Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 82 74 Anchorage, AK............................... 101 106 Atlanta, GA................................. 95 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 90 85 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 89 86 Birmingham, AL.............................. 87 86 Bloomington, IN............................. 87 92 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 103 104 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 75 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 95 83 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 85 85 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 89 88 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 101 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 92 92 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 92 86 Columbus, OH................................ 93 101 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 80 82 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 91 96 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 90 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 94 89 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 97 95 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 91 96 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 88 85 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 95 92 Great Falls, MT............................. 83 85 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 92 96 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 89 93 Hartford, CT................................ 103 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 90 85 Honolulu, HI................................ 95 94 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 89 93 Huntsville, AL.............................. 88 92 Indianapolis, IN............................ 92 87 Iowa City, IA............................... 93 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 84 72 Anchorage, AK............................... 99 101 Atlanta, GA................................. 97 81 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 98 76 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 90 78 Birmingham, AL.............................. 89 84 Bloomington, IN............................. 87 78 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 104 95 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 94 65 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 90 91 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 91 71 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 90 82 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 104 89 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 96 85 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 96 82 Columbus, OH................................ 93 82 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 89 69 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 98 79 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 92 80 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 100 82 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 103 86 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 97 78 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 92 76 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 94 88 Great Falls, MT............................. 82 78 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 90 82 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 89 80 Hartford, CT................................ 105 101 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 93 77 Honolulu, HI................................ 104 89 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 98 73 Huntsville, AL.............................. 93 77 Indianapolis, IN............................ 95 85 Iowa City, IA............................... 97 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 83 84 Anchorage, AK............................... 98 101 Atlanta, GA................................. 93 100 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 78 94 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 93 92 Birmingham, AL.............................. 89 91 Bloomington, IN............................. 87 84 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 104 109 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 79 74 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 96 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 92 90 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 78 93 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 99 104 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 99 96 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 90 96 Columbus, OH................................ 108 94 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 85 81 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 99 93 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 91 87 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 95 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 94 98 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 89 86 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 91 91 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 104 95 Great Falls, MT............................. 83 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 95 94 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 84 92 Hartford, CT................................ 104 106 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 89 94 Honolulu, HI................................ 92 93 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 90 93 Huntsville, AL.............................. 87 91 Indianapolis, IN............................ 88 93 Iowa City, IA............................... 87 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 78 77 Anchorage, AK............................... 112 98 Atlanta, GA................................. 94 96 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 76 91 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 87 90 Birmingham, AL.............................. 77 82 Bloomington, IN............................. 76 90 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 108 102 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 65 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 98 89 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 75 80 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 88 90 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 113 101 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 80 90 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 93 99 Columbus, OH................................ 93 90 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 72 73 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 81 87 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 98 97 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 87 100 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 103 94 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 92 79 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 89 93 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 111 87 Great Falls, MT............................. 114 94 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 88 89 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 74 80 Hartford, CT................................ 108 98 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 76 82 Honolulu, HI................................ 98 100 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 83 88 Huntsville, AL.............................. 89 82 Indianapolis, IN............................ 88 93 Iowa City, IA............................... 95 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 83 85 Anchorage, AK............................... 103 103 Atlanta, GA................................. 88 101 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 90 84 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 87 84 Birmingham, AL.............................. 81 87 Bloomington, IN............................. 87 98 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 96 104 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 65 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 97 96 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 82 98 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 89 94 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 94 96 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 91 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 95 95 Columbus, OH................................ 87 90 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 78 80 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 79 92 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 97 88 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 87 95 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 105 95 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 87 103 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 90 94 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 94 93 Great Falls, MT............................. 88 78 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 89 95 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 92 91 Hartford, CT................................ 96 102 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 89 97 Honolulu, HI................................ 85 91 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 88 85 Huntsville, AL.............................. 85 85 Indianapolis, IN............................ 93 91 Iowa City, IA............................... 84 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA............................... 82 85 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 89 89 Knoxville, TN............................... 85 90 Lincoln, NE................................. 82 86 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 97 98 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 92 96 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 84 90 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 87 87 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 87 92 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 94 96 Mobile, AL.................................. 86 98 New Orleans, LA............................. 85 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 103 107 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 86 87 Ocala, FL................................... 83 86 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 84 92 Orlando, FL................................. 86 88 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 98 103 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 92 90 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 89 89 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 93 96 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 100 109 Reading, PA................................. 95 115 Reno, NV.................................... 89 87 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 94 94 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 93 Rochester, NY............................... 91 92 Rockford, IL................................ 93 83 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 99 101 Salinas, CA................................. 104 108 San Antonio, TX............................. 83 87 San Diego, CA............................... 97 94 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 108 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA............................... 86 77 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 89 80 Knoxville, TN............................... 88 75 Lincoln, NE................................. 84 75 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 106 90 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 96 84 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 81 78 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 85 74 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 92 77 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 91 87 Mobile, AL.................................. 90 72 New Orleans, LA............................. 94 72 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 110 96 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 91 77 Ocala, FL................................... 83 76 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 83 75 Orlando, FL................................. 88 74 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 106 89 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 99 81 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 92 81 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 91 93 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 107 97 Reading, PA................................. 95 84 Reno, NV.................................... 92 83 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 93 93 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 94 82 Rochester, NY............................... 95 88 Rockford, IL................................ 96 84 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 103 97 Salinas, CA................................. 118 98 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 70 San Diego, CA............................... 106 95 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 114 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA............................... 82 79 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 89 94 Knoxville, TN............................... 92 87 Lincoln, NE................................. 75 83 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 99 100 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 87 92 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 87 82 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 89 91 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 87 92 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 101 96 Mobile, AL.................................. 94 88 New Orleans, LA............................. 98 87 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 99 107 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 87 89 Ocala, FL................................... 86 87 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 80 82 Orlando, FL................................. 92 88 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 91 102 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 99 97 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 86 93 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 98 95 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 96 101 Reading, PA................................. 93 93 Reno, NV.................................... 93 89 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 99 92 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 90 93 Rochester, NY............................... 86 91 Rockford, IL................................ 92 87 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 100 99 Salinas, CA................................. 110 99 San Antonio, TX............................. 90 85 San Diego, CA............................... 98 97 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 104 114 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA............................... 83 90 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 88 92 Knoxville, TN............................... 77 81 Lincoln, NE................................. 78 92 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 103 98 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 97 90 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 85 91 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 81 97 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 77 92 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 100 92 Mobile, AL.................................. 89 85 New Orleans, LA............................. 77 84 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 117 102 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 80 87 Ocala, FL................................... 72 81 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 83 91 Orlando, FL................................. 79 89 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 98 97 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 81 91 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 88 86 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 109 95 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 94 86 Reading, PA................................. 98 93 Reno, NV.................................... 84 96 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 96 83 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 79 93 Rochester, NY............................... 82 78 Rockford, IL................................ 102 94 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 91 104 Salinas, CA................................. 109 107 San Antonio, TX............................. 81 81 San Diego, CA............................... 93 95 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 113 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA............................... 78 76 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 92 89 Knoxville, TN............................... 78 92 Lincoln, NE................................. 79 83 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 88 88 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 87 86 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 83 91 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 85 86 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 86 87 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 91 94 Mobile, AL.................................. 83 86 New Orleans, LA............................. 81 83 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 92 103 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 78 85 Ocala, FL................................... 78 91 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 83 89 Orlando, FL................................. 80 91 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 93 98 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 84 93 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 84 90 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 84 89 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 93 97 Reading, PA................................. 91 95 Reno, NV.................................... 84 90 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 83 88 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 85 96 Rochester, NY............................... 87 93 Rockford, IL................................ 94 94 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 92 102 Salinas, CA................................. 91 87 San Antonio, TX............................. 87 81 San Diego, CA............................... 90 88 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 97 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 99 91 Springfield, MA............................. 90 100 Springfield, MO............................. 83 82 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 92 93 Tallahassee, FL............................. 81 72 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 85 88 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 88 81 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 98 96 York, PA.................................... 89 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 87 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 97 101 Springfield, MA............................. 109 90 Springfield, MO............................. 89 73 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 93 81 Tallahassee, FL............................. 85 75 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 88 76 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 95 83 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 105 90 York, PA.................................... 96 82 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 91 73 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 100 101 Springfield, MA............................. 99 105 Springfield, MO............................. 82 82 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 90 94 Tallahassee, FL............................. 85 83 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 82 93 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 83 90 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 92 105 York, PA.................................... 87 90 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 89 82 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 103 96 Springfield, MA............................. 101 98 Springfield, MO............................. 78 87 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 107 92 Tallahassee, FL............................. 83 78 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 87 86 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 84 86 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 93 102 York, PA.................................... 85 91 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 88 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 100 97 Springfield, MA............................. 103 67 Springfield, MO............................. 85 83 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 90 102 Tallahassee, FL............................. 80 95 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 81 89 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 88 86 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 100 90 York, PA.................................... 81 90 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 91 100 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.