Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Great Falls, MT....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 100 110 Anchorage, AK......................... 125 123 Atlanta, GA........................... 116 120 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 108 105 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 109 107 Birmingham, AL........................ 108 108 Bloomington, IN....................... 103 104 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 128 129 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 89 86 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 115 107 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 107 115 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 115 117 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 124 123 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 112 110 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 115 113 Columbus, OH.......................... 114 118 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 100 108 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 112 117 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 112 116 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 116 117 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 121 114 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 110 113 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 114 111 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 115 109 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 109 108 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 108 111 Hartford, CT.......................... 128 128 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 108 104 Honolulu, HI.......................... 120 124 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 110 118 Huntsville, AL........................ 109 111 Indianapolis, IN...................... 111 96 Iowa City, IA......................... 112 111 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Great Falls, MT....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 112 93 Anchorage, AK......................... 132 130 Atlanta, GA........................... 135 104 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 132 96 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 125 99 Birmingham, AL........................ 126 108 Bloomington, IN....................... 128 96 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 143 120 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 126 82 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 120 113 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 125 92 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 122 105 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 142 114 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 130 110 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 133 104 Columbus, OH.......................... 122 107 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 124 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 133 102 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 122 103 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 135 105 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 138 108 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 124 103 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 125 100 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 128 112 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 125 101 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 119 104 Hartford, CT.......................... 143 127 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 118 96 Honolulu, HI.......................... 137 118 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 129 93 Huntsville, AL........................ 126 102 Indianapolis, IN...................... 129 104 Iowa City, IA......................... 126 109 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Great Falls, MT....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 102 108 Anchorage, AK......................... 123 131 Atlanta, GA........................... 111 130 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 94 119 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 113 120 Birmingham, AL........................ 107 119 Bloomington, IN....................... 89 109 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 120 141 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 85 95 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 119 123 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 115 116 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 124 127 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 121 136 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 107 121 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 108 126 Columbus, OH.......................... 120 123 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 100 105 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 117 123 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 110 114 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 118 127 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 115 131 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 108 114 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 120 126 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 124 125 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 98 120 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 103 116 Hartford, CT.......................... 123 139 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 104 118 Honolulu, HI.......................... 119 123 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 108 122 Huntsville, AL........................ 114 119 Indianapolis, IN...................... 108 122 Iowa City, IA......................... 105 125 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Great Falls, MT....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 70 81 Anchorage, AK......................... 106 111 Atlanta, GA........................... 78 102 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 80 97 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 74 99 Birmingham, AL........................ 71 99 Bloomington, IN....................... 66 85 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 105 115 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 57 78 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 93 100 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 68 82 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 78 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 105 114 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 76 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 85 102 Columbus, OH.......................... 83 100 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 78 80 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 76 95 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 84 106 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 77 105 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 93 97 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 92 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 84 104 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 89 96 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 77 98 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 69 84 Hartford, CT.......................... 96 108 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 83 91 Honolulu, HI.......................... 95 115 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 77 95 Huntsville, AL........................ 77 90 Indianapolis, IN...................... 78 95 Iowa City, IA......................... 85 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Great Falls, MT....................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 93 101 Anchorage, AK......................... 119 120 Atlanta, GA........................... 107 116 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 102 104 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 97 100 Birmingham, AL........................ 90 107 Bloomington, IN....................... 101 113 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 112 121 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 79 83 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 116 110 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 105 114 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 108 108 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 108 115 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 103 108 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 109 115 Columbus, OH.......................... 100 111 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 92 94 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 94 108 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 111 114 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 107 107 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 122 118 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 102 111 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 99 121 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 105 110 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 105 113 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 109 104 Hartford, CT.......................... 116 117 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 104 111 Honolulu, HI.......................... 110 113 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 104 104 Huntsville, AL........................ 103 102 Indianapolis, IN...................... 113 108 Iowa City, IA......................... 105 104 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA......................... 100 102 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 113 110 Knoxville, TN......................... 106 122 Lincoln, NE........................... 102 100 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 122 125 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 110 107 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 106 100 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 109 113 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 110 126 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 117 118 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 123 120 Mobile, AL............................ 101 96 New Orleans, LA....................... 109 106 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 130 135 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 104 102 Ocala, FL............................. 103 103 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 104 103 Orlando, FL........................... 106 111 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 121 125 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 111 117 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 110 107 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 119 122 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 123 129 Reading, PA........................... 116 124 Reno, NV.............................. 112 115 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 118 113 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 112 116 Rochester, NY......................... 112 105 Rockford, IL.......................... 114 106 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 122 121 Salinas, CA........................... 130 136 San Antonio, TX....................... 102 110 San Diego, CA......................... 124 125 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA......................... 120 95 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 125 102 Knoxville, TN......................... 129 90 Lincoln, NE........................... 116 97 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 144 116 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 126 110 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 108 108 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 122 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 125 102 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 128 107 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 138 126 Mobile, AL............................ 113 89 New Orleans, LA....................... 127 97 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 153 122 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 118 101 Ocala, FL............................. 116 98 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 112 97 Orlando, FL........................... 116 100 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 142 112 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 134 102 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 128 105 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 125 119 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 147 120 Reading, PA........................... 124 108 Reno, NV.............................. 125 106 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 126 120 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 126 105 Rochester, NY......................... 129 111 Rockford, IL.......................... 128 106 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 141 119 Salinas, CA........................... 159 123 San Antonio, TX....................... 120 93 San Diego, CA......................... 146 120 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA......................... 98 105 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 110 124 Knoxville, TN......................... 112 118 Lincoln, NE........................... 97 108 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 131 132 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 113 121 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 109 111 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 119 121 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 108 120 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 116 130 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 124 128 Mobile, AL............................ 108 112 New Orleans, LA....................... 115 120 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 127 142 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 106 113 Ocala, FL............................. 105 110 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 105 111 Orlando, FL........................... 115 112 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 114 132 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 121 125 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 101 121 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 126 131 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 117 131 Reading, PA........................... 121 127 Reno, NV.............................. 115 124 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 119 124 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 113 123 Rochester, NY......................... 109 121 Rockford, IL.......................... 114 120 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 116 129 Salinas, CA........................... 147 139 San Antonio, TX....................... 96 114 San Diego, CA......................... 121 131 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA......................... 81 88 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 92 104 Knoxville, TN......................... 72 87 Lincoln, NE........................... 72 93 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 93 106 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 93 94 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 78 101 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 80 98 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 76 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 93 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 96 107 Mobile, AL............................ 79 97 New Orleans, LA....................... 76 91 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 108 114 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 73 94 Ocala, FL............................. 70 106 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 85 108 Orlando, FL........................... 77 93 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 90 112 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 69 100 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 81 95 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 97 110 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 87 108 Reading, PA........................... 86 100 Reno, NV.............................. 81 111 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 94 93 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 78 99 Rochester, NY......................... 79 89 Rockford, IL.......................... 94 104 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 87 118 Salinas, CA........................... 111 110 San Antonio, TX....................... 82 97 San Diego, CA......................... 90 107 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA......................... 88 89 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 108 106 Knoxville, TN......................... 92 104 Lincoln, NE........................... 94 100 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 103 111 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 103 102 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 109 112 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 101 105 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 101 107 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 110 116 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 121 117 Mobile, AL............................ 99 99 New Orleans, LA....................... 99 109 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 109 120 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 97 97 Ocala, FL............................. 98 112 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 92 95 Orlando, FL........................... 89 116 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 104 117 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 100 109 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 102 105 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 105 109 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 116 115 Reading, PA........................... 103 111 Reno, NV.............................. 102 110 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 102 109 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 105 109 Rochester, NY......................... 103 109 Rockford, IL.......................... 107 113 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 115 118 Salinas, CA........................... 99 113 San Antonio, TX....................... 99 93 San Diego, CA......................... 108 110 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 136 134 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 125 121 Springfield, MA....................... 125 123 Springfield, MO....................... 99 97 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 116 114 Tallahassee, FL....................... 104 95 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 109 105 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 113 119 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 123 122 York, PA.............................. 110 120 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 110 113 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 154 131 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 131 127 Springfield, MA....................... 145 113 Springfield, MO....................... 117 89 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 131 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 119 103 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 120 102 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 130 108 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 142 113 York, PA.............................. 129 105 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 123 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 140 151 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 126 134 Springfield, MA....................... 129 137 Springfield, MO....................... 103 107 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 113 123 Tallahassee, FL....................... 105 113 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 112 124 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 116 121 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 121 139 York, PA.............................. 103 118 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 105 115 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 103 117 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 94 106 Springfield, MA....................... 89 110 Springfield, MO....................... 65 91 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 99 107 Tallahassee, FL....................... 74 87 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 82 93 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 78 93 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 84 116 York, PA.............................. 86 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 84 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Great Falls, MT metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 112 118 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 122 123 Springfield, MA....................... 112 125 Springfield, MO....................... 97 97 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 108 118 Tallahassee, FL....................... 98 102 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 97 112 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 109 105 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 112 115 York, PA.............................. 99 112 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 106 120 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.