Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 92 103 Anchorage, AK......................... 115 115 Atlanta, GA........................... 107 112 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 99 98 Birmingham, AL........................ 99 101 Bloomington, IN....................... 95 98 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 118 121 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 82 80 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 105 100 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 98 107 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 106 110 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 114 115 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 103 103 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 106 106 Columbus, OH.......................... 105 110 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 92 101 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 103 110 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 103 109 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 107 109 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 111 107 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 101 106 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 105 104 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 106 102 Great Falls, MT....................... 92 93 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 100 100 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 99 104 Hartford, CT.......................... 118 119 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 100 98 Honolulu, HI.......................... 110 116 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 101 110 Huntsville, AL........................ 101 104 Indianapolis, IN...................... 102 90 Iowa City, IA......................... 103 104 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89 93 Anchorage, AK......................... 106 130 Atlanta, GA........................... 108 105 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 105 96 Birmingham, AL........................ 100 109 Bloomington, IN....................... 102 97 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 114 121 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 100 82 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 96 114 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 100 93 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 98 106 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 113 115 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 104 111 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 106 105 Columbus, OH.......................... 98 108 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 99 89 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 106 103 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 97 104 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 108 106 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 110 109 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 99 103 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 100 101 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 103 112 Great Falls, MT....................... 80 101 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 100 102 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 95 104 Hartford, CT.......................... 114 128 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 94 97 Honolulu, HI.......................... 109 119 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 103 94 Huntsville, AL........................ 101 103 Indianapolis, IN...................... 103 104 Iowa City, IA......................... 101 110 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 90 90 Anchorage, AK......................... 109 109 Atlanta, GA........................... 97 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 83 99 Birmingham, AL........................ 95 99 Bloomington, IN....................... 78 91 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 106 117 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 75 79 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 105 103 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 101 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 109 106 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 106 113 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 95 101 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 95 105 Columbus, OH.......................... 106 103 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 88 87 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 103 102 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 97 95 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 104 106 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 101 109 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 95 95 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 106 105 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 109 104 Great Falls, MT....................... 88 83 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 87 100 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 91 97 Hartford, CT.......................... 109 116 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 91 99 Honolulu, HI.......................... 105 103 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 96 102 Huntsville, AL........................ 101 99 Indianapolis, IN...................... 95 102 Iowa City, IA......................... 92 104 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 94 82 Anchorage, AK......................... 143 111 Atlanta, GA........................... 106 103 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 109 98 Birmingham, AL........................ 96 99 Bloomington, IN....................... 89 85 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 142 115 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 77 79 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 126 100 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 92 82 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 105 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 142 115 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 103 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 116 103 Columbus, OH.......................... 112 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 105 81 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 103 96 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 114 107 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 104 105 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 125 98 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 125 93 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 113 105 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 121 96 Great Falls, MT....................... 135 101 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 104 99 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 94 84 Hartford, CT.......................... 130 108 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 112 92 Honolulu, HI.......................... 128 116 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 104 96 Huntsville, AL........................ 104 91 Indianapolis, IN...................... 106 96 Iowa City, IA......................... 115 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 95 101 Anchorage, AK......................... 123 120 Atlanta, GA........................... 110 117 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 105 105 Birmingham, AL........................ 93 108 Bloomington, IN....................... 104 114 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 116 121 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 81 84 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 119 111 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 108 114 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 111 109 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 111 116 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 106 109 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 112 116 Columbus, OH.......................... 103 111 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 95 94 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 97 108 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 114 114 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 110 107 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 126 118 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 105 111 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 102 122 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 108 110 Great Falls, MT....................... 103 100 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 108 114 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 112 105 Hartford, CT.......................... 119 118 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 107 111 Honolulu, HI.......................... 114 113 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 107 104 Huntsville, AL........................ 106 102 Indianapolis, IN...................... 116 108 Iowa City, IA......................... 107 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA......................... 92 95 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 104 102 Knoxville, TN......................... 97 114 Lincoln, NE........................... 93 93 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 112 116 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 102 100 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 98 93 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 100 105 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 101 117 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 107 110 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 113 112 Mobile, AL............................ 93 89 New Orleans, LA....................... 100 99 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 120 126 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 96 95 Ocala, FL............................. 95 96 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 95 96 Orlando, FL........................... 97 104 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 111 117 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 102 109 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 101 100 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 110 114 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 113 120 Reading, PA........................... 107 116 Reno, NV.............................. 103 107 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 109 106 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 103 108 Rochester, NY......................... 103 98 Rockford, IL.......................... 105 99 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 112 113 Salinas, CA........................... 119 127 San Antonio, TX....................... 94 103 San Diego, CA......................... 114 117 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA......................... 96 96 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 100 103 Knoxville, TN......................... 103 90 Lincoln, NE........................... 92 98 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 115 117 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 101 111 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 86 109 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 97 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 100 103 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 102 108 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 110 127 Mobile, AL............................ 90 90 New Orleans, LA....................... 102 98 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 122 123 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 95 102 Ocala, FL............................. 93 99 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 89 98 Orlando, FL........................... 93 101 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 113 113 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 107 103 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 102 106 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 100 120 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 117 121 Reading, PA........................... 99 108 Reno, NV.............................. 100 107 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 101 121 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 101 105 Rochester, NY......................... 103 112 Rockford, IL.......................... 102 106 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 112 120 Salinas, CA........................... 127 124 San Antonio, TX....................... 96 94 San Diego, CA......................... 116 121 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA......................... 86 87 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 97 103 Knoxville, TN......................... 98 98 Lincoln, NE........................... 86 90 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 115 110 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 99 101 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 96 92 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 105 101 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 95 100 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 102 108 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 109 107 Mobile, AL............................ 95 93 New Orleans, LA....................... 101 100 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 112 118 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 94 94 Ocala, FL............................. 93 91 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 93 93 Orlando, FL........................... 101 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 101 110 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 107 104 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 89 101 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 111 109 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 103 109 Reading, PA........................... 107 106 Reno, NV.............................. 101 103 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 105 103 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 100 102 Rochester, NY......................... 96 101 Rockford, IL.......................... 100 100 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 102 107 Salinas, CA........................... 129 115 San Antonio, TX....................... 85 95 San Diego, CA......................... 106 109 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA......................... 110 89 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 124 105 Knoxville, TN......................... 97 87 Lincoln, NE........................... 97 94 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 125 107 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 126 94 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 106 101 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 108 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 103 94 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 126 102 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 130 108 Mobile, AL............................ 107 98 New Orleans, LA....................... 102 91 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 146 115 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 99 94 Ocala, FL............................. 95 106 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 116 108 Orlando, FL........................... 104 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 122 112 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 94 100 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 110 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 131 111 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 118 108 Reading, PA........................... 116 101 Reno, NV.............................. 110 112 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 127 94 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 105 99 Rochester, NY......................... 107 89 Rockford, IL.......................... 127 104 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 117 118 Salinas, CA........................... 151 111 San Antonio, TX....................... 110 97 San Diego, CA......................... 122 108 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA......................... 90 90 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 111 106 Knoxville, TN......................... 95 105 Lincoln, NE........................... 97 100 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 106 112 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 106 103 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 112 113 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 104 106 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 103 107 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 113 117 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 124 117 Mobile, AL............................ 102 100 New Orleans, LA....................... 102 110 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 112 120 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 100 97 Ocala, FL............................. 101 113 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 95 95 Orlando, FL........................... 91 116 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 107 118 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 103 110 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 105 105 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 108 109 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 119 115 Reading, PA........................... 106 112 Reno, NV.............................. 105 111 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 105 110 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 108 110 Rochester, NY......................... 106 109 Rockford, IL.......................... 110 114 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 118 118 Salinas, CA........................... 102 113 San Antonio, TX....................... 102 94 San Diego, CA......................... 111 110 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 125 126 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 115 113 Springfield, MA....................... 115 115 Springfield, MO....................... 91 91 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 107 107 Tallahassee, FL....................... 96 89 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 100 98 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 104 111 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 113 114 York, PA.............................. 102 113 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 101 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 123 132 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 105 128 Springfield, MA....................... 116 113 Springfield, MO....................... 93 90 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 104 101 Tallahassee, FL....................... 95 103 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 96 103 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 104 109 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 113 114 York, PA.............................. 103 106 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 99 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 124 126 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 111 112 Springfield, MA....................... 114 114 Springfield, MO....................... 91 89 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 100 102 Tallahassee, FL....................... 93 94 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 99 103 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 102 101 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 107 115 York, PA.............................. 91 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 93 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 139 118 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 127 107 Springfield, MA....................... 120 110 Springfield, MO....................... 87 91 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 134 107 Tallahassee, FL....................... 100 88 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 111 94 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 106 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 114 116 York, PA.............................. 117 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 113 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Austin-San Marcos, TX metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 116 119 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 125 123 Springfield, MA....................... 116 125 Springfield, MO....................... 100 98 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 111 118 Tallahassee, FL....................... 101 102 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 99 112 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 112 106 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 115 116 York, PA.............................. 102 112 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 109 121 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.