Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 80 91 Anchorage, AK......................... 100 101 Atlanta, GA........................... 93 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 86 87 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 87 88 Birmingham, AL........................ 86 89 Bloomington, IN....................... 83 86 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 103 107 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 71 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 92 89 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 85 95 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 92 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 99 101 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 90 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 92 93 Columbus, OH.......................... 91 97 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 80 89 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 90 97 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 90 96 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 93 96 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 97 94 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 88 93 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 91 91 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 92 90 Great Falls, MT....................... 80 82 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 87 89 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 86 92 Hartford, CT.......................... 102 105 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 87 86 Honolulu, HI.......................... 96 102 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 88 97 Huntsville, AL........................ 88 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 85 73 Anchorage, AK......................... 101 102 Atlanta, GA........................... 103 82 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 101 76 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 96 78 Birmingham, AL........................ 96 85 Bloomington, IN....................... 97 76 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 109 95 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 96 64 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 92 90 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 95 73 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 93 83 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 108 90 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 100 87 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 102 82 Columbus, OH.......................... 93 85 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 95 70 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 102 81 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 93 81 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 103 83 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 105 85 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 95 81 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 96 79 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 98 88 Great Falls, MT....................... 76 79 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 95 80 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 91 82 Hartford, CT.......................... 109 100 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 90 76 Honolulu, HI.......................... 105 93 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 99 73 Huntsville, AL........................ 97 81 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 81 80 Anchorage, AK......................... 97 98 Atlanta, GA........................... 88 97 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 75 89 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 90 90 Birmingham, AL........................ 85 89 Bloomington, IN....................... 70 81 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 95 105 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 67 71 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 95 92 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 91 86 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 98 95 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 96 101 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 85 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 86 94 Columbus, OH.......................... 95 92 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 79 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 93 92 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 87 85 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 93 95 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 91 98 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 86 85 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 95 94 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 98 93 Great Falls, MT....................... 79 75 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 78 90 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 82 87 Hartford, CT.......................... 97 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 82 88 Honolulu, HI.......................... 94 92 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 86 91 Huntsville, AL........................ 90 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 74 76 Anchorage, AK......................... 113 104 Atlanta, GA........................... 84 96 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 86 91 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 79 93 Birmingham, AL........................ 76 93 Bloomington, IN....................... 70 80 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 112 108 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 61 73 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 100 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 72 77 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 83 92 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 112 107 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 81 92 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 91 96 Columbus, OH.......................... 88 94 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 83 76 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 81 90 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 90 100 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 82 98 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 99 91 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 98 87 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 89 98 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 95 90 Great Falls, MT....................... 107 94 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 82 92 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 74 79 Hartford, CT.......................... 103 101 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 88 86 Honolulu, HI.......................... 101 108 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 82 90 Huntsville, AL........................ 82 85 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 76 82 Anchorage, AK......................... 98 97 Atlanta, GA........................... 88 95 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 84 85 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 80 81 Birmingham, AL........................ 74 87 Bloomington, IN....................... 83 92 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 92 98 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 64 68 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 95 90 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 86 93 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 88 88 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 88 94 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 85 88 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 89 94 Columbus, OH.......................... 82 90 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 76 76 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 77 88 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 91 93 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 88 87 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 100 96 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 83 90 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 81 99 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 86 89 Great Falls, MT....................... 82 81 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 86 92 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 89 85 Hartford, CT.......................... 95 95 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 85 90 Honolulu, HI.......................... 91 92 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 85 84 Huntsville, AL........................ 85 83 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Indianapolis, IN...................... 89 79 Iowa City, IA......................... 90 92 Johnstown, PA......................... 80 84 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 91 90 Knoxville, TN......................... 85 100 Lincoln, NE........................... 81 82 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 98 103 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 88 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 85 82 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 87 93 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 88 104 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 93 97 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 99 99 Mobile, AL............................ 81 79 New Orleans, LA....................... 87 87 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 104 111 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84 84 Ocala, FL............................. 83 85 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 83 85 Orlando, FL........................... 85 92 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 97 103 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 89 96 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 88 89 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 96 101 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 99 106 Reading, PA........................... 93 102 Reno, NV.............................. 90 95 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 95 93 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 90 95 Rochester, NY......................... 89 87 Rockford, IL.......................... 92 88 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 97 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Indianapolis, IN...................... 98 82 Iowa City, IA......................... 96 86 Johnstown, PA......................... 92 75 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 96 81 Knoxville, TN......................... 99 71 Lincoln, NE........................... 88 77 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 110 92 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 96 87 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 82 85 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 93 77 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 96 81 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 97 85 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 105 100 Mobile, AL............................ 86 71 New Orleans, LA....................... 97 77 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 117 97 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 90 80 Ocala, FL............................. 88 77 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 85 77 Orlando, FL........................... 89 79 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 108 89 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 102 81 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 98 83 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 96 94 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 112 95 Reading, PA........................... 94 85 Reno, NV.............................. 96 84 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 96 95 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 96 83 Rochester, NY......................... 98 88 Rockford, IL.......................... 98 83 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 108 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Indianapolis, IN...................... 86 91 Iowa City, IA......................... 83 94 Johnstown, PA......................... 77 78 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 87 92 Knoxville, TN......................... 88 88 Lincoln, NE........................... 77 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 103 99 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 89 91 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 86 83 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 94 91 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 86 90 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 92 97 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 98 96 Mobile, AL............................ 85 83 New Orleans, LA....................... 91 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 101 106 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 84 85 Ocala, FL............................. 83 82 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 84 83 Orlando, FL........................... 91 84 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 90 98 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 96 94 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 80 90 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 99 98 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 92 98 Reading, PA........................... 96 95 Reno, NV.............................. 91 92 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 94 93 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 89 91 Rochester, NY......................... 86 91 Rockford, IL.......................... 90 90 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 91 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Indianapolis, IN...................... 83 90 Iowa City, IA......................... 91 96 Johnstown, PA......................... 87 83 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 98 98 Knoxville, TN......................... 76 82 Lincoln, NE........................... 77 87 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 99 100 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 99 88 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 83 95 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 85 92 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 81 88 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 99 95 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 102 101 Mobile, AL............................ 84 92 New Orleans, LA....................... 81 86 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 115 107 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 78 88 Ocala, FL............................. 74 99 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 91 101 Orlando, FL........................... 82 88 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 96 105 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 74 94 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 87 90 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 103 104 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 93 101 Reading, PA........................... 91 94 Reno, NV.............................. 87 104 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 100 88 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 83 93 Rochester, NY......................... 84 84 Rockford, IL.......................... 100 98 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 92 111 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Indianapolis, IN...................... 92 88 Iowa City, IA......................... 86 85 Johnstown, PA......................... 72 73 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 89 86 Knoxville, TN......................... 75 85 Lincoln, NE........................... 77 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 84 91 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 85 83 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 89 91 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 83 85 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 82 87 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 90 95 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 99 95 Mobile, AL............................ 82 81 New Orleans, LA....................... 81 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 89 97 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 80 79 Ocala, FL............................. 81 91 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 75 77 Orlando, FL........................... 73 94 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 85 95 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 82 89 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 84 85 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 86 89 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 95 93 Reading, PA........................... 85 91 Reno, NV.............................. 84 90 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 83 89 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 86 89 Rochester, NY......................... 85 89 Rockford, IL.......................... 88 92 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 94 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Salinas, CA........................... 104 112 San Antonio, TX....................... 82 90 San Diego, CA......................... 99 103 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 109 111 Springfield, MA....................... 100 101 Springfield, MO....................... 80 80 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 93 94 Tallahassee, FL....................... 83 79 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 87 87 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 91 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 98 100 York, PA.............................. 89 99 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 88 93 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Salinas, CA........................... 122 97 San Antonio, TX....................... 91 74 San Diego, CA......................... 111 95 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 118 103 Springfield, MA....................... 110 89 Springfield, MO....................... 89 71 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 100 79 Tallahassee, FL....................... 91 81 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 92 80 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 99 85 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 108 90 York, PA.............................. 99 83 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 94 77 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Salinas, CA........................... 116 103 San Antonio, TX....................... 76 85 San Diego, CA......................... 96 98 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 111 113 Springfield, MA....................... 102 103 Springfield, MO....................... 82 80 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 90 92 Tallahassee, FL....................... 83 84 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 89 92 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 92 90 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 96 103 York, PA.............................. 82 88 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 83 86 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Salinas, CA........................... 119 104 San Antonio, TX....................... 87 91 San Diego, CA......................... 96 101 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 110 110 Springfield, MA....................... 95 103 Springfield, MO....................... 69 85 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 106 100 Tallahassee, FL....................... 79 82 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 87 88 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 83 88 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 90 109 York, PA.............................. 92 93 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 89 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, June 2006 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Salinas, CA........................... 81 92 San Antonio, TX....................... 81 76 San Diego, CA......................... 89 89 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 92 96 Springfield, MA....................... 92 102 Springfield, MO....................... 80 79 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 88 96 Tallahassee, FL....................... 80 83 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 79 91 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 89 86 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 92 94 York, PA.............................. 82 91 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 87 98 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.