Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 76 70 Anchorage, AK............................... 94 100 Atlanta, GA................................. 88 94 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 83 81 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 83 82 Birmingham, AL.............................. 81 81 Bloomington, IN............................. 81 87 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 96 99 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 69 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 88 78 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 79 80 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 83 83 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 93 95 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 85 87 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 86 81 Columbus, OH................................ 86 96 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 75 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 85 91 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 84 89 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 87 84 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 91 90 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 84 90 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 82 81 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 89 87 Great Falls, MT............................. 77 81 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 85 91 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 83 88 Hartford, CT................................ 96 95 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 83 80 Honolulu, HI................................ 88 89 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 83 88 Huntsville, AL.............................. 82 87 Indianapolis, IN............................ 85 82 Iowa City, IA............................... 86 84 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 74 69 Anchorage, AK............................... 87 98 Atlanta, GA................................. 86 78 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 86 74 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 79 76 Birmingham, AL.............................. 78 81 Bloomington, IN............................. 77 75 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 91 92 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 83 63 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 79 89 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 80 69 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 79 80 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 91 86 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 85 82 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 85 79 Columbus, OH................................ 82 80 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 78 67 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 87 77 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 81 78 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 88 80 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 91 84 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 85 76 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 80 74 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 83 85 Great Falls, MT............................. 72 75 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 79 80 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 78 77 Hartford, CT................................ 92 98 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 82 75 Honolulu, HI................................ 92 86 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 86 70 Huntsville, AL.............................. 82 75 Indianapolis, IN............................ 84 82 Iowa City, IA............................... 85 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 80 73 Anchorage, AK............................... 94 88 Atlanta, GA................................. 89 87 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 75 82 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 89 81 Birmingham, AL.............................. 86 80 Bloomington, IN............................. 83 74 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 100 96 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 76 65 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 92 82 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 89 79 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 75 81 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 95 92 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 96 84 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 87 84 Columbus, OH................................ 104 83 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 82 71 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 95 82 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 88 76 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 91 86 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 90 86 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 86 76 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 87 79 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 100 83 Great Falls, MT............................. 79 68 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 92 82 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 80 81 Hartford, CT................................ 100 93 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 86 83 Honolulu, HI................................ 89 82 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 87 81 Huntsville, AL.............................. 84 79 Indianapolis, IN............................ 85 81 Iowa City, IA............................... 84 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 69 75 Anchorage, AK............................... 100 96 Atlanta, GA................................. 83 94 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 67 89 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 77 87 Birmingham, AL.............................. 68 80 Bloomington, IN............................. 67 88 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 96 99 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 58 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 87 87 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 66 78 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 78 87 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 99 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 71 88 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 83 96 Columbus, OH................................ 83 88 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 64 71 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 72 84 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 87 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 77 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 91 92 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 81 77 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 79 91 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 99 85 Great Falls, MT............................. 101 92 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 78 87 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 66 78 Hartford, CT................................ 96 96 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 68 80 Honolulu, HI................................ 87 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 74 86 Huntsville, AL.............................. 79 80 Indianapolis, IN............................ 78 90 Iowa City, IA............................... 84 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 86 84 Anchorage, AK............................... 106 101 Atlanta, GA................................. 91 100 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 93 83 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 90 83 Birmingham, AL.............................. 84 85 Bloomington, IN............................. 90 96 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 99 102 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 67 70 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 101 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 85 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 91 93 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 97 94 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 94 90 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 99 93 Columbus, OH................................ 89 88 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 80 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 82 91 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 100 86 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 90 94 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 108 94 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 89 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 93 92 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 97 92 Great Falls, MT............................. 91 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 92 93 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 95 90 Hartford, CT................................ 99 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 91 96 Honolulu, HI................................ 88 90 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 90 83 Huntsville, AL.............................. 88 84 Indianapolis, IN............................ 96 89 Iowa City, IA............................... 87 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA............................... 76 81 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 83 84 Knoxville, TN............................... 79 85 Lincoln, NE................................. 76 82 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 90 93 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 85 91 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 78 85 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 81 83 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 81 87 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 87 91 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 93 95 Mobile, AL.................................. 80 92 New Orleans, LA............................. 79 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 96 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 79 82 Ocala, FL................................... 77 81 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 78 87 Orlando, FL................................. 80 83 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 91 97 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 86 85 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 82 84 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 87 91 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 93 103 Reading, PA................................. 88 109 Reno, NV.................................... 83 83 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 87 89 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 84 88 Rochester, NY............................... 84 87 Rockford, IL................................ 86 79 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 92 96 Salinas, CA................................. 97 102 San Antonio, TX............................. 77 82 San Diego, CA............................... 90 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA............................... 76 74 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 78 77 Knoxville, TN............................... 77 73 Lincoln, NE................................. 74 73 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 93 88 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 84 82 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 71 75 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 75 71 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 81 75 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 80 85 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 88 97 Mobile, AL.................................. 79 70 New Orleans, LA............................. 83 70 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 97 93 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 80 75 Ocala, FL................................... 73 74 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 73 73 Orlando, FL................................. 78 72 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 93 86 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 87 79 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 81 79 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 80 91 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 94 94 Reading, PA................................. 84 81 Reno, NV.................................... 81 80 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 82 91 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 83 79 Rochester, NY............................... 83 86 Rockford, IL................................ 84 82 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 91 94 Salinas, CA................................. 104 95 San Antonio, TX............................. 80 68 San Diego, CA............................... 94 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA............................... 78 70 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 85 83 Knoxville, TN............................... 88 76 Lincoln, NE................................. 72 72 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 96 88 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 83 80 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 84 72 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 86 80 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 84 80 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 97 85 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 96 88 Mobile, AL.................................. 91 77 New Orleans, LA............................. 94 76 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 96 93 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 83 78 Ocala, FL................................... 83 76 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 77 72 Orlando, FL................................. 89 77 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 88 89 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 95 85 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 82 81 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 94 83 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 92 89 Reading, PA................................. 90 82 Reno, NV.................................... 89 78 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 95 81 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 86 81 Rochester, NY............................... 82 80 Rockford, IL................................ 89 77 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 96 86 Salinas, CA................................. 105 86 San Antonio, TX............................. 87 75 San Diego, CA............................... 95 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA............................... 74 87 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 78 89 Knoxville, TN............................... 68 79 Lincoln, NE................................. 69 89 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 92 95 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 86 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 76 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 72 94 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 68 90 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 89 90 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 89 97 Mobile, AL.................................. 79 82 New Orleans, LA............................. 68 82 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 104 100 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 71 85 Ocala, FL................................... 64 79 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 74 88 Orlando, FL................................. 71 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 87 94 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 72 89 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 78 84 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 96 92 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 84 84 Reading, PA................................. 87 90 Reno, NV.................................... 75 94 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 86 81 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 70 90 Rochester, NY............................... 73 76 Rockford, IL................................ 91 92 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 81 102 Salinas, CA................................. 97 104 San Antonio, TX............................. 72 79 San Diego, CA............................... 83 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA............................... 81 74 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 95 87 Knoxville, TN............................... 81 91 Lincoln, NE................................. 82 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 91 87 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 89 84 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 86 90 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 88 85 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 89 85 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 94 92 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 103 98 Mobile, AL.................................. 86 85 New Orleans, LA............................. 83 81 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 94 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 81 84 Ocala, FL................................... 81 89 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 86 88 Orlando, FL................................. 83 89 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 96 96 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 86 92 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 87 88 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 87 88 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 95 95 Reading, PA................................. 94 93 Reno, NV.................................... 87 89 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 86 87 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 88 94 Rochester, NY............................... 90 91 Rockford, IL................................ 97 92 Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 95 100 Salinas, CA................................. 94 86 San Antonio, TX............................. 90 80 San Diego, CA............................... 93 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 92 86 Springfield, MA............................. 83 94 Springfield, MO............................. 77 77 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 86 88 Tallahassee, FL............................. 75 68 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 79 83 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 82 77 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 91 90 York, PA.................................... 83 93 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 81 77 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 85 98 Springfield, MA............................. 96 88 Springfield, MO............................. 78 70 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 82 78 Tallahassee, FL............................. 75 72 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 77 74 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 84 81 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 93 87 York, PA.................................... 84 80 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 80 71 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 96 89 Springfield, MA............................. 95 92 Springfield, MO............................. 79 72 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 86 82 Tallahassee, FL............................. 82 73 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 79 81 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 80 78 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 89 92 York, PA.................................... 83 79 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 86 72 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 91 94 Springfield, MA............................. 89 96 Springfield, MO............................. 69 85 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 95 90 Tallahassee, FL............................. 73 76 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 78 84 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 74 84 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 83 99 York, PA.................................... 76 88 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 78 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 103 95 Springfield, MA............................. 106 65 Springfield, MO............................. 87 82 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 93 100 Tallahassee, FL............................. 82 94 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 84 87 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 91 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 103 88 York, PA.................................... 84 89 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 94 98 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.