Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 88 77 Anchorage, AK............................... 109 110 Atlanta, GA................................. 102 104 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 96 89 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 95 90 Birmingham, AL.............................. 93 89 Bloomington, IN............................. 93 96 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 110 109 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 80 81 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 101 86 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 91 88 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 96 92 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 107 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 99 96 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 99 89 Columbus, OH................................ 99 106 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 86 86 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 98 100 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 97 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 100 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 104 100 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 97 100 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 95 89 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 102 96 Great Falls, MT............................. 88 89 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 98 101 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 96 98 Hartford, CT................................ 110 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 96 88 Honolulu, HI................................ 102 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 95 97 Huntsville, AL.............................. 94 96 Indianapolis, IN............................ 98 91 Iowa City, IA............................... 100 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 92 77 Anchorage, AK............................... 109 108 Atlanta, GA................................. 107 87 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 107 81 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 99 84 Birmingham, AL.............................. 97 90 Bloomington, IN............................. 95 83 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 114 101 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 103 69 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 98 98 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 100 76 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 99 88 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 113 95 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 105 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 105 87 Columbus, OH................................ 102 88 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 98 74 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 108 85 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 100 86 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 109 88 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 113 92 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 106 84 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 100 82 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 103 94 Great Falls, MT............................. 89 83 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 98 88 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 97 85 Hartford, CT................................ 115 108 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 102 83 Honolulu, HI................................ 114 95 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 107 78 Huntsville, AL.............................. 102 82 Indianapolis, IN............................ 104 90 Iowa City, IA............................... 106 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 85 89 Anchorage, AK............................... 100 107 Atlanta, GA................................. 95 105 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 80 99 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 95 98 Birmingham, AL.............................. 92 96 Bloomington, IN............................. 89 89 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 107 116 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 81 78 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 99 99 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 95 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 80 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 102 110 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 102 102 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 93 101 Columbus, OH................................ 111 100 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 87 86 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 101 98 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 94 92 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 97 104 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 96 103 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 92 91 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 93 96 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 106 101 Great Falls, MT............................. 85 82 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 98 100 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 86 98 Hartford, CT................................ 107 112 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 91 100 Honolulu, HI................................ 94 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 93 98 Huntsville, AL.............................. 89 96 Indianapolis, IN............................ 90 98 Iowa City, IA............................... 90 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 72 82 Anchorage, AK............................... 103 104 Atlanta, GA................................. 86 102 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 70 97 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 80 95 Birmingham, AL.............................. 71 87 Bloomington, IN............................. 70 95 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 108 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 60 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 91 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 69 84 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 81 95 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 104 107 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 74 95 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 86 104 Columbus, OH................................ 86 95 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 66 77 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 75 91 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 90 102 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 80 106 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 95 100 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 84 84 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 82 99 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 102 92 Great Falls, MT............................. 105 99 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 81 94 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 68 84 Hartford, CT................................ 99 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 70 87 Honolulu, HI................................ 90 106 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 77 93 Huntsville, AL.............................. 82 87 Indianapolis, IN............................ 81 98 Iowa City, IA............................... 88 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 99 95 Anchorage, AK............................... 122 116 Atlanta, GA................................. 104 114 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 107 95 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 103 94 Birmingham, AL.............................. 97 97 Bloomington, IN............................. 103 109 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 114 116 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 77 80 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 116 108 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 98 110 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 105 106 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 112 107 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 108 102 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 113 106 Columbus, OH................................ 103 100 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 92 89 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 94 103 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 114 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 104 107 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 124 107 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 103 115 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 106 105 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 112 105 Great Falls, MT............................. 105 88 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 106 106 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 109 102 Hartford, CT................................ 114 114 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 105 109 Honolulu, HI................................ 101 103 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 104 95 Huntsville, AL.............................. 101 95 Indianapolis, IN............................ 111 102 Iowa City, IA............................... 100 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA............................... 88 89 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 96 93 Knoxville, TN............................... 91 94 Lincoln, NE................................. 88 90 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 104 103 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 98 100 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 90 93 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 93 91 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 94 96 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 100 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 107 104 Mobile, AL.................................. 93 102 New Orleans, LA............................. 91 98 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 111 111 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 92 91 Ocala, FL................................... 89 90 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 90 96 Orlando, FL................................. 92 92 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 105 107 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 99 94 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 95 93 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 107 114 Reading, PA................................. 102 121 Reno, NV.................................... 96 91 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 101 99 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 97 98 Rochester, NY............................... 97 96 Rockford, IL................................ 100 87 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 106 106 Salinas, CA................................. 112 113 San Antonio, TX............................. 89 91 San Diego, CA............................... 104 99 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 115 110 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 106 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA............................... 94 82 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 97 85 Knoxville, TN............................... 96 80 Lincoln, NE................................. 92 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 116 97 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 104 90 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 88 83 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 93 79 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 100 82 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 99 93 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 109 107 Mobile, AL.................................. 98 77 New Orleans, LA............................. 103 77 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 121 102 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 100 83 Ocala, FL................................... 91 82 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 91 80 Orlando, FL................................. 96 79 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 116 95 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 108 87 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 100 87 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 117 104 Reading, PA................................. 104 90 Reno, NV.................................... 101 89 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 102 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 103 87 Rochester, NY............................... 103 94 Rockford, IL................................ 105 90 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 113 104 Salinas, CA................................. 129 104 San Antonio, TX............................. 99 75 San Diego, CA............................... 116 102 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 124 110 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 106 108 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA............................... 84 84 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 91 100 Knoxville, TN............................... 94 92 Lincoln, NE................................. 77 87 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 102 106 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 89 97 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 89 87 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 91 96 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 89 97 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 104 102 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 103 106 Mobile, AL.................................. 97 93 New Orleans, LA............................. 100 92 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 102 113 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 89 94 Ocala, FL................................... 88 91 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 82 86 Orlando, FL................................. 95 93 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 94 107 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 101 102 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 88 98 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 98 107 Reading, PA................................. 96 99 Reno, NV.................................... 95 94 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 101 98 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 92 98 Rochester, NY............................... 88 96 Rockford, IL................................ 94 92 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 102 104 Salinas, CA................................. 112 104 San Antonio, TX............................. 92 90 San Diego, CA............................... 101 102 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 107 121 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 102 107 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA............................... 77 95 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 81 97 Knoxville, TN............................... 71 86 Lincoln, NE................................. 72 97 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 95 103 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 89 95 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 79 96 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 75 102 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 71 97 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 92 97 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 92 106 Mobile, AL.................................. 82 89 New Orleans, LA............................. 71 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 107 108 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 73 92 Ocala, FL................................... 66 85 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 77 96 Orlando, FL................................. 73 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 90 102 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 75 96 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 81 91 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 87 91 Reading, PA................................. 90 98 Reno, NV.................................... 77 102 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 89 88 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 73 98 Rochester, NY............................... 76 82 Rockford, IL................................ 94 99 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 84 110 Salinas, CA................................. 100 113 San Antonio, TX............................. 75 86 San Diego, CA............................... 86 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 104 108 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 95 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA............................... 93 85 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 109 100 Knoxville, TN............................... 93 103 Lincoln, NE................................. 94 93 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 104 99 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 103 96 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 98 102 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 101 97 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 102 97 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 108 105 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 119 112 Mobile, AL.................................. 98 97 New Orleans, LA............................. 96 93 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 109 115 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 93 95 Ocala, FL................................... 93 102 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 99 100 Orlando, FL................................. 95 102 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 110 110 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 99 105 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 100 101 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 110 109 Reading, PA................................. 108 107 Reno, NV.................................... 100 101 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 99 99 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 101 108 Rochester, NY............................... 103 104 Rockford, IL................................ 111 105 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 109 115 Salinas, CA................................. 108 98 San Antonio, TX............................. 103 91 San Diego, CA............................... 107 99 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 115 114 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 118 108 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 96 104 Springfield, MO............................. 89 85 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 99 97 Tallahassee, FL............................. 86 75 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 91 92 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 94 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 105 100 York, PA.................................... 95 103 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 94 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 119 97 Springfield, MO............................. 97 78 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 102 86 Tallahassee, FL............................. 93 80 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 96 81 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 104 89 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 115 96 York, PA.................................... 105 88 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 100 78 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 102 111 Springfield, MO............................. 84 87 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 92 99 Tallahassee, FL............................. 87 88 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 84 98 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 85 95 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 95 111 York, PA.................................... 89 95 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 92 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 93 104 Springfield, MO............................. 71 92 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 98 97 Tallahassee, FL............................. 76 82 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 80 91 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 77 91 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 86 108 York, PA.................................... 79 96 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 81 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 122 75 Springfield, MO............................. 100 93 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 107 114 Tallahassee, FL............................. 95 107 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 96 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 104 97 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 119 101 York, PA.................................... 96 101 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 108 112 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.