Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 91 89 Anchorage, AK......................... 111 110 Atlanta, GA........................... 103 101 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 95 94 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 97 95 Birmingham, AL........................ 94 104 Bloomington, IN....................... 93 102 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 112 110 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 81 78 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 102 92 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 96 105 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 98 97 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 106 103 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 101 95 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 101 101 Columbus, OH.......................... 97 90 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 88 95 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 99 103 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 99 93 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 102 101 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 106 102 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 94 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 97 88 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 104 101 Great Falls, MT....................... 87 85 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 99 95 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 96 93 Hartford, CT.......................... 113 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 99 88 Honolulu, HI.......................... 104 104 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 97 107 Huntsville, AL........................ 97 98 Indianapolis, IN...................... 98 94 Iowa City, IA......................... 100 99 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 87 89 Anchorage, AK......................... 109 119 Atlanta, GA........................... 99 102 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 97 89 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 95 102 Birmingham, AL........................ 97 97 Bloomington, IN....................... 87 93 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 109 114 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 95 81 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 97 108 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 98 86 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 91 94 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 103 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 98 104 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 101 99 Columbus, OH.......................... 96 96 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 93 84 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 100 95 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 96 94 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 99 101 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 107 101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 99 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 95 97 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 100 101 Great Falls, MT....................... 83 92 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 98 97 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 94 93 Hartford, CT.......................... 109 124 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 93 98 Honolulu, HI.......................... 106 107 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 102 88 Huntsville, AL........................ 99 95 Indianapolis, IN...................... 98 96 Iowa City, IA......................... 98 104 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 88 90 Anchorage, AK......................... 101 107 Atlanta, GA........................... 107 105 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 88 93 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 100 102 Birmingham, AL........................ 92 92 Bloomington, IN....................... 96 88 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 106 117 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 80 81 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 100 102 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 93 99 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 102 101 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 108 108 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 104 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 97 99 Columbus, OH.......................... 100 99 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 90 86 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 101 100 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 102 96 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 97 101 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 98 108 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 95 92 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 96 99 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 106 100 Great Falls, MT....................... 82 81 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 88 100 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 91 99 Hartford, CT.......................... 114 111 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 90 100 Honolulu, HI.......................... 105 102 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 98 97 Huntsville, AL........................ 96 97 Indianapolis, IN...................... 82 104 Iowa City, IA......................... 91 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 89 90 Anchorage, AK......................... 130 108 Atlanta, GA........................... 103 108 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 88 98 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 93 103 Birmingham, AL........................ 76 100 Bloomington, IN....................... 98 92 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 117 111 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 70 80 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 101 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 81 89 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 89 98 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 123 105 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 102 98 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 96 105 Columbus, OH.......................... 112 98 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 80 84 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 96 98 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 99 99 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 96 106 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 110 104 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 99 87 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 99 100 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 106 101 Great Falls, MT....................... 122 100 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 93 102 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 90 88 Hartford, CT.......................... 138 111 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 81 97 Honolulu, HI.......................... 102 107 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 94 95 Huntsville, AL........................ 89 95 Indianapolis, IN...................... 95 99 Iowa City, IA......................... 104 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving United States......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX.......................... 110 97 Anchorage, AK......................... 122 114 Atlanta, GA........................... 100 103 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................. 99 96 Austin-San Marcos, TX................. 90 87 Birmingham, AL........................ 93 94 Bloomington, IN....................... 98 101 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT........................... 109 119 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX.................................... 73 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY............. 105 101 Charleston-North Charleston, SC....... 93 102 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC... 104 103 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI........ 103 109 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN......... 108 100 Cleveland-Akron, OH................... 106 105 Columbus, OH.......................... 92 98 Corpus Christi, TX.................... 90 85 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX................. 94 99 Dayton-Springfield, OH................ 112 104 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO............ 104 104 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI........... 115 109 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.................... 95 94 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO............. 96 100 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI..... 107 107 Great Falls, MT....................... 101 88 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC.................................... 104 104 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC... 103 97 Hartford, CT.......................... 112 110 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC.......... 103 111 Honolulu, HI.......................... 94 106 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX........ 96 93 Huntsville, AL........................ 98 94 Indianapolis, IN...................... 106 104 Iowa City, IA......................... 99 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA......................... 87 95 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 98 87 Knoxville, TN......................... 95 105 Lincoln, NE........................... 92 93 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 107 108 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 100 103 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 92 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 96 94 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 93 98 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 105 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 109 103 Mobile, AL............................ 90 90 New Orleans, LA....................... 90 87 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 110 111 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 93 94 Ocala, FL............................. 92 98 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 91 86 Orlando, FL........................... 91 91 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 107 107 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 102 98 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 97 96 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 100 97 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 108 103 Reading, PA........................... 104 108 Reno, NV.............................. 99 93 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 100 98 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 99 95 Rochester, NY......................... 99 101 Rockford, IL.......................... 101 84 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 108 106 Salinas, CA........................... 110 108 San Antonio, TX....................... 92 91 San Diego, CA......................... 108 109 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA......................... 84 90 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 93 98 Knoxville, TN......................... 91 89 Lincoln, NE........................... 87 95 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 111 111 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 102 105 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 86 95 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 89 93 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 97 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 95 100 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 104 119 Mobile, AL............................ 93 85 New Orleans, LA....................... 93 83 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 115 110 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 93 91 Ocala, FL............................. 88 87 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 88 88 Orlando, FL........................... 89 86 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 108 106 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 101 94 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 96 99 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 93 109 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 110 117 Reading, PA........................... 101 103 Reno, NV.............................. 95 102 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 99 105 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 97 99 Rochester, NY......................... 97 107 Rockford, IL.......................... 102 98 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 112 113 Salinas, CA........................... 117 111 San Antonio, TX....................... 93 87 San Diego, CA......................... 117 111 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA......................... 90 83 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 105 101 Knoxville, TN......................... 92 99 Lincoln, NE........................... 91 90 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 109 107 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 98 100 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 96 92 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 94 92 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 94 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 120 102 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 105 105 Mobile, AL............................ 88 92 New Orleans, LA....................... 109 84 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 107 114 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 98 96 Ocala, FL............................. 91 97 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 91 89 Orlando, FL........................... 100 92 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 112 108 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 130 106 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 94 99 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 102 102 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 113 109 Reading, PA........................... 103 102 Reno, NV.............................. 111 91 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 105 92 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 99 98 Rochester, NY......................... 96 95 Rockford, IL.......................... 93 93 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 108 106 Salinas, CA........................... 119 110 San Antonio, TX....................... 97 95 San Diego, CA......................... 111 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA......................... 84 107 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 103 94 Knoxville, TN......................... 86 92 Lincoln, NE........................... 82 96 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 110 109 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 104 91 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 90 101 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 111 103 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 84 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 105 111 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 116 108 Mobile, AL............................ 91 90 New Orleans, LA....................... 85 89 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 127 100 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 87 92 Ocala, FL............................. 81 94 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 86 93 Orlando, FL........................... 87 104 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 106 107 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 90 106 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 91 95 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 108 105 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 98 88 Reading, PA........................... 100 98 Reno, NV.............................. 101 114 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 99 92 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 88 97 Rochester, NY......................... 95 89 Rockford, IL.......................... 111 115 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 105 112 Salinas, CA........................... 118 109 San Antonio, TX....................... 79 83 San Diego, CA......................... 108 108 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA......................... 85 80 Kansas City, MO-KS.................... 109 100 Knoxville, TN......................... 93 94 Lincoln, NE........................... 94 95 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA.................................... 97 101 Louisville, KY-IN..................... 92 99 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL..... 89 100 Memphis, TN-AR-MS..................... 94 101 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL............. 89 92 Milwaukee-Racine, WI.................. 117 107 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI........... 111 119 Mobile, AL............................ 91 98 New Orleans, LA....................... 86 94 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................... 102 113 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC................................. 86 93 Ocala, FL............................. 86 104 Oklahoma City, OK..................... 97 93 Orlando, FL........................... 90 92 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD........................... 101 108 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ...................... 102 100 Pittsburgh, PA........................ 94 101 Portland-Salem, OR-WA................. 99 103 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA................................. 100 115 Reading, PA........................... 104 108 Reno, NV.............................. 93 100 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA.......... 104 100 Richmond-Petersburg, VA............... 101 104 Rochester, NY......................... 102 100 Rockford, IL.......................... 107 103 Sacramento-Yolo, CA................... 106 110 Salinas, CA........................... 100 96 San Antonio, TX....................... 100 95 San Diego, CA......................... 100 102 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area(1) All business, occupations and financial San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 117 117 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 105 95 Springfield, MA....................... 94 103 Springfield, MO....................... 89 91 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 98 95 Tallahassee, FL....................... 86 83 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 94 99 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 98 95 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 105 101 York, PA.............................. 98 106 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 98 89 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Metropolitan Area(1) Professional Service and related San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 118 121 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 98 116 Springfield, MA....................... 107 106 Springfield, MO....................... 88 89 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 95 95 Tallahassee, FL....................... 86 84 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 90 92 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 105 98 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 108 105 York, PA.............................. 101 97 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 94 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area(1) Sales and administrat- related ive support San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 113 120 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 103 105 Springfield, MA....................... 110 110 Springfield, MO....................... 88 86 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 105 98 Tallahassee, FL....................... 99 88 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 106 93 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 101 96 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 101 110 York, PA.............................. 102 93 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 101 87 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area(1) and n, extraction maintenance, and repair San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 127 116 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 115 102 Springfield, MA....................... 107 109 Springfield, MO....................... 83 90 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 112 95 Tallahassee, FL....................... 91 79 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 88 101 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 87 99 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 103 101 York, PA.............................. 91 100 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 99 96 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, July 2004 - Continued (Average pay nationally for all occupations and for each occupational group shown = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area(1) Production ion and material moving San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.... 110 113 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA.......... 108 105 Springfield, MA....................... 110 65 Springfield, MO....................... 95 94 St. Louis, MO-IL...................... 97 109 Tallahassee, FL....................... 83 108 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL... 93 100 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA........ 93 91 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV..... 102 98 York, PA.............................. 94 101 Youngstown-Warren, OH................. 111 111 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Combined Statistical Area (CSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.