Department of Labor Logo United States Department of Labor
Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

News Release Information

21-1994-DAL
Tuesday, December 14, 2021

Contacts Technical information: Media contact:
  • (972) 850-4800

County Employment and Wages in Oklahoma – Second Quarter 2021

Employment rose in the three largest counties in Oklahoma from June 2020 to June 2021, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are those with annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more in 2020.) Regional Commissioner Michael Hirniak noted that Cleveland County had the largest over-the-year increases in employment (+5.7 percent). (See chart 1 and table 1.)


National employment increased 6.7 percent over the year, with 339 of the 343 largest U.S. counties reporting gains. Atlantic, NJ, had the largest over-the-year increase in employment with a gain of 36.8 percent. Calcasieu, LA, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment with a loss of 0.9 percent.

Among the three largest counties in Oklahoma, employment was highest in Oklahoma County (451,100) in June 2021. Within Oklahoma County’s private industry, health care and social assistance accounted for the largest employment. Together, the three largest Oklahoma counties accounted for 56.5 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 343 largest counties made up 72.2 percent of total U.S. employment.

Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 74 counties in Oklahoma with employment below 75,000. Wage levels in all 74 smaller counties were below the national average of $1,241 in the second quarter of 2021. (See table 2.)

Large county wage changes

Two of the three large Oklahoma counties reported average weekly wage gains from the second quarter of 2020 to the second quarter of 2021. (See chart 2.) However, all three counties had rates of wage change that were less than the national rate of 4.5 percent. Weekly wages increased in Oklahoma County (+2.6 percent) and Tulsa County (+1.7 percent), while Cleveland County’s average weekly wage declined (-1.8 percent).


Among the 343 largest counties in the United States, 302 had over-the-year wage increases. San Francisco, CA, had the largest percentage wage increase (+29.7 percent). Atlantic, NJ, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease (-7.4 percent).

Large county average weekly wages

Weekly wages in the three large counties in Oklahoma were all below the national average of $1,241 in the second quarter of 2021. Average weekly wages in Oklahoma County ($1,085) and Tulsa County ($1,035) ranked 187th and 228th, respectively, in the middle third of the large county national rankings. The average weekly wage in Cleveland County ($854) ranked 335th out of the 343 largest U.S. counties.

Among the largest U.S. counties, 90 reported average weekly wages above the U.S. average in the second quarter of 2021. Santa Clara, CA, had the highest average weekly wage at $3,516. Average weekly wages were at or below the national average in the remaining 253 counties. At $728 a week, Hidalgo, TX, had the lowest average weekly wage.

Average weekly wages in Oklahoma's smaller counties

All 74 smaller counties in Oklahoma reported average weekly wages below the national average. Among these smaller counties, Washington posted the highest weekly wage, $1,004, followed by Dewey ($995). Sequoyah County reported the lowest average wage in the state at $628 per week, followed by Jefferson County and McIntosh County at $639 and $642 per week, respectively.

When all 77 counties in Oklahoma were considered, 10 reported average weekly wages of less than $700, 24 registered wages from $700 to $799, 32 had wages from $800 to $899, and 11 had average weekly wages of $900 or higher. (See chart 3.) Over half of the higher-paying counties were located in and around the Oklahoma City and Tulsa metropolitan areas. The lower-paying counties, those with weekly wages under $700, were located in the southern and eastern portions of the state

Additional statistics and other information

QCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.

Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2019 edition of this publication was published in September 2020. Tables and additional content from the 2019 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online are available at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2019/home.htm. The 2020 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2021.

The County Employment and Wages release for third quarter 2021 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, February 23, 2022.
The County Employment and Wages full data update for third quarter 2021 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, March 9, 2022.


Technical Note

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS web site at www.bls.gov/cew. However, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s web site.

QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.

Information in this release will be made available to individuals with sensory impairments upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.

Table 1. Covered establishments, employment, and wages in the United States and the three largest counties in Oklahoma, second quarter 2021
AreaEstablishments,
second quarter
(thousands)
EmploymentAverage weekly wage (1)
June 2021
(thousands)
Percent change,
June
2020–21 (2)
National ranking
by percent change (3)
Second quarter
2021
National ranking
by level (3)
Percent change,
second quarter
2020–21 (2)
National ranking
by percent change (3)

United States (4)

10,863.2144,044.86.7--$1,241--4.5--

Oklahoma

114.61,568.73.1--963462.433

Cleveland

6.386.35.7174854335-1.8330

Oklahoma

29.0451.13.13131,0851872.6201

Tulsa

23.1349.63.13131,0352281.7248

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Percent changes were computed from employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(3) Ranking does not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

Table 2. Covered establishments, employment, and wages in the United States and all counties in Oklahoma, second quarter 2021
AreaEstablishmentsEmployment June 2021Average weekly wage (1)

United States (2)

10,863,217144,044,799$1,241

Oklahoma

114,5831,568,683963

Adair

3124,513739

Alfalfa

1431,247897

Atoka

3073,173676

Beaver

1681,321841

Beckham

7888,248879

Blaine

3112,939832

Bryan

1,05918,750855

Caddo

6117,196859

Canadian

3,35433,436882

Carter

1,71922,532887

Cherokee

81116,218770

Choctaw

3714,355725

Cimarron

95785655

Cleveland

6,29686,323854

Coal

1181,044738

Comanche

2,42340,105828

Cotton

1051,589666

Craig

4284,872824

Creek

1,55718,626901

Custer

1,00112,140817

Delaware

8409,375702

Dewey

1951,532995

Ellis

1331,101783

Garfield

1,69923,367874

Garvin

8039,642945

Grady

1,19911,628852

Grant

1611,346936

Greer

106881680

Harmon

69632741

Harper

143982708

Haskell

2503,182670

Hughes

2702,701693

Jackson

6389,355910

Jefferson

1431,027639

Johnston

2322,585782

Kay

1,18617,169878

Kingfisher

5786,276922

Kiowa

2371,849705

Latimer

2132,225780

LeFlore

95911,333816

Lincoln

6836,747845

Logan

7787,656761

Love

2345,541752

McClain

1,1169,726794

McCurtain

76112,241777

McIntosh

3944,150642

Major

2522,017778

Marshall

2844,451853

Mayes

93312,372952

Murray

3635,292741

Muskogee

1,53628,812881

Noble

2564,533882

Nowata

1821,840848

Okfuskee

2172,308683

Oklahoma

28,956451,0711,085

Okmulgee

7549,052799

Osage

5516,206803

Ottawa

73012,214757

Pawnee

3013,260779

Payne

2,07531,278869

Pittsburg

1,03114,664864

Pontotoc

1,14918,538870

Pottawatomie

1,40621,756791

Pushmataha

2682,553803

Roger Mills

107861863

Rogers

1,97425,469909

Seminole

5086,635800

Sequoyah

7139,343628

Stephens

1,13014,144880

Texas

5769,308785

Tillman

1781,472741

Tulsa

23,107349,5901,035

Wagoner

8059,606865

Washington

1,30418,7541,004

Washita

2691,786769

Woods

3103,285804

Woodward

8138,109899

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

Table 3. Covered establishments, employment, and wages by state, second quarter 2021
StateEstablishments,
second quarter
(thousands)
EmploymentAverage weekly wage (1)
June 2021
(thousands)
Percent change,
June
2020–21
Second quarter
2021
National ranking
by level (3)
Percent change,
second quarter
2020–21
National ranking
by percent change (3)

United States (2)

10,863.2144,044.86.7$1,241--4.5--

Alabama

137.81,952.04.41,010354.815

Alaska

23.7315.56.71,18117-1.251

Arizona

180.22,857.85.31,154205.96

Arkansas

96.11,205.34.4974455.212

California

1,662.916,992.17.01,57937.55

Colorado

228.92,723.97.11,283104.419

Connecticut

130.11,604.17.91,41160.647

Delaware

35.1440.15.11,165191.741

District of Columbia

44.0724.63.32,09615.48

Florida

782.58,654.06.71,113247.73

Georgia

337.04,453.56.51,139225.96

Hawaii

48.7590.512.71,117230.746

Idaho

76.4801.87.3930505.310

Illinois

394.65,743.56.51,260113.525

Indiana

178.23,011.85.21,013345.48

Iowa

106.11,528.04.8999382.138

Kansas

90.51,356.04.0995412.730

Kentucky

132.41,851.25.6999382.928

Louisiana

142.71,806.65.41,005362.039

Maine

57.0623.08.71,005362.433

Maryland

175.62,599.76.81,31991.044

Massachusetts

277.43,497.010.11,59121.143

Michigan

270.24,175.68.41,143212.532

Minnesota

192.82,814.56.41,240133.326

Mississippi

75.71,107.14.1843513.822

Missouri

221.62,759.35.31,052323.623

Montana

55.1490.77.0959474.518

Nebraska

74.4976.64.8997403.921

Nevada

93.91,353.914.01,106255.310

New Hampshire

58.5657.48.71,345810.61

New Jersey

300.43,993.812.01,38770.845

New Mexico

63.0790.64.3987422.928

New York

667.98,885.49.21,54051.342

North Carolina

311.14,511.37.21,092275.114

North Dakota

32.6407.44.31,067290.647

Ohio

312.45,266.74.31,068283.623

Oklahoma

114.61,568.73.1963462.433

Oregon

169.21,899.65.61,196154.815

Pennsylvania

370.95,674.76.91,193162.039

Rhode Island

42.1472.210.01,16818-0.350

South Carolina

150.12,091.94.9977445.212

South Dakota

36.3442.36.4936492.631

Tennessee

182.33,012.45.91,094267.64

Texas

758.012,466.75.71,210144.717

Utah

119.91,586.07.61,060304.220

Vermont

27.8292.47.51,05331-0.249

Virginia

293.63,854.36.11,257123.227

Washington

263.63,376.75.71,54748.32

West Virginia

52.7663.84.8955482.237

Wisconsin

186.52,845.75.71,037332.335

Wyoming

28.2275.15.6987422.335

Puerto Rico

47.6867.28.6567(3)2.0(3)

Virgin Islands

3.535.70.0923(3)-8.4(3)

(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(3) Data not included in the national ranking.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

 

Last Modified Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2021