Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA............................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 88 83 Anchorage, AK............................... 109 119 Atlanta, GA................................. 102 111 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 96 96 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 96 97 Birmingham, AL.............................. 94 96 Bloomington, IN............................. 94 103 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 111 117 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 80 87 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 102 93 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 91 95 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 96 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 107 113 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 99 103 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 99 96 Columbus, OH................................ 100 113 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 86 92 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 98 108 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 97 106 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 101 100 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 105 107 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 97 107 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 95 96 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 102 103 Great Falls, MT............................. 89 96 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 99 108 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 96 105 Hartford, CT................................ 111 112 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 96 95 Honolulu, HI................................ 102 105 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 96 104 Huntsville, AL.............................. 94 103 Indianapolis, IN............................ 98 98 Johnstown, PA............................... 88 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA............................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 87 81 Anchorage, AK............................... 103 114 Atlanta, GA................................. 101 91 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 101 86 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 93 89 Birmingham, AL.............................. 92 95 Bloomington, IN............................. 90 88 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 107 107 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 97 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 93 103 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 94 81 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 93 93 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 107 100 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 99 96 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 99 92 Columbus, OH................................ 96 93 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 92 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 102 90 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 95 90 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 103 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 107 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 100 88 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 95 86 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 98 99 Great Falls, MT............................. 85 88 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 93 93 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 92 90 Hartford, CT................................ 109 114 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 96 87 Honolulu, HI................................ 108 100 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 101 82 Huntsville, AL.............................. 97 87 Indianapolis, IN............................ 99 95 Johnstown, PA............................... 89 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA............................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 95 87 Anchorage, AK............................... 112 104 Atlanta, GA................................. 106 103 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 89 97 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 106 95 Birmingham, AL.............................. 102 94 Bloomington, IN............................. 99 87 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 119 113 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 90 76 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 110 97 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 106 93 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 90 96 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 113 108 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 114 99 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 103 99 Columbus, OH................................ 124 97 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 97 84 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 113 96 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 105 90 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 109 101 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 107 101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 102 89 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 104 94 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 119 98 Great Falls, MT............................. 95 80 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 109 97 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 96 96 Hartford, CT................................ 119 109 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 102 97 Honolulu, HI................................ 105 96 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 103 96 Huntsville, AL.............................. 100 94 Indianapolis, IN............................ 101 96 Johnstown, PA............................... 93 82 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA............................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 82 93 Anchorage, AK............................... 118 118 Atlanta, GA................................. 99 116 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 80 110 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 91 108 Birmingham, AL.............................. 81 99 Bloomington, IN............................. 79 108 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 114 123 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 69 88 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 103 107 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 79 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 92 108 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 119 122 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 84 108 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 98 119 Columbus, OH................................ 98 108 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 75 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 85 104 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 103 116 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 92 121 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 108 113 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 96 95 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 94 112 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 117 105 Great Falls, MT............................. 120 113 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 93 107 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 78 96 Hartford, CT................................ 113 118 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 80 99 Honolulu, HI................................ 103 121 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 88 106 Huntsville, AL.............................. 93 99 Indianapolis, IN............................ 92 112 Johnstown, PA............................... 88 108 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA............................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 98 91 Anchorage, AK............................... 121 110 Atlanta, GA................................. 104 109 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 107 90 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 103 90 Birmingham, AL.............................. 96 93 Bloomington, IN............................. 103 104 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 114 111 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 77 76 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 115 103 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 97 105 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 105 101 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 112 102 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 107 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 113 101 Columbus, OH................................ 103 96 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 92 85 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 94 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 114 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 103 102 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 124 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 102 110 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 106 101 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 112 100 Great Falls, MT............................. 105 84 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 106 102 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 109 98 Hartford, CT................................ 114 109 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 105 104 Honolulu, HI................................ 101 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 104 91 Huntsville, AL.............................. 101 91 Indianapolis, IN............................ 111 97 Johnstown, PA............................... 93 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 96 100 Knoxville, TN............................... 91 101 Lincoln, NE................................. 88 97 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 104 110 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 98 107 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 90 100 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 93 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 94 103 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 101 108 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 108 112 Mobile, AL.................................. 93 109 New Orleans, LA............................. 92 106 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 111 120 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 92 97 Ocala, FL................................... 89 96 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 90 103 Orlando, FL................................. 92 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 106 115 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 99 101 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 95 99 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 100 107 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 107 122 Reading, PA................................. 102 129 Reno, NV.................................... 96 98 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 101 106 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 98 105 Rochester, NY............................... 97 103 Rockford, IL................................ 100 94 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 106 114 Salinas, CA................................. 112 122 San Antonio, TX............................. 90 97 San Diego, CA............................... 104 106 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 116 119 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 106 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 92 90 Knoxville, TN............................... 91 85 Lincoln, NE................................. 87 85 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 109 102 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 99 95 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 83 88 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 88 83 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 95 87 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 94 98 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 103 113 Mobile, AL.................................. 92 81 New Orleans, LA............................. 97 81 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 114 108 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 94 87 Ocala, FL................................... 86 86 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 86 85 Orlando, FL................................. 91 83 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 109 101 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 102 92 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 95 92 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 94 105 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 110 109 Reading, PA................................. 98 95 Reno, NV.................................... 95 94 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 96 105 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 97 92 Rochester, NY............................... 98 100 Rockford, IL................................ 99 95 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 107 109 Salinas, CA................................. 122 110 San Antonio, TX............................. 94 79 San Diego, CA............................... 110 107 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 117 116 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 100 114 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 102 97 Knoxville, TN............................... 105 90 Lincoln, NE................................. 85 85 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 114 104 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 99 95 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 100 85 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 102 94 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 100 95 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 116 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 114 103 Mobile, AL.................................. 108 91 New Orleans, LA............................. 112 90 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 114 110 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 99 92 Ocala, FL................................... 98 89 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 92 84 Orlando, FL................................. 106 91 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 105 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 113 100 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 98 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 112 98 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 110 105 Reading, PA................................. 107 96 Reno, NV.................................... 106 92 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 113 95 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 103 96 Rochester, NY............................... 98 94 Rockford, IL................................ 105 90 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 114 102 Salinas, CA................................. 125 102 San Antonio, TX............................. 103 88 San Diego, CA............................... 113 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 119 118 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 114 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 92 110 Knoxville, TN............................... 81 97 Lincoln, NE................................. 82 110 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 109 117 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 102 109 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 90 110 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 86 117 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 81 111 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 105 111 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 105 120 Mobile, AL.................................. 94 102 New Orleans, LA............................. 81 101 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 123 123 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 84 105 Ocala, FL................................... 76 97 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 88 109 Orlando, FL................................. 84 107 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 103 117 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 85 109 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 93 103 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 114 114 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 99 104 Reading, PA................................. 103 112 Reno, NV.................................... 88 116 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 101 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 83 111 Rochester, NY............................... 86 94 Rockford, IL................................ 108 113 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 96 126 Salinas, CA................................. 114 129 San Antonio, TX............................. 85 98 San Diego, CA............................... 98 114 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 118 123 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 108 115 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 109 95 Knoxville, TN............................... 93 99 Lincoln, NE................................. 94 88 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 104 94 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 103 92 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 98 98 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 101 92 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 102 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 108 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 118 107 Mobile, AL.................................. 98 92 New Orleans, LA............................. 95 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 108 110 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 93 91 Ocala, FL................................... 92 97 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 99 96 Orlando, FL................................. 95 97 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 110 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 99 100 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 100 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 100 95 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 109 104 Reading, PA................................. 108 102 Reno, NV.................................... 100 97 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 99 94 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 101 103 Rochester, NY............................... 103 99 Rockford, IL................................ 111 101 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 109 109 Salinas, CA................................. 108 93 San Antonio, TX............................. 103 87 San Diego, CA............................... 107 95 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 115 109 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 118 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 96 112 Springfield, MO............................. 89 92 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 99 105 Tallahassee, FL............................. 87 81 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 92 99 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 95 91 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 105 107 York, PA.................................... 96 111 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 94 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 113 102 Springfield, MO............................. 92 82 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 96 91 Tallahassee, FL............................. 88 84 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 91 86 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 98 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 109 101 York, PA.................................... 99 93 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 94 82 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 114 109 Springfield, MO............................. 94 85 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 103 97 Tallahassee, FL............................. 97 86 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 94 96 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 95 93 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 106 109 York, PA.................................... 99 93 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 102 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 106 118 Springfield, MO............................. 82 105 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 112 111 Tallahassee, FL............................. 87 94 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 92 104 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 88 104 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 98 123 York, PA.................................... 90 109 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 92 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Iowa City, IA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 122 71 Springfield, MO............................. 100 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 107 109 Tallahassee, FL............................. 94 102 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 96 95 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 104 92 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 118 96 York, PA.................................... 96 97 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 108 107 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.