Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Oklahoma City, OK........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 98 80 Anchorage, AK............................... 121 115 Atlanta, GA................................. 114 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 107 92 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 106 94 Birmingham, AL.............................. 104 93 Bloomington, IN............................. 104 99 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 123 113 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 89 84 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 113 90 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 102 92 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 107 95 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 120 109 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 110 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 110 93 Columbus, OH................................ 111 110 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 96 89 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 109 104 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 108 102 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 112 97 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 117 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 108 104 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 106 92 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 114 100 Great Falls, MT............................. 99 93 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 110 105 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 107 101 Hartford, CT................................ 123 108 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 107 92 Honolulu, HI................................ 114 102 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 107 101 Huntsville, AL.............................. 105 100 Indianapolis, IN............................ 110 94 Iowa City, IA............................... 111 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Oklahoma City, OK........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 101 96 Anchorage, AK............................... 119 135 Atlanta, GA................................. 117 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 117 102 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 108 105 Birmingham, AL.............................. 107 112 Bloomington, IN............................. 104 104 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 125 127 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 113 86 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 108 122 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 109 95 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 108 110 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 124 119 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 115 113 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 115 109 Columbus, OH................................ 112 110 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 107 92 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 118 106 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 110 107 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 120 110 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 124 115 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 116 104 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 110 102 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 113 117 Great Falls, MT............................. 98 104 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 108 110 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 106 106 Hartford, CT................................ 126 135 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 112 103 Honolulu, HI................................ 125 119 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 117 97 Huntsville, AL.............................. 112 103 Indianapolis, IN............................ 114 113 Iowa City, IA............................... 116 118 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Oklahoma City, OK........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 104 103 Anchorage, AK............................... 122 124 Atlanta, GA................................. 115 122 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 97 115 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 116 113 Birmingham, AL.............................. 111 112 Bloomington, IN............................. 108 103 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 129 134 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 98 90 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 120 115 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 115 111 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 97 114 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 123 128 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 124 118 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 112 117 Columbus, OH................................ 134 116 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 106 99 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 123 114 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 114 106 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 118 120 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 117 120 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 111 106 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 113 111 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 129 116 Great Falls, MT............................. 103 95 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 119 115 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 104 113 Hartford, CT................................ 130 130 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 111 115 Honolulu, HI................................ 115 114 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 112 113 Huntsville, AL.............................. 109 111 Indianapolis, IN............................ 110 113 Iowa City, IA............................... 109 119 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Oklahoma City, OK........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 93 85 Anchorage, AK............................... 135 108 Atlanta, GA................................. 113 106 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 91 101 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 104 99 Birmingham, AL.............................. 92 91 Bloomington, IN............................. 91 99 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 130 112 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 79 80 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 118 98 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 90 88 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 105 99 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 135 112 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 96 99 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 112 109 Columbus, OH................................ 112 99 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 86 80 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 97 95 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 117 106 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 104 111 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 123 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 110 87 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 107 103 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 133 96 Great Falls, MT............................. 137 104 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 106 98 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 89 88 Hartford, CT................................ 129 108 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 91 91 Honolulu, HI................................ 117 110 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 100 98 Huntsville, AL.............................. 106 91 Indianapolis, IN............................ 105 102 Iowa City, IA............................... 114 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Oklahoma City, OK........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 100 95 Anchorage, AK............................... 123 115 Atlanta, GA................................. 105 114 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 108 95 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 104 94 Birmingham, AL.............................. 98 97 Bloomington, IN............................. 105 109 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 115 116 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 78 80 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 117 108 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 99 110 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 106 106 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 113 107 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 109 102 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 115 106 Columbus, OH................................ 104 100 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 93 89 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 95 103 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 116 98 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 105 107 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 126 107 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 104 115 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 108 105 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 113 104 Great Falls, MT............................. 106 88 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 107 106 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 110 102 Hartford, CT................................ 115 114 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 106 109 Honolulu, HI................................ 102 102 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 105 95 Huntsville, AL.............................. 103 95 Indianapolis, IN............................ 112 102 Iowa City, IA............................... 101 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA............................... 98 93 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 107 96 Knoxville, TN............................... 101 98 Lincoln, NE................................. 98 94 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 116 107 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 110 104 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 100 97 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 104 95 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 105 100 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 112 105 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 120 109 Mobile, AL.................................. 103 106 New Orleans, LA............................. 102 102 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 124 116 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 102 94 Ocala, FL................................... 99 93 Orlando, FL................................. 103 95 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 118 112 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 110 98 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 106 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 112 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 120 118 Reading, PA................................. 114 125 Reno, NV.................................... 107 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 113 103 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 109 101 Rochester, NY............................... 109 99 Rockford, IL................................ 111 90 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 118 110 Salinas, CA................................. 125 118 San Antonio, TX............................. 100 94 San Diego, CA............................... 116 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 129 115 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 118 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA............................... 103 102 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 107 107 Knoxville, TN............................... 105 100 Lincoln, NE................................. 101 101 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 127 121 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 115 113 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 97 104 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 102 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 110 103 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 109 116 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 120 133 Mobile, AL.................................. 107 96 New Orleans, LA............................. 113 96 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 132 128 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 109 103 Ocala, FL................................... 100 102 Orlando, FL................................. 106 99 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 127 119 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 119 109 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 110 108 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 110 125 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 128 129 Reading, PA................................. 114 112 Reno, NV.................................... 110 111 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 112 125 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 113 109 Rochester, NY............................... 113 118 Rockford, IL................................ 115 112 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 124 129 Salinas, CA................................. 142 130 San Antonio, TX............................. 109 94 San Diego, CA............................... 128 127 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 136 138 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 116 135 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA............................... 101 97 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 110 115 Knoxville, TN............................... 114 107 Lincoln, NE................................. 93 101 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 124 123 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 108 112 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 108 101 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 111 111 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 108 112 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 126 118 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 124 122 Mobile, AL.................................. 118 108 New Orleans, LA............................. 122 107 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 124 131 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 108 109 Ocala, FL................................... 107 106 Orlando, FL................................. 115 108 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 114 124 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 123 119 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 107 114 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 121 116 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 119 124 Reading, PA................................. 116 114 Reno, NV.................................... 115 109 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 123 113 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 112 114 Rochester, NY............................... 107 111 Rockford, IL................................ 115 107 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 124 121 Salinas, CA................................. 136 121 San Antonio, TX............................. 112 104 San Diego, CA............................... 122 118 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 129 140 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 124 124 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA............................... 100 99 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 105 101 Knoxville, TN............................... 92 89 Lincoln, NE................................. 94 101 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 124 108 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 116 100 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 102 100 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 98 107 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 92 101 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 120 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 120 110 Mobile, AL.................................. 107 93 New Orleans, LA............................. 92 92 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 140 113 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 96 96 Ocala, FL................................... 86 89 Orlando, FL................................. 95 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 117 107 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 97 100 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 106 95 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 130 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 113 95 Reading, PA................................. 118 102 Reno, NV.................................... 101 106 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 116 91 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 95 102 Rochester, NY............................... 99 86 Rockford, IL................................ 123 104 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 109 115 Salinas, CA................................. 131 118 San Antonio, TX............................. 97 90 San Diego, CA............................... 112 104 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 135 113 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 123 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA............................... 94 85 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 111 100 Knoxville, TN............................... 94 103 Lincoln, NE................................. 95 92 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 105 99 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 104 96 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 100 102 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 103 96 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 103 97 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 109 105 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 120 112 Mobile, AL.................................. 100 97 New Orleans, LA............................. 97 93 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 110 115 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 94 95 Ocala, FL................................... 94 102 Orlando, FL................................. 96 102 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 112 110 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 100 105 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 101 101 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 101 100 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 111 109 Reading, PA................................. 110 107 Reno, NV.................................... 101 101 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 100 99 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 102 107 Rochester, NY............................... 104 104 Rockford, IL................................ 112 105 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 111 115 Salinas, CA................................. 109 98 San Antonio, TX............................. 104 91 San Diego, CA............................... 108 99 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 116 114 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 119 108 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 107 108 Springfield, MO............................. 99 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 110 101 Tallahassee, FL............................. 96 78 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 102 95 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 105 88 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 117 104 York, PA.................................... 107 107 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 105 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 131 121 Springfield, MO............................. 107 97 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 112 108 Tallahassee, FL............................. 102 100 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 105 101 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 114 111 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 126 120 York, PA.................................... 115 110 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 109 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 124 129 Springfield, MO............................. 102 100 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 112 115 Tallahassee, FL............................. 106 102 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 102 113 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 103 110 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 115 129 York, PA.................................... 108 110 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 111 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 121 109 Springfield, MO............................. 93 96 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 128 102 Tallahassee, FL............................. 99 86 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 105 95 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 101 95 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 112 112 York, PA.................................... 102 100 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 105 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Oklahoma City, OK metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 123 75 Springfield, MO............................. 101 93 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 109 114 Tallahassee, FL............................. 96 107 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 97 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 106 97 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 120 101 York, PA.................................... 98 101 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 110 112 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.