Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81 89 Anchorage, AK......................... 101 100 Atlanta, GA........................... 94 98 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 87 86 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 88 87 Birmingham, AL........................ 87 88 Bloomington, IN....................... 83 85 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 104 105 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 72 70 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 93 88 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 86 94 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 93 95 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 90 89 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 93 92 Columbus, OH.......................... 92 96 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 81 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 90 96 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91 95 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 94 95 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 98 93 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 89 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 92 90 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 93 89 Great Falls, MT....................... 81 81 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 88 88 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 87 91 Hartford, CT.......................... 103 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 88 85 Honolulu, HI.......................... 97 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 89 96 Huntsville, AL........................ 88 91 Indianapolis, IN...................... 89 78 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 79 81 Anchorage, AK......................... 93 113 Atlanta, GA........................... 95 91 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 93 84 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 88 87 Birmingham, AL........................ 89 94 Bloomington, IN....................... 90 84 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 101 105 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 89 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 85 99 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 88 81 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 86 92 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 92 96 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 94 91 Columbus, OH.......................... 86 94 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 88 77 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 94 89 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 86 90 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 95 92 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 97 95 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 88 90 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 88 87 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 91 97 Great Falls, MT....................... 71 87 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 88 89 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 84 91 Hartford, CT.......................... 101 111 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 83 84 Honolulu, HI.......................... 97 103 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 91 81 Huntsville, AL........................ 89 89 Indianapolis, IN...................... 91 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 85 79 Anchorage, AK......................... 102 97 Atlanta, GA........................... 92 95 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 78 88 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 94 88 Birmingham, AL........................ 89 88 Bloomington, IN....................... 74 80 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 100 104 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 71 70 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 99 91 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 95 85 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 102 94 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 89 89 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 90 92 Columbus, OH.......................... 99 91 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 83 77 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 97 91 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91 84 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 98 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 95 96 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 90 84 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 100 92 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 102 92 Great Falls, MT....................... 83 74 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 81 88 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 86 85 Hartford, CT.......................... 102 102 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 86 87 Honolulu, HI.......................... 99 91 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 90 90 Huntsville, AL........................ 95 88 Indianapolis, IN...................... 90 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 66 71 Anchorage, AK......................... 101 97 Atlanta, GA........................... 75 90 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 76 85 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 70 87 Birmingham, AL........................ 68 87 Bloomington, IN....................... 63 74 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 100 101 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 54 69 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 89 88 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 65 72 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 74 86 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 73 86 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 81 90 Columbus, OH.......................... 79 88 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 74 71 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 72 84 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 80 93 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 73 92 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 88 85 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 88 81 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 80 91 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 85 84 Great Falls, MT....................... 95 88 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 73 86 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 66 74 Hartford, CT.......................... 92 95 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 79 80 Honolulu, HI.......................... 90 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 73 84 Huntsville, AL........................ 73 79 Indianapolis, IN...................... 74 84 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 86 87 Anchorage, AK......................... 111 104 Atlanta, GA........................... 100 101 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 95 90 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 90 86 Birmingham, AL........................ 83 93 Bloomington, IN....................... 94 98 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 104 105 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 73 72 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 107 95 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 98 99 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 100 94 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 96 94 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 101 100 Columbus, OH.......................... 93 96 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 86 81 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 87 93 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 103 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 99 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 114 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 94 96 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 92 105 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 98 95 Great Falls, MT....................... 93 87 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 98 98 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 101 90 Hartford, CT.......................... 107 101 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 96 96 Honolulu, HI.......................... 102 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 96 90 Huntsville, AL........................ 96 88 Indianapolis, IN...................... 104 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA......................... 91 91 Johnstown, PA......................... 81 83 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91 89 Knoxville, TN......................... 86 99 Lincoln, NE........................... 82 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 99 101 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 89 87 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 86 81 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 88 92 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 89 102 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 94 96 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 99 97 Mobile, AL............................ 82 78 New Orleans, LA....................... 88 86 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 105 110 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84 83 Ocala, FL............................. 84 84 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84 84 Orlando, FL........................... 86 91 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 97 102 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 90 95 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 89 87 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 96 100 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 100 105 Reading, PA........................... 94 101 Reno, NV.............................. 91 93 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 96 92 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91 94 Rochester, NY......................... 90 86 Rockford, IL.......................... 92 86 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 98 98 Salinas, CA........................... 105 111 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA......................... 89 95 Johnstown, PA......................... 85 83 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 88 89 Knoxville, TN......................... 91 78 Lincoln, NE........................... 82 85 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 102 102 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 89 97 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 76 94 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 86 85 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 89 90 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 90 94 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 97 110 Mobile, AL............................ 80 78 New Orleans, LA....................... 90 85 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 108 107 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84 88 Ocala, FL............................. 82 86 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 79 85 Orlando, FL........................... 82 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 100 98 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 94 89 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 90 92 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 89 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 104 105 Reading, PA........................... 87 94 Reno, NV.............................. 88 93 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 89 105 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 89 91 Rochester, NY......................... 91 97 Rockford, IL.......................... 90 92 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 99 104 Salinas, CA........................... 113 107 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA......................... 87 92 Johnstown, PA......................... 81 77 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91 91 Knoxville, TN......................... 93 87 Lincoln, NE........................... 80 79 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 108 97 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 93 89 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 90 81 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 98 89 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 90 88 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 96 95 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 103 94 Mobile, AL............................ 89 82 New Orleans, LA....................... 95 88 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 105 104 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 88 83 Ocala, FL............................. 87 81 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 87 82 Orlando, FL........................... 95 83 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 95 97 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 100 92 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 84 89 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 104 96 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 97 97 Reading, PA........................... 100 93 Reno, NV.............................. 95 91 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 99 91 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 94 90 Rochester, NY......................... 90 89 Rockford, IL.......................... 94 88 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 96 95 Salinas, CA........................... 122 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA......................... 81 89 Johnstown, PA......................... 77 78 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 87 92 Knoxville, TN......................... 68 76 Lincoln, NE........................... 68 82 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 88 93 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 88 82 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 74 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 76 86 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 73 82 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 88 89 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 91 94 Mobile, AL............................ 75 86 New Orleans, LA....................... 72 80 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 103 100 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 70 82 Ocala, FL............................. 67 93 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 81 94 Orlando, FL........................... 73 82 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 85 98 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 66 88 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 77 84 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 92 97 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 83 94 Reading, PA........................... 82 88 Reno, NV.............................. 77 97 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 89 82 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 74 87 Rochester, NY......................... 75 78 Rockford, IL.......................... 89 91 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 83 103 Salinas, CA........................... 106 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA......................... 97 90 Johnstown, PA......................... 81 77 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 100 91 Knoxville, TN......................... 85 90 Lincoln, NE........................... 87 86 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 95 97 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 96 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 101 97 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 94 91 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 93 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 102 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 112 101 Mobile, AL............................ 92 86 New Orleans, LA....................... 92 95 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 101 103 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 90 84 Ocala, FL............................. 91 97 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 85 82 Orlando, FL........................... 82 100 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 96 102 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 93 95 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 95 91 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 97 94 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 107 99 Reading, PA........................... 96 96 Reno, NV.............................. 95 96 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 94 95 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 98 94 Rochester, NY......................... 96 94 Rockford, IL.......................... 99 98 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 107 102 Salinas, CA........................... 92 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Antonio, TX....................... 82 89 San Diego, CA......................... 100 102 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 110 109 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 101 99 Springfield, MA....................... 101 100 Springfield, MO....................... 80 79 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 94 93 Tallahassee, FL....................... 84 78 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 88 86 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 91 97 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 99 99 York, PA.............................. 89 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 89 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Antonio, TX....................... 85 82 San Diego, CA......................... 103 105 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 109 114 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 92 111 Springfield, MA....................... 102 98 Springfield, MO....................... 82 78 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 92 88 Tallahassee, FL....................... 84 90 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 85 89 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 92 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 100 99 York, PA.............................. 91 92 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 87 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Antonio, TX....................... 79 84 San Diego, CA......................... 100 96 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 116 111 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 105 99 Springfield, MA....................... 107 101 Springfield, MO....................... 86 79 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 94 90 Tallahassee, FL....................... 87 83 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 93 91 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 96 89 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 100 102 York, PA.............................. 85 87 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 87 84 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Antonio, TX....................... 78 85 San Diego, CA......................... 86 94 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 98 103 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 89 93 Springfield, MA....................... 84 96 Springfield, MO....................... 61 80 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 94 94 Tallahassee, FL....................... 71 76 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 78 82 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 74 82 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 80 102 York, PA.............................. 82 86 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 80 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Antonio, TX....................... 92 81 San Diego, CA......................... 100 95 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 104 102 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 113 106 Springfield, MA....................... 104 108 Springfield, MO....................... 90 84 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 100 102 Tallahassee, FL....................... 91 88 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 90 97 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 101 91 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 104 100 York, PA.............................. 92 97 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 98 104 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.