Department of Labor Logo United States Department of Labor
Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

International Labor Comparisons

Charting International Labor Comparisons (2012 Edition)

These are interactive charts. Mouse over to see data labels. Click the legend items to hide and show data displayed.

Section 3b: Competitiveness in manufacturing — Productivity and unit labor costs Previous | Next

On This Page

  • Chart 3.7 - Manufacturing productivity growth, selected countries, average annual rates, 2000–2007 and 2007–2010 (HTML) (PDF)
  • Chart 3.8 - Manufacturing output growth, selected countries, average annual rates, 2000–2007 and 2007–2010 (HTML) (PDF)
  • Chart 3.9 - Growth in manufacturing hours worked, selected countries, average annual rates, 2000–2007 and 2007–2010 (HTML) (PDF)
  • Chart 3.10 - Growth in manufacturing unit labor costs in national currency, selected countries, average annual rates, 2000–2007 and 2007–2010 (HTML) (PDF)
  • Chart 3.11 - Growth in manufacturing unit labor costs in U.S. dollars, selected countries, average annual rates, 2000–2007 and 2007–2010 (HTML) (PDF)
  • Chart 3.12 - Gap between productivity and real hourly compensation in manufacturing, selected countries, 1970–2010 (HTML) (PDF)
  • Section 3b Notes - Sources and definitions
Go to:

Three indicators of international competitiveness in the manufactured goods sector are hourly compensation costs, labor productivity, and unit labor costs.

Hourly compensation measures employers’ average hourly labor costs in the manufacturing sector.

Labor productivity (output per hour worked) measures how effectively hours worked are converted into output. Unit labor costs measure the cost of labor compensation required to produce one unit of output. Increases in labor productivity indicate that a country's workforce is becoming more efficient, and declines in unit labor costs indicate that an economy is becoming more cost competitive.
 

Chart 3.7

Manufacturing productivity growth, selected countries,
average annual rates, 2000-2007 and 2007-2010
2000-2007 2007-2010
Taiwan 7.6 7.0
Singapore 2.0 6.3
Czech Republic 7.4 5.1
Estonia 8.7 3.7
Denmark 3.0 3.5
South Korea 8.1 3.4
United States 6.0 3.3
Japan 3.8 2.2
Norway 3.0 2.1
Belgium 1.8 1.8
Hungary 6.6 1.7
Australia 2.4 1.0
Canada 0.9 0.8
Spain 1.9 0.8
France 3.3 0.7
Netherlands 3.8 0.6
United Kingdom 4.2 0.2
Austria 3.6 0.1
Slovakia 13.3 -0.2
Sweden 6.5 -0.3
Italy 0.3 -0.9
Finland 7.0 -1.0
Germany 3.7 -2.5


  • Manufacturing productivity grew for most countries from 2007 to 2010, but at a much slower rate than during the 2000–2007 period.
  • Germany, Finland, Italy, Sweden, and Slovakia experienced productivity declines in manufacturing during the 2007–2010 period.
  • Singapore and Denmark were the only countries that had faster productivity growth from 2007 to 2010 than from 2000 to 2007.

Back to Top Back to Top



Chart 3.8

Manufacturing output growth, selected countries,
average annual rates, 2000-2007 and 2007-2010
2000-2007 2007-2010
Taiwan 7.2 7.0
Singapore 5.5 6.0
South Korea 6.8 5.1
Czech Republic 7.4 1.7
Australia 1.6 0.3
Norway 2.6 -0.5
Netherlands 2.0 -1.2
Austria 3.6 -1.8
Belgium 0.7 -1.9
Hungary 5.3 -1.9
Denmark 0.6 -2.3
Japan 2.3 -2.3
United States 2.8 -2.8
France 1.2 -3.0
United Kingdom 0.0 -3.5
Sweden 5.0 -3.5
Slovakia 13.6 -4.2
Canada -0.6 -4.2
Germany 2.4 -4.4
Estonia 9.9 -4.7
Spain 1.2 -5.4
Italy 0.3 -5.8
Finland 6.2 -6.5


  • When output grows faster than hours worked, productivity (output per hour) rises.
  • Manufacturing output decreased in 18 out of 23 selected countries between 2007 and 2010, causing relatively slow growth in manufacturing labor productivity for most countries during this period.
  • In contrast to the 2007 to 2010 period, output increased in 21 out of 23 selected countries from 2000 to 2007.

Back to Top Back to Top



Chart 3.9

Growth in manufacturing hours worked, selected countries,
average annual rates, 2000-2007 and 2007-2010
2000-2007 2007-2010
South Korea -1.1 1.7
Taiwan -0.4 -0.1
Singapore 3.5 -0.3
Australia -0.8 -0.7
Netherlands -1.7 -1.7
Austria 0.0 -1.9
Germany -1.3 -1.9
Norway -0.3 -2.6
Czech Republic 0.0 -3.2
Sweden -1.5 -3.2
Hungary -1.2 -3.5
Belgium -1.1 -3.6
United Kingdom -4.0 -3.7
France -2.1 -3.8
Slovakia 0.3 -4.0
Japan -1.4 -4.4
Italy -0.1 -4.9
Canada -1.5 -5.0
Denmark -2.4 -5.5
Finland -0.8 -5.5
United States -3.1 -5.8
Spain -0.6 -6.1
Estonia 1.0 -8.1


  • Between 2007 and 2010, hours worked in manufacturing declined in all selected countries except South Korea. In several countries, hours fell by more than 5 percent.
  • Hours worked also decreased in almost all selected countries from 2000 to 2007, but not to the extent seen during the 2007–2010 period.

Back to Top Back to Top



Chart 3.10

Growth in manufacturing unit labor costs in national currency,
selected countries, average annual rates, 2000-2007 and 2007-2010
2000-2007 2007-2010
Germany -1.6 4.6
Slovakia -4.4 4.6
Italy 2.8 4.2
Finland -3.1 4.0
Austria -0.6 2.9
Norway 2.0 2.8
United Kingdom 0.8 2.7
Netherlands -0.1 1.9
France 0.1 1.8
Sweden -2.2 1.7
Spain 2.5 1.6
Australia 3.0 1.3
Belgium 0.8 1.3
South Korea 1.6 1.2
Hungary 1.7 0.7
United States -2.1 0.2
Estonia 3.3 -0.5
Denmark 1.9 -0.8
Canada 2.7 -0.9
Japan -3.8 -1.7
Czech Republic -0.2 -2.4
Singapore -1.1 -3.1
Taiwan -3.8 -5.9


  • Manufacturing unit labor costs (compensation per unit of output) in national currency grew between 2007 and 2010 in 16 out of 23 selected countries. Germany, Slovakia, Italy, and Finland experienced the largest growth.
  • Of the countries that experienced increases in unit labor costs from 2000 to 2007, only Canada, Denmark, and Estonia had declines in unit labor costs from 2007 to 2010.

Back to Top Back to Top



Chart 3.11

Growth in manufacturing unit labor costs in U.S. dollars,
selected countries, average annual rates, 2000-2007 and 2007-2010
2000-2007 2007-2010
Japan -5.0 8.4
Slovakia 4.6 7.1
Australia 8.5 4.5
Germany 4.1 3.4
Italy 8.7 3.0
Finland 2.6 2.9
Norway 8.1 1.8
Austria 5.2 1.7
Netherlands 5.7 0.8
France 5.9 0.7
Spain 8.5 0.5
Canada 7.6 0.5
Singapore 0.8 0.2
Belgium 6.7 0.2
United States -2.1 0.2
Czech Republic 9.2 0.0
Sweden 2.2 -0.4
Estonia 9.3 -1.9
Denmark 7.8 -1.9
Hungary 8.1 -3.4
Taiwan -4.5 -4.6
United Kingdom 4.9 -5.8
South Korea 4.5 -6.0


  • Converting unit labor costs (compensation per unit of output) to U.S. dollars enables comparisons of international competitiveness. Competitiveness increases as unit labor costs decrease.
  • Growth in manufacturing unit labor costs was faster from 2000 to 2007 than the growth between 2007 and 2010 in most countries. Japan and Slovakia had the sharpest increases in unit labor costs during the latter period.

Back to Top Back to Top



Chart 3.12



  • In all selected countries, the growth of productivity outpaced the growth of real hourly compensation in manufacturing between 1970 and 2010, creating a compensation-productivity gap.
  • By 2010, the gap was largest in the United States, Finland, and Sweden. The gap was smallest in Germany, the United Kingdom, and Denmark.

Back to Top Back to Top


Section 3b Notes


Sources

Hourly compensation costs (charts 3.1–3.6) measure employers’ average hourly labor costs in the manufacturing sector. Average costs refer to all employees, are based on national establishment surveys, and are prepared for level comparisons. To permit meaningful level comparisons of employer labor costs across countries, earnings data from national surveys are adjusted to the BLS concept of hourly compensation. (See definition that follows.) Data for all countries are based on the BLS news release International Comparisons of Hourly Compensation Costs in Manufacturing, 2010 and the related time series tables. Also, see the technical notes and country notes associated with this release.

Because of various data gaps and methodological issues, compensation costs for China and India are not directly comparable with each other or with data for other countries. For further information, see the Country at a Glance pages for China and India at www.bls.gov/fls/country.htm.

Average compensation costs for selected regions (charts 3.2 and 3.5) are calculated by weighting each country's compensation cost value by its relative importance to U.S. trade. The weights are calculated using the dollar value of U.S. trade (exports plus imports) in manufactured commodities with each country in 2010.

Data on productivity, output, hours, unit labor costs, and real hourly compensation (charts 3.7–3.12) refer to all employed persons (employees and the self-employed) in the manufacturing sector. These data are based on national accounts and are prepared for trend (rather than level) comparisons. Data for most countries are based on the BLS news release International Comparisons of Manufacturing Productivity and Unit Labor Cost Trends and the related time series tables. See the technical notes associated with the news release.

Data for the remaining countries are based on data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) database OECD.Stat.

In charts 3.4 and 3.7–3.11, the periods 2000–2007 and 2007–2010 are selected to compare a time of global recession (2007–2010) against a prerecessionary time (2000–2007). The charts show the average annual growth rate during each period. Although 2007 is included in both, it represents two different annual changes that do not overlap: 2006–2007 in the first period and 2007–2008 in the second period.

Definitions

Hourly compensation (labor cost) is the average cost to employers of using one hour of employee labor in the manufacturing sector. Compensation includes (1) pay for time worked, (2) directly paid benefits, and (3) employer social insurance expenditures and labor-related taxes. Pay for time worked refers to wages and salaries for time actually worked, including basic wages, overtime pay, shift and holiday premiums, and regular bonuses. Directly paid benefits primarily include pay for vacations and other leave, irregular bonuses, and pay in kind. Social insurance expenditures are employer contributions to social benefit funds on behalf of workers, such as for unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, health insurance, and pension funds. Labor-related taxes are taxes on payrolls or employment, net of subsidies. Total hourly direct pay includes all payments made directly to the worker consisting of pay for time worked and directly paid benefits.

Productivity is real output per hour worked. Output is the market value in constant dollars of goods and services produced in a country. For international comparisons, output refers to gross output minus intermediate inputs, or real value added. Hours refer to the hours worked by all persons engaged in the manufacturing process. Unit labor costs are nominal compensation costs divided by real value-added output. Unit labor costs can be expressed in national currency and in U.S. dollars. Real hourly compensation refers to the hourly labor cost for employed persons (employees and the self-employed), adjusted for inflation. It includes all payments made in cash or in kind directly to employees and employer social insurance expenditures. It includes labor-related taxes and excludes labor-related subsidies.


Back to Top Back to Top

Go to:

 

Last Modified Date: September 25, 2012