Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 84 90 Anchorage, AK......................... 105 100 Atlanta, GA........................... 98 98 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 90 86 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 91 87 Birmingham, AL........................ 90 88 Bloomington, IN....................... 87 85 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 107 106 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 75 70 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 96 88 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 89 94 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 97 96 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 104 100 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 94 90 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 96 93 Columbus, OH.......................... 95 96 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 84 88 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 94 96 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 94 95 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 97 95 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 101 93 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 92 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 96 91 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 97 89 Great Falls, MT....................... 84 82 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 91 88 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 90 91 Hartford, CT.......................... 107 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 91 85 Honolulu, HI.......................... 100 101 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 92 96 Huntsville, AL........................ 92 91 Indianapolis, IN...................... 93 79 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89 78 Anchorage, AK......................... 105 109 Atlanta, GA........................... 108 87 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 105 80 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 100 83 Birmingham, AL........................ 100 90 Bloomington, IN....................... 102 81 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 114 101 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 100 68 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 96 95 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 99 77 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 97 88 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 113 96 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 104 92 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 106 87 Columbus, OH.......................... 97 90 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 99 74 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 106 86 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 97 86 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 107 88 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 110 91 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 99 86 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 100 84 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 102 93 Great Falls, MT....................... 80 84 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 99 85 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 95 87 Hartford, CT.......................... 114 106 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 94 80 Honolulu, HI.......................... 109 99 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 103 78 Huntsville, AL........................ 101 85 Indianapolis, IN...................... 103 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81 83 Anchorage, AK......................... 98 101 Atlanta, GA........................... 88 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 75 91 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 90 92 Birmingham, AL........................ 86 91 Bloomington, IN....................... 71 83 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 96 108 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 68 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 95 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 91 89 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 98 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 96 104 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 85 93 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 86 96 Columbus, OH.......................... 96 94 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 79 80 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 93 94 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 87 87 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 94 97 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 91 100 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 86 87 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 96 96 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 98 95 Great Falls, MT....................... 80 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 78 92 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 82 89 Hartford, CT.......................... 98 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 83 91 Honolulu, HI.......................... 95 94 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 86 93 Huntsville, AL........................ 91 91 Indianapolis, IN...................... 86 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 72 74 Anchorage, AK......................... 110 100 Atlanta, GA........................... 81 93 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 83 88 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 77 90 Birmingham, AL........................ 74 90 Bloomington, IN....................... 68 77 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 109 104 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 59 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 97 90 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 70 74 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 80 89 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 109 103 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 79 89 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 88 93 Columbus, OH.......................... 85 91 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 81 73 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 78 86 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 87 96 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 80 95 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 96 88 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 96 84 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 87 94 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 92 87 Great Falls, MT....................... 104 91 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 80 89 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 72 76 Hartford, CT.......................... 100 98 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 86 83 Honolulu, HI.......................... 98 105 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 80 86 Huntsville, AL........................ 79 82 Indianapolis, IN...................... 81 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89 92 Anchorage, AK......................... 114 110 Atlanta, GA........................... 103 107 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 98 96 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 93 92 Birmingham, AL........................ 86 99 Bloomington, IN....................... 97 104 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 107 111 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 75 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 111 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 101 105 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 103 99 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 103 106 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 99 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 104 106 Columbus, OH.......................... 95 102 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 88 86 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 90 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 106 105 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 102 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 117 108 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 97 102 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 95 112 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 101 101 Great Falls, MT....................... 96 92 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 101 104 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 104 96 Hartford, CT.......................... 111 108 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 99 102 Honolulu, HI.......................... 106 104 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 99 95 Huntsville, AL........................ 99 93 Indianapolis, IN...................... 108 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Iowa City, IA......................... 94 91 Johnstown, PA......................... 84 83 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 95 90 Knoxville, TN......................... 89 99 Lincoln, NE........................... 85 82 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 102 102 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 92 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 89 81 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 91 92 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 92 103 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 98 96 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 103 98 Mobile, AL............................ 85 78 New Orleans, LA....................... 91 87 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 109 110 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 87 83 Ocala, FL............................. 87 84 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 87 84 Orlando, FL........................... 89 91 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 101 102 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 93 95 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 92 88 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 103 105 Reading, PA........................... 97 101 Reno, NV.............................. 94 94 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 99 92 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 94 94 Rochester, NY......................... 93 86 Rockford, IL.......................... 96 87 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 102 98 Salinas, CA........................... 109 111 San Antonio, TX....................... 85 90 San Diego, CA......................... 104 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Iowa City, IA......................... 101 91 Johnstown, PA......................... 96 80 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 100 85 Knoxville, TN......................... 103 75 Lincoln, NE........................... 92 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 115 97 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 101 93 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 86 90 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 97 82 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 100 86 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 102 90 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 110 106 Mobile, AL............................ 90 75 New Orleans, LA....................... 102 81 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 122 102 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 94 85 Ocala, FL............................. 92 82 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 89 82 Orlando, FL........................... 93 84 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 113 94 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 106 86 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 102 88 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 117 101 Reading, PA........................... 99 90 Reno, NV.............................. 100 89 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 100 101 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 100 88 Rochester, NY......................... 103 93 Rockford, IL.......................... 102 88 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 112 100 Salinas, CA........................... 127 103 San Antonio, TX....................... 95 78 San Diego, CA......................... 116 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Iowa City, IA......................... 83 96 Johnstown, PA......................... 78 80 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 87 95 Knoxville, TN......................... 89 90 Lincoln, NE........................... 77 83 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 104 101 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 90 93 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 87 85 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 94 93 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 86 92 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 92 99 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 99 98 Mobile, AL............................ 86 86 New Orleans, LA....................... 91 92 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 101 108 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 85 87 Ocala, FL............................. 84 84 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84 85 Orlando, FL........................... 91 86 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 91 101 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 97 96 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 81 92 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 93 100 Reading, PA........................... 96 97 Reno, NV.............................. 91 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 95 95 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 90 94 Rochester, NY......................... 87 93 Rockford, IL.......................... 91 92 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 92 99 Salinas, CA........................... 117 106 San Antonio, TX....................... 76 87 San Diego, CA......................... 96 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Iowa City, IA......................... 88 92 Johnstown, PA......................... 84 80 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 95 95 Knoxville, TN......................... 74 79 Lincoln, NE........................... 74 84 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 96 96 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 96 85 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 81 92 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 82 89 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 79 85 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 96 92 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 99 97 Mobile, AL............................ 82 88 New Orleans, LA....................... 78 82 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 112 103 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 76 85 Ocala, FL............................. 72 96 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 88 97 Orlando, FL........................... 79 84 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 93 101 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 72 91 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 84 87 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 91 98 Reading, PA........................... 89 91 Reno, NV.............................. 84 101 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 97 85 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 80 89 Rochester, NY......................... 82 81 Rockford, IL.......................... 97 94 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 90 107 Salinas, CA........................... 115 100 San Antonio, TX....................... 84 88 San Diego, CA......................... 94 97 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Iowa City, IA......................... 100 96 Johnstown, PA......................... 84 82 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 104 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 88 96 Lincoln, NE........................... 90 92 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 98 102 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 99 94 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 104 103 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 97 97 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 96 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 105 107 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 116 107 Mobile, AL............................ 95 91 New Orleans, LA....................... 95 101 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 104 110 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 93 89 Ocala, FL............................. 94 103 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 88 87 Orlando, FL........................... 85 106 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 99 108 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 96 100 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 98 96 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 111 106 Reading, PA........................... 99 102 Reno, NV.............................. 97 101 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 97 101 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 101 100 Rochester, NY......................... 99 100 Rockford, IL.......................... 102 104 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 110 108 Salinas, CA........................... 95 104 San Antonio, TX....................... 95 86 San Diego, CA......................... 104 101 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 114 110 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 105 99 Springfield, MA....................... 105 100 Springfield, MO....................... 83 79 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 97 93 Tallahassee, FL....................... 87 78 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 91 86 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 95 97 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 103 99 York, PA.............................. 93 98 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 92 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 123 110 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 104 106 Springfield, MA....................... 115 94 Springfield, MO....................... 93 75 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 104 84 Tallahassee, FL....................... 95 86 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 96 85 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 104 91 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 113 95 York, PA.............................. 103 88 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 98 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 112 116 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 101 103 Springfield, MA....................... 103 105 Springfield, MO....................... 82 82 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 90 94 Tallahassee, FL....................... 84 86 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 89 95 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 92 92 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 96 106 York, PA.............................. 82 90 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 84 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 106 106 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 97 96 Springfield, MA....................... 92 99 Springfield, MO....................... 67 82 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 103 97 Tallahassee, FL....................... 77 79 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 85 85 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 81 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 87 105 York, PA.............................. 89 89 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 87 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Portland-Salem, OR-WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 108 109 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 117 113 Springfield, MA....................... 107 115 Springfield, MO....................... 93 89 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 103 108 Tallahassee, FL....................... 94 93 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 92 103 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 104 97 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 107 106 York, PA.............................. 95 103 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 101 110 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.