Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 92 86 Anchorage, AK............................... 114 123 Atlanta, GA................................. 107 115 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 101 99 Birmingham, AL.............................. 98 99 Bloomington, IN............................. 98 106 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 116 121 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 84 90 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 106 96 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 95 98 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 100 102 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 112 117 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 103 107 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 104 99 Columbus, OH................................ 104 117 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 90 95 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 102 111 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 102 109 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 105 104 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 110 111 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 102 111 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 99 99 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 107 107 Great Falls, MT............................. 93 99 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 103 112 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 100 108 Hartford, CT................................ 116 116 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 101 98 Honolulu, HI................................ 107 109 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 100 108 Huntsville, AL.............................. 99 107 Indianapolis, IN............................ 103 101 Iowa City, IA............................... 105 103 Johnstown, PA............................... 92 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 93 91 Anchorage, AK............................... 110 129 Atlanta, GA................................. 108 103 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 108 97 Birmingham, AL.............................. 98 107 Bloomington, IN............................. 96 99 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 115 121 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 104 82 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 99 117 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 101 91 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 100 105 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 115 113 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 106 108 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 106 104 Columbus, OH................................ 103 105 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 99 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 109 101 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 102 102 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 111 105 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 114 110 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 107 99 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 101 97 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 104 112 Great Falls, MT............................. 91 99 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 99 105 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 98 101 Hartford, CT................................ 116 129 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 103 98 Honolulu, HI................................ 115 113 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 108 93 Huntsville, AL.............................. 103 98 Indianapolis, IN............................ 106 108 Iowa City, IA............................... 107 113 Johnstown, PA............................... 95 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 90 91 Anchorage, AK............................... 105 109 Atlanta, GA................................. 100 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 84 101 Birmingham, AL.............................. 96 99 Bloomington, IN............................. 93 91 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 112 118 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 85 80 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 103 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 99 98 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 84 101 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 107 113 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 107 104 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 97 104 Columbus, OH................................ 116 102 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 91 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 106 101 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 98 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 102 106 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 101 106 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 96 93 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 98 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 111 103 Great Falls, MT............................. 89 84 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 103 102 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 90 100 Hartford, CT................................ 112 115 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 96 102 Honolulu, HI................................ 99 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 97 100 Huntsville, AL.............................. 94 98 Indianapolis, IN............................ 95 100 Iowa City, IA............................... 94 105 Johnstown, PA............................... 88 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 89 86 Anchorage, AK............................... 129 110 Atlanta, GA................................. 108 107 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 87 102 Birmingham, AL.............................. 88 92 Bloomington, IN............................. 87 100 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 124 114 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 75 81 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 113 99 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 86 89 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 101 100 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 130 113 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 92 101 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 107 110 Columbus, OH................................ 107 100 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 82 81 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 93 97 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 113 108 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 100 112 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 118 105 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 106 88 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 103 104 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 128 98 Great Falls, MT............................. 132 105 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 101 100 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 86 89 Hartford, CT................................ 124 109 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 88 92 Honolulu, HI................................ 113 112 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 96 99 Huntsville, AL.............................. 102 92 Indianapolis, IN............................ 101 104 Iowa City, IA............................... 110 93 Johnstown, PA............................... 96 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 96 101 Anchorage, AK............................... 118 122 Atlanta, GA................................. 101 120 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 104 100 Birmingham, AL.............................. 94 103 Bloomington, IN............................. 100 116 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 111 123 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 75 85 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 112 114 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 95 117 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 102 112 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 109 113 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 104 108 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 110 112 Columbus, OH................................ 100 106 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 90 94 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 91 110 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 111 104 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 101 113 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 121 113 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 100 122 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 103 111 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 109 111 Great Falls, MT............................. 102 93 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 103 113 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 106 108 Hartford, CT................................ 110 120 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 102 115 Honolulu, HI................................ 98 109 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 101 101 Huntsville, AL.............................. 98 101 Indianapolis, IN............................ 108 108 Iowa City, IA............................... 97 111 Johnstown, PA............................... 90 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 101 103 Knoxville, TN............................... 95 105 Lincoln, NE................................. 92 100 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 109 114 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 103 111 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 94 104 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 98 101 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 98 106 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 105 112 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 112 116 Mobile, AL.................................. 97 113 New Orleans, LA............................. 96 109 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 116 124 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 96 101 Ocala, FL................................... 93 100 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 94 107 Orlando, FL................................. 97 102 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 110 119 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 104 104 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 100 103 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 105 111 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 112 127 Reading, PA................................. 107 134 Reno, NV.................................... 100 101 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 106 110 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 102 108 Rochester, NY............................... 102 106 Rockford, IL................................ 104 97 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 111 117 Salinas, CA................................. 117 126 San Antonio, TX............................. 94 101 San Diego, CA............................... 109 110 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 121 123 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 111 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 99 102 Knoxville, TN............................... 97 96 Lincoln, NE................................. 93 96 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 117 115 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 106 108 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 89 99 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 94 94 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 101 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 100 111 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 111 127 Mobile, AL.................................. 99 92 New Orleans, LA............................. 104 91 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 122 122 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 101 99 Ocala, FL................................... 92 97 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 92 95 Orlando, FL................................. 98 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 117 114 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 110 104 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 101 104 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 101 119 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 118 124 Reading, PA................................. 105 107 Reno, NV.................................... 102 106 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 103 119 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 104 104 Rochester, NY............................... 105 112 Rockford, IL................................ 106 107 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 114 123 Salinas, CA................................. 131 124 San Antonio, TX............................. 100 89 San Diego, CA............................... 118 121 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 126 131 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 107 129 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 95 102 Knoxville, TN............................... 99 94 Lincoln, NE................................. 80 90 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 107 109 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 93 99 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 93 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 96 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 93 99 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 109 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 108 108 Mobile, AL.................................. 102 96 New Orleans, LA............................. 105 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 107 115 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 93 97 Ocala, FL................................... 92 94 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 86 88 Orlando, FL................................. 99 95 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 98 110 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 106 105 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 92 100 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 105 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 103 110 Reading, PA................................. 100 101 Reno, NV.................................... 100 96 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 106 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 96 101 Rochester, NY............................... 92 99 Rockford, IL................................ 99 95 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 107 107 Salinas, CA................................. 118 107 San Antonio, TX............................. 97 92 San Diego, CA............................... 106 105 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 112 124 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 107 110 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 101 102 Knoxville, TN............................... 88 90 Lincoln, NE................................. 90 102 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 119 109 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 112 101 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 98 102 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 94 108 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 89 103 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 115 103 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 115 112 Mobile, AL.................................. 103 94 New Orleans, LA............................. 88 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 134 114 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 92 97 Ocala, FL................................... 83 90 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 96 101 Orlando, FL................................. 92 99 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 112 108 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 94 101 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 102 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 125 106 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 109 96 Reading, PA................................. 113 103 Reno, NV.................................... 97 108 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 111 93 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 103 Rochester, NY............................... 95 87 Rockford, IL................................ 118 105 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 105 117 Salinas, CA................................. 125 119 San Antonio, TX............................. 94 91 San Diego, CA............................... 108 106 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 130 115 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 118 107 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 106 106 Knoxville, TN............................... 90 109 Lincoln, NE................................. 91 98 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 101 105 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 100 102 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 95 108 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 98 102 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 99 103 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 105 111 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 115 119 Mobile, AL.................................. 96 102 New Orleans, LA............................. 93 98 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 105 122 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 90 101 Ocala, FL................................... 90 108 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 96 106 Orlando, FL................................. 92 108 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 107 116 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 96 111 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 97 107 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 97 106 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 106 115 Reading, PA................................. 105 113 Reno, NV.................................... 97 107 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 96 105 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 98 114 Rochester, NY............................... 100 110 Rockford, IL................................ 108 112 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 106 121 Salinas, CA................................. 105 103 San Antonio, TX............................. 100 96 San Diego, CA............................... 104 105 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 112 121 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 115 115 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 101 116 Springfield, MO............................. 93 95 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 104 108 Tallahassee, FL............................. 91 83 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 96 102 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 99 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 110 111 York, PA.................................... 100 114 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 98 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 121 115 Springfield, MO............................. 98 93 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 103 103 Tallahassee, FL............................. 94 95 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 97 97 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 105 106 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 117 114 York, PA.................................... 106 105 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 101 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 107 114 Springfield, MO............................. 88 89 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 97 101 Tallahassee, FL............................. 91 90 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 89 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 89 97 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 99 114 York, PA.................................... 93 97 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 96 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 116 110 Springfield, MO............................. 89 98 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 123 103 Tallahassee, FL............................. 95 87 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 101 96 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 97 96 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 107 114 York, PA.................................... 98 101 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 101 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 118 79 Springfield, MO............................. 97 99 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 104 121 Tallahassee, FL............................. 92 113 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 93 106 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 101 102 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 115 107 York, PA.................................... 94 107 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 105 119 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.