 99 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 100 100 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 117 105 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 115 109 Mobile, AL.................................. 109 96 New Orleans, LA............................. 113 95 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 115 116 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 100 97 Ocala, FL................................... 99 94 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 93 89 Orlando, FL................................. 106 96 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 105 111 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 114 105 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 99 101 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 112 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 110 110 Reading, PA................................. 108 102 Reno, NV.................................... 107 97 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 114 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 103 101 Rochester, NY............................... 99 99 Rockford, IL................................ 106 95 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 115 107 Salinas, CA................................. 126 107 San Antonio, TX............................. 104 93 San Diego, CA............................... 113 105 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 120 124 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 115 110 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA............................... 86 99 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 90 102 Knoxville, TN............................... 79 90 Lincoln, NE................................. 81 102 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 107 108 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 88 101 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 84 107 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 79 102 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 103 102 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 103 111 Mobile, AL.................................. 92 94 New Orleans, LA............................. 79 93 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 120 113 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 82 97 Ocala, FL................................... 74 90 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 86 100 Orlando, FL................................. 82 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 101 107 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 84 101 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 91 95 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 112 105 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 98 96 Reading, PA................................. 101 103 Reno, NV.................................... 87 107 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 100 92 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 82 103 Rochester, NY............................... 85 86 Rockford, IL................................ 106 104 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 94 116 Salinas, CA................................. 112 119 San Antonio, TX............................. 84 90 San Diego, CA............................... 96 105 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 116 114 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 106 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA............................... 90 88 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 106 104 Knoxville, TN............................... 91 108 Lincoln, NE................................. 91 97 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 101 103 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 96 107 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 99 101 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 99 101 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 105 110 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 115 117 Mobile, AL.................................. 96 101 New Orleans, LA............................. 93 97 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 106 120 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 90 99 Ocala, FL................................... 90 106 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 96 104 Orlando, FL................................. 93 106 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 107 115 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 97 109 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 97 105 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 97 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 107 114 Reading, PA................................. 105 111 Reno, NV.................................... 97 106 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 96 103 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 98 112 Rochester, NY............................... 101 108 Rockford, IL................................ 108 110 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 107 120 Salinas, CA................................. 105 102 San Antonio, TX............................. 101 95 San Diego, CA............................... 104 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 112 119 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 115 113 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 98 104 Springfield, MO............................. 90 85 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 101 97 Tallahassee, FL............................. 88 75 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 93 92 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 96 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 107 100 York, PA.................................... 97 103 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 96 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 114 107 Springfield, MO............................. 93 86 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 98 95 Tallahassee, FL............................. 89 88 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 92 90 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 100 99 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 110 106 York, PA.................................... 101 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 95 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 114 115 Springfield, MO............................. 95 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 104 102 Tallahassee, FL............................. 98 90 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 95 101 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 96 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 107 115 York, PA.................................... 100 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 103 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 104 109 Springfield, MO............................. 80 97 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 110 102 Tallahassee, FL............................. 85 86 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 90 96 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 87 96 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 96 113 York, PA.................................... 88 100 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 91 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Louisville, KY-IN metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 119 78 Springfield, MO............................. 98 97 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 104 119 Tallahassee, FL............................. 92 111 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 94 104 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 102 101 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 115 105 York, PA.................................... 94 105 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 106 117 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.