Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Lincoln, NE................................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 100 86 Anchorage, AK............................... 123 123 Atlanta, GA................................. 116 115 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 109 99 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 108 100 Birmingham, AL.............................. 106 99 Bloomington, IN............................. 106 106 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 125 121 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 91 90 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 115 96 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 103 98 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 109 102 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 122 117 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 112 107 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 112 99 Columbus, OH................................ 113 117 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 98 95 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 111 111 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 110 109 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 114 104 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 119 111 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 110 111 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 108 99 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 116 107 Great Falls, MT............................. 101 99 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 112 112 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 109 108 Hartford, CT................................ 126 116 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 109 98 Honolulu, HI................................ 116 109 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 109 108 Huntsville, AL.............................. 107 107 Indianapolis, IN............................ 112 101 Iowa City, IA............................... 113 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Lincoln, NE................................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 100 95 Anchorage, AK............................... 118 134 Atlanta, GA................................. 116 107 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 116 101 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 107 104 Birmingham, AL.............................. 106 111 Bloomington, IN............................. 103 103 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 123 126 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 112 86 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 107 121 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 108 95 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 107 109 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 123 118 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 114 112 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 114 108 Columbus, OH................................ 111 109 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 106 92 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 117 105 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 109 106 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 119 109 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 123 114 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 115 103 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 109 101 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 112 116 Great Falls, MT............................. 97 103 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 107 109 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 105 105 Hartford, CT................................ 125 134 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 111 102 Honolulu, HI................................ 124 118 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 116 96 Huntsville, AL.............................. 111 102 Indianapolis, IN............................ 113 112 Iowa City, IA............................... 115 117 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Lincoln, NE................................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 112 101 Anchorage, AK............................... 131 122 Atlanta, GA................................. 124 120 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 104 113 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 125 112 Birmingham, AL.............................. 120 110 Bloomington, IN............................. 116 102 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 139 132 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 105 89 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 129 113 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 124 109 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 105 112 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 133 126 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 133 116 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 121 116 Columbus, OH................................ 145 114 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 114 98 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 132 113 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 122 105 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 127 118 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 125 118 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 120 104 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 122 110 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 139 115 Great Falls, MT............................. 111 94 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 128 114 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 112 112 Hartford, CT................................ 139 128 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 119 114 Honolulu, HI................................ 123 113 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 121 112 Huntsville, AL.............................. 117 110 Indianapolis, IN............................ 118 112 Iowa City, IA............................... 117 117 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Lincoln, NE................................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 100 84 Anchorage, AK............................... 144 107 Atlanta, GA................................. 120 105 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 97 100 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 111 98 Birmingham, AL.............................. 98 90 Bloomington, IN............................. 97 98 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 139 111 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 84 79 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 126 97 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 96 87 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 112 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 145 110 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 102 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 119 108 Columbus, OH................................ 119 98 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 92 79 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 104 94 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 125 105 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 112 109 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 132 103 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 118 86 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 114 102 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 143 95 Great Falls, MT............................. 147 102 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 113 97 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 95 87 Hartford, CT................................ 138 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 98 90 Honolulu, HI................................ 125 109 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 107 96 Huntsville, AL.............................. 114 90 Indianapolis, IN............................ 112 101 Iowa City, IA............................... 122 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Lincoln, NE................................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 105 103 Anchorage, AK............................... 129 125 Atlanta, GA................................. 111 123 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 114 102 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 110 102 Birmingham, AL.............................. 103 105 Bloomington, IN............................. 110 118 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 122 125 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 82 87 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 123 116 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 104 119 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 112 114 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 119 116 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 115 111 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 121 115 Columbus, OH................................ 109 108 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 98 96 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 100 112 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 122 106 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 110 115 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 132 115 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 109 125 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 113 114 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 119 113 Great Falls, MT............................. 111 95 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 113 115 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 116 111 Hartford, CT................................ 121 123 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 112 118 Honolulu, HI................................ 108 111 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 111 103 Huntsville, AL.............................. 108 103 Indianapolis, IN............................ 118 110 Iowa City, IA............................... 107 113 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA............................... 100 99 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 109 103 Knoxville, TN............................... 103 105 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 118 114 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 112 111 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 102 104 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 106 101 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 106 106 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 114 112 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 122 116 Mobile, AL.................................. 105 113 New Orleans, LA............................. 104 109 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 126 124 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 104 101 Ocala, FL................................... 101 100 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 102 107 Orlando, FL................................. 105 102 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 120 119 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 112 104 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 108 103 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 114 111 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 122 127 Reading, PA................................. 116 134 Reno, NV.................................... 109 101 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 115 110 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 111 108 Rochester, NY............................... 111 106 Rockford, IL................................ 113 97 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 120 117 Salinas, CA................................. 127 126 San Antonio, TX............................. 102 101 San Diego, CA............................... 118 110 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 131 123 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 120 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA............................... 102 101 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 106 106 Knoxville, TN............................... 104 100 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 125 120 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 113 112 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 96 103 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 101 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 109 102 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 108 116 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 119 132 Mobile, AL.................................. 106 95 New Orleans, LA............................. 112 95 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 131 127 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 108 102 Ocala, FL................................... 99 101 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 99 99 Orlando, FL................................. 105 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 126 118 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 118 108 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 109 108 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 109 124 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 127 128 Reading, PA................................. 113 111 Reno, NV.................................... 109 110 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 111 124 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 112 108 Rochester, NY............................... 112 117 Rockford, IL................................ 114 111 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 122 128 Salinas, CA................................. 140 129 San Antonio, TX............................. 108 93 San Diego, CA............................... 126 126 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 135 137 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 115 134 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA............................... 109 96 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 119 114 Knoxville, TN............................... 123 105 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 133 121 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 116 111 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 116 99 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 119 110 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 116 111 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 135 117 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 134 121 Mobile, AL.................................. 126 107 New Orleans, LA............................. 131 105 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 133 129 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 116 108 Ocala, FL................................... 115 105 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 108 99 Orlando, FL................................. 124 106 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 122 123 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 132 117 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 115 112 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 131 114 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 128 123 Reading, PA................................. 125 113 Reno, NV.................................... 124 107 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 132 112 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 120 112 Rochester, NY............................... 115 110 Rockford, IL................................ 123 106 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 133 119 Salinas, CA................................. 147 119 San Antonio, TX............................. 121 103 San Diego, CA............................... 132 117 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 139 138 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 133 122 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA............................... 107 98 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 112 100 Knoxville, TN............................... 98 88 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 133 106 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 124 98 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 109 99 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 104 106 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 99 100 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 128 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 128 109 Mobile, AL.................................. 114 92 New Orleans, LA............................. 98 91 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 150 111 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 102 95 Ocala, FL................................... 92 88 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 107 99 Orlando, FL................................. 102 97 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 125 106 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 104 99 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 113 93 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 139 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 121 94 Reading, PA................................. 126 101 Reno, NV.................................... 108 105 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 124 90 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 102 101 Rochester, NY............................... 105 85 Rockford, IL................................ 131 103 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 117 114 Salinas, CA................................. 140 117 San Antonio, TX............................. 104 89 San Diego, CA............................... 120 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 144 112 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 132 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA............................... 99 92 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 116 108 Knoxville, TN............................... 99 112 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 111 107 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 109 104 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 105 111 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 108 104 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 109 105 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 115 114 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 126 121 Mobile, AL.................................. 105 105 New Orleans, LA............................. 102 100 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 116 125 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 99 103 Ocala, FL................................... 99 110 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 105 108 Orlando, FL................................. 101 110 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 118 119 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 106 113 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 107 109 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 106 108 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 117 118 Reading, PA................................. 115 115 Reno, NV.................................... 106 109 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 105 107 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 107 116 Rochester, NY............................... 110 112 Rockford, IL................................ 118 114 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 117 124 Salinas, CA................................. 115 106 San Antonio, TX............................. 110 98 San Diego, CA............................... 114 107 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 122 123 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 126 117 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 109 116 Springfield, MO............................. 101 95 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 112 108 Tallahassee, FL............................. 98 83 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 104 102 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 107 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 120 111 York, PA.................................... 109 114 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 107 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 129 120 Springfield, MO............................. 106 96 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 111 107 Tallahassee, FL............................. 101 99 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 104 101 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 113 110 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 125 119 York, PA.................................... 114 109 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 108 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 133 127 Springfield, MO............................. 110 99 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 120 113 Tallahassee, FL............................. 114 100 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 110 112 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 111 108 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 124 127 York, PA.................................... 116 108 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 120 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 129 107 Springfield, MO............................. 99 95 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 137 100 Tallahassee, FL............................. 106 85 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 112 94 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 108 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 119 111 York, PA.................................... 109 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 112 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Lincoln, NE metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 130 81 Springfield, MO............................. 107 101 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 114 123 Tallahassee, FL............................. 101 115 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 102 108 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 111 104 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 126 109 York, PA.................................... 103 109 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 115 121 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.