An official website of the United States government
Technical information: (202) 691-6392 USDL 08-0668 http://www.bls.gov/mls/ For release: 10:00 A.M. (EDT) Media contact: (202) 691-5902 Thursday, May 15, 2008 (NOTE: This news release was reissued on Friday, May 16, 2008, to correct a data value shown in table 10. The value for total private nonfarm separations in the first quarter 2008 was corrected from 8,326 to 188,326. Data in the other tables and other figures in the text were not affected by this correction.) EXTENDED MASS LAYOFFS IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2008 In the first quarter of 2008, there were 1,111 mass layoff events that resulted in the separation of 188,326 workers from their jobs for at least 31 days, according to preliminary figures released by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics. A strike at a transportation equip- ment manufacturer was a contributing factor in 31 extended layoff events affecting 19,887 workers at other firms. The total number of layoff events was essentially unchanged from the January-March 2007 time period, while the number of associated separations was lower. (See table A.) First quarter 2008 layoff data are preliminary and are subject to revision. (See the Technical Note.) Among the 7 categories of economic reasons for layoff, business demand accounted for the highest share of events (47 percent) and number of separa- tions (79,358) in January-March 2008. (See table B.) Layoff activity attri- buted to business demand factors increased from the same period in 2007, when these reasons were cited in 39 percent of layoff events and involved 62,693 laid-off workers. Since the collection of movement of work data began in 2004, a series low 47 extended mass layoff events associated with 8,856 separated workers were recorded in the first quarter of 2008. (See table C.) These events accounted for 5 percent of the nonseasonal layoff events and 6 percent of the nonseasonal separations. Permanent closure of worksites occurred in 12 percent of all extended mass layoff events and affected 33,103 workers during the first quarter of 2008. Forty-three percent of the employers reporting a layoff indicated they antici- pated some type of recall. Of those employers expecting to recall workers, a record low 30 percent indicated that the offer would be extended to all employ- ees. Extended mass layoffs without an expectation of recall occurred mainly in credit intermediation and related activities and in transportation equipment manufacturing. The national unemployment rate averaged 5.3 percent, not seasonally adjusted, in the first quarter of 2008, up from 4.8 percent a year earlier. Private non- farm payroll employment, not seasonally adjusted, increased by 0.4 percent, or 507,000 over the year. --------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | Changes to Extended Mass Layoff Data | | | | Effective with this news release, the Mass Layoff Statistics (MLS)| |program has switched the basis for their industry classification | |from the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) | |to the 2007 NAICS for extended mass layoff data. The new classifi- | |cation includes minor definitional changes within manufacturing; | |telecommunications; financial activities; and professional, scienti- | |fic, and technical services. Several industry titles and descrip- | |tions also were updated. For more information on the MLS program's | |change to NAICS 2007, see http://www.bls.gov/mls/mls2007naics.htm. | | | | For additional information on the 2007 NAICS, see http://www. | |census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html. | | | --------------------------------------------------------------------- - 2 - Table A. Selected measures of extended mass layoff activity ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | Period | Layoff events | Separations | Initial claimants | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | 2004 | | | | | | January-March ........| 1,339 | 276,503 | 238,392 April-June ...........| 1,358 | 278,831 | 254,063 July-September .......| 886 | 164,608 | 148,575 October-December .....| 1,427 | 273,967 | 262,049 | | | 2005 | | | | | | January-March ........| 1,142 | 186,506 | 185,486 April-June ...........| 1,203 | 246,099 | 212,673 July-September .......| 1,136 | 201,878 | 190,186 October-December .....| 1,400 | 250,178 | 246,188 | | | 2006 | | | | | | January-March ........| 963 | 183,089 | 193,510 April-June ...........| 1,353 | 295,964 | 264,927 July-September .......| 929 | 160,254 | 161,764 October-December .....| 1,640 | 296,662 | 330,901 | | | 2007 | | | | | | January-March (r).....| 1,110 | 225,600 | 199,250 April-June (r)........| 1,421 | 278,719 | 259,082 July-September (r)....| 1,019 | 160,830 | 173,518 October-December (r)..| 1,814 | 301,377 | 346,030 | | | 2008 | | | | | | January-March (p).....| 1,111 | 188,326 | 165,933 | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- r = revised. p = preliminary. Industry Distribution of Extended Layoffs Manufacturing industries accounted for 31 percent of private nonfarm extended mass layoff events and 40 percent of related separations in the first quarter of 2008. (See table 1.) The largest number of separations was in transporta- tion equipment manufacturing (31,340, mostly associated with automobile manufac- turing), followed by food manufacturing (9,478). A strike involving a transport- ation equipment manufacturer was a contributing factor in 55 percent of the separ- ations in that industry. The construction sector accounted for 26 percent of events and 16 percent of separations during January-March 2008, largely in specialty trade contracting and heavy and civil engineering construction. Layoffs in the retail trade sector ac- counted for 8 percent of all extended mass layoff events and 11 percent of separa- tions and were concentrated in general merchandise stores. - 3 - Table B. Distribution of extended layoff events and separations by economic reason categories, January-March 2008p ---------------------------------------------------------------- | Layoff events | Separations Category |--------------------------------------- | Number | Percent | Number | Percent ------------------------|--------------------------------------- | | | | Total ................| 1,111 | 100.0 | 188,326 | 100.0 | | | | Business demand.........| 520 | 46.8 | 79,358 | 42.1 Organizational changes .| 91 | 8.2 | 18,675 | 9.9 Financial issues .......| 106 | 9.5 | 22,972 | 12.2 Production specific ....| 24 | 2.2 | 11,760 | 6.2 Disaster/safety ........| 6 | .5 | 968 | .5 Seasonal ...............| 226 | 20.3 | 38,540 | 20.5 Other/miscellaneous ....| 138 | 12.4 | 16,053 | 8.5 | | | | ---------------------------------------------------------------- p = preliminary. Reasons for Extended Layoffs Among the 7 categories of economic reasons for extended mass layoffs, events related to business demand factors (contract cancellation, contract completion, domestic competition, excess inventory, import competition, and slack work) ac- counted for 47 percent of the extended layoffs and resulted in 79,358 separations during the first quarter of 2008. (See table 2.) Business demand job cuts were most numerous in transportation equipment manufacturing (motor vehicle manufact- uring) and in specialty trade contracting (building equipment contractors). About one-quarter of all layoff events and separations were due to slack work, the high- est proportion of events since first quarter 2002 and the highest proportion of separations since third quarter 2001. However, 11 percent of these slack work events and 42 percent of the associated separations were strike-related cutbacks in the transportation equipment manufacturing sector. Job losses related to seasonal factors (seasonal and vacation period) accounted for 20 percent of the extended layoff events and resulted in 38,540 separations, primarily in food manufacturing and general merchandise stores. Financial issues (bankruptcy, cost control, and financial difficulty) accounted for 10 percent of events and resulted in 22,972 separations. These layoffs were most common among workers in credit intermediation and related activities and in furniture and home furnishings stores. - 4 - Table C. Extended mass layoff events and separations, selected measures, first quarter 2008(p) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Action | Layoff events | Separations | | -----------------------------------|-----------------|----------------- | | Total, private nonfarm ............| 1,111 | 188,326 | | Total, excluding seasonal | | and vacation events (1) ......| 885 | 149,786 | | Total events with movement | | of work (2) ................| 47 | 8,856 | | Movement of work actions ...| 59 | (3) With separations reported.| 36 | 5,297 With separations unknown .| 23 | (3) | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 The questions on movement of work were not asked of employers when the reason for layoff was either seasonal work or vacation period. 2 A layoff event can involve more than one movement of work action. 3 Data are not available. p = preliminary. Movement of Work Since the collection of movement of work data began in 2004, a series low 47 extended mass layoff events associated with 8,856 separated workers were recorded in the first quarter of 2008. (See table C.) These movements of work were to other domestic locations or to locations outside of the U.S., and they occurred either within the same company or to other companies. A year earlier, there were 70 layoff events and 11,438 separations associated with the movement of work. (See table 10.) Among the 47 extended mass layoff events with reported relocation of work in the first quarter of 2008, 64 percent were permanent closures of worksites, which affected 6,566 workers. In comparison, 12 percent of the total extended mass lay- off events reported for the quarter involved the permanent closure of worksites affecting 33,103 workers. Of the layoffs involving the movement of work, 60 percent of the events and 53 percent of the laid-off workers were from manufacturing industries during the first quarter. (See table 7.) Among all private nonfarm extended layoffs, manufacturing accounted for 31 percent of the events and 40 percent of the separations. - 5 - Table D. Movement of work actions by type of separation where the number of separations is known by employers, first quarter 2008(p) -------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Activities | Actions (1) | Separations | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | | With separations reported ......| 36 | 5,297 | | By location | | | | Out-of-country relocations ..| 13 | 1,181 Within company ............| 10 | 882 Different company .........| 3 | 299 | | Domestic relocations ........| 23 | 4,116 Within company ............| 21 | 3,201 Different company .........| 2 | 915 | | By company | | | | Within company ..............| 31 | 4,083 Domestic ..................| 21 | 3,201 Out of country ............| 10 | 882 | | Different company ...........| 5 | 1,214 Domestic ..................| 2 | 915 Out of country ............| 3 | 299 | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Only actions for which separations associated with the movement of work were reported are shown. p = preliminary. While 18 percent of the extended mass layoff events in the total private non- farm economy were because of either financial issues or organizational changes, such reasons accounted for 66 percent of layoff events associated with work relo- cation and resulted in 6,012 separations during the first quarter. (See table 8.) Among the regions, the South accounted for the largest proportion of workers affected by extended mass layoffs associated with the movement of work (38 per- cent), followed by the West (28 percent), the Midwest (26 percent), and the Northeast (9 percent). (See table 9.) Some extended mass layoff events involve more than one relocation of work ac- tion. For example, an extended mass layoff event at an employer may involve job loss due to movement of work to both another domestic location of the company and a location out of the country. This would be counted as two movement of work ac- tions. The 47 extended layoff events with movement of work for the first quarter of 2008 involved 59 identifiable relocations of work. (See table C.) An identi- fiable relocation of work occurs when the employer provides sufficient information on the new location of work and/or the number of workers affected by the movement. Of the 59 relocations, employers were able to provide information on the specific number of separations associated with the movement of work component of the layoff in 36 actions involving 5,297 workers. (See table 10.) In the 36 actions where employers were able to provide more complete separations information, 86 percent of relocations (31 out of 36) occurred within the same com- pany. (See table D.) Sixty-four percent of these relocations (23 out of 36) were do- mestic reassignments, while 36 percent involved out-of-country moves (13 out of 36). Domestic relocation of work--both within the company and to other companies--affected 4,116 workers. Out-of-country relocations were associated with the separation of 1,181 workers, 1 percent of all nonseasonal and nonvacation extended mass layoff separations. (See table 11.) - 6 - Table E. Summary of employer expectations of a recall from extended layoff, first quarter 2007-first quarter 2008 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | Percentage of events Nature of the recall |_________________________________________ | | | | | | I | II | III | IV | I | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007(r)| 2008(p) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | | | | Anticipate a recall .......| 40.2 | 57.1 | 37.9 | 55.8 | 43.2 | | | | | Timeframe | | | | | | | | | | Within 6 months ...........| 83.6 | 87.5 | 83.9 | 87.9 | 71.7 Within 3 months .........| 51.3 | 59.7 | 62.7 | 34.2 | 46.7 | | | | | Size | | | | | | | | | | At least half .............| 87.2 | 93.3 | 86.0 | 90.5 | 74.6 All workers .............| 38.6 | 57.2 | 45.6 | 50.5 | 29.6 | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r = revised. p = preliminary. Recall Expectations Forty-three percent of employers reporting an extended layoff in the first quarter of 2008 indicated they anticipated some type of recall, up slightly from a year earl- ier. (See table E.) However, of those employers expecting to recall workers, a re- cord low 30 percent indicated that the offer would be extended to all displaced employ- ees. For events without an expectation of recall, the highest number of separations occurred in credit intermediation and related activities, in transportation equipment manufacturing, and in general merchandise stores. Seventy-two percent of employers expected to recall the laid-off employees within 6 months, a record low for the series. Seventy-five percent of employers anticipated extending the offer to at least half of the workers. Excluding layoff events due to seasonal work and vacation period (in which 89 per- cent of the employers expected a recall), employers anticipated recalling laid-off workers in 32 percent of the events, up from 27 percent a year earlier. - 7 - Table F. Distribution of extended layoff events by size of layoff, first quarter 2008(p) ------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | Layoff events | Separations Size |--------------------------------------- | | | | | Number | Percent | Number | Percent ------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | Total ..................| 1,111 | 100.0 | 188,326 | 100.0 | | | | 50-99 .....................| 519 | 46.7 | 36,653 | 19.5 100-149 ...................| 268 | 24.1 | 31,555 | 16.8 150-199 ...................| 102 | 9.2 | 17,092 | 9.1 200-299 ...................| 106 | 9.5 | 24,500 | 13.0 300-499 ...................| 67 | 6.0 | 25,165 | 13.4 500-999 ...................| 33 | 3.0 | 20,132 | 10.7 1,000 or more .............| 16 | 1.4 | 33,229 | 17.6 ------------------------------------------------------------------- p = preliminary. Size of Extended Layoffs The average size of a layoff (as measured by separations per layoff event) in the first quarter of 2008 was 170, compared to 203 per layoff in the first quarter of 2007. The average differed widely by industry, ranging from a low of 67 in leather and allied products to a high of 776 in motion picture and sound recording industries. Layoff events during January-March 2008 continued to be concentrated at the lower end of the extended layoff-size spectrum, with 71 percent of the events involving fewer than 150 workers. Layoffs involving less than 150 workers accounted for 36 percent of all separations during the period, compared to 29 percent in the first quarter of 2007. Separations involving 500 or more workers, while comprising only 4 percent of the events, accounted for 28 percent of all separations in the first quarter of 2008, down from 41 percent a year earlier. (See table F.) Initial Claimant Characteristics A total of 165,933 initial claimants for unemployment insurance were associated with extended mass layoffs in the first quarter of 2008. Of these claimants, 14 percent were black, 18 percent were Hispanic, 35 percent were women, 35 percent were 30 to 44 years of age, and 18 percent were 55 years of age or older. (See table 3.) Among persons in the civilian labor force for the same period, 11 percent were black, 14 percent were Hispanic, 47 percent were women, 33 percent were age 30 to 44, and 18 percent were 55 years of age or older. Geographic Distribution Among the 4 census regions, the highest number of separations due to extended mass layoff events in the first quarter of 2008 was in the Midwest, with 71,890, followed by the West, with 65,141. (See table 4.) Extended mass layoffs in the Midwest were largely in transportation equipment manufacturing and in administrative and support services. The Midwest region accounted for 38 percent of all separations, up from 25 percent in the same period last year. Thirty-five percent of the extended layoffs were reported by the West, a decrease from 46 percent in the first quarter of 2007. Among the 9 census regions, the highest number of separations during the first quarter of 2008 was in the East North Central, with 63,758, followed by the Pacific, with 59,012. (See table 4.) Extended mass layoffs in the East North Central division were largely in transportation equipment manufacturing. California recorded the largest number of worker separations (55,469), followed by Ohio (19,420), Illinois (17,771), and Michigan (14,149). These four states accounted for 56 percent of total extended mass layoff events and 57 percent of total separa- tions during the first quarter of 2008. (See table 5.) After excluding the substant- ial impact of seasonal reasons, California still reported the highest number of job cuts (46,437), largely due to layoffs in specialty trade contractors and in heavy and civil engineering construction. California accounted for 29 percent of all separations in January-March 2008, down sharply from 41 percent in 2007. Ohio accounted for 10 percent of the separations in the first quarter of 2008, up from 4 percent in 2007. In the first quarter of 2008, Michigan reported the largest number of separations related to the transportation equipment manufacturing strike (7,107), followed by Ohio (6,760) and Indiana (4,580). - 8 - Table G. Mass layoff events and separations, selected metropolitan areas -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | Events | Separations Metropolitan area |-----------------|----------------- | | | | | I | I | I | I | 2007(r)| 2008(p)| 2007(r)| 2008(p) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | Total, nonmetropolitan areas ...............| 120 | 105 | 17,422 | 15,688 | | | | Total, 369 metropolitan areas ..............| 624 | 587 | 86,443 | 92,165 | | | | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, Calif. ..| 72 | 78 | 9,304 | 11,454 Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, Ill.-Ind.-Wis. .| 59 | 47 | 8,689 | 7,746 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long | | | | Island, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa. ....................| 47 | 35 | 6,886 | 5,660 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, Calif. .....| 31 | 37 | 3,245 | 4,523 Detriot-Warren-Livonia, Mich. .............| 22 | 26 | 2,766 | 4,426 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif. ....| 9 | 15 | 768 | 2,758 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, Va. ....| (1) | (1) | (1) | (1) Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. ..| 23 | 19 | 2,746 | 2,250 St. Louis, Mo.-Ill. .......................| 9 | 7 | 2,704 | 1,902 Shreveport-Bossier City, La. ..............| (1) | 3 | (1) | 1,840 | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Data do not meet BLS or state agency disclosure standards. r = revised. p = preliminary. NOTE: The geographic boundaries of the metropolitan areas shown in this table are defined in Office of Management and Budget Bulletin 08-01, November 20, 2007. Fifty-three percent of events and 49 percent of separations (92,165) occurred in metropolitan areas in the first quarter of 2008, compared with 56 percent of events and 38 percent of separations (86,443) during the first quarter of 2007. Among the 369 metropolitan areas, Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, Calif., reported the high- est number of separations (11,454) in the first quarter of 2008. Next were Chicago- Naperville-Joliet, Ill.-Ind.-Wis., with 7,746 separations and New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa., with 5,660 separations. (See table G.) Employers located in nonmetropolitan areas separated 15,688 workers in extended mass layoffs. Note The quarterly series on extended mass layoffs cover layoffs of at least 31-days duration that involve 50 or more individuals from a single employer filing initial claims for unemployment insurance during a consecutive 5-week period. Approximately 30 days after a mass layoff is triggered, the employer is contacted for additional information. Data for the first quarter are preliminary and subject to revision. This release also includes revised data for previous quarters. Data are not sea- sonally adjusted, but survey data suggest that there is a seasonal pattern to lay- offs. Thus, comparisons between consecutive quarters should not be used as an in- dicator of trend. For additional information about the program, see the Technical Note. ______________________________ The report on Mass Layoffs in April 2008 is scheduled to be released on Thursday, May 22.
- 9 - Technical Note The Mass Layoff Statistics (MLS) program is a federal-state program which identifies, describes, and tracks the effects of major job cutbacks, using data from each state's unemployment insurance database. Employers which have at least 50 initial claims filed against them during a con- secutive 5-week period are contacted by the state agency to determine whether these separations are of at least 31 days duration, and, if so, information is obtained on the total number of persons separated and the reasons for these separations. Employers are identified according to in- dustry classification and location, and unemployment insurance claimants are identified by such demographic factors as age, race, gender, ethnic group, and place of residence. The program yields information on an individual's entire spell of unemployment, to the point when regular unemployment insurance benefits are exhausted. Definitions Employer. Employers in the MLS program include those covered by state unemployment insurance laws. Information on employers is obtained from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, which is admini- stered by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Extended layoff event. Fifty or more initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits from an employer during a 5-week period, with at least 50 workers separated for more than 30 days. Initial claimant. A person who files any notice of unemployment to initiate a request either for a determination of entitlement to and eligi- bility for compensation, or for a subsequent period of unemployment within a benefit year or period of eligibility. Layoff. The separation of persons from an employer as part of a mass layoff event. (See below.) Such layoffs involve both persons subject to recall and those who are terminated by the establishment. Mass layoff. Fifty or more initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits from an employer beginning in a given month, regardless of dura- tion. Worksite closure. The complete closure of either multi-unit or single- unit employers or the partial closure of a multi-unit employer where entire worksites affected by layoffs are closed or planned to be closed. - 10 - Revisions to preliminary data The latest quarterly data in this news release are considered preliminary. After the initial publication of quarterly information, more data are col- lected as remaining employer interviews for the quarter are completed and additional initial claimant information associated with extended layoff events is received. Movement of work concepts and questions Because of the employer interview component, the BLS decided to use the MLS program as a vehicle for collecting additional information on offshoring and outsourcing associated with job loss, by adding questions that address movement of work. The term "moving work" means that the company experiencing the layoff has reassigned work activities that were performed at a worksite by the company's employees (1) to another work- site within the company; (2) to another company under formal arrangements at the same worksite; or (3) to another company under formal arrangements at another worksite. The type of work activities subject to movement can include accounting, customer service, cleaning, warehousing, etc. "Overseas relocation" is the movement of work from within the U.S. to locations outside of the U.S. "Overseas relocation" can occur within the same company and involve movement of work to a different location of that company outside of the U.S., or to a different company altogether. "Domestic relocation" is the movement of work to other locations inside the U.S., either within the same company or to a different company. "Overseas relocation" and "domestic relocation" are no longer used in the same way as they were in earlier extended mass layoff news releases. There- fore, the data presented in this news release are not comparable to those that were presented in earlier news releases. Questions on movement of work and location are asked for all identified layoff events when the reason for separation is other than "seasonal work" or "vacation period." Seasonal and vacation layoff events were excluded because movement of work appears unlikely. Questions on movement of work are asked after the analyst verifies that a layoff in fact occurred and lasted more than 30 days, and obtained the total number of workers separated from jobs, the date the layoff began, and the economic reason for the layoff. If the reason for layoff is other than seasonal or vacation, the employer was asked the following: (1) "Did this layoff include your company moving work from this loca- tion(s) to a different geographic location(s) within your company?" (2) "Did this layoff include your company moving work that was performed in-house by your employees to a different company, through contractual ar- rangements?" A "yes" response to either question is followed by: "Is the location inside or outside of the U.S.?" and "How many of the layoffs were a result of this relocation?" Layoff actions are classified as "overseas relocation" if the employer responds "yes" to questions 1 and/or 2, and indicates that the location(s) was outside of the U.S. Domestic relocation is determined if the employer responds "yes" to questions 1 and/or 2 and indicates that the location(s) was within the U.S. After asking the movement of work questions, the employer interview continues and responses are obtained for questions on recall expectations and open/closed status of the worksite. - 11 - Reliability of the data The identification of employers and layoff events in the MLS program and associated characteristics of claimants is based on administrative data on covered establishments and unemployment insurance claims, and, therefore, is not subject to issues associated with sampling error. Nonsampling errors such as typographical errors may occur but are not likely to be significant. While the MLS employers and layoff events are not subject to sampling error, and all such employers are asked the interview questions, the employer responses are subject to nonsampling error. Nonsampling error can occur for many reasons, including the in- ability to obtain information for all respondents, inability or unwill- ingness of respondents to provide correct information, and errors made in the collection or processing of the data. For the first quarter of 2008, outright refusal to participate in the employer interview accounted for 3.9 percent of all private nonfarm events. Although included in the total number of instances involving the movement of work, for the first quarter, employers in 23 relocations were unable to provide the number of separations specifically associated with the movement of work, 7 of which involved out-of-country moves. Other information Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral phone: 1-800-877-8339.
Table 1. Industry distribution: Extended mass layoff events, separations, and initial claimants for unemployment insurance, private nonfarm sector, selected quarters, 2007 and 2008 Initial claimants for Layoff events Separations unemployment insurance Industry I IV I I IV I I IV I 2007r 2007r 2008p 2007r 2007r 2008p 2007r 2007r 2008p Total, private nonfarm (1) ................. 1,110 1,814 1,111 225,600 301,377 188,326 199,250 346,030 165,933 Mining ....................................... 7 27 (2) 843 3,584 (2) 557 3,491 (2) Utilities .................................... (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) Construction ................................. 305 682 291 30,513 86,848 30,767 37,493 100,624 30,585 Manufacturing ................................ 369 442 343 68,797 80,539 74,453 82,529 117,512 68,254 Food .................................... 64 71 43 10,176 17,131 9,478 11,999 16,912 6,535 Beverage and tobacco products ........... 9 (2) 8 1,084 (2) 1,416 1,569 (2) 1,392 Textile mills ........................... 10 10 11 1,716 1,799 1,063 2,992 4,834 2,558 Textile product mills (3)................ 4 5 (2) 603 968 (2) 785 1,806 (2) Apparel (3) ............................. 14 10 10 1,583 1,524 952 1,698 1,379 987 Leather and allied products ............. (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) Wood products ........................... 22 49 31 3,688 6,553 4,271 4,528 7,628 5,923 Paper ................................... 7 6 5 820 899 457 724 1,045 472 Printing and related support activities . 13 14 4 1,989 2,323 346 1,579 2,272 381 Petroleum and coal products ............. (2) 18 (2) (2) 2,760 (2) (2) 2,925 (2) Chemicals ............................... 9 11 5 1,610 2,892 933 995 2,354 425 Plastics and rubber products (3) ........ 15 19 18 3,167 2,998 2,799 1,542 2,724 1,981 Nonmetallic mineral products ............ 29 56 32 2,984 7,773 3,296 3,346 9,755 3,117 Primary metals .......................... 9 14 11 1,282 2,456 2,451 1,650 3,131 1,801 Fabricated metal products ............... 16 21 23 1,831 2,774 2,795 2,367 3,317 2,429 Machinery (3) ........................... 16 22 19 3,304 4,364 3,040 3,346 6,548 2,704 Computer and electronic products ........ 24 12 21 4,326 1,857 3,444 3,687 1,738 2,538 Electrical equipment and appliances ..... 7 16 10 733 3,616 1,897 1,327 8,524 2,632 Transportation equipment (3) ............ 63 55 67 23,131 12,858 31,340 33,601 35,566 29,117 Furniture and related products (3) ...... 27 19 16 3,527 2,490 2,775 3,775 3,100 2,360 Miscellaneous manufacturing (3) ......... 6 7 5 803 1,648 1,229 482 1,028 447 Wholesale trade .............................. 17 38 29 2,249 4,442 2,914 1,615 5,470 2,155 Retail trade ................................. 89 76 89 70,086 19,152 21,102 22,642 21,129 19,213 Transportation and warehousing ............... 35 43 42 5,711 9,719 6,895 5,513 8,752 6,163 Information .................................. 17 29 20 2,640 5,061 5,845 3,177 7,215 3,511 Finance and insurance (3) .................... 57 104 74 8,993 18,575 12,190 9,692 18,927 11,457 Real estate and rental and leasing (3) ....... 7 9 5 806 1,461 453 901 1,176 456 Professional and technical services (3) ...... 31 50 29 7,990 9,634 5,397 7,808 9,675 2,697 Management of companies and enterprises ...... 6 9 5 1,183 1,642 700 668 1,226 434 Administrative and waste services (3) ........ 72 136 82 13,448 21,525 12,142 13,808 24,702 10,181 Educational services ......................... (2) (2) 4 (2) (2) 393 (2) (2) 349 Health care and social assistance ............ 19 22 14 2,432 4,697 3,412 1,843 3,476 1,675 Arts, entertainment, and recreation .......... 22 50 19 2,427 17,859 2,398 2,318 7,218 1,680 Accommodation and food services .............. 47 73 52 6,267 12,843 7,940 7,389 11,819 5,971 Other services, except public administration . 7 14 5 805 2,220 441 664 1,945 401 Unclassified ................................. - 3 3 - 696 404 - 514 259 1 For the first quarter of 2008, data on layoffs were reported by employers in all states and the District of Columbia. 2 Data do not meet BLS or state agency disclosure standards. 3 Data beginning in 2008 are not strictly comparable to prior years due to a change in NAICS versions. r = revised. p = preliminary. NOTE: Dash represents zero.
Table 2. Reason for layoff: Extended mass layoff events, separations, and initial claimants for unemployment insurance, private nonfarm sector, selected quarters, 2007 and 2008 Initial claimants for Layoff events Separations unemployment insurance Reason for layoff I IV I I IV I I IV I 2007r 2007r 2008p 2007r 2007r 2008p 2007r 2007r 2008p Total, private nonfarm (1) ..... 1,110 1,814 1,111 225,600 301,377 188,326 199,250 346,030 165,933 Business demand ................... 437 613 520 62,693 83,995 79,358 84,844 137,224 80,248 Contract cancellation ........... 23 17 16 3,503 2,564 2,264 3,269 3,384 1,775 Contract completion ............. 193 286 212 24,371 34,838 25,769 31,181 49,155 25,782 Domestic competition ............ 7 (2) - 885 (2) - 728 (2) - Excess inventory/saturated market ......................... 15 (2) 6 3,525 (2) 1,380 3,834 (2) 653 Import competition .............. 23 16 14 2,744 2,868 2,096 2,791 6,065 1,644 Slack work/insufficient demand/ non-seasonal business slowdown.. 176 282 272 27,665 42,200 47,849 43,041 76,589 50,394 Organizational changes ............ 127 92 91 68,354 22,626 18,675 18,814 20,535 13,602 Business-ownership change ....... 34 24 18 54,698 9,673 5,626 5,260 5,693 1,489 Reorganization or restructuring of company ..................... 93 68 73 13,656 12,953 13,049 13,554 14,842 12,113 Financial issues .................. 99 124 106 21,689 24,652 22,972 20,939 25,800 16,611 Bankruptcy ...................... 12 15 22 2,858 4,665 5,433 1,670 2,597 2,974 Cost control/cost cutting/ increase profitability ......... 54 42 34 11,672 8,254 5,297 12,216 13,274 5,878 Financial difficulty ............ 33 67 50 7,159 11,733 12,242 7,053 9,929 7,759 Production specific ............... 24 25 24 5,959 3,935 11,760 7,295 4,864 8,051 Automation/technological advances ...................... (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) Energy related .................. - - - - - - - - - Governmental regulations/ intervention ................... 4 (2) (2) 568 (2) (2) 388 (2) (2) Labor dispute/contract negotiations/strike ............ (2) 10 4 (2) 1,457 5,054 (2) 2,386 2,186 Material or supply shortage ..... 9 (2) 5 803 (2) 4,289 955 (2) 3,977 Model changeover ................ (2) (2) - (2) (2) - (2) (2) - Plant or machine repair/ maintenance .................... (2) 8 5 (2) 1,360 507 (2) 972 399 Product line discontinued ....... 4 (2) 4 642 (2) 1,104 397 (2) 908 Disaster/safety ................... 20 6 6 1,639 778 968 1,615 809 568 Hazardous work environment ...... (2) - (2) (2) - (2) (2) - (2) Natural disaster (not weather related) ....................... (2) - (2) (2) - (2) (2) - (2) Non-natural disaster ............ (2) - - (2) - - (2) - - Extreme weather-related event ... 16 6 (2) 1,290 778 (2) 1,237 809 (2) Seasonal .......................... 261 752 226 39,255 129,733 38,540 40,110 119,180 31,356 Seasonal ........................ (2) 747 226 (2) 129,317 38,540 (2) 118,616 31,356 Vacation period-school related or otherwise ................... (2) 5 - (2) 416 - (2) 564 - Other/miscellaneous ............... 142 202 138 26,011 35,658 16,053 25,633 37,618 15,497 Other ........................... 9 12 15 1,454 2,091 1,363 950 3,150 1,691 Data not provided: refusal ...... 52 57 46 9,922 11,227 6,535 9,903 11,241 6,494 Data not provided: does not know ........................... 81 133 77 14,635 22,340 8,155 14,780 23,227 7,312 1 See footnote 1, table 1. 2 Data do not meet BLS or state agency disclosure standards. r = revised. p = preliminary. NOTE: Dash represents zero.
Table 3. State and selected claimant characteristics: Extended mass layoff events and initial claimants for unemployment insurance, private nonfarm sector, fourth quarter, 2007 and first quarter, 2008 Total Percent of total initial Hispanic Persons age 55 Layoff events claimants Black origin Women and over State IV I IV I IV I IV I IV I IV I 2007r 2008p 2007r 2008p 2007r 2008p 2007r 2008p 2007r 2008p 2007r 2008p Total, private nonfarm (1) . 1,814 1,111 346,030 165,933 12.4 14.3 16.4 18.1 29.5 34.7 16.7 17.9 Alabama ........................ 9 11 1,867 1,730 59.4 51.3 2.5 5.2 46.7 46.8 20.4 16.2 Alaska ......................... 8 (2) 1,373 (2) 3.4 3.8 14.2 15.4 25.9 25.0 17.0 21.2 Arizona ........................ 7 3 1,079 287 11.6 15.0 30.7 31.0 40.6 35.2 9.6 11.1 Arkansas ....................... 8 3 3,229 331 19.5 41.4 1.2 2.4 36.5 65.9 24.1 20.2 California ..................... 435 402 79,551 52,822 7.1 8.6 38.0 39.3 34.7 34.7 13.8 14.0 Colorado ....................... 18 9 2,308 1,324 2.3 7.2 41.9 17.5 12.3 34.2 18.4 16.9 Connecticut .................... 8 3 1,231 246 13.2 8.9 7.4 8.5 33.5 43.9 22.4 32.9 Delaware ....................... 3 - 209 - 29.7 - 9.1 - 23.9 - 41.1 - District of Columbia ........... (2) - (2) - 50.0 - 18.0 - 51.6 - 13.9 - Florida ........................ 61 15 7,122 1,329 13.9 12.9 25.2 24.5 40.4 31.9 21.6 22.0 Georgia ........................ 15 19 6,450 3,149 28.7 29.2 11.2 9.3 42.3 47.3 16.0 17.6 Hawaii ......................... 4 6 495 603 7.9 8.1 10.7 12.8 19.0 12.3 12.7 10.6 Idaho .......................... 14 6 2,041 683 .4 .3 18.2 14.6 23.2 23.7 15.6 16.5 Illinois ....................... 178 98 27,605 13,287 14.4 24.8 21.6 15.9 21.5 37.3 13.0 15.4 Indiana ........................ 54 23 17,360 7,658 10.1 9.1 4.5 4.3 24.3 27.4 15.8 20.4 Iowa ........................... 27 9 6,287 2,321 2.3 1.2 3.8 1.6 24.0 37.5 17.5 16.4 Kansas ......................... 8 6 1,335 663 12.7 14.9 6.3 2.9 26.7 46.9 18.3 18.1 Kentucky ....................... 18 16 2,179 1,660 2.2 13.3 - .3 11.2 30.5 16.7 17.9 Louisiana ...................... 12 7 1,296 2,252 62.7 42.7 1.9 3.2 26.5 27.0 15.3 25.9 Maine .......................... 8 (2) 1,388 (2) 3.2 3.1 .3 .3 35.1 52.9 20.0 21.8 Maryland ....................... 25 6 3,285 853 34.9 19.6 .5 4.5 38.0 33.2 18.8 29.0 Massachusetts .................. 26 18 3,554 2,008 9.1 12.1 .7 1.4 31.1 43.3 21.6 16.7 Michigan ....................... 95 56 32,411 14,190 22.6 19.5 6.0 2.7 24.4 27.7 17.4 22.5 Minnesota ...................... 75 15 11,285 1,252 3.1 3.7 9.1 3.4 16.1 25.8 16.3 15.7 Mississippi .................... 5 7 747 558 67.1 54.3 .3 1.1 32.3 36.4 20.3 19.5 Missouri ....................... 40 19 5,015 1,634 7.7 14.5 .4 .4 33.6 43.1 26.9 17.7 Montana ........................ 10 3 1,379 280 .4 - 3.6 2.5 9.9 18.2 17.8 26.8 Nebraska ....................... 6 (2) 580 (2) 2.1 .6 9.0 23.6 7.8 2.5 31.6 18.0 Nevada ......................... 13 9 3,121 1,200 9.5 4.3 17.5 32.3 28.6 35.9 19.2 19.6 New Hampshire .................. 3 (2) 369 (2) 1.1 .7 1.6 3.7 5.7 41.5 29.0 9.6 New Jersey ..................... 54 28 7,609 3,152 17.4 22.5 9.2 11.1 42.3 44.4 23.5 22.8 New Mexico ..................... 3 5 428 660 1.4 2.7 79.7 37.4 50.5 26.8 29.7 36.8 New York ....................... 106 47 19,864 6,329 9.6 10.8 8.6 7.9 24.0 28.6 19.3 17.5 North Carolina ................. 6 13 992 1,795 39.9 61.6 3.9 4.2 40.5 52.0 25.6 24.7 North Dakota ................... 8 - 1,166 - .5 - 3.9 - 13.2 - 18.2 - Ohio ........................... 116 64 22,436 13,598 13.3 17.0 2.8 3.1 24.1 30.4 14.5 18.2 Oklahoma ....................... (2) (2) (2) (2) 3.5 17.4 5.3 3.1 29.8 56.7 5.3 8.7 Oregon ......................... 24 10 6,795 3,009 1.2 .5 26.7 26.4 40.8 35.5 18.2 21.2 Pennsylvania ................... 78 61 21,399 9,125 7.1 6.9 4.2 5.0 36.9 34.2 19.6 23.3 Rhode Island ................... 6 3 726 218 2.8 1.4 12.5 7.8 31.4 34.9 16.0 40.4 South Carolina ................. 13 7 1,942 728 69.8 43.3 .1 .1 58.9 47.7 8.4 3.7 South Dakota ................... (2) (2) (2) (2) - 5.6 14.7 16.7 34.7 68.9 37.3 10.0 Tennessee ...................... 28 16 6,770 1,462 33.9 21.5 .1 - 40.8 58.2 28.8 19.3 Texas .......................... 29 22 5,552 2,456 21.6 18.6 39.7 33.3 36.5 34.6 11.7 20.4 Utah ........................... 11 5 2,105 465 1.0 3.9 13.8 24.1 9.5 50.1 12.5 8.4 Vermont ........................ 4 (2) 423 (2) - 1.0 .5 - 27.4 31.6 22.9 20.7 Virginia ....................... 21 14 2,656 2,819 42.0 26.0 5.0 1.3 52.5 44.4 19.5 23.1 Washington ..................... 25 5 3,907 550 4.1 4.7 24.3 4.4 31.9 42.4 16.8 18.0 West Virginia .................. 8 4 921 551 .4 .2 - - 11.7 44.6 14.9 18.3 Wisconsin ...................... 76 26 13,802 5,321 4.1 4.1 8.2 11.6 16.8 35.6 15.4 20.6 Wyoming ........................ (2) (2) (2) (2) 2.3 - - 1.5 25.8 35.4 30.3 26.2 Puerto Rico .................... 9 8 2,088 1,741 - .1 98.0 97.8 54.1 58.5 11.1 6.3 1 See footnote 1, table 1. 2 Data do not meet BLS or state agency disclosure standards. r = revised. p = preliminary. NOTE: Dash represents zero.
Table 4. Census region and division: Extended mass layoff events, separations, and initial claimants for unemployment insurance, private nonfarm sector, selected quarters, 2007 and 2008 Initial claimants for Layoff events Separations unemployment insurance Census region and division I IV I I IV I I IV I 2007r 2007r 2008p 2007r 2007r 2008p 2007r 2007r 2008p United States (1) ..... 1,110 1,814 1,111 225,600 301,377 188,326 199,250 346,030 165,933 Northeast ..................... 198 293 165 28,100 49,004 21,741 32,564 56,563 21,695 New England ............... 39 55 29 7,381 11,348 4,264 4,964 7,691 3,089 Middle Atlantic ........... 159 238 136 20,719 37,656 17,477 27,600 48,872 18,606 South ......................... 196 263 162 37,709 45,153 29,554 37,962 45,396 22,063 South Atlantic ............ 109 153 78 18,113 24,182 13,454 20,970 23,699 11,224 East South Central ........ 51 60 50 10,752 12,757 8,202 10,221 11,563 5,410 West South Central ........ 36 50 34 8,844 8,214 7,898 6,771 10,134 5,429 Midwest ....................... 314 684 319 55,894 114,726 71,890 65,252 139,357 60,175 East North Central ........ 256 519 267 46,550 88,794 63,758 56,418 113,614 54,054 West North Central ........ 58 165 52 9,344 25,932 8,132 8,834 25,743 6,121 West .......................... 402 574 465 103,897 92,494 65,141 63,472 104,714 62,000 Mountain .................. 39 78 41 4,705 16,135 6,129 3,970 12,593 4,964 Pacific ................... 363 496 424 99,192 76,359 59,012 59,502 92,121 57,036 1 See footnote 1, table 1. r = revised. p = preliminary. NOTE: The States (including the District of Columbia) that comprise the census divisions are: New England: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Middle Atlantic: New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania; South Atlantic: Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia; East South Central: Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, and Tennessee; West South Central: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas; East North Central: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin; West North Central: Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota; Mountain: Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming; and Pacific: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington.
Table 5. State distribution: Extended mass layoff events, separations, and initial claimants for unemployment insurance, private nonfarm sector, selected quarters, 2007 and 2008 Initial claimants for Layoff events Separations unemployment insurance State I IV I I IV I I IV I 2007r 2007r 2008p 2007r 2007r 2008p 2007r 2007r 2008p Total, private nonfarm (1) . 1,110 1,814 1,111 225,600 301,377 188,326 199,250 346,030 165,933 Alabama ........................ 8 9 11 1,448 1,693 1,267 1,335 1,867 1,730 Alaska ......................... - 8 (2) - 1,916 (2) - 1,373 (2) Arizona ........................ 4 7 3 538 1,364 253 382 1,079 287 Arkansas ....................... 3 8 3 821 1,193 500 562 3,229 331 California ..................... 321 435 402 92,008 64,718 55,469 53,242 79,551 52,822 Colorado ....................... 7 18 9 567 3,588 2,098 573 2,308 1,324 Connecticut .................... 6 8 3 1,895 1,624 247 1,509 1,231 246 Delaware ....................... - 3 - - 231 - - 209 - District of Columbia ........... - (2) - - (2) - - (2) - Florida ........................ 38 61 15 6,989 9,110 1,506 6,384 7,122 1,329 Georgia ........................ 14 15 19 2,115 2,813 2,112 2,743 6,450 3,149 Hawaii ......................... 4 4 6 602 563 555 525 495 603 Idaho .......................... 9 14 6 1,073 2,218 610 799 2,041 683 Illinois ....................... 94 178 98 15,633 30,467 17,771 15,171 27,605 13,287 Indiana ........................ 27 54 23 3,429 8,797 7,485 4,859 17,360 7,658 Iowa ........................... 9 27 9 1,352 4,559 1,404 1,326 6,287 2,321 Kansas ......................... 3 8 6 925 1,066 810 1,163 1,335 663 Kentucky ....................... 12 18 16 1,224 2,716 1,812 1,187 2,179 1,660 Louisiana ...................... 6 12 7 875 2,080 2,975 629 1,296 2,252 Maine .......................... 9 8 (2) 2,769 1,827 (2) 908 1,388 (2) Maryland ....................... 12 25 6 1,071 3,115 986 1,105 3,285 853 Massachusetts .................. 19 26 18 2,025 6,181 2,486 2,024 3,554 2,008 Michigan ....................... 58 95 56 14,826 16,433 14,149 21,743 32,411 14,190 Minnesota ...................... 22 75 15 3,004 12,047 1,957 3,284 11,285 1,252 Mississippi .................... 9 5 7 2,234 782 1,834 1,695 747 558 Missouri ....................... 19 40 19 3,569 6,019 3,371 2,602 5,015 1,634 Montana ........................ (2) 10 3 (2) 1,385 280 (2) 1,379 280 Nebraska ....................... - 6 (2) - 859 (2) - 580 (2) Nevada ......................... 9 13 9 1,412 2,780 1,020 1,390 3,121 1,200 New Hampshire .................. (2) 3 (2) (2) 415 (2) (2) 369 (2) New Jersey ..................... 37 54 28 6,205 9,257 5,344 5,630 7,609 3,152 New Mexico ..................... 3 3 5 219 434 518 224 428 660 New York ....................... 53 106 47 6,615 17,570 6,377 6,592 19,864 6,329 North Carolina ................. 20 6 13 2,629 553 2,101 5,140 992 1,795 North Dakota ................... 3 8 - 319 1,166 - 319 1,166 - Ohio ........................... 55 116 64 7,940 20,000 19,420 9,673 22,436 13,598 Oklahoma ....................... 7 (2) (2) 3,129 (2) (2) 1,899 (2) (2) Oregon ......................... 16 24 10 3,035 6,535 1,752 2,901 6,795 3,009 Pennsylvania ................... 69 78 61 7,899 10,829 5,756 15,378 21,399 9,125 Rhode Island ................... (2) 6 3 (2) 779 243 (2) 726 218 South Carolina ................. 5 13 7 565 2,001 910 528 1,942 728 South Dakota ................... (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) Tennessee ...................... 22 28 16 5,846 7,566 3,289 6,004 6,770 1,462 Texas .......................... 20 29 22 4,019 4,840 3,949 3,681 5,552 2,456 Utah ........................... 5 11 5 724 2,004 1,150 486 2,105 465 Vermont ........................ (2) 4 (2) (2) 522 (2) (2) 423 (2) Virginia ....................... 17 21 14 4,494 5,250 5,136 4,846 2,656 2,819 Washington ..................... 22 25 5 3,547 2,627 536 2,834 3,907 550 West Virginia .................. 3 8 4 250 987 703 224 921 551 Wisconsin ...................... 22 76 26 4,722 13,097 4,933 4,972 13,802 5,321 Wyoming ........................ (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) Puerto Rico .................... 12 9 8 902 755 493 3,022 2,088 1,741 1 See footnote 1, table 1. 2 Data do not meet BLS or state agency disclosure standards. r = revised. p = preliminary. NOTE: Dash represents zero.
Table 6. Information technology-producing industries: Extended mass layoff events and separations, private nonfarm sector, 2001-2008 Information technology-producing industries (1) Total extended Year mass layoffs Computer Software and Communications Communications hardware (2) computer services (3) equipment (4) services (5) Layoff Layoff Layoff Layoff Layoff events Separations events Separations events Separations events Separations events Separations 2001 First quarter .... 1,546 304,171 91 20,991 32 5,558 22 4,441 13 3,317 Second quarter ... 1,828 430,499 161 38,986 69 9,563 36 12,109 15 3,519 Third quarter .... 1,629 330,391 142 24,813 45 5,724 39 8,200 21 5,350 Fourth quarter ... 2,372 459,771 109 17,797 50 7,667 43 10,124 38 9,889 Total ........ 7,375 1,524,832 503 102,587 196 28,512 140 34,874 87 22,075 2002 First quarter .... 1,611 299,266 84 18,574 34 3,770 32 8,192 28 4,346 Second quarter ... 1,624 344,606 69 11,764 39 4,326 27 4,870 34 5,643 Third quarter .... 1,186 255,152 76 15,017 36 4,359 34 6,529 33 5,496 Fourth quarter ... 1,916 373,307 74 14,298 26 5,709 19 3,645 31 7,643 Total ........ 6,337 1,272,331 303 59,653 135 18,164 112 23,236 126 23,128 2003 First quarter .... 1,502 286,947 71 11,900 27 5,097 23 4,402 26 4,513 Second quarter ... 1,799 368,273 54 9,221 19 2,741 21 3,098 22 4,169 Third quarter .... 1,190 236,333 46 6,488 24 4,189 9 1,289 8 842 Fourth quarter ... 1,690 325,333 25 5,080 8 1,167 9 1,619 23 5,774 Total ........ 6,181 1,216,886 196 32,689 78 13,194 62 10,408 79 15,298 2004 First quarter .... 1,339 276,503 27 3,222 13 2,786 8 894 14 2,832 Second quarter ... 1,358 278,831 18 2,959 15 2,775 - - 15 3,250 Third quarter .... 886 164,608 13 2,288 14 1,467 4 430 11 3,792 Fourth quarter ... 1,427 273,967 18 3,055 10 1,547 4 563 20 3,143 Total ........ 5,010 993,909 76 11,524 52 8,575 16 1,887 60 13,017 2005 First quarter .... 1,142 186,506 13 1,526 9 2,355 4 439 12 2,400 Second quarter ... 1,203 246,099 20 2,973 13 1,558 4 842 7 1,331 Third quarter .... 1,136 201,878 23 3,307 7 1,034 (6) (6) 3 304 Fourth quarter ... 1,400 250,178 19 4,122 3 720 (6) (6) 5 845 Total ........ 4,881 884,661 75 11,928 32 5,667 13 3,000 27 4,880 2006 First quarter .... 963 183,089 12 1,159 6 744 (6) (6) (6) (6) Second quarter ... 1,353 295,964 10 3,294 7 1,564 8 988 (6) (6) Third quarter .... 929 160,254 14 3,544 6 487 (6) (6) 8 1,222 Fourth quarter ... 1,640 296,662 12 4,039 4 708 5 1,482 8 947 Total ........ 4,885 935,969 48 12,036 23 3,503 19 3,753 23 3,406 2007 First quarter(r) . 1,110 225,600 19 3,007 5 875 3 415 5 885 Second quarter ... 1,421 278,719 22 3,634 4 413 5 433 3 315 Third quarter(r) . 1,019 160,830 22 5,279 6 1,030 4 403 3 276 Fourth quarter(r) 1,814 301,377 9 1,459 4 473 3 381 7 870 Total(r) ..... 5,364 966,526 72 13,379 19 2,791 15 1,632 18 2,346 2008 First quarter(p) . 1,111 188,326 18 2,921 5 543 (6) (6) (6) (6) 1 Information technology-producing industries are defined in Digital Economy 2003, (U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, 2003). In the MLS program, however, computer and software merchant wholesalers and computer and software stores are only included in the computer hardware industry. Beginning with first quarter 2008 data, the MLS program switched to the 2007 NAICS. The industry groups defined by the Digital Economy 2003 are based on 2002 NAICS. Due to these differences, historical data were subject to revision. 2 The industries included in this grouping, based on the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), are: semiconductor machinery manufacturing; office machinery manufacturing; electronic computer manufacturing; computer storage device manufacturing; computer terminal manufacturing; other computer peripheral equipment mfg.; electron tube manufacturing; bare printed circuit board manufacturing; semiconductors and related device mfg.; electronic capacitor manufacturing; electronic resistor manufacturing; electronic coils, transformers, and inductors; electronic connector manufacturing; printed circuit assembly manufacturing; other electronic component manufacturing; industrial process variable instruments; electricity and signal testing instruments; analytical laboratory instrument mfg.; computer and software merchant wholesalers; and computer and software stores. 3 The industries included in this grouping, based on the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), are: software publishers; internet service providers; web search portals; data processing and related services; computer and software merchant wholesalers; computer and software stores; custom computer programming services; computer systems design services; computer facilities management services; other computer related services; office equipment rental and leasing; and computer and office machine repair. 4 The industries included in this grouping, based on the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), are: telephone apparatus manufacturing; audio and video equipment manufacturing; broadcast and wireless communications equip.; fiber optic cable manufacturing; software reproducing; and magnetic and optical recording media mfg. 5 The industries included in this grouping, based on the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), are: wired telecommunications carriers; cellular and other wireless carriers; telecommunications resellers; cable and other program distribution; satellite telecommunications; other telecommunications; and communication equipment repair. 6 Data do not meet BLS or state agency disclosure standards. NOTE: Dash represents zero. r = revised. p = preliminary.
Table 7. Industry distribution: Extended mass layoff events and separations associated with the movement of work, selected quarters, 2007 and 2008 Layoff events Separations Industry I IV I I IV I 2007 2007r 2008p 2007 2007r 2008p Total, private nonfarm (1) ................ 70 69 47 11,438 11,302 8,856 Mining ...................................... (2) - - (2) - - Utilities ................................... - - - - - - Construction ................................ - - - - - - Manufacturing ............................... 50 48 28 8,147 7,980 4,735 Food ................................... 4 5 - 374 1,232 - Beverage and tobacco products .......... (2) - (2) (2) - (2) Textile mills .......................... - (2) (2) - (2) (2) Textile product mills (3) .............. (2) (2) - (2) (2) - Apparel (3) ............................ 8 - (2) 1,023 - (2) Leather and allied products ............ (2) - (2) (2) - (2) Wood products .......................... (2) - 3 (2) - 390 Paper .................................. 3 (2) (2) 405 (2) (2) Printing and related support activities 5 3 (2) 913 411 (2) Petroleum and coal products ............ - - - - - - Chemicals .............................. 3 (2) (2) 998 (2) (2) Plastics and rubber products (3) ....... (2) 3 (2) (2) 382 (2) Nonmetallic mineral products ........... (2) (2) - (2) (2) - Primary metals ......................... (2) 3 (2) (2) 390 (2) Fabricated metal products .............. (2) 5 (2) (2) 879 (2) Machinery (3) .......................... (2) (2) - (2) (2) - Computer and electronic products ....... 3 3 5 916 620 1,195 Electrical equipment and appliances .... (2) 6 (2) (2) 1,360 (2) Transportation equipment (3) ........... 5 10 6 775 1,438 958 Furniture and related products (3) ..... (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) Miscellaneous manufacturing (3) ........ 3 - - 524 - - Wholesale trade ............................. (2) (2) 3 (2) (2) 244 Retail trade ................................ (2) 3 (2) (2) 334 (2) Transportation and warehousing .............. 3 (2) 3 538 (2) 284 Information ................................. (2) 3 (2) (2) 252 (2) Finance and insurance (3) ................... 6 5 6 1,230 861 1,312 Real estate and rental and leasing (3) ...... - - - - - - Professional and technical services (3) ..... - 4 (2) - 647 (2) Management of companies and enterprises ..... (2) (2) - (2) (2) - Administrative and waste services (3) ....... 3 (2) (2) 495 (2) (2) Educational services ........................ - - - - - - Health care and social assistance ........... - - - - - - Arts, entertainment, and recreation ......... - - - - - - Accommodation and food services ............. - - - - - - Other services, except public administration (2) (2) - (2) (2) - Unclassified ................................ - - - - - - 1 See footnote 1, table 1. 2 Data do not meet BLS or state agency disclosure standards. 3 Data beginning in 2008 are not strictly comparable to prior years due to a change in NAICS versions. r = revised. p = preliminary. NOTE: Dash represents zero.
Table 8. Reason for layoff: Extended mass layoff events and separations associated with the movement of work, selected quarters, 2007 and 2008 Layoff events Separations Reason for layoff I IV I I IV I 2007r 2007r 2008p 2007r 2007r 2008p Total, private nonfarm (1) ..... 70 69 47 11,438 11,302 8,856 Business demand ................... 13 17 (2) 1,684 2,492 (2) Contract cancellation ........... (2) (2) - (2) (2) - Contract completion ............. - (2) - - (2) - Domestic competition ............ (2) - - (2) - - Excess inventory/saturated market ......................... (2) - - (2) - - Import competition .............. (2) 7 (2) (2) 1,167 (2) Slack work/insufficient demand/ non-seasonal business slowdown . (2) 7 (2) (2) 950 (2) Organizational changes ............ 39 30 15 6,766 5,110 2,958 Business-ownership change ....... 7 5 5 2,091 1,326 1,495 Reorganization or restructuring of company ..................... 32 25 10 4,675 3,784 1,463 Financial issues .................. 14 21 16 2,425 3,600 3,054 Bankruptcy ...................... (2) - - (2) - - Cost control/cost cutting/ increase profitability ......... (2) (2) 9 (2) (2) 1,056 Financial difficulty ............ (2) (2) 7 (2) (2) 1,998 Production specific ............... (2) - (2) (2) - (2) Automation/technological advances ....................... - - - - - - Energy related .................. - - - - - - Governmental regulations/ intervention ................... - - - - - - Labor dispute/contract negotiations/strike ............ - - - - - - Material or supply shortage ..... - - (2) - - (2) Model changeover ................ - - - - - - Plant or machine repair/ maintenance .................... - - - - - - Product line discontinued ....... (2) - - (2) - - Disaster/safety ................... - - (2) - - (2) Hazardous work environment ...... - - - - - - Natural disaster (not weather related) ....................... - - (2) - - (2) Non-natural disaster ............ - - - - - - Extreme weather-related event ... - - - - - - Other/miscellaneous ............... (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) Other ........................... (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) Data not provided: refusal ...... - - - - - - Data not provided: does not know ........................... - - - - - - 1 See footnote 1, table 1. 2 Data do not meet BLS or state agency disclosure standards. r = revised. p = preliminary. NOTE: Dash represents zero.
Table 9. Census region and division: Extended mass layoff events and separations associated with the movement of work, selected quarters, 2007 and 2008 Layoff events Separations Census region and division I IV I I IV I 2007 2007r 2008p 2007 2007r 2008p United States (1) . 70 69 47 11,438 11,302 8,856 Northeast ................. 17 11 4 2,834 1,726 1,176 New England ........... (2) 3 (2) (2) 562 (2) Middle Atlantic ....... (2) 8 (2) (2) 1,164 (2) South ..................... 26 16 18 3,466 2,105 2,753 South Atlantic ........ 15 8 8 1,827 903 947 East South Central .... (2) 5 7 (2) 512 1,140 West South Central .... (2) 3 3 (2) 690 666 Midwest ................... 16 30 12 2,781 5,847 2,700 East North Central .... 13 23 (2) 2,416 4,190 (2) West North Central .... 3 7 (2) 365 1,657 (2) West ...................... 11 12 13 2,357 1,624 2,227 Mountain .............. 5 (2) (2) 844 (2) (2) Pacific ............... 6 (2) (2) 1,513 (2) (2) 1 See footnote 1, table 1. 2 Data do not meet BLS or state agency disclosure standards. r = revised. p = preliminary. NOTE: The States (including the District of Columbia) that comprise the census divisions are: New England: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Middle Atlantic: New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania; South Atlantic: Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia; East South Central: Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, and Tennessee; West South Central: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas: East North Central: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin; West North Central: Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota; Mountain: Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming; and Pacific: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington.
Table 10. Extended mass layoff events and separations, selected measures, selected quarters, 2007 and 2008 Layoff events Separations Action I IV I I IV I 2007 2007r 2008p 2007 2007r 2008p Total, private nonfarm (1) ............. 1,110 1,814 1,111 225,600 301,377 188,326 Total, excluding seasonal and vacation events (2)............ 849 1,062 885 186,345 171,644 149,786 Total, movement of work (3) .... 70 69 47 11,438 11,302 8,856 Movement of work actions ..... 86 90 59 (4) (4) (4) With separations reported .. 61 66 36 8,467 7,152 5,297 With separations unknown .. 25 24 23 (4) (4) (4) 1 See footnote 1, table 1. 2 The questions on movement of work were not asked of employers when the reason for layoff was either seasonal work or vacation period. 3 Movement of work can involve more than one action. 4 Data are not available. r = revised. p = preliminary.
Table 11. Movement of work actions by type of separation where number of separations is known by employers, selected quarters, 2007 and 2008 Actions (1) Separations Activities I IV I I IV I 2007 2007r 2008p 2007 2007r 2008p With separations reported (2) . 61 66 36 8,467 7,152 5,297 By location Out-of-country relocations .. 14 27 13 2,135 2,997 1,181 Within company .......... 13 26 10 2,086 2,910 882 Different company ....... 1 1 3 49 87 299 Domestic relocations ........ 46 39 23 6,261 4,155 4,116 Within company .......... 41 38 21 5,221 3,975 3,201 Different company ....... 5 1 2 1,040 180 915 Unable to assign place of relocation ................. 1 - - 71 - - By company Within company .............. 55 64 31 7,378 6,885 4,083 Domestic ................ 41 38 21 5,221 3,975 3,201 Out of country .......... 13 26 10 2,086 2,910 882 Unable to assign ........ 1 - - 71 - - Different company ........... 6 2 5 1,089 267 1,214 Domestic ................ 5 1 2 1,040 180 915 Out of country .......... 1 1 3 49 87 299 Unable to assign ........ - - - - - - 1 Only actions for which separations associated with the movement of work were reported are shown. 2 See footnote 1, table 1 r = revised. p = preliminary. Note: Dash represents zero.