Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81 85 Anchorage, AK......................... 101 95 Atlanta, GA........................... 94 93 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 87 82 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 88 83 Birmingham, AL........................ 87 84 Bloomington, IN....................... 84 81 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 104 101 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 72 67 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 93 83 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 86 89 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 93 91 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 100 95 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 91 85 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 93 88 Columbus, OH.......................... 92 92 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 81 84 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 91 91 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91 90 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 94 91 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 98 89 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 89 88 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 92 86 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 93 85 Great Falls, MT....................... 81 78 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 88 84 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 87 87 Hartford, CT.......................... 104 99 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 88 81 Honolulu, HI.......................... 97 97 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 89 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 76 77 Anchorage, AK......................... 90 108 Atlanta, GA........................... 92 86 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 90 80 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 85 83 Birmingham, AL........................ 86 90 Bloomington, IN....................... 87 80 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 97 100 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 86 68 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 82 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 85 77 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 83 88 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 96 95 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 89 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 91 87 Columbus, OH.......................... 83 89 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 84 74 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 91 85 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 83 86 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 92 88 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 94 90 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 85 86 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 85 83 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 87 93 Great Falls, MT....................... 68 83 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 85 84 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 81 86 Hartford, CT.......................... 98 106 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 80 80 Honolulu, HI.......................... 93 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 88 77 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 87 82 Anchorage, AK......................... 105 100 Atlanta, GA........................... 95 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 81 91 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 97 91 Birmingham, AL........................ 92 91 Bloomington, IN....................... 76 83 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 103 107 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 73 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 102 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 98 88 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 106 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 103 104 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 92 93 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 93 96 Columbus, OH.......................... 103 94 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 85 80 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 94 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 94 87 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 101 97 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 98 100 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 93 87 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 103 96 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 106 95 Great Falls, MT....................... 86 76 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 84 92 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 88 88 Hartford, CT.......................... 105 106 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 89 90 Honolulu, HI.......................... 102 94 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 93 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 80 76 Anchorage, AK......................... 121 103 Atlanta, GA........................... 90 95 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 92 90 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 85 92 Birmingham, AL........................ 82 92 Bloomington, IN....................... 75 79 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 120 107 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 65 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 107 93 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 78 76 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 89 91 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 120 106 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 87 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 98 95 Columbus, OH.......................... 94 93 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 89 75 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 87 89 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 96 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 88 97 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 106 90 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 106 86 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 96 97 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 102 89 Great Falls, MT....................... 114 93 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 88 91 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 79 78 Hartford, CT.......................... 110 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 95 85 Honolulu, HI.......................... 109 107 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 88 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 80 88 Anchorage, AK......................... 103 104 Atlanta, GA........................... 93 101 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 88 91 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 84 87 Birmingham, AL........................ 78 93 Bloomington, IN....................... 87 99 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 97 105 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 68 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 100 96 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 91 99 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 93 94 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 93 101 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 89 94 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 94 100 Columbus, OH.......................... 86 96 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 80 82 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 81 94 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 96 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 92 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 106 103 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 88 96 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 86 106 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 91 96 Great Falls, MT....................... 86 87 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 91 99 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 94 91 Hartford, CT.......................... 100 102 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 90 97 Honolulu, HI.......................... 95 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 90 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Huntsville, AL........................ 89 86 Indianapolis, IN...................... 90 75 Iowa City, IA......................... 91 87 Johnstown, PA......................... 81 79 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 92 85 Knoxville, TN......................... 86 95 Lincoln, NE........................... 82 78 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 99 97 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 89 83 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 86 77 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 88 88 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 89 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 95 92 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 100 93 Mobile, AL............................ 82 74 New Orleans, LA....................... 88 82 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 106 105 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 85 79 Ocala, FL............................. 84 80 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84 80 Orlando, FL........................... 86 86 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 98 97 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 90 91 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 89 83 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 97 95 Reading, PA........................... 94 96 Reno, NV.............................. 91 89 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 96 88 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91 90 Rochester, NY......................... 90 82 Rockford, IL.......................... 93 82 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 98 94 Salinas, CA........................... 105 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Huntsville, AL........................ 86 85 Indianapolis, IN...................... 88 86 Iowa City, IA......................... 86 91 Johnstown, PA......................... 82 79 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 85 85 Knoxville, TN......................... 88 75 Lincoln, NE........................... 79 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 98 97 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 86 92 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 73 90 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 83 81 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 85 85 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 87 89 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 94 105 Mobile, AL............................ 77 74 New Orleans, LA....................... 87 81 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 104 102 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 81 84 Ocala, FL............................. 79 82 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 76 81 Orlando, FL........................... 79 83 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 96 94 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 91 85 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 87 87 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 85 99 Reading, PA........................... 84 90 Reno, NV.............................. 85 88 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 86 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 86 87 Rochester, NY......................... 88 92 Rockford, IL.......................... 87 88 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 96 99 Salinas, CA........................... 109 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Huntsville, AL........................ 98 91 Indianapolis, IN...................... 93 93 Iowa City, IA......................... 90 95 Johnstown, PA......................... 84 80 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 94 94 Knoxville, TN......................... 96 90 Lincoln, NE........................... 83 82 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 112 101 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 96 93 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 93 84 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 102 92 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 93 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 99 99 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 106 98 Mobile, AL............................ 92 85 New Orleans, LA....................... 98 91 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 109 108 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 91 86 Ocala, FL............................. 90 84 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 90 85 Orlando, FL........................... 98 86 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 98 100 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 104 95 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 87 92 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 108 100 Reading, PA........................... 104 97 Reno, NV.............................. 98 94 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 102 95 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 97 93 Rochester, NY......................... 93 92 Rockford, IL.......................... 97 91 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 99 98 Salinas, CA........................... 126 106 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Huntsville, AL........................ 88 84 Indianapolis, IN...................... 90 89 Iowa City, IA......................... 97 95 Johnstown, PA......................... 93 82 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 105 97 Knoxville, TN......................... 82 81 Lincoln, NE........................... 82 87 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 106 99 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 106 87 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 89 94 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 91 91 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 87 87 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 106 94 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 110 100 Mobile, AL............................ 90 91 New Orleans, LA....................... 87 85 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 123 106 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84 87 Ocala, FL............................. 80 98 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 98 100 Orlando, FL........................... 88 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 103 104 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 79 93 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 93 89 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 110 103 Reading, PA........................... 98 93 Reno, NV.............................. 93 103 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 107 87 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 89 92 Rochester, NY......................... 90 83 Rockford, IL.......................... 107 96 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 99 109 Salinas, CA........................... 127 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Huntsville, AL........................ 89 89 Indianapolis, IN...................... 97 94 Iowa City, IA......................... 90 91 Johnstown, PA......................... 76 78 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 94 92 Knoxville, TN......................... 80 91 Lincoln, NE........................... 81 87 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 89 97 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 89 89 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 94 98 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 87 92 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 87 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 95 101 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 104 102 Mobile, AL............................ 86 87 New Orleans, LA....................... 85 95 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 94 104 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84 85 Ocala, FL............................. 85 98 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 79 82 Orlando, FL........................... 77 101 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 90 102 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 86 95 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 88 91 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 90 95 Reading, PA........................... 89 97 Reno, NV.............................. 88 96 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 88 95 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 91 95 Rochester, NY......................... 89 95 Rockford, IL.......................... 92 98 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 99 102 Salinas, CA........................... 86 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Antonio, TX....................... 83 85 San Diego, CA......................... 100 97 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 110 104 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 101 94 Springfield, MA....................... 101 95 Springfield, MO....................... 81 75 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 94 89 Tallahassee, FL....................... 84 74 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 88 82 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 92 93 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 100 94 York, PA.............................. 90 94 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 89 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Antonio, TX....................... 82 78 San Diego, CA......................... 99 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 105 109 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 89 105 Springfield, MA....................... 98 94 Springfield, MO....................... 79 74 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 89 84 Tallahassee, FL....................... 81 85 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 82 85 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 89 90 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 97 95 York, PA.............................. 88 87 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 84 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Antonio, TX....................... 82 87 San Diego, CA......................... 103 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 120 115 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 108 102 Springfield, MA....................... 110 105 Springfield, MO....................... 89 82 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 97 94 Tallahassee, FL....................... 90 86 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 96 94 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 99 92 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 104 106 York, PA.............................. 88 90 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 90 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Antonio, TX....................... 93 90 San Diego, CA......................... 103 100 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 118 109 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 107 99 Springfield, MA....................... 102 102 Springfield, MO....................... 74 84 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 113 99 Tallahassee, FL....................... 85 81 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 94 87 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 89 87 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 96 108 York, PA.............................. 99 92 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 96 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Antonio, TX....................... 86 81 San Diego, CA......................... 94 95 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 97 103 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 105 107 Springfield, MA....................... 97 109 Springfield, MO....................... 84 85 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 93 103 Tallahassee, FL....................... 85 89 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 83 97 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 94 92 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 97 100 York, PA.............................. 86 97 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 92 105 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.