Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 82 92 Anchorage, AK......................... 102 103 Atlanta, GA........................... 95 100 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 88 88 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 88 89 Birmingham, AL........................ 88 90 Bloomington, IN....................... 84 87 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 104 108 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 72 72 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 93 90 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 87 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 94 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 101 103 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 91 92 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 93 95 Columbus, OH.......................... 93 99 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 81 90 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 91 98 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91 97 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 95 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 98 96 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 89 95 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 93 93 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 94 91 Great Falls, MT....................... 81 84 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 89 90 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 87 93 Hartford, CT.......................... 104 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 88 87 Honolulu, HI.......................... 97 104 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 89 98 Huntsville, AL........................ 89 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81 74 Anchorage, AK......................... 96 103 Atlanta, GA........................... 98 82 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 96 76 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 91 79 Birmingham, AL........................ 91 86 Bloomington, IN....................... 92 77 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 104 96 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 91 65 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 87 90 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 90 73 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 89 83 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 103 91 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 94 87 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 96 83 Columbus, OH.......................... 88 85 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 90 70 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 96 81 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 88 82 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 98 84 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 100 86 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 90 81 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 91 79 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 93 88 Great Falls, MT....................... 72 79 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 90 80 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 86 82 Hartford, CT.......................... 104 101 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 85 76 Honolulu, HI.......................... 99 93 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 94 74 Huntsville, AL........................ 92 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 82 84 Anchorage, AK......................... 99 102 Atlanta, GA........................... 89 101 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 76 93 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 92 94 Birmingham, AL........................ 87 93 Bloomington, IN....................... 72 85 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 97 110 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 69 74 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 96 96 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 93 90 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 100 99 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 97 106 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 87 95 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 87 98 Columbus, OH.......................... 97 96 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 80 82 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 94 96 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 89 89 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 95 99 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 92 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 87 89 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 97 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 100 97 Great Falls, MT....................... 81 78 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 79 94 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 83 90 Hartford, CT.......................... 99 109 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 84 92 Honolulu, HI.......................... 96 96 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 87 95 Huntsville, AL........................ 92 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 73 76 Anchorage, AK......................... 110 103 Atlanta, GA........................... 82 96 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 84 91 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 77 93 Birmingham, AL........................ 74 92 Bloomington, IN....................... 69 79 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 109 107 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 59 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 98 93 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 71 76 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 81 91 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 110 106 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 80 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 89 95 Columbus, OH.......................... 86 93 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 81 75 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 79 89 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 88 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 81 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 97 91 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 96 86 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 87 97 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 93 89 Great Falls, MT....................... 104 93 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 81 92 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 72 78 Hartford, CT.......................... 101 101 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 87 85 Honolulu, HI.......................... 99 108 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 81 89 Huntsville, AL........................ 80 84 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 77 86 Anchorage, AK......................... 98 103 Atlanta, GA........................... 89 100 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 84 89 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 80 85 Birmingham, AL........................ 74 92 Bloomington, IN....................... 84 97 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 93 104 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 65 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 96 95 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 87 98 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 89 93 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 89 99 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 86 93 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 90 99 Columbus, OH.......................... 83 95 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 76 81 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 78 92 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 92 98 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 88 92 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 101 101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 84 95 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 82 104 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 87 94 Great Falls, MT....................... 83 86 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 87 97 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 90 89 Hartford, CT.......................... 96 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 86 95 Honolulu, HI.......................... 91 97 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 86 89 Huntsville, AL........................ 85 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis, IN...................... 90 80 Iowa City, IA......................... 91 93 Johnstown, PA......................... 81 85 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 92 92 Knoxville, TN......................... 86 102 Lincoln, NE........................... 83 84 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 99 104 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 90 90 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 86 83 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 88 94 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 90 105 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 95 99 Mobile, AL............................ 82 80 New Orleans, LA....................... 88 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 106 113 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 85 85 Ocala, FL............................. 84 86 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84 86 Orlando, FL........................... 86 93 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 98 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 90 98 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 90 90 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 97 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 100 108 Reading, PA........................... 95 103 Reno, NV.............................. 91 96 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 96 94 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91 97 Rochester, NY......................... 91 88 Rockford, IL.......................... 93 89 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 99 101 Salinas, CA........................... 105 114 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Indianapolis, IN...................... 93 82 Iowa City, IA......................... 91 86 Johnstown, PA......................... 87 75 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91 81 Knoxville, TN......................... 94 71 Lincoln, NE........................... 84 77 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 104 92 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 91 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 78 85 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 88 77 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 91 81 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 92 85 Mobile, AL............................ 82 71 New Orleans, LA....................... 92 77 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 111 97 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86 80 Ocala, FL............................. 84 78 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 81 77 Orlando, FL........................... 84 79 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 103 89 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 97 81 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 93 83 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 91 95 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 106 95 Reading, PA........................... 90 85 Reno, NV.............................. 91 84 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 91 95 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91 83 Rochester, NY......................... 93 88 Rockford, IL.......................... 93 84 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 102 94 Salinas, CA........................... 115 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis, IN...................... 87 95 Iowa City, IA......................... 84 98 Johnstown, PA......................... 79 82 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 89 96 Knoxville, TN......................... 90 92 Lincoln, NE........................... 78 84 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 105 103 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 91 95 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 88 86 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 96 94 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 87 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 94 101 Mobile, AL............................ 87 87 New Orleans, LA....................... 93 93 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 103 110 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86 88 Ocala, FL............................. 85 86 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 85 87 Orlando, FL........................... 93 88 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 92 103 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 98 98 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 82 94 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 101 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 94 102 Reading, PA........................... 98 99 Reno, NV.............................. 93 96 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 96 97 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91 95 Rochester, NY......................... 88 95 Rockford, IL.......................... 92 94 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 93 100 Salinas, CA........................... 118 108 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis, IN...................... 82 89 Iowa City, IA......................... 89 95 Johnstown, PA......................... 85 83 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 75 81 Lincoln, NE........................... 75 87 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 97 99 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 97 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 81 94 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 83 91 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 80 87 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 97 95 Mobile, AL............................ 83 91 New Orleans, LA....................... 79 85 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 113 106 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 77 88 Ocala, FL............................. 73 99 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 89 100 Orlando, FL........................... 80 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 94 104 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 72 93 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 85 89 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 101 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 91 100 Reading, PA........................... 90 93 Reno, NV.............................. 85 104 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 98 87 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 81 92 Rochester, NY......................... 83 83 Rockford, IL.......................... 98 97 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 91 110 Salinas, CA........................... 116 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Indianapolis, IN...................... 93 92 Iowa City, IA......................... 86 90 Johnstown, PA......................... 72 77 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 90 91 Knoxville, TN......................... 76 89 Lincoln, NE........................... 78 85 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 85 96 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 85 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 90 96 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 83 90 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 83 92 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 91 100 Mobile, AL............................ 82 85 New Orleans, LA....................... 82 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 90 103 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 80 83 Ocala, FL............................. 81 96 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 76 81 Orlando, FL........................... 73 99 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 86 101 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 83 94 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 85 90 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 86 93 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 96 98 Reading, PA........................... 85 96 Reno, NV.............................. 84 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 84 94 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 87 94 Rochester, NY......................... 86 93 Rockford, IL.......................... 88 97 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 95 101 Salinas, CA........................... 82 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Antonio, TX....................... 83 92 San Diego, CA......................... 101 105 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 111 112 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 101 101 Springfield, MA....................... 101 103 Springfield, MO....................... 81 81 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 94 95 Tallahassee, FL....................... 85 80 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 88 88 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 92 100 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 100 102 York, PA.............................. 90 101 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 90 95 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Antonio, TX....................... 87 74 San Diego, CA......................... 106 95 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 112 104 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 95 100 Springfield, MA....................... 105 89 Springfield, MO....................... 84 71 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 95 80 Tallahassee, FL....................... 86 81 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 87 81 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 94 86 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 103 90 York, PA.............................. 94 83 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 89 77 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Antonio, TX....................... 77 89 San Diego, CA......................... 97 102 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 113 118 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 102 104 Springfield, MA....................... 104 107 Springfield, MO....................... 83 84 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 91 96 Tallahassee, FL....................... 85 88 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 90 97 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 93 94 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 98 108 York, PA.............................. 83 92 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 85 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Antonio, TX....................... 85 90 San Diego, CA......................... 94 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 107 110 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 98 99 Springfield, MA....................... 93 102 Springfield, MO....................... 68 85 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 103 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 77 81 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 85 87 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 81 87 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 88 108 York, PA.............................. 90 92 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 88 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Antonio, TX....................... 82 80 San Diego, CA......................... 90 94 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 93 101 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 101 105 Springfield, MA....................... 93 107 Springfield, MO....................... 80 83 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 89 101 Tallahassee, FL....................... 81 87 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 80 96 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 90 91 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 93 99 York, PA.............................. 82 96 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 88 103 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.