Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 78 85 Anchorage, AK......................... 98 95 Atlanta, GA........................... 91 93 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 84 81 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 85 83 Birmingham, AL........................ 84 84 Bloomington, IN....................... 81 81 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 70 66 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 90 83 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 83 89 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 90 91 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 97 95 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 87 85 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 90 88 Columbus, OH.......................... 89 91 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 78 83 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 87 91 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 88 90 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 91 90 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 94 88 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 86 87 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 89 86 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 90 84 Great Falls, MT....................... 78 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 85 83 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 84 86 Hartford, CT.......................... 100 99 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 85 81 Honolulu, HI.......................... 94 96 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 86 91 Huntsville, AL........................ 85 86 Indianapolis, IN...................... 86 74 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 78 77 Anchorage, AK......................... 92 108 Atlanta, GA........................... 94 86 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 92 79 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 88 82 Birmingham, AL........................ 88 90 Bloomington, IN....................... 89 80 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 88 68 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 84 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 87 77 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 86 87 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 99 95 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 91 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 93 87 Columbus, OH.......................... 85 89 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 87 73 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 93 85 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 85 85 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 94 87 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 96 90 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 87 85 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 87 83 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 90 93 Great Falls, MT....................... 70 83 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 87 84 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 83 86 Hartford, CT.......................... 100 105 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 82 80 Honolulu, HI.......................... 96 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 90 77 Huntsville, AL........................ 88 85 Indianapolis, IN...................... 90 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 85 77 Anchorage, AK......................... 102 93 Atlanta, GA........................... 92 92 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 78 84 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 94 85 Birmingham, AL........................ 89 85 Bloomington, IN....................... 74 77 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 71 68 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 99 87 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 95 82 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 103 90 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 100 96 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 89 86 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 90 89 Columbus, OH.......................... 100 87 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 83 74 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 97 87 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91 81 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 98 90 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 95 93 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 90 81 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 100 89 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 103 89 Great Falls, MT....................... 83 71 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 82 85 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 86 82 Hartford, CT.......................... 102 99 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 86 84 Honolulu, HI.......................... 99 87 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 90 87 Huntsville, AL........................ 95 85 Indianapolis, IN...................... 90 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 67 71 Anchorage, AK......................... 101 96 Atlanta, GA........................... 75 89 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 77 84 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 70 87 Birmingham, AL........................ 68 86 Bloomington, IN....................... 63 74 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 54 68 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 89 87 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 65 71 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 74 85 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 100 99 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 73 85 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 81 89 Columbus, OH.......................... 79 87 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 74 70 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 72 83 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 80 92 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 74 91 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 88 85 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 88 80 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 80 91 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 85 83 Great Falls, MT....................... 95 87 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 74 86 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 66 73 Hartford, CT.......................... 92 94 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 79 79 Honolulu, HI.......................... 91 100 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 74 83 Huntsville, AL........................ 73 79 Indianapolis, IN...................... 75 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 83 83 Anchorage, AK......................... 106 99 Atlanta, GA........................... 96 96 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 91 86 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 87 82 Birmingham, AL........................ 80 89 Bloomington, IN....................... 90 94 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 70 69 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 103 91 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 94 94 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 96 89 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 96 96 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 92 90 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 97 95 Columbus, OH.......................... 89 92 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 82 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 84 89 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 99 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 95 88 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 109 98 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 91 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 88 101 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 94 91 Great Falls, MT....................... 89 83 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 94 94 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 97 86 Hartford, CT.......................... 103 97 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 92 92 Honolulu, HI.......................... 98 93 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 93 86 Huntsville, AL........................ 92 84 Indianapolis, IN...................... 100 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA......................... 88 86 Johnstown, PA......................... 78 79 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 88 85 Knoxville, TN......................... 83 94 Lincoln, NE........................... 79 77 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 95 96 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 86 83 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 83 77 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 85 87 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 86 97 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 91 91 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 96 92 Mobile, AL............................ 79 74 New Orleans, LA....................... 85 82 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 102 104 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 81 79 Ocala, FL............................. 81 80 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 81 79 Orlando, FL........................... 83 86 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 94 97 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 87 90 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 86 83 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 93 95 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 96 99 Reading, PA........................... 91 96 Reno, NV.............................. 88 89 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 92 87 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 88 89 Rochester, NY......................... 87 81 Rockford, IL.......................... 89 82 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 95 93 Salinas, CA........................... 101 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA......................... 88 90 Johnstown, PA......................... 84 79 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 88 85 Knoxville, TN......................... 90 75 Lincoln, NE........................... 81 80 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 101 97 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 88 92 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 75 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 85 81 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 88 85 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 89 89 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 97 105 Mobile, AL............................ 79 74 New Orleans, LA....................... 89 80 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 107 102 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 83 84 Ocala, FL............................. 81 81 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 78 81 Orlando, FL........................... 81 83 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 99 93 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 93 85 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 90 87 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 88 99 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 103 100 Reading, PA........................... 86 89 Reno, NV.............................. 88 88 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 88 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 88 87 Rochester, NY......................... 90 92 Rockford, IL.......................... 90 88 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 98 99 Salinas, CA........................... 112 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA......................... 87 89 Johnstown, PA......................... 81 74 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91 88 Knoxville, TN......................... 93 84 Lincoln, NE........................... 81 77 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 108 94 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 94 86 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 90 79 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 99 86 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 90 85 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 96 92 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 103 91 Mobile, AL............................ 90 79 New Orleans, LA....................... 95 85 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 106 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 88 80 Ocala, FL............................. 88 78 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 88 79 Orlando, FL........................... 95 80 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 95 94 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 101 89 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 84 86 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 104 93 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 97 93 Reading, PA........................... 101 90 Reno, NV.............................. 95 88 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 99 88 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 94 87 Rochester, NY......................... 90 86 Rockford, IL.......................... 95 85 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 96 92 Salinas, CA........................... 122 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA......................... 81 89 Johnstown, PA......................... 78 77 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 87 91 Knoxville, TN......................... 68 76 Lincoln, NE........................... 69 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 88 92 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 88 82 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 74 88 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 76 85 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 73 81 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 89 88 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 91 93 Mobile, AL............................ 75 85 New Orleans, LA....................... 72 79 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 103 99 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 70 82 Ocala, FL............................. 67 92 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 81 94 Orlando, FL........................... 73 81 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 86 97 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 66 87 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 78 83 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 92 96 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 83 94 Reading, PA........................... 82 87 Reno, NV.............................. 78 97 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 89 81 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 74 86 Rochester, NY......................... 75 77 Rockford, IL.......................... 89 90 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 83 103 Salinas, CA........................... 106 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA......................... 93 86 Johnstown, PA......................... 78 74 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 87 Knoxville, TN......................... 82 86 Lincoln, NE........................... 84 82 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 92 92 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 92 85 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 97 93 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 90 87 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 89 88 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 98 96 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 108 96 Mobile, AL............................ 89 82 New Orleans, LA....................... 88 91 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 97 99 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86 80 Ocala, FL............................. 88 93 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 82 78 Orlando, FL........................... 79 96 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 92 97 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 89 90 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 91 87 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 93 90 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 103 95 Reading, PA........................... 92 92 Reno, NV.............................. 91 91 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 91 91 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 94 90 Rochester, NY......................... 92 90 Rockford, IL.......................... 95 94 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 102 97 Salinas, CA........................... 88 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Antonio, TX....................... 80 85 San Diego, CA......................... 97 97 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 106 104 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 98 94 Springfield, MA....................... 98 95 Springfield, MO....................... 78 75 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 90 88 Tallahassee, FL....................... 81 74 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 85 81 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 88 92 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 96 94 York, PA.............................. 86 93 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 86 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Antonio, TX....................... 84 78 San Diego, CA......................... 102 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 108 109 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 92 105 Springfield, MA....................... 101 94 Springfield, MO....................... 82 74 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 91 83 Tallahassee, FL....................... 83 85 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 84 85 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 91 90 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 99 94 York, PA.............................. 90 87 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 86 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Antonio, TX....................... 80 81 San Diego, CA......................... 100 93 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 117 107 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 105 95 Springfield, MA....................... 107 97 Springfield, MO....................... 86 76 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 94 87 Tallahassee, FL....................... 87 80 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 93 88 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 96 86 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 101 98 York, PA.............................. 86 84 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 87 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Antonio, TX....................... 78 84 San Diego, CA......................... 86 93 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 98 102 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 90 93 Springfield, MA....................... 85 96 Springfield, MO....................... 62 79 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 94 93 Tallahassee, FL....................... 71 76 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 78 81 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 74 81 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 80 101 York, PA.............................. 82 86 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 80 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Antonio, TX....................... 88 77 San Diego, CA......................... 96 91 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 100 98 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 109 102 Springfield, MA....................... 100 103 Springfield, MO....................... 87 80 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 96 98 Tallahassee, FL....................... 87 84 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 86 93 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 97 87 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 100 95 York, PA.............................. 89 92 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 94 99 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.