Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Great Falls, MT............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 99 86 Anchorage, AK............................... 123 124 Atlanta, GA................................. 115 116 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 109 100 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 108 101 Birmingham, AL.............................. 106 100 Bloomington, IN............................. 105 107 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 125 122 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 90 91 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 115 97 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 103 99 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 108 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 121 118 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 111 108 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 112 100 Columbus, OH................................ 112 118 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 97 96 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 110 112 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 109 110 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 113 104 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 118 112 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 110 112 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 107 100 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 115 108 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 111 113 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 108 109 Hartford, CT................................ 125 117 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 109 99 Honolulu, HI................................ 115 110 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 108 109 Huntsville, AL.............................. 106 108 Indianapolis, IN............................ 111 102 Iowa City, IA............................... 113 104 Johnstown, PA............................... 100 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Great Falls, MT............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 103 92 Anchorage, AK............................... 121 130 Atlanta, GA................................. 119 104 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 120 98 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 110 101 Birmingham, AL.............................. 109 108 Bloomington, IN............................. 106 100 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 127 122 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 115 83 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 110 117 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 112 92 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 110 106 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 127 114 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 117 109 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 117 105 Columbus, OH................................ 114 105 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 109 89 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 120 102 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 112 103 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 122 106 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 126 111 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 118 100 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 112 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 115 113 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 110 105 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 108 102 Hartford, CT................................ 128 130 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 114 99 Honolulu, HI................................ 128 114 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 120 93 Huntsville, AL.............................. 114 99 Indianapolis, IN............................ 117 109 Iowa City, IA............................... 118 114 Johnstown, PA............................... 105 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Great Falls, MT............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 101 108 Anchorage, AK............................... 118 130 Atlanta, GA................................. 112 129 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 94 121 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 113 119 Birmingham, AL.............................. 108 118 Bloomington, IN............................. 105 109 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 126 141 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 95 95 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 116 121 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 112 117 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 95 120 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 120 135 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 120 124 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 109 124 Columbus, OH................................ 131 122 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 103 105 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 119 120 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 110 112 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 115 127 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 113 126 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 108 111 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 110 117 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 125 123 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 115 122 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 101 119 Hartford, CT................................ 126 137 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 108 122 Honolulu, HI................................ 111 120 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 109 120 Huntsville, AL.............................. 106 117 Indianapolis, IN............................ 107 120 Iowa City, IA............................... 106 125 Johnstown, PA............................... 99 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Great Falls, MT............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 68 82 Anchorage, AK............................... 98 105 Atlanta, GA................................. 82 102 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 66 97 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 76 95 Birmingham, AL.............................. 67 87 Bloomington, IN............................. 66 95 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 95 108 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 57 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 86 95 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 65 85 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 77 95 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 99 108 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 70 96 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 81 105 Columbus, OH................................ 82 96 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 63 77 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 71 92 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 86 103 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 76 107 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 90 100 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 80 84 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 78 99 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 97 93 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 77 95 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 65 85 Hartford, CT................................ 94 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 67 87 Honolulu, HI................................ 85 106 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 73 94 Huntsville, AL.............................. 78 87 Indianapolis, IN............................ 77 99 Iowa City, IA............................... 83 88 Johnstown, PA............................... 73 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Great Falls, MT............................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 94 109 Anchorage, AK............................... 116 132 Atlanta, GA................................. 100 129 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 102 108 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 98 107 Birmingham, AL.............................. 92 111 Bloomington, IN............................. 99 125 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 109 132 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 74 91 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 110 123 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 93 125 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 100 120 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 107 122 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 103 116 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 108 121 Columbus, OH................................ 98 114 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 88 102 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 90 118 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 109 112 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 99 122 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 119 122 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 98 131 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 102 120 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 107 119 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 101 121 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 104 116 Hartford, CT................................ 109 129 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 100 124 Honolulu, HI................................ 97 117 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 99 108 Huntsville, AL.............................. 97 109 Indianapolis, IN............................ 106 116 Iowa City, IA............................... 96 119 Johnstown, PA............................... 89 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 108 104 Knoxville, TN............................... 103 106 Lincoln, NE................................. 99 101 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 117 115 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 111 112 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 102 105 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 105 102 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 106 107 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 113 113 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 121 117 Mobile, AL.................................. 105 114 New Orleans, LA............................. 103 110 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 125 125 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 104 102 Ocala, FL................................... 100 101 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 101 108 Orlando, FL................................. 104 103 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 119 120 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 112 105 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 107 104 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 113 112 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 121 128 Reading, PA................................. 115 135 Reno, NV.................................... 108 102 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 114 111 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 110 109 Rochester, NY............................... 110 107 Rockford, IL................................ 112 98 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 119 119 Salinas, CA................................. 126 127 San Antonio, TX............................. 101 102 San Diego, CA............................... 117 111 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 130 124 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 120 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 109 103 Knoxville, TN............................... 107 97 Lincoln, NE................................. 103 97 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 129 116 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 117 108 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 99 100 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 104 95 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 112 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 111 112 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 122 128 Mobile, AL.................................. 109 92 New Orleans, LA............................. 115 92 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 135 123 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 111 99 Ocala, FL................................... 102 98 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 102 96 Orlando, FL................................. 108 95 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 129 115 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 121 104 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 112 104 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 112 120 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 130 125 Reading, PA................................. 116 108 Reno, NV.................................... 112 106 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 114 120 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 115 105 Rochester, NY............................... 116 113 Rockford, IL................................ 117 108 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 126 124 Salinas, CA................................. 144 125 San Antonio, TX............................. 111 90 San Diego, CA............................... 130 122 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 139 132 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 118 130 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 107 122 Knoxville, TN............................... 111 113 Lincoln, NE................................. 90 107 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 120 130 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 105 119 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 105 106 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 108 117 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 105 118 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 122 125 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 121 129 Mobile, AL.................................. 114 114 New Orleans, LA............................. 118 113 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 120 138 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 105 115 Ocala, FL................................... 104 112 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 97 106 Orlando, FL................................. 112 114 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 111 131 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 119 125 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 104 120 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 118 122 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 116 131 Reading, PA................................. 113 121 Reno, NV.................................... 112 115 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 119 119 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 109 120 Rochester, NY............................... 104 118 Rockford, IL................................ 111 113 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 120 127 Salinas, CA................................. 133 128 San Antonio, TX............................. 109 110 San Diego, CA............................... 119 125 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 126 147 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 121 131 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 77 98 Knoxville, TN............................... 67 86 Lincoln, NE................................. 68 98 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 91 104 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 85 96 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 75 97 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 71 103 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 67 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 88 98 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 88 106 Mobile, AL.................................. 78 90 New Orleans, LA............................. 67 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 102 109 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 70 93 Ocala, FL................................... 63 86 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 73 96 Orlando, FL................................. 70 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 85 103 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 71 97 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 77 91 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 95 101 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 83 92 Reading, PA................................. 86 99 Reno, NV.................................... 74 103 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 84 88 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 69 98 Rochester, NY............................... 72 83 Rockford, IL................................ 90 100 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 80 111 Salinas, CA................................. 95 114 San Antonio, TX............................. 71 86 San Diego, CA............................... 82 101 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 99 109 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 90 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 104 114 Knoxville, TN............................... 89 118 Lincoln, NE................................. 90 105 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 99 113 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 98 109 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 94 116 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 97 110 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 97 111 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 103 120 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 113 128 Mobile, AL.................................. 94 110 New Orleans, LA............................. 91 106 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 104 131 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 89 108 Ocala, FL................................... 88 116 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 94 114 Orlando, FL................................. 91 116 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 105 125 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 95 119 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 96 115 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 96 114 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 105 124 Reading, PA................................. 103 121 Reno, NV.................................... 95 115 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 95 112 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 96 122 Rochester, NY............................... 99 118 Rockford, IL................................ 106 120 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 105 131 Salinas, CA................................. 103 111 San Antonio, TX............................. 99 104 San Diego, CA............................... 102 113 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 110 130 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 113 123 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 109 117 Springfield, MO............................. 100 96 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 112 109 Tallahassee, FL............................. 98 84 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 103 103 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 107 95 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 119 112 York, PA.................................... 108 115 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 106 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 133 116 Springfield, MO............................. 109 93 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 114 104 Tallahassee, FL............................. 104 96 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 107 97 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 116 107 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 129 115 York, PA.................................... 117 106 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 111 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 120 136 Springfield, MO............................. 99 106 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 109 121 Tallahassee, FL............................. 103 107 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 100 120 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 101 116 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 112 136 York, PA.................................... 105 116 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 108 107 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 88 105 Springfield, MO............................. 68 93 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 93 98 Tallahassee, FL............................. 72 83 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 76 92 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 73 92 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 81 108 York, PA.................................... 75 96 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 77 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 116 85 Springfield, MO............................. 96 106 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 102 130 Tallahassee, FL............................. 90 122 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 92 114 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 100 110 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 113 115 York, PA.................................... 92 115 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 104 128 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.