Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 90 77 Anchorage, AK............................... 111 110 Atlanta, GA................................. 104 103 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 98 89 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 98 90 Birmingham, AL.............................. 96 89 Bloomington, IN............................. 96 96 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 113 109 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 82 81 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 104 86 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 93 88 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 98 91 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 110 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 101 96 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 101 89 Columbus, OH................................ 102 105 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 88 85 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 99 98 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 103 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 107 100 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 99 100 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 97 89 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 105 96 Great Falls, MT............................. 91 89 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 101 101 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 98 97 Hartford, CT................................ 113 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 98 88 Honolulu, HI................................ 104 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 98 97 Huntsville, AL.............................. 96 96 Indianapolis, IN............................ 100 91 Iowa City, IA............................... 102 93 Johnstown, PA............................... 90 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 86 90 Anchorage, AK............................... 101 127 Atlanta, GA................................. 99 102 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 99 96 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 92 99 Birmingham, AL.............................. 90 106 Bloomington, IN............................. 88 98 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 106 120 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 96 82 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 91 115 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 93 90 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 92 104 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 105 112 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 98 107 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 98 103 Columbus, OH................................ 95 103 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 91 87 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 93 101 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 102 104 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 105 109 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 98 98 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 93 96 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 96 111 Great Falls, MT............................. 83 98 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 91 103 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 90 100 Hartford, CT................................ 107 128 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 95 97 Honolulu, HI................................ 106 112 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 100 92 Huntsville, AL.............................. 95 97 Indianapolis, IN............................ 97 107 Iowa City, IA............................... 98 112 Johnstown, PA............................... 87 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 84 90 Anchorage, AK............................... 99 108 Atlanta, GA................................. 94 107 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 79 101 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 94 99 Birmingham, AL.............................. 91 98 Bloomington, IN............................. 88 91 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 105 117 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 80 79 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 97 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 94 97 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 79 100 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 112 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 101 103 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 91 103 Columbus, OH................................ 109 101 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 86 87 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 92 93 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 96 105 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 95 105 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 90 93 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 92 97 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 105 102 Great Falls, MT............................. 84 83 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 97 101 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 85 99 Hartford, CT................................ 105 114 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 90 101 Honolulu, HI................................ 93 100 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 92 99 Huntsville, AL.............................. 88 97 Indianapolis, IN............................ 89 100 Iowa City, IA............................... 88 104 Johnstown, PA............................... 83 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 96 89 Anchorage, AK............................... 139 114 Atlanta, GA................................. 116 111 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 93 106 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 107 104 Birmingham, AL.............................. 95 95 Bloomington, IN............................. 93 104 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 134 118 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 81 84 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 122 103 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 92 92 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 108 104 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 140 117 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 99 104 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 115 114 Columbus, OH................................ 115 104 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 88 84 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 121 112 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 108 116 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 127 109 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 113 91 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 110 108 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 137 101 Great Falls, MT............................. 141 109 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 109 103 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 92 92 Hartford, CT................................ 133 113 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 94 95 Honolulu, HI................................ 121 116 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 103 102 Huntsville, AL.............................. 110 95 Indianapolis, IN............................ 108 107 Iowa City, IA............................... 117 96 Johnstown, PA............................... 103 104 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 105 92 Anchorage, AK............................... 130 112 Atlanta, GA................................. 111 110 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 114 92 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 110 91 Birmingham, AL.............................. 103 94 Bloomington, IN............................. 110 106 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 122 112 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 82 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 123 104 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 104 106 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 112 102 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 119 104 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 115 99 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 121 103 Columbus, OH................................ 110 97 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 98 86 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 122 95 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 110 103 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 132 103 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 109 111 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 113 102 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 119 101 Great Falls, MT............................. 112 85 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 113 103 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 116 99 Hartford, CT................................ 121 110 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 112 105 Honolulu, HI................................ 108 99 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 111 92 Huntsville, AL.............................. 108 92 Indianapolis, IN............................ 118 99 Iowa City, IA............................... 107 101 Johnstown, PA............................... 99 82 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 98 93 Knoxville, TN............................... 93 94 Lincoln, NE................................. 90 90 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 106 103 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 101 100 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 92 93 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 95 91 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 96 96 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 103 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 110 104 Mobile, AL.................................. 95 102 New Orleans, LA............................. 94 98 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 113 111 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 94 91 Ocala, FL................................... 91 90 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 92 96 Orlando, FL................................. 94 91 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 108 107 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 101 94 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 97 92 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 102 100 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 110 114 Reading, PA................................. 104 120 Reno, NV.................................... 98 91 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 103 99 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 100 97 Rochester, NY............................... 99 96 Rockford, IL................................ 102 87 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 108 106 Salinas, CA................................. 115 113 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 91 San Diego, CA............................... 106 99 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 118 110 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 108 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 90 101 Knoxville, TN............................... 89 95 Lincoln, NE................................. 86 95 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 107 114 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 97 106 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 82 98 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 86 93 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 93 97 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 92 110 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 102 126 Mobile, AL.................................. 91 91 New Orleans, LA............................. 95 90 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 112 120 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 93 97 Ocala, FL................................... 85 96 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 85 94 Orlando, FL................................. 90 93 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 108 112 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 101 103 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 93 102 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 93 118 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 108 122 Reading, PA................................. 97 106 Reno, NV.................................... 93 104 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 95 118 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 96 103 Rochester, NY............................... 96 111 Rockford, IL................................ 97 106 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 105 122 Salinas, CA................................. 120 123 San Antonio, TX............................. 92 88 San Diego, CA............................... 108 120 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 115 130 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 98 128 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 90 101 Knoxville, TN............................... 93 94 Lincoln, NE................................. 76 89 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 101 108 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 88 99 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 88 88 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 90 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 88 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 102 104 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 101 107 Mobile, AL.................................. 96 95 New Orleans, LA............................. 99 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 101 115 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 88 96 Ocala, FL................................... 87 93 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 81 88 Orlando, FL................................. 94 95 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 93 109 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 100 104 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 87 100 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 99 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 97 109 Reading, PA................................. 95 100 Reno, NV.................................... 94 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 100 99 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 100 Rochester, NY............................... 87 98 Rockford, IL................................ 93 94 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 101 106 Salinas, CA................................. 111 106 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 92 San Diego, CA............................... 100 104 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 105 123 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 101 109 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 108 106 Knoxville, TN............................... 95 94 Lincoln, NE................................. 96 106 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 128 113 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 120 104 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 105 105 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 100 112 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 95 106 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 124 106 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 124 116 Mobile, AL.................................. 110 98 New Orleans, LA............................. 95 97 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 144 118 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 99 101 Ocala, FL................................... 89 93 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 103 105 Orlando, FL................................. 98 103 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 121 112 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 100 105 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 109 99 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 134 109 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 117 100 Reading, PA................................. 121 107 Reno, NV.................................... 104 111 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 119 96 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 98 107 Rochester, NY............................... 102 90 Rockford, IL................................ 127 109 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 112 121 Salinas, CA................................. 134 124 San Antonio, TX............................. 100 94 San Diego, CA............................... 115 109 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 139 119 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 127 111 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 116 96 Knoxville, TN............................... 99 100 Lincoln, NE................................. 100 89 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 111 96 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 109 93 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 105 99 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 108 93 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 109 94 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 115 102 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 126 108 Mobile, AL.................................. 105 94 New Orleans, LA............................. 102 90 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 116 111 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 99 92 Ocala, FL................................... 99 98 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 105 97 Orlando, FL................................. 101 99 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 118 106 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 106 101 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 107 98 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 107 97 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 117 105 Reading, PA................................. 115 103 Reno, NV.................................... 106 98 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 105 96 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 107 104 Rochester, NY............................... 110 100 Rockford, IL................................ 118 102 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 117 111 Salinas, CA................................. 115 94 San Antonio, TX............................. 110 88 San Diego, CA............................... 114 96 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 122 110 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 126 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 98 104 Springfield, MO............................. 91 85 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 101 97 Tallahassee, FL............................. 88 75 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 94 92 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 97 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 108 100 York, PA.................................... 98 103 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 96 84 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 111 114 Springfield, MO............................. 90 92 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 95 102 Tallahassee, FL............................. 87 94 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 89 96 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 97 105 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 107 113 York, PA.................................... 98 104 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 93 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 101 113 Springfield, MO............................. 83 88 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 91 101 Tallahassee, FL............................. 86 89 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 83 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 84 96 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 94 113 York, PA.................................... 88 96 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 91 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 124 114 Springfield, MO............................. 96 101 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 132 107 Tallahassee, FL............................. 102 90 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 108 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 104 100 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 115 118 York, PA.................................... 105 105 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 108 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Dallas-Fort Worth, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 130 72 Springfield, MO............................. 107 90 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 114 110 Tallahassee, FL............................. 101 103 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 103 97 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 111 93 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 126 97 York, PA.................................... 103 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 116 108 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.