Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 83 73 Anchorage, AK............................... 103 104 Atlanta, GA................................. 97 98 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 91 84 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 90 85 Birmingham, AL.............................. 89 85 Bloomington, IN............................. 88 91 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 104 103 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 76 77 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 96 81 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 86 83 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 91 87 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 101 100 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 93 91 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 94 85 Columbus, OH................................ 94 100 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 81 81 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 92 95 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 92 93 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 95 88 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 99 94 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 92 94 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 90 84 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 97 91 Great Falls, MT............................. 84 84 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 93 95 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 90 92 Hartford, CT................................ 105 99 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 91 84 Honolulu, HI................................ 96 93 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 90 92 Huntsville, AL.............................. 89 91 Indianapolis, IN............................ 93 86 Iowa City, IA............................... 94 88 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 82 74 Anchorage, AK............................... 96 104 Atlanta, GA................................. 94 84 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 95 79 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 88 81 Birmingham, AL.............................. 86 86 Bloomington, IN............................. 84 80 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 101 98 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 91 67 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 87 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 89 74 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 87 85 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 101 92 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 93 87 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 93 84 Columbus, OH................................ 91 85 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 87 71 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 95 82 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 89 83 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 97 85 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 100 89 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 94 81 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 89 79 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 92 91 Great Falls, MT............................. 79 80 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 87 85 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 86 82 Hartford, CT................................ 102 104 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 90 80 Honolulu, HI................................ 101 92 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 95 75 Huntsville, AL.............................. 91 80 Indianapolis, IN............................ 93 87 Iowa City, IA............................... 94 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 84 85 Anchorage, AK............................... 98 102 Atlanta, GA................................. 93 101 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 78 95 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 93 94 Birmingham, AL.............................. 90 92 Bloomington, IN............................. 87 86 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 104 111 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 79 75 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 97 95 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 93 92 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 79 94 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 100 106 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 100 97 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 91 97 Columbus, OH................................ 108 96 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 85 82 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 99 94 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 92 88 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 95 99 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 94 99 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 90 87 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 91 92 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 104 96 Great Falls, MT............................. 83 78 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 96 95 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 84 94 Hartford, CT................................ 105 107 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 90 96 Honolulu, HI................................ 93 94 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 91 94 Huntsville, AL.............................. 88 92 Indianapolis, IN............................ 89 94 Iowa City, IA............................... 88 98 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 85 74 Anchorage, AK............................... 123 94 Atlanta, GA................................. 103 92 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 83 88 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 95 86 Birmingham, AL.............................. 84 79 Bloomington, IN............................. 83 86 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 119 98 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 72 70 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 108 85 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 82 77 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 96 86 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 124 97 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 88 86 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 102 95 Columbus, OH................................ 102 86 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 79 70 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 89 83 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 107 92 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 96 96 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 113 90 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 101 76 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 98 89 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 122 84 Great Falls, MT............................. 126 90 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 97 85 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 82 77 Hartford, CT................................ 119 94 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 84 79 Honolulu, HI................................ 107 96 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 92 85 Huntsville, AL.............................. 98 79 Indianapolis, IN............................ 96 89 Iowa City, IA............................... 105 80 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Sacramento-Yolo, CA......................... 100 100 Amarillo, TX................................ 90 83 Anchorage, AK............................... 111 101 Atlanta, GA................................. 95 99 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC........................ 98 83 Austin-San Marcos, TX....................... 94 82 Birmingham, AL.............................. 88 85 Bloomington, IN............................. 95 95 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence, MA-NH-ME-CT...... 104 101 Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX........ 70 70 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY................... 106 94 Charleston-North Charleston, SC............. 89 96 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC......... 96 92 Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-WI.............. 102 93 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN............... 98 89 Cleveland-Akron, OH......................... 103 93 Columbus, OH................................ 94 87 Corpus Christi, TX.......................... 84 78 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX....................... 86 90 Dayton-Springfield, OH...................... 105 86 Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO.................. 95 93 Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint, MI................. 113 93 Elkhart-Goshen, IN.......................... 94 101 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO................... 97 92 Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI........... 102 91 Great Falls, MT............................. 96 77 Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC..... 97 93 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC......... 99 89 Hartford, CT................................ 104 99 Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC................ 96 95 Honolulu, HI................................ 93 89 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX.............. 95 83 Huntsville, AL.............................. 93 83 Indianapolis, IN............................ 101 89 Iowa City, IA............................... 92 91 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Johnstown, PA............................... 83 84 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 91 88 Knoxville, TN............................... 86 89 Lincoln, NE................................. 83 85 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 98 97 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 93 95 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 85 88 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 88 86 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 89 91 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 95 95 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 102 99 Mobile, AL.................................. 88 96 New Orleans, LA............................. 87 93 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 105 105 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 87 86 Ocala, FL................................... 84 85 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 85 91 Orlando, FL................................. 87 87 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 100 102 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 93 89 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 90 88 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 95 95 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 101 108 Reading, PA................................. 96 114 Reno, NV.................................... 91 86 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 95 93 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 92 92 Rochester, NY............................... 92 91 Rockford, IL................................ 94 82 Salinas, CA................................. 106 107 San Antonio, TX............................. 85 86 San Diego, CA............................... 98 93 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 109 104 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 100 90 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Johnstown, PA............................... 83 79 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 86 82 Knoxville, TN............................... 85 78 Lincoln, NE................................. 82 78 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 102 93 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 93 87 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 78 80 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 83 76 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 89 80 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 88 90 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 97 103 Mobile, AL.................................. 87 74 New Orleans, LA............................. 91 74 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 107 99 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 88 80 Ocala, FL................................... 81 79 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 81 77 Orlando, FL................................. 86 76 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 103 92 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 96 84 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 89 84 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 89 96 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 103 100 Reading, PA................................. 92 87 Reno, NV.................................... 89 86 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 90 96 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 91 84 Rochester, NY............................... 92 91 Rockford, IL................................ 93 87 Salinas, CA................................. 115 101 San Antonio, TX............................. 88 72 San Diego, CA............................... 103 98 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 110 106 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 94 105 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Johnstown, PA............................... 82 80 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 89 95 Knoxville, TN............................... 92 88 Lincoln, NE................................. 75 84 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 100 102 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 87 93 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 87 83 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 90 92 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 87 93 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 102 98 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 100 101 Mobile, AL.................................. 95 90 New Orleans, LA............................. 98 88 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 100 108 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 87 91 Ocala, FL................................... 86 88 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 81 83 Orlando, FL................................. 93 89 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 92 103 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 99 98 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 86 94 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 98 96 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 96 103 Reading, PA................................. 94 95 Reno, NV.................................... 93 90 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 99 94 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 90 94 Rochester, NY............................... 86 92 Rockford, IL................................ 93 89 Salinas, CA................................. 110 100 San Antonio, TX............................. 91 86 San Diego, CA............................... 99 98 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 104 116 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 100 103 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Johnstown, PA............................... 92 86 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 96 88 Knoxville, TN............................... 84 78 Lincoln, NE................................. 86 88 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 114 93 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 106 86 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 94 87 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 89 93 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 84 88 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 110 88 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 110 96 Mobile, AL.................................. 98 81 New Orleans, LA............................. 84 80 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 128 98 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 88 84 Ocala, FL................................... 79 77 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 92 87 Orlando, FL................................. 87 85 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 107 93 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 89 87 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 97 82 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 119 91 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 104 83 Reading, PA................................. 108 89 Reno, NV.................................... 92 92 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 106 79 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 87 89 Rochester, NY............................... 90 75 Rockford, IL................................ 113 90 Salinas, CA................................. 120 102 San Antonio, TX............................. 89 78 San Diego, CA............................... 103 91 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 124 98 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 113 92 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Johnstown, PA............................... 85 74 Kansas City, MO-KS.......................... 100 87 Knoxville, TN............................... 85 90 Lincoln, NE................................. 86 81 Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County, CA..... 95 86 Louisville, KY-IN........................... 94 84 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL........... 90 89 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................... 93 84 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL................... 93 85 Milwaukee-Racine, WI........................ 99 92 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI................. 108 98 Mobile, AL.................................. 90 84 New Orleans, LA............................. 87 81 New York-Northern New Jersey- Long Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA................................. 99 100 Norfolk-VA Beach-Newport News, VA-NC........ 85 83 Ocala, FL................................... 85 89 Oklahoma City, OK........................... 90 87 Orlando, FL................................. 87 89 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD................................. 101 96 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ............................ 91 91 Pittsburgh, PA.............................. 91 88 Portland-Salem, OR-WA....................... 91 87 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA........ 100 95 Reading, PA................................. 99 93 Reno, NV.................................... 91 88 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA................ 90 86 Richmond-Petersburg, VA..................... 92 94 Rochester, NY............................... 94 91 Rockford, IL................................ 101 92 Salinas, CA................................. 98 85 San Antonio, TX............................. 94 79 San Diego, CA............................... 98 86 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA.......... 105 100 Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, WA................ 108 94 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Management, Metropolitan Area1 All business, occupations and financial Springfield, MA............................. 91 98 Springfield, MO............................. 84 81 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 94 92 Tallahassee, FL............................. 82 71 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 87 87 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 89 80 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 99 94 York, PA.................................... 90 97 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 89 80 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Metropolitan Area1 Professional Service and related Springfield, MA............................. 106 93 Springfield, MO............................. 86 75 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 90 83 Tallahassee, FL............................. 83 77 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 85 78 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 92 86 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 102 92 York, PA.................................... 93 85 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 88 75 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Office and Metropolitan Area1 Sales and administrat- related ive support Springfield, MA............................. 100 107 Springfield, MO............................. 83 83 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 90 95 Tallahassee, FL............................. 85 84 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 83 94 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 83 91 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 93 107 York, PA.................................... 87 91 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 90 84 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Construction Installatio- Metropolitan Area1 and n, extraction maintenance, and repair Springfield, MA............................. 111 94 Springfield, MO............................. 85 84 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 117 88 Tallahassee, FL............................. 91 75 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 96 83 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 92 83 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 102 98 York, PA.................................... 94 87 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 96 84 See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Pay relatives for major occupational groups in metropolitan areas, National Compensation Survey, 2005 - Continued (Average pay for all occupations and for each occupational group shown in the Sacramento-Yolo, CA metropolitan area = 100.) Transportat- Metropolitan Area1 Production ion and material moving Springfield, MA............................. 111 65 Springfield, MO............................. 92 81 St. Louis, MO-IL............................ 98 100 Tallahassee, FL............................. 86 93 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL......... 88 87 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA.............. 95 84 Washington-Baltimore, DC-MD-VA-WV........... 108 88 York, PA.................................... 88 88 Youngstown-Warren, OH....................... 99 98 1 A metropolitan area can be a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (CMSA) as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, 1994.