Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 92 79 Anchorage, AK............................... 114 113 Atlanta, GA................................. 107 106 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 101 91 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 100 92 Birmingham, AL.............................. 98 92 Bloomington, IN............................. 98 98 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 115 112 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 84 83 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 106 88 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 95 90 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 100 94 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 112 108 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 103 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 103 92 Columbus, OH................................ 104 108 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 90 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 102 103 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 101 101 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 105 96 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 109 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 102 102 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 99 91 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 107 99 Great Falls, MT............................. 93 91 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 103 103 Hartford, CT................................ 116 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 101 91 Honolulu, HI................................ 107 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 100 99 Huntsville, AL.............................. 99 99 Indianapolis, IN............................ 103 93 Iowa City, IA............................... 104 95 Johnstown, PA............................... 92 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 95 90 Anchorage, AK............................... 112 127 Atlanta, GA................................. 110 102 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 110 96 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 102 99 Birmingham, AL.............................. 100 105 Bloomington, IN............................. 98 98 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 117 119 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 106 81 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 101 115 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 103 90 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 102 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 117 112 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 108 106 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 108 102 Columbus, OH................................ 105 103 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 101 87 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 111 100 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 103 101 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 113 103 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 116 108 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 109 98 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 103 96 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 106 110 Great Falls, MT............................. 92 98 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 101 103 Hartford, CT................................ 119 127 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 105 97 Honolulu, HI................................ 118 112 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 110 91 Huntsville, AL.............................. 105 97 Indianapolis, IN............................ 108 106 Iowa City, IA............................... 109 111 Johnstown, PA............................... 97 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 100 91 Anchorage, AK............................... 117 109 Atlanta, GA................................. 111 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 93 101 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 111 100 Birmingham, AL.............................. 107 99 Bloomington, IN............................. 104 91 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 124 118 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 94 80 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 115 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 111 98 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 94 101 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 119 113 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 119 104 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 108 104 Columbus, OH................................ 129 102 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 102 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 118 101 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 109 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 114 106 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 112 106 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 107 93 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 109 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 124 103 Great Falls, MT............................. 99 84 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 114 102 Hartford, CT................................ 125 114 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 107 102 Honolulu, HI................................ 110 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 108 100 Huntsville, AL.............................. 104 98 Indianapolis, IN............................ 106 100 Iowa City, IA............................... 105 105 Johnstown, PA............................... 98 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 105 97 Anchorage, AK............................... 151 123 Atlanta, GA................................. 126 121 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 102 114 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 117 112 Birmingham, AL.............................. 103 103 Bloomington, IN............................. 102 112 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 146 128 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 88 91 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 133 112 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 101 100 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 118 112 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 152 127 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 108 113 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 125 124 Columbus, OH................................ 125 112 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 96 91 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 109 108 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 132 121 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 117 126 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 138 118 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 123 99 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 120 117 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 150 110 Great Falls, MT............................. 154 118 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 119 112 Hartford, CT................................ 145 123 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 103 103 Honolulu, HI................................ 132 125 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 112 111 Huntsville, AL.............................. 119 103 Indianapolis, IN............................ 118 116 Iowa City, IA............................... 128 104 Johnstown, PA............................... 112 112 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 91 93 Anchorage, AK............................... 112 113 Atlanta, GA................................. 96 111 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 98 93 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 95 92 Birmingham, AL.............................. 89 95 Bloomington, IN............................. 95 107 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 105 113 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 71 78 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 106 105 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 90 108 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 97 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 103 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 99 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 104 104 Columbus, OH................................ 95 98 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 85 87 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 86 101 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 105 96 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 95 104 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 114 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 94 113 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 98 103 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 103 102 Great Falls, MT............................. 96 86 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 97 104 Hartford, CT................................ 105 111 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 97 107 Honolulu, HI................................ 93 100 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 95 93 Huntsville, AL.............................. 93 93 Indianapolis, IN............................ 102 100 Iowa City, IA............................... 92 102 Johnstown, PA............................... 85 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 100 95 Knoxville, TN............................... 95 97 Lincoln, NE................................. 92 92 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 109 105 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 103 102 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 94 96 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 97 93 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 98 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 105 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 112 107 Mobile, AL.................................. 97 104 New Orleans, LA............................. 96 101 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 116 114 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 96 93 Ocala, FL................................... 93 92 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 94 99 Orlando, FL................................. 96 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 110 110 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 103 96 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 99 95 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 105 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 112 117 Reading, PA................................. 106 123 Reno, NV.................................... 100 94 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 106 101 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 102 100 Rochester, NY............................... 102 98 Rockford, IL................................ 104 89 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 111 108 Salinas, CA................................. 117 116 San Antonio, TX............................. 93 93 San Diego, CA............................... 109 101 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 121 113 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 100 100 Knoxville, TN............................... 99 94 Lincoln, NE................................. 95 95 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 119 113 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 108 106 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 91 98 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 96 93 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 103 97 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 102 110 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 113 126 Mobile, AL.................................. 101 90 New Orleans, LA............................. 106 90 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 124 120 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 103 97 Ocala, FL................................... 94 96 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 94 94 Orlando, FL................................. 99 93 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 119 112 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 112 102 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 103 102 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 103 117 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 120 122 Reading, PA................................. 107 105 Reno, NV.................................... 104 104 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 105 117 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 106 103 Rochester, NY............................... 107 111 Rockford, IL................................ 108 106 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 116 122 Salinas, CA................................. 133 123 San Antonio, TX............................. 102 88 San Diego, CA............................... 120 119 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 128 130 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 106 102 Knoxville, TN............................... 110 94 Lincoln, NE................................. 89 89 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 119 109 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 104 99 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 104 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 107 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 104 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 121 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 120 108 Mobile, AL.................................. 113 95 New Orleans, LA............................. 117 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 119 115 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 104 97 Ocala, FL................................... 103 94 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 96 88 Orlando, FL................................. 111 95 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 109 110 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 118 105 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 103 100 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 117 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 115 110 Reading, PA................................. 112 101 Reno, NV.................................... 111 96 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 118 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 107 101 Rochester, NY............................... 103 98 Rockford, IL................................ 110 95 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 119 107 Salinas, CA................................. 131 107 San Antonio, TX............................. 108 92 San Diego, CA............................... 118 105 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 124 123 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 118 115 Knoxville, TN............................... 103 101 Lincoln, NE................................. 105 115 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 139 122 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 130 113 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 115 114 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 110 121 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 103 115 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 135 115 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 135 125 Mobile, AL.................................. 120 106 New Orleans, LA............................. 103 105 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 157 128 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 107 109 Ocala, FL................................... 97 101 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 112 114 Orlando, FL................................. 107 111 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 132 121 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 109 114 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 119 107 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 146 118 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 127 108 Reading, PA................................. 132 116 Reno, NV.................................... 113 121 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 130 104 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 107 116 Rochester, NY............................... 111 98 Rockford, IL................................ 138 118 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 123 131 Salinas, CA................................. 147 134 San Antonio, TX............................. 109 102 San Diego, CA............................... 126 118 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 152 128 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 100 98 Knoxville, TN............................... 86 101 Lincoln, NE................................. 86 90 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 96 97 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 94 94 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 90 100 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 93 94 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 94 95 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 99 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 109 110 Mobile, AL.................................. 91 95 New Orleans, LA............................. 88 91 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 100 113 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 85 93 Ocala, FL................................... 85 100 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 91 98 Orlando, FL................................. 87 100 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 101 107 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 91 102 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 92 99 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 92 98 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 101 107 Reading, PA................................. 100 104 Reno, NV.................................... 92 99 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 91 97 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 93 105 Rochester, NY............................... 95 102 Rockford, IL................................ 102 103 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 101 112 Salinas, CA................................. 99 96 San Antonio, TX............................. 95 89 San Diego, CA............................... 98 97 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 106 112 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 111 97 Springfield, MA............................. 101 107 Springfield, MO............................. 93 87 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 104 100 Tallahassee, FL............................. 90 77 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 96 94 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 99 87 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 110 102 York, PA.................................... 100 105 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 98 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 109 127 Springfield, MA............................. 123 114 Springfield, MO............................. 100 91 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 105 101 Tallahassee, FL............................. 96 94 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 99 95 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 107 105 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 119 112 York, PA.................................... 108 104 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 103 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 119 110 Springfield, MA............................. 119 114 Springfield, MO............................. 98 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 108 101 Tallahassee, FL............................. 102 90 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 99 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 99 97 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 111 114 York, PA.................................... 104 97 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 107 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 139 120 Springfield, MA............................. 136 123 Springfield, MO............................. 104 109 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 144 115 Tallahassee, FL............................. 111 98 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 118 108 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 113 108 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 125 128 York, PA.................................... 115 113 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 118 109 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 108 106 Springfield, MA............................. 112 73 Springfield, MO............................. 92 91 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 99 112 Tallahassee, FL............................. 87 104 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 88 98 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 96 95 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 109 98 York, PA.................................... 89 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 100 110 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.