For Release: Thursday, July 10, 2014

14-1229-ATL

SOUTHEAST INFORMATION OFFICE: Atlanta, Ga.
Technical information: (404) 893-4222 BLSInfoAtlanta@bls.gov www.bls.gov/regions/southeast
Media contact: (404) 893-4220

County Employment and Wages in North Carolina — Fourth Quarter 2013

Eight of North Carolina’s nine largest counties reported employment gains from December 2012 to December 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2012 annual average employment.) Regional Commissioner Janet S. Rankin noted that employment increases ranged from 3.7 percent in both Mecklenburg and Wake Counties to 1.1 percent in Guilford County. Employment declined 1.0 percent in Cumberland County over the 12-month period. (See table 1.)

Nationally, employment increased 1.8 percent over the year, as 292 of the 334 largest U.S. counties gained jobs. Weld, Colo., posted the largest increase, with a gain of 6.0 percent over the year. St. Clair, Ill., experienced the largest over-the-year decrease in employment among the largest counties in the U.S. with a loss of 3.1 percent.

Among the largest counties in North Carolina, employment was highest in Mecklenburg (606,800) in December 2013. Two other counties—Wake and Guilford—had employment levels exceeding 250,000. Together, North Carolina’s nine large counties accounted for 53.1 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 334 largest counties accounted for 71.7 percent of total U.S. employment, which stood at 136.1 million in December 2013.

Six of North Carolina’s nine largest counties experienced an increase in their average weekly wages from the fourth quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2013. Average weekly wage increases in two counties exceeded 2.0 percent—Durham (3.6 percent) and Forsyth (2.2 percent). Durham County had the highest average weekly wage in the state at $1,255, followed by the counties of Mecklenburg ($1,098) and Wake ($984). Nationally, the average weekly wage was unchanged over the year at $1,000 in the fourth quarter of 2013. (See table 1.)

Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 91 counties with employment levels below 75,000 in North Carolina. Average weekly wages in these counties ranged from $1,018 to $538. (See table 2.)

Large county wage changes

As noted, average weekly wages advanced in six of North Carolina’s large counties from the fourth quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2013. At 3.6 percent, Durham’s wage increase ranked 14th among the nation’s 334 large counties. Two other counties placed in the top third of the rankings—Forsyth (2.2 percent, 41st) and New Hanover (1.1 percent, 95th). (See table 1.)

Nationwide, 185 large counties experienced over-the-year increases in average weekly wages. Santa Cruz, Calif., had the largest wage gain (6.5 percent). Ada, Idaho, had the second largest increase (6.4 percent), followed by Washington, Ore. (5.9 percent).

Among the 334 largest U.S. counties, 140 had over-the-year decreases in average weekly wages in the fourth quarter of 2013. Douglas, Colo., had the largest average weekly wage decline with a loss of 29.7 percent, followed by the counties of San Mateo, Calif. (-15.8 percent), Virginia Beach City, Va. (-10.0 percent), McHenry, Ill. (-8.8 percent) and Shawnee, Kan. (-5.1 percent).

Large county average weekly wages

Durham and Mecklenburg Counties, with average weekly wages of $1,255 and $1,098, respectively, placed in the top third of the national ranking among the 334 largest U.S. counties in the fourth quarter of 2012. Wake ($984), Forsyth ($895), and Guilford ($858) fell in the middle third of the national ranking and the state’s remaining four large counties fell in the bottom third.

Nationally, San Mateo, Calif., recorded the highest average weekly wage at $2,724, followed by New York, N.Y. ($2,041), Santa Clara, Calif. ($1,972), San Francisco, Calif. ($1,753), and Suffolk, Mass. ($1,741).

There were 235 large counties with an average weekly wage below the U.S. average in the fourth quarter of 2013. Horry, S.C. ($587), reported the lowest wage, followed by the counties of Cameron, Texas ($598), Hidalgo, Texas ($620), Lake, Fla. ($668), and Webb, Texas ($670).

Average weekly wages in North Carolina’s smaller counties

Among the 91 counties in North Carolina with employment below 75,000, only Orange County ($1,018) had an average weekly wage above the national average of $1,000. This was followed by the counties of Iredell ($832) and Camden ($809). Tyrrell County reported the lowest weekly wage in the state, averaging $538 in the fourth quarter of 2013. (See table 2.)

When all 100 counties in North Carolina were considered, 21 reported average weekly wages under $600, 50 reported wages from $600 to $699, 20 had wages from $700 to $799, and 9 had wages above $800. (See chart 1.)

Additional statistics and other information

Quarterly data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit the QCEW Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/.

Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2012 edition of this publication, which was published in October 2013, contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2012 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Online Annual Averages 2012 are now available at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2012/home.htm.  The 2013 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available  in September 2014.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; Federal Relay Service: 800-877-8339.

Technical Note

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 9.3 million employer reports cover 136.1 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.

QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons—some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases. 

Table 1. Covered employment and wages in the United States and the 9 largest counties in North Carolina, fourth quarter 2013
Table 1. Covered employment and wages in the United States and the 9 largest counties in North Carolina, fourth quarter 2013
AreaEmploymentAverage Weekly Wage (1)
December 2013 (thousands)Percent change, December 2012-13 (2)National ranking by percent change (3)Average weekly wageNational ranking by level (3)Percent change, fourth quarter 2012-13 (2)National ranking by percent change (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- ContinuedNote: See footnotes at end of table.

United States (4)

136,129.41.8--$1,000--0.0--

North Carolina

4,045.51.9--860330.718

Buncombe, N.C.

118.81.61567583100.7128

Catawba, N.C.

81.71.61567313180.8120

Cumberland, N.C.

118.0-1.0322766306-0.8245

Durham, N.C.

186.91.31751,255263.614

Forsyth, N.C.

178.22.7818951812.241

Guilford, N.C.

271.61.1200858220-0.1195

Mecklenburg, N.C.

606.83.7341,09858-0.5226

New Hanover, N.C.

101.42.7817992801.195

Wake, N.C.

485.03.7349841130.5141

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(3) Ranking does not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
 

NOTE: Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary.
 

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(3) Ranking does not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
 

NOTE: Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary.
 

Table 2. Covered employment and wages in the United States and all counties in North Carolina, 4th quarter 2013
Table 2. Covered employment and wages in the United States and all counties in North Carolina, 4th quarter 2013
AreaEmployment December 2013Average Weekly Wage (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- Continued

United States (2)

136,129,407$1,000

North Carolina

4,045,526860

Alamance

58,484716

Alexander

8,941595

Alleghany

3,194549

Anson

7,669613

Ashe

7,127629

Avery

6,514556

Beaufort

15,715690

Bertie

6,265565

Bladen

12,071680

Brunswick

28,148710

Buncombe

118,774758

Burke

29,952660

Cabarrus

67,132716

Caldwell

23,068645

Camden

1,475809

Carteret

21,725605

Caswell

3,145572

Catawba

81,699731

Chatham

14,277663

Cherokee

7,631589

Chowan

4,604685

Clay

1,908552

Cleveland

33,949674

Columbus

16,289631

Craven

37,653775

Cumberland

118,015766

Currituck

5,747672

Dare

16,253614

Davidson

41,536677

Davie

10,494661

Duplin

19,781627

Durham

186,9341,255

Edgecombe

18,344652

Forsyth

178,213895

Franklin

11,577711

Gaston

68,231727

Gates

1,428610

Graham

2,092619

Granville

20,065763

Greene

4,034590

Guilford

271,595858

Halifax

16,103624

Harnett

22,505631

Haywood

16,701650

Henderson

35,260694

Hertford

9,254674

Hoke

10,636727

Hyde

2,004546

Iredell

66,498832

Jackson

12,456609

Johnston

43,410709

Jones

1,667632

Lee

24,772723

Lenoir

28,216661

Lincoln

21,076675

McDowell

15,101624

Macon

10,573611

Madison

3,856592

Martin

7,229577

Mecklenburg

606,7941,098

Mitchell

4,952597

Montgomery

9,077641

Moore

32,734734

Nash

37,157685

New Hanover

101,439799

Northampton

5,494599

Onslow

48,383616

Orange

65,4181,018

Pamlico

3,098566

Pasquotank

15,544677

Pender

9,937636

Perquimans

1,969590

Person

9,589714

Pitt

73,893803

Polk

5,117568

Randolph

43,759659

Richmond

13,427633

Robeson

38,884612

Rockingham

25,953679

Rowan

44,418773

Rutherford

18,267628

Sampson

18,412678

Scotland

11,807646

Stanly

18,926616

Stokes

6,798578

Surry

27,574614

Swain

8,479660

Transylvania

8,272626

Tyrrell

1,233538

Union

56,720766

Vance

14,537630

Wake

485,018984

Warren

3,434595

Washington

3,654766

Watauga

22,054657

Wayne

42,936660

Wilkes

20,948632

Wilson

37,609776

Yadkin

10,402588

Yancey

3,791570

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

NOTE: Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary.
 

Table 3. Covered employment and wages by state, fourth quarter 2013
Table 3. Covered employment and wages by state, fourth quarter 2013
StateEmploymentAverage weekly wage (1)
December 2013 (thousands)Percent change, December 2012-13Average weekly wageNational ranking by levelPercent change, fourth quarter 2012-13National ranking by percent change
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- ContinuedNote: See footnotes at end of table.

United States (2)

136,129.41.8$1,000--0.0--

Alabama

1,866.51.085134-0.539

Alaska

315.10.01,022141.67

Arizona

2,571.02.490623-0.539

Arkansas

1,154.3-0.5771470.422

California

15,650.32.81,1756-0.943

Colorado

2,383.93.11,02313-0.943

Connecticut

1,661.20.31,2384-1.349

Delaware

419.61.81,0359-0.641

District of Columbia

727.30.61,6381-3.951

Florida

7,739.52.7883290.227

Georgia

3,986.92.592421-0.132

Hawaii

632.91.7871300.325

Idaho

634.52.6754503.02

Illinois

5,758.91.01,06080.227

Indiana

2,896.91.681440-0.235

Iowa

1,510.91.4834381.67

Kansas

1,359.51.683239-0.438

Kentucky

1,818.01.2804420.227

Louisiana

1,911.60.9889260.520

Maine

586.80.8786461.75

Maryland

2,555.10.41,0767-0.943

Massachusetts

3,332.91.51,25830.817

Michigan

4,072.42.095220-0.235

Minnesota

2,720.61.7988160.325

Mississippi

1,108.11.1729511.311

Missouri

2,670.41.186132-0.235

Montana

440.01.3760480.422

Nebraska

944.31.479643-0.132

Nevada

1,180.53.0884280.718

New Hampshire

629.31.41,01715-0.842

New Jersey

3,887.51.21,18651.114

New Mexico

796.2-0.1814401.410

New York

8,888.61.71,2662-1.148

North Carolina

4,045.51.9860330.718

North Dakota

435.03.3980173.81

Ohio

5,175.41.4887270.030

Oklahoma

1,581.30.685134-0.132

Oregon

1,699.62.5894252.63

Pennsylvania

5,650.30.4976180.422

Rhode Island

462.71.4960191.59

South Carolina

1,875.82.3793441.015

South Dakota

407.11.3759491.311

Tennessee

2,758.31.889524-0.943

Texas

11,246.32.61,027120.030

Utah

1,284.73.183637-0.943

Vermont

308.50.6848362.34

Virginia

3,670.00.11,02811-1.349

Washington

2,976.02.51,034101.75

West Virginia

710.1-0.6792450.520

Wisconsin

2,751.81.0865311.213

Wyoming

279.20.6917221.015

Puerto Rico

958.3-2.3551(3)0.2(3)

Virgin Islands

38.5-3.6754(3)2.4(3)

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(3) Data not included in the national ranking.
 

NOTE: Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary.
 

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(3) Data not included in the national ranking.
 

NOTE: Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary.
 

 Chart 1. Average weekly wages by county in North Carolina, fourth quarter 2013