Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 86 80 Anchorage, AK............................... 106 115 Atlanta, GA................................. 100 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 94 92 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 93 94 Birmingham, AL.............................. 92 93 Bloomington, IN............................. 91 99 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 108 113 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 78 84 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 99 90 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 89 92 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 94 95 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 105 109 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 97 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 97 93 Columbus, OH................................ 97 110 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 84 89 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 96 104 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 95 102 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 98 97 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 102 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 95 104 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 93 92 Great Falls, MT............................. 87 93 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 96 105 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 94 101 Hartford, CT................................ 108 108 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 94 92 Honolulu, HI................................ 100 102 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 93 101 Huntsville, AL.............................. 92 100 Indianapolis, IN............................ 96 94 Iowa City, IA............................... 98 97 Johnstown, PA............................... 86 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 89 82 Anchorage, AK............................... 105 115 Atlanta, GA................................. 103 92 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 104 87 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 96 89 Birmingham, AL.............................. 94 95 Bloomington, IN............................. 92 89 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 110 108 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 100 74 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 95 104 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 97 81 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 95 94 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 110 101 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 102 96 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 102 93 Columbus, OH................................ 99 94 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 94 79 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 104 90 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 97 91 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 106 94 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 109 98 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 102 89 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 97 87 Great Falls, MT............................. 87 89 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 95 93 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 94 91 Hartford, CT................................ 111 115 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 99 88 Honolulu, HI................................ 111 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 104 83 Huntsville, AL.............................. 99 88 Indianapolis, IN............................ 101 96 Iowa City, IA............................... 103 101 Johnstown, PA............................... 91 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 81 88 Anchorage, AK............................... 94 106 Atlanta, GA................................. 89 105 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 75 98 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 90 97 Birmingham, AL.............................. 86 96 Bloomington, IN............................. 84 89 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 115 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 76 78 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 93 98 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 89 95 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 76 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 96 110 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 96 101 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 87 101 Columbus, OH................................ 104 99 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 82 85 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 95 98 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 88 91 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 92 103 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 90 103 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 86 91 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 88 95 Great Falls, MT............................. 80 81 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 92 99 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 81 97 Hartford, CT................................ 101 111 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 86 99 Honolulu, HI................................ 89 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 87 97 Huntsville, AL.............................. 84 95 Indianapolis, IN............................ 85 97 Iowa City, IA............................... 84 102 Johnstown, PA............................... 79 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 70 88 Anchorage, AK............................... 101 112 Atlanta, GA................................. 84 110 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 68 104 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 78 102 Birmingham, AL.............................. 69 94 Bloomington, IN............................. 68 103 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 97 117 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 59 83 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 88 102 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 67 91 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 79 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 102 116 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 72 103 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 84 113 Columbus, OH................................ 84 103 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 64 83 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 73 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 88 110 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 78 115 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 92 108 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 82 90 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 80 107 Great Falls, MT............................. 103 107 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 79 102 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 67 91 Hartford, CT................................ 97 112 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 68 94 Honolulu, HI................................ 88 114 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 75 101 Huntsville, AL.............................. 80 94 Indianapolis, IN............................ 79 106 Iowa City, IA............................... 86 95 Johnstown, PA............................... 75 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 88 91 Anchorage, AK............................... 109 111 Atlanta, GA................................. 93 109 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 95 91 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 92 90 Birmingham, AL.............................. 86 93 Bloomington, IN............................. 92 105 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 102 111 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 69 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 103 103 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 87 105 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 94 101 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 103 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 96 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 101 102 Columbus, OH................................ 92 96 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 82 85 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 84 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 102 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 92 102 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 111 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 92 110 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 95 101 Great Falls, MT............................. 93 84 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 95 102 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 97 98 Hartford, CT................................ 102 109 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 94 104 Honolulu, HI................................ 90 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 93 91 Huntsville, AL.............................. 90 91 Indianapolis, IN............................ 99 98 Iowa City, IA............................... 89 100 Johnstown, PA............................... 83 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 94 96 Knoxville, TN............................... 89 98 Lincoln, NE................................. 86 94 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 102 107 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 96 104 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 88 97 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 91 95 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 92 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 98 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 105 108 Mobile, AL.................................. 91 106 New Orleans, LA............................. 90 102 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 108 116 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 90 94 Ocala, FL................................... 87 93 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 88 100 Orlando, FL................................. 90 95 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 103 112 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 97 98 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 93 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 98 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 105 118 Reading, PA................................. 100 125 Reno, NV.................................... 94 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 99 102 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 95 101 Rochester, NY............................... 95 99 Rockford, IL................................ 97 90 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 103 110 Salinas, CA................................. 110 117 San Antonio, TX............................. 87 94 San Diego, CA............................... 102 102 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 113 115 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 94 91 Knoxville, TN............................... 93 86 Lincoln, NE................................. 89 86 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 112 103 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 101 96 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 85 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 90 84 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 97 88 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 96 99 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 106 114 Mobile, AL.................................. 95 82 New Orleans, LA............................. 100 82 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 117 109 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 97 88 Ocala, FL................................... 88 87 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 88 85 Orlando, FL................................. 93 84 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 112 102 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 105 93 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 97 93 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 97 106 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 113 110 Reading, PA................................. 101 96 Reno, NV.................................... 97 94 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 99 106 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 100 93 Rochester, NY............................... 100 100 Rockford, IL................................ 101 96 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 109 110 Salinas, CA................................. 125 111 San Antonio, TX............................. 96 80 San Diego, CA............................... 113 108 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 120 117 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 86 99 Knoxville, TN............................... 89 92 Lincoln, NE................................. 72 87 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 96 106 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 84 97 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 84 86 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 86 95 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 84 96 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 98 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 97 105 Mobile, AL.................................. 91 93 New Orleans, LA............................. 94 92 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 96 112 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 84 94 Ocala, FL................................... 83 91 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 78 86 Orlando, FL................................. 89 93 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 88 107 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 95 102 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 83 98 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 94 99 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 92 107 Reading, PA................................. 90 98 Reno, NV.................................... 89 93 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 95 97 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 87 98 Rochester, NY............................... 83 96 Rockford, IL................................ 89 92 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 96 104 Salinas, CA................................. 106 104 San Antonio, TX............................. 87 90 San Diego, CA............................... 95 102 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 100 120 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 79 105 Knoxville, TN............................... 69 93 Lincoln, NE................................. 70 105 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 93 111 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 87 103 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 77 104 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 73 111 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 69 105 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 90 105 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 90 114 Mobile, AL.................................. 80 97 New Orleans, LA............................. 69 96 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 105 117 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 72 100 Ocala, FL................................... 65 92 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 75 104 Orlando, FL................................. 71 102 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 88 111 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 73 104 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 79 98 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 98 108 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 85 99 Reading, PA................................. 88 106 Reno, NV.................................... 76 110 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 87 95 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 71 106 Rochester, NY............................... 74 89 Rockford, IL................................ 92 108 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 82 119 Salinas, CA................................. 98 122 San Antonio, TX............................. 73 93 San Diego, CA............................... 84 108 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 101 117 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 98 95 Knoxville, TN............................... 83 99 Lincoln, NE................................. 84 89 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 93 95 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 92 92 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 88 98 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 91 92 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 91 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 96 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 106 107 Mobile, AL.................................. 88 93 New Orleans, LA............................. 85 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 97 110 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 83 91 Ocala, FL................................... 83 97 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 88 96 Orlando, FL................................. 85 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 99 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 89 100 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 89 97 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 89 96 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 98 104 Reading, PA................................. 97 102 Reno, NV.................................... 89 97 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 88 95 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 90 103 Rochester, NY............................... 92 99 Rockford, IL................................ 99 101 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 98 110 Salinas, CA................................. 96 93 San Antonio, TX............................. 92 87 San Diego, CA............................... 95 95 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 103 109 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 104 98 Springfield, MA............................. 94 108 Springfield, MO............................. 87 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 97 101 Tallahassee, FL............................. 85 78 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 90 95 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 92 88 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 103 104 York, PA.................................... 93 107 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 92 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 102 115 Springfield, MA............................. 115 103 Springfield, MO............................. 94 83 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 99 92 Tallahassee, FL............................. 90 85 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 93 86 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 101 95 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 112 102 York, PA.................................... 102 94 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 97 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 96 107 Springfield, MA............................. 96 111 Springfield, MO............................. 79 86 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 87 99 Tallahassee, FL............................. 82 87 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 79 97 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 80 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 89 111 York, PA.................................... 84 94 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 86 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 92 110 Springfield, MA............................. 91 112 Springfield, MO............................. 70 100 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 96 105 Tallahassee, FL............................. 74 89 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 79 99 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 75 99 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 84 116 York, PA.................................... 77 104 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 79 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 105 103 Springfield, MA............................. 109 71 Springfield, MO............................. 89 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 96 109 Tallahassee, FL............................. 84 102 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 86 96 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 93 92 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 106 96 York, PA.................................... 86 97 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 97 107 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.