Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 82 68 Anchorage, AK............................... 101 97 Atlanta, GA................................. 95 91 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 90 78 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 89 79 Birmingham, AL.............................. 87 78 Bloomington, IN............................. 87 84 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 103 96 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 75 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 95 76 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 85 77 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 89 80 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 92 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 92 84 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 92 78 Columbus, OH................................ 93 93 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 80 75 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 91 88 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 90 86 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 94 82 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 97 87 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 91 88 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 88 78 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 95 84 Great Falls, MT............................. 83 78 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 92 88 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 89 86 Hartford, CT................................ 103 92 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 90 78 Honolulu, HI................................ 95 86 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 89 85 Huntsville, AL.............................. 88 85 Indianapolis, IN............................ 92 80 Iowa City, IA............................... 93 82 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 79 74 Anchorage, AK............................... 93 104 Atlanta, GA................................. 91 83 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 92 79 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 85 81 Birmingham, AL.............................. 83 86 Bloomington, IN............................. 82 80 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 98 98 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 88 67 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 84 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 86 74 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 85 85 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 97 92 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 90 87 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 90 84 Columbus, OH................................ 88 85 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 84 71 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 92 82 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 86 83 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 94 85 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 97 89 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 91 81 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 86 79 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 89 91 Great Falls, MT............................. 77 80 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 84 85 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 83 82 Hartford, CT................................ 99 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 87 80 Honolulu, HI................................ 98 92 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 92 75 Huntsville, AL.............................. 88 79 Indianapolis, IN............................ 90 87 Iowa City, IA............................... 91 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 87 83 Anchorage, AK............................... 102 100 Atlanta, GA................................. 97 98 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 81 92 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 97 91 Birmingham, AL.............................. 93 90 Bloomington, IN............................. 91 83 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 109 108 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 82 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 100 92 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 96 89 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 82 92 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 103 103 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 104 95 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 94 95 Columbus, OH................................ 113 93 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 89 80 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 103 92 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 95 86 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 99 97 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 98 96 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 93 85 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 95 90 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 108 94 Great Falls, MT............................. 86 76 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 100 93 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 87 91 Hartford, CT................................ 109 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 93 93 Honolulu, HI................................ 96 92 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 94 91 Huntsville, AL.............................. 91 89 Indianapolis, IN............................ 92 91 Iowa City, IA............................... 91 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 82 89 Anchorage, AK............................... 119 114 Atlanta, GA................................. 99 112 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 80 106 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 92 104 Birmingham, AL.............................. 81 95 Bloomington, IN............................. 80 104 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 114 118 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 69 84 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 104 103 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 79 92 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 93 104 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 120 117 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 85 104 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 98 114 Columbus, OH................................ 99 104 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 76 84 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 86 100 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 103 112 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 92 116 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 109 109 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 97 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 94 108 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 118 101 Great Falls, MT............................. 121 109 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 93 103 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 79 92 Hartford, CT................................ 114 114 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 81 95 Honolulu, HI................................ 103 116 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 88 102 Huntsville, AL.............................. 94 95 Indianapolis, IN............................ 93 107 Iowa City, IA............................... 101 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 90 88 Anchorage, AK............................... 111 106 Atlanta, GA................................. 95 104 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 98 87 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 94 87 Birmingham, AL.............................. 88 89 Bloomington, IN............................. 94 100 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 104 106 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 70 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 105 99 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 89 101 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 96 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 102 98 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 98 94 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 103 97 Columbus, OH................................ 94 92 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 84 82 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 86 95 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 104 90 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 94 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 113 98 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 94 106 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 97 97 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 102 96 Great Falls, MT............................. 95 81 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 97 98 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 99 94 Hartford, CT................................ 104 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 96 100 Honolulu, HI................................ 92 94 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 95 87 Huntsville, AL.............................. 92 88 Indianapolis, IN............................ 101 94 Iowa City, IA............................... 91 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA............................... 82 78 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 89 81 Knoxville, TN............................... 85 83 Lincoln, NE................................. 82 79 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 97 90 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 92 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 84 82 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 87 80 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 87 84 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 94 88 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 100 92 Mobile, AL.................................. 86 89 New Orleans, LA............................. 85 86 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 103 98 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 86 80 Ocala, FL................................... 83 79 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 84 84 Orlando, FL................................. 86 80 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 98 94 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 92 82 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 89 81 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 93 88 Reading, PA................................. 95 106 Reno, NV.................................... 89 80 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 94 87 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 86 Rochester, NY............................... 91 84 Rockford, IL................................ 93 76 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 99 93 Salinas, CA................................. 104 99 San Antonio, TX............................. 83 80 San Diego, CA............................... 97 87 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 108 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA............................... 81 79 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 84 82 Knoxville, TN............................... 82 78 Lincoln, NE................................. 79 78 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 99 93 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 90 87 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 76 80 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 80 76 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 86 80 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 85 90 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 94 103 Mobile, AL.................................. 84 74 New Orleans, LA............................. 88 74 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 104 99 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 86 80 Ocala, FL................................... 78 79 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 78 77 Orlando, FL................................. 83 76 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 99 92 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 93 84 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 86 84 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 86 96 Reading, PA................................. 89 87 Reno, NV.................................... 86 85 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 87 96 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 88 84 Rochester, NY............................... 89 91 Rockford, IL................................ 90 87 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 97 100 Salinas, CA................................. 111 101 San Antonio, TX............................. 85 72 San Diego, CA............................... 100 98 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 107 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA............................... 85 78 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 93 93 Knoxville, TN............................... 96 86 Lincoln, NE................................. 78 82 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 104 99 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 91 91 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 91 81 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 93 90 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 91 90 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 106 95 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 104 99 Mobile, AL.................................. 99 87 New Orleans, LA............................. 102 86 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 104 105 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 91 88 Ocala, FL................................... 90 85 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 84 81 Orlando, FL................................. 96 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 95 100 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 103 96 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 90 92 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 102 93 Reading, PA................................. 98 92 Reno, NV.................................... 97 88 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 103 91 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 94 92 Rochester, NY............................... 89 90 Rockford, IL................................ 96 86 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 104 97 Salinas, CA................................. 114 97 San Antonio, TX............................. 94 84 San Diego, CA............................... 103 95 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 109 113 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA............................... 88 104 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 93 106 Knoxville, TN............................... 81 94 Lincoln, NE................................. 83 106 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 109 113 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 102 104 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 90 105 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 86 112 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 81 107 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 106 106 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 106 116 Mobile, AL.................................. 94 98 New Orleans, LA............................. 81 97 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 123 118 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 84 101 Ocala, FL................................... 76 94 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 88 105 Orlando, FL................................. 84 103 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 103 112 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 86 105 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 93 99 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 115 110 Reading, PA................................. 104 107 Reno, NV.................................... 89 112 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 102 96 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 84 107 Rochester, NY............................... 87 90 Rockford, IL................................ 108 109 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 96 121 Salinas, CA................................. 115 124 San Antonio, TX............................. 86 94 San Diego, CA............................... 99 109 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 119 119 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA............................... 85 78 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 100 92 Knoxville, TN............................... 85 95 Lincoln, NE................................. 86 85 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 95 91 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 94 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 90 94 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 92 89 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 93 89 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 98 97 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 108 103 Mobile, AL.................................. 90 89 New Orleans, LA............................. 87 85 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 99 106 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 85 87 Ocala, FL................................... 84 93 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 90 92 Orlando, FL................................. 87 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 101 101 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 90 96 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 91 93 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 91 92 Reading, PA................................. 99 98 Reno, NV.................................... 91 93 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 90 91 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 92 99 Rochester, NY............................... 94 95 Rockford, IL................................ 101 97 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 100 105 Salinas, CA................................. 98 90 San Antonio, TX............................. 94 84 San Diego, CA............................... 98 91 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 105 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 99 83 Springfield, MA............................. 90 91 Springfield, MO............................. 83 75 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 92 85 Tallahassee, FL............................. 81 66 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 85 80 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 88 74 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 98 88 York, PA.................................... 89 90 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 88 74 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 91 105 Springfield, MA............................. 102 93 Springfield, MO............................. 84 75 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 88 83 Tallahassee, FL............................. 80 77 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 82 78 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 89 86 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 99 92 York, PA.................................... 90 85 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 86 75 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 104 100 Springfield, MA............................. 104 104 Springfield, MO............................. 86 81 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 94 93 Tallahassee, FL............................. 89 82 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 86 91 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 87 88 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 97 104 York, PA.................................... 90 88 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 93 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 109 111 Springfield, MA............................. 107 114 Springfield, MO............................. 82 101 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 113 107 Tallahassee, FL............................. 87 90 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 92 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 89 100 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 99 118 York, PA.................................... 90 105 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 93 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 108 99 Springfield, MA............................. 111 68 Springfield, MO............................. 91 85 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 98 105 Tallahassee, FL............................. 86 98 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 88 92 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 95 89 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 108 92 York, PA.................................... 88 93 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 99 103 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.