Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 74 82 Anchorage, AK......................... 92 91 Atlanta, GA........................... 86 89 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 79 78 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 80 80 Birmingham, AL........................ 79 80 Bloomington, IN....................... 76 78 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 94 96 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 66 64 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 84 80 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 78 86 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 85 87 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 91 91 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 82 82 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 85 84 Columbus, OH.......................... 84 88 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 73 80 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 82 87 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 83 86 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 86 87 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 89 85 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 81 84 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 84 83 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 85 81 Great Falls, MT....................... 74 74 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 80 80 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 79 83 Hartford, CT.......................... 94 95 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 80 78 Honolulu, HI.......................... 88 92 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 81 87 Huntsville, AL........................ 80 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 73 71 Anchorage, AK......................... 86 99 Atlanta, GA........................... 88 79 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 86 73 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 81 76 Birmingham, AL........................ 82 82 Bloomington, IN....................... 83 74 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 93 92 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 82 62 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 78 87 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 81 70 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 79 80 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 92 87 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 85 84 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 86 80 Columbus, OH.......................... 79 82 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 80 67 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 86 78 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 79 79 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 87 80 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 89 83 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 81 78 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 81 76 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 83 85 Great Falls, MT....................... 65 76 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 81 77 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 77 79 Hartford, CT.......................... 93 97 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 76 73 Honolulu, HI.......................... 89 90 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 84 71 Huntsville, AL........................ 82 78 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 73 71 Anchorage, AK......................... 88 87 Atlanta, GA........................... 79 86 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 67 79 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 81 79 Birmingham, AL........................ 76 79 Bloomington, IN....................... 63 72 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 86 93 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 61 63 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 85 81 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 82 76 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 88 84 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 86 90 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 76 80 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 77 83 Columbus, OH.......................... 85 81 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 71 69 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 83 81 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 78 76 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 84 84 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 82 87 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 77 75 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 86 83 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 88 82 Great Falls, MT....................... 71 66 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 70 80 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 74 77 Hartford, CT.......................... 88 92 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 74 78 Honolulu, HI.......................... 85 81 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 77 81 Huntsville, AL........................ 81 79 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 68 69 Anchorage, AK......................... 103 94 Atlanta, GA........................... 76 87 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 78 83 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 72 85 Birmingham, AL........................ 69 84 Bloomington, IN....................... 64 72 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 102 98 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 55 67 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 91 85 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 66 70 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 76 83 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 102 97 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 74 83 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 83 87 Columbus, OH.......................... 80 85 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 76 69 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 74 81 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 82 90 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 75 89 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 90 83 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 90 79 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 81 89 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 87 82 Great Falls, MT....................... 97 85 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 75 84 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 67 71 Hartford, CT.......................... 94 92 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 81 78 Honolulu, HI.......................... 92 98 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 75 81 Huntsville, AL........................ 74 77 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 82 85 Anchorage, AK......................... 106 101 Atlanta, GA........................... 95 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 91 88 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 86 84 Birmingham, AL........................ 80 91 Bloomington, IN....................... 90 96 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 100 102 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 70 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 103 93 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 94 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 96 92 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 96 98 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 92 92 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 97 98 Columbus, OH.......................... 89 94 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 82 79 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 84 91 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 99 96 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 95 91 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 109 100 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 90 94 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 88 103 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 94 93 Great Falls, MT....................... 89 85 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 94 96 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 96 88 Hartford, CT.......................... 103 99 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 92 94 Honolulu, HI.......................... 98 96 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 92 88 Huntsville, AL........................ 92 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis, IN...................... 81 72 Iowa City, IA......................... 82 83 Johnstown, PA......................... 74 76 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 83 82 Knoxville, TN......................... 78 91 Lincoln, NE........................... 75 74 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 90 93 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 81 80 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 78 74 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 80 84 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 81 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 86 88 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 90 89 Mobile, AL............................ 74 71 New Orleans, LA....................... 80 79 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 96 100 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 77 76 Ocala, FL............................. 76 77 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 76 76 Orlando, FL........................... 78 83 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 89 93 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 81 87 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 81 80 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 88 91 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 91 96 Reading, PA........................... 85 92 Reno, NV.............................. 83 85 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 87 84 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 82 86 Rochester, NY......................... 82 78 Rockford, IL.......................... 84 79 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 89 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Indianapolis, IN...................... 84 79 Iowa City, IA......................... 82 83 Johnstown, PA......................... 78 72 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 81 78 Knoxville, TN......................... 84 69 Lincoln, NE........................... 75 74 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 93 89 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 82 84 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 70 82 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 79 75 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 81 78 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 83 82 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 90 96 Mobile, AL............................ 73 68 New Orleans, LA....................... 83 74 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 99 93 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 77 77 Ocala, FL............................. 75 75 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 73 74 Orlando, FL........................... 75 76 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 92 86 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 87 78 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 83 80 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 81 91 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 95 92 Reading, PA........................... 80 82 Reno, NV.............................. 81 81 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 82 92 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 82 80 Rochester, NY......................... 84 85 Rockford, IL.......................... 83 81 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 91 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis, IN...................... 77 81 Iowa City, IA......................... 74 83 Johnstown, PA......................... 69 69 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 78 82 Knoxville, TN......................... 80 78 Lincoln, NE........................... 69 71 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 93 87 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 80 80 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 77 73 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 84 80 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 77 79 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 83 86 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 88 85 Mobile, AL............................ 77 74 New Orleans, LA....................... 82 79 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 91 94 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 76 75 Ocala, FL............................. 75 73 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 75 73 Orlando, FL........................... 82 74 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 81 87 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 86 83 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 72 80 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 89 86 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 83 87 Reading, PA........................... 86 84 Reno, NV.............................. 82 82 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 85 82 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 80 81 Rochester, NY......................... 77 80 Rockford, IL.......................... 81 79 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 82 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis, IN...................... 76 81 Iowa City, IA......................... 83 87 Johnstown, PA......................... 79 75 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 89 89 Knoxville, TN......................... 70 74 Lincoln, NE........................... 70 79 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 90 90 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 90 80 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 76 86 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 77 83 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 74 80 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 90 86 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 93 91 Mobile, AL............................ 77 83 New Orleans, LA....................... 74 78 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 105 97 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 71 80 Ocala, FL............................. 68 90 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 83 92 Orlando, FL........................... 75 79 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 87 95 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 67 85 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 79 81 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 94 94 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 85 92 Reading, PA........................... 83 85 Reno, NV.............................. 79 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 91 80 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 75 84 Rochester, NY......................... 77 76 Rockford, IL.......................... 91 88 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 84 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Indianapolis, IN...................... 100 91 Iowa City, IA......................... 93 88 Johnstown, PA......................... 78 76 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 89 Knoxville, TN......................... 82 88 Lincoln, NE........................... 84 84 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 91 94 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 92 87 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 97 95 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 90 89 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 89 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 97 99 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 108 99 Mobile, AL............................ 88 84 New Orleans, LA....................... 88 93 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 97 101 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86 82 Ocala, FL............................. 87 95 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 82 80 Orlando, FL........................... 79 98 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 92 99 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 89 93 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 91 89 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 93 92 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 103 97 Reading, PA........................... 92 94 Reno, NV.............................. 91 93 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 90 93 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 94 92 Rochester, NY......................... 92 92 Rockford, IL.......................... 95 96 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 102 100 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Salinas, CA........................... 95 101 San Antonio, TX....................... 75 82 San Diego, CA......................... 91 93 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 92 90 Springfield, MA....................... 92 91 Springfield, MO....................... 73 72 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 85 85 Tallahassee, FL....................... 77 71 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 80 78 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 83 89 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 90 90 York, PA.............................. 81 90 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 81 84 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Salinas, CA........................... 103 94 San Antonio, TX....................... 78 71 San Diego, CA......................... 95 92 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 85 97 Springfield, MA....................... 94 86 Springfield, MO....................... 76 68 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 85 77 Tallahassee, FL....................... 77 78 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 78 78 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 84 83 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 92 87 York, PA.............................. 84 80 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 80 74 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Salinas, CA........................... 104 92 San Antonio, TX....................... 68 75 San Diego, CA......................... 86 87 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 90 89 Springfield, MA....................... 92 91 Springfield, MO....................... 74 71 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 81 81 Tallahassee, FL....................... 75 75 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 80 82 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 82 80 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 86 92 York, PA.............................. 73 78 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 75 76 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Salinas, CA........................... 108 94 San Antonio, TX....................... 79 82 San Diego, CA......................... 88 91 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 91 91 Springfield, MA....................... 86 94 Springfield, MO....................... 63 77 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 96 91 Tallahassee, FL....................... 72 74 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 80 80 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 76 80 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 82 99 York, PA.............................. 84 84 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 82 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Salinas, CA........................... 88 96 San Antonio, TX....................... 88 79 San Diego, CA......................... 96 93 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 108 104 Springfield, MA....................... 100 106 Springfield, MO....................... 86 82 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 96 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 87 86 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 86 95 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 97 89 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 100 97 York, PA.............................. 88 95 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 94 102 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.