An official website of the United States government
19-886-KAN
Wednesday, July 10, 2019
Employment rose in all nine large counties in Colorado from December 2017 to December 2018, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with 2017 average annual employment levels of 75,000 or more.) Assistant Commissioner for Regional Operations Stanley W. Suchman noted that Weld County (3.9 percent) had the fastest employment growth among the nine largest counties in the state. (See table 1.)
Nationwide, employment advanced 1.5 percent during the 12-month period as 296 of the 349 largest U.S. counties registered increases. Midland, TX, had the largest over-the-year percentage increase, up 10.0 percent. Bay, FL, experienced the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment with a loss of 5.6 percent.
Among the nine largest counties in Colorado, employment was highest in Denver County (522,900) and lowest in Weld (111,400) in December 2018. Together, the nine largest Colorado counties accounted for 80.6 percent of total employment within the state.
Average weekly wages increased in 8 of the 9 large counties in Colorado. Douglas County (-3.6 percent) was the only large county to record a decrease over the year. Jefferson County had the largest over-the-year wage increase among the state’s large counties, up 8.7 percent. Denver County ($1,414) had the highest average weekly wage among Colorado’s large counties and was above the national average of $1,144. (See table 1.)
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 55 counties in Colorado with employment levels below 75,000. Of these small counties, Broomfield ($1,546) had the highest average weekly wage level. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesJefferson County’s 8.7-percent annual wage increase ranked eighth among large U.S. counties in the fourth quarter of 2018. Three large counties registered increases of 6.0 percent each and ranked 25th: Boulder, Denver, and Larimer. Douglas County had an over-the-year decline of 3.6 percent, which ranked 346th among the 349 large U.S. counties. (See table 1.)
Average weekly wages for the nation increased to $1,144, a 3.2-percent increase over the year. Of the 349 largest U.S. counties, 332 had over-the-year wage increases. Tippecanoe, IN, had the largest fourth quarter over-the-year wage gain at 15.1 percent. Fifteen large U.S. counties had over-the-year decreases in average weekly wages. Washington, PA, recorded the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in average weekly wages with a loss of 6.6 percent.
Large county average weekly wagesThree of the state’s large counties had average weekly wages that placed in the top 50 of the 349 largest U.S. counties in the fourth quarter of 2018. Average weekly wages in Denver County ($1,414, 25th), Boulder County ($1,354, 39th), and Arapahoe County ($1,306, 47th) recorded wages above the national average of $1,144. Douglas County ($1,272, 51st) and Jefferson County ($1,211, 67th) also recorded wages above the national average and were in the top third of the national ranking. The four remaining large counties in Colorado had average weekly wages that placed in the middle-third of the national ranking.
Nationally, 94 large counties registered average weekly wages above the U.S. average in the fourth quarter of 2018. Santa Clara, CA, held the top position with an average weekly wage of $2,670. San Francisco, CA, was second at $2,452. The average weekly wage in the highest-ranked county, Santa Clara, CA, was nearly four times the average weekly wage in the lowest-ranked county, Hidalgo, TX ($680).
Average weekly wages in Colorado’s smaller countiesOf the 55 counties in Colorado with employment below 75,000, Broomfield County reported the highest average weekly wage at $1,546 and San Juan County reported the lowest average weekly wage at $548 in the fourth quarter of 2018. (See table 2.)
When all 64 counties in Colorado were considered, 6 had wages above the national average. Thirteen reported average weekly wages of $1000 or higher, 5 reported wages from $900 to $999, 18 had wages from $800 to $899, 16 recorded wages from $700 to $799, and 12 counties had wages of $699 or less. (See chart 1.)
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2017 edition of this publication contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2018 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages 2017 are now available online at https://www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2017/home.htm. The 2018 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2019.
The County Employment and Wages release for first quarter 2019 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, August 21, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. (ET).
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339
Area | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2018 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2017-18 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, fourth quarter 2017-18 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | |
United States (4) | 148,061.8 | 1.5 | -- | $1,144 | -- | 3.2 | -- |
Colorado | 2,713.7 | 2.2 | -- | 1,180 | 10 | 4.1 | 11 |
Adams | 220.0 | 3.7 | 12 | 1,094 | 123 | 2.0 | 257 |
Arapahoe | 334.5 | 1.6 | 126 | 1,306 | 47 | 3.0 | 176 |
Boulder | 185.8 | 1.9 | 86 | 1,354 | 39 | 6.0 | 25 |
Denver | 522.9 | 1.8 | 100 | 1,414 | 25 | 6.0 | 25 |
Douglas | 127.7 | 1.7 | 114 | 1,272 | 51 | -3.6 | 346 |
El Paso | 280.0 | 2.2 | 60 | 1,013 | 189 | 4.6 | 65 |
Jefferson | 241.3 | 1.6 | 126 | 1,211 | 67 | 8.7 | 8 |
Larimer | 163.5 | 2.7 | 36 | 1,064 | 150 | 6.0 | 25 |
Weld | 111.4 | 3.9 | 9 | 1,014 | 188 | 5.3 | 43 |
Footnotes: | |||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Employment December 2018 | Average Weekly Wage(1) |
---|---|---|
United States(2) | 148,061,773 | $1,144 |
Colorado | 2,713,706 | 1,180 |
Adams | 220,006 | 1,094 |
Alamosa | 8,271 | 763 |
Arapahoe | 334,539 | 1,306 |
Archuleta | 4,151 | 697 |
Baca | 1,105 | 624 |
Bent | 1,075 | 744 |
Boulder | 185,785 | 1,354 |
Broomfield | 40,255 | 1,546 |
Chaffee | 7,946 | 824 |
Cheyenne | 695 | 855 |
Clear Creek | 3,422 | 904 |
Conejos | 1,449 | 625 |
Costilla | 895 | 612 |
Crowley | 1,085 | 830 |
Custer | 851 | 675 |
Delta | 8,450 | 703 |
Denver | 522,914 | 1,414 |
Dolores | 538 | 672 |
Douglas | 127,650 | 1,272 |
Eagle | 35,471 | 945 |
Elbert | 3,764 | 880 |
El Paso | 280,019 | 1,013 |
Fremont | 13,494 | 824 |
Garfield | 26,263 | 1,009 |
Gilpin | 4,734 | 886 |
Grand | 8,265 | 723 |
Gunnison | 8,829 | 771 |
Hinsdale | 254 | 666 |
Huerfano | 1,753 | 698 |
Jackson | 569 | 865 |
Jefferson | 241,298 | 1,211 |
Kiowa | 482 | 762 |
Kit Carson | 2,819 | 742 |
Lake | 2,498 | 823 |
La Plata | 26,057 | 991 |
Larimer | 163,454 | 1,064 |
Las Animas | 5,033 | 842 |
Lincoln | 2,266 | 761 |
Logan | 8,052 | 808 |
Mesa | 63,396 | 895 |
Mineral | 706 | 554 |
Moffat | 4,750 | 978 |
Montezuma | 9,046 | 713 |
Montrose | 15,400 | 801 |
Morgan | 12,520 | 953 |
Otero | 6,056 | 736 |
Ouray | 1,796 | 776 |
Park | 2,365 | 809 |
Phillips | 1,694 | 769 |
Pitkin | 18,536 | 1,111 |
Prowers | 4,472 | 684 |
Pueblo | 61,586 | 872 |
Rio Blanco | 2,683 | 1,086 |
Rio Grande | 3,922 | 782 |
Routt | 16,188 | 889 |
Saguache | 1,555 | 663 |
San Juan | 282 | 548 |
San Miguel | 6,078 | 841 |
Sedgwick | 787 | 721 |
Summit | 24,582 | 819 |
Teller | 7,240 | 777 |
Washington | 1,241 | 786 |
Weld | 111,425 | 1,014 |
Yuma | 4,419 | 848 |
Footnotes | ||
NOTE: Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary. |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2018 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2017-18 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, fourth quarter 2017-18 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (2) | 148,061.8 | 1.5 | $1,144 | -- | 3.2 | -- |
Alabama | 1,986.6 | 1.6 | 957 | 36 | 3.1 | 33 |
Alaska | 308.3 | 0.4 | 1,103 | 16 | 4.9 | 7 |
Arizona | 2,921.1 | 3.0 | 1,017 | 24 | 4.1 | 11 |
Arkansas | 1,227.0 | 0.8 | 869 | 50 | 2.4 | 43 |
California | 17,556.7 | 1.7 | 1,392 | 4 | 3.3 | 26 |
Colorado | 2,713.7 | 2.2 | 1,180 | 10 | 4.1 | 11 |
Connecticut | 1,697.9 | 0.5 | 1,334 | 5 | 1.3 | 49 |
Delaware | 451.2 | 1.1 | 1,107 | 15 | 2.4 | 43 |
District of Columbia | 775.1 | 0.6 | 1,943 | 1 | 7.3 | 2 |
Florida | 8,902.7 | 2.1 | 1,006 | 27 | 3.1 | 33 |
Georgia | 4,499.8 | 1.8 | 1,053 | 21 | 2.4 | 43 |
Hawaii | 669.3 | 0.6 | 1,016 | 25 | 3.3 | 26 |
Idaho | 734.4 | 3.2 | 890 | 47 | 3.6 | 20 |
Illinois | 6,026.0 | 0.3 | 1,189 | 9 | 3.3 | 26 |
Indiana | 3,086.2 | 0.9 | 941 | 38 | 2.8 | 37 |
Iowa | 1,558.4 | 0.5 | 966 | 35 | 3.0 | 35 |
Kansas | 1,402.2 | 0.8 | 927 | 41 | 3.7 | 18 |
Kentucky | 1,914.0 | 0.3 | 924 | 42 | 3.2 | 30 |
Louisiana | 1,934.1 | 0.7 | 968 | 34 | 3.8 | 15 |
Maine | 618.4 | 1.3 | 906 | 44 | 2.5 | 41 |
Maryland | 2,702.5 | 0.8 | 1,228 | 8 | 1.7 | 48 |
Massachusetts | 3,620.3 | 1.0 | 1,457 | 2 | 3.3 | 26 |
Michigan | 4,366.5 | 1.0 | 1,077 | 19 | 1.3 | 49 |
Minnesota | 2,902.3 | 0.9 | 1,140 | 14 | 3.6 | 20 |
Mississippi | 1,144.3 | 0.2 | 793 | 51 | 2.5 | 41 |
Missouri | 2,821.3 | 0.5 | 980 | 31 | 3.6 | 20 |
Montana | 468.8 | 1.6 | 888 | 48 | 5.2 | 5 |
Nebraska | 983.0 | 0.2 | 930 | 40 | 3.2 | 30 |
Nevada | 1,397.4 | 3.3 | 1,006 | 27 | 5.3 | 4 |
New Hampshire | 666.0 | 0.7 | 1,158 | 12 | 2.3 | 46 |
New Jersey | 4,125.6 | 0.8 | 1,298 | 6 | 2.7 | 38 |
New Mexico | 830.2 | 1.5 | 905 | 45 | 4.6 | 9 |
New York | 9,613.2 | 1.5 | 1,445 | 3 | 1.0 | 51 |
North Carolina | 4,458.9 | 1.6 | 1,013 | 26 | 5.1 | 6 |
North Dakota | 422.3 | 1.5 | 1,057 | 20 | 4.7 | 8 |
Ohio | 5,442.9 | 0.5 | 1,006 | 27 | 3.4 | 24 |
Oklahoma | 1,632.3 | 1.5 | 932 | 39 | 4.1 | 11 |
Oregon | 1,935.8 | 1.7 | 1,052 | 22 | 3.7 | 18 |
Pennsylvania | 5,932.5 | 1.0 | 1,103 | 16 | 2.6 | 39 |
Rhode Island | 487.2 | 0.8 | 1,085 | 18 | 2.6 | 39 |
South Carolina | 2,119.6 | 2.8 | 893 | 46 | 1.9 | 47 |
South Dakota | 428.4 | 1.2 | 885 | 49 | 3.4 | 24 |
Tennessee | 3,039.8 | 1.8 | 1,030 | 23 | 3.0 | 35 |
Texas | 12,531.7 | 2.5 | 1,148 | 13 | 3.5 | 23 |
Utah | 1,511.5 | 3.2 | 972 | 33 | 3.8 | 15 |
Vermont | 314.2 | -0.4 | 954 | 37 | 3.2 | 30 |
Virginia | 3,927.2 | 1.1 | 1,164 | 11 | 3.8 | 15 |
Washington | 3,384.2 | 2.4 | 1,292 | 7 | 6.3 | 3 |
West Virginia | 704.2 | 1.5 | 917 | 43 | 8.3 | 1 |
Wisconsin | 2,892.3 | 0.6 | 989 | 30 | 4.0 | 14 |
Wyoming | 272.1 | 1.8 | 978 | 32 | 4.4 | 10 |
Puerto Rico | 896.4 | 0.8 | 576 | (3) | 0.9 | (3) |
Virgin Islands | 34.5 | 0.5 | 925 | (3) | 2.3 | (3) |
Footnotes: | ||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Wednesday, July 10, 2019