An official website of the United States government
17-1630-ATL
Wednesday, December 20, 2017
Employment increased in 5 of Alabama’s 6 largest counties from June 2016 to June 2017, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2016 annual average employment.) Regional Commissioner Janet S. Rankin noted that employment increases ranged from 2.7 percent in Madison County to 0.6 percent in Shelby County. Employment in Mobile County declined 0.1 percent over the year. (See table 1.)
Nationally, employment rose 1.7 percent from June 2016 to June 2017 as 318 of the 346 largest U.S. counties gained jobs. Midland, Texas, had the largest percentage increase, up 7.3 percent over the year. Lucas, Ohio, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment with a loss of 1.9 percent.
Among the six largest counties in Alabama, employment was highest in Jefferson (345,100) in June 2017, while Shelby had the smallest employment (85,200). Together, Alabama’s large counties accounted for 52.5 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 346 largest counties made up 72.7 percent of total U.S. employment, which stood at 145.2 million in June 2017.
Each of Alabama’s six large counties had over-the-year wage increases with the largest gain in Tuscaloosa County (4.8 percent). Madison County had the highest average weekly wage among the state’s six largest counties at $1,072. Nationally, the average weekly wage was $1,020, a 3.2 percent increase from a year ago. (See table 1.)
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 61 counties in Alabama with employment below 75,000. Average weekly wages in these counties ranged from $1,119 to $602. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesAs noted, average weekly wages increased in all of Alabama’s large counties from the second quarter of 2016 to the second quarter of 2017. Tuscaloosa (4.8 percent, 48th) and Jefferson (4.3 percent, 71st) were in the top third of the national ranking. Average weekly wage growth in Alabama’s four other large counties ranged from 2.6 to 0.2 percent. (See table 1.)
Nationally, 325 of the 346 largest counties had over-the-year increases in average weekly wages. New Hanover, N.C., had the largest wage increase among the largest U.S. counties (11.9 percent). San Mateo, Calif., and Midland, Texas were second with wage increases of 11.4 percent each. Rounding out the top five were Kitsap, Wash. (11.0 percent) and Clackamas, Ore. (10.0 percent).
Of the 346 largest U.S. counties, 19 had over-the-year decreases in average weekly wages. McLean, Ill., had the largest percentage decrease in average weekly wages (-20.4 percent), followed by Union, N.J. (-3.7 percent); Warren, Ohio (-3.6 percent); Somerset, N.J. (-3.4 percent); Fairfield, Conn. (-1.9 percent); and Washington, Ore. (-1.9 percent).
Large county average weekly wagesAverage weekly wages in 3 of Alabama’s 6 largest counties placed in the top half of the national ranking among the 346 largest counties in the second quarter of 2017. Madison County’s average weekly wage of $1,072 was above the U.S. average of $1,020, and ranked 73rd nationwide. Jefferson County ($1,008) and Shelby County ($948) ranked 108th and 163rd, respectively.
Nationwide, average weekly wages were higher than the U.S. average in 97 of the 346 largest counties. Santa Clara, Calif., was the highest-paid large county with an average weekly wage of $2,392. San Mateo, Calif., was second with an average weekly wage of $2,093, followed by San Francisco, Calif. ($1,941) and New York, N.Y. ($1,907).
Among the largest U.S. counties, 249 reported average weekly wages below the national average in the second quarter of 2017. Cameron, Texas ($615) had the lowest weekly wage, followed by Horry, S.C. ($622); and the Texas counties of Hidalgo ($632) and Webb ($667).
Average weekly wages in Alabama’s smaller countiesAmong the 61 counties in Alabama with employment below 75,000, Washington ($1,119) was the only county with a weekly wage above the national average of $1,020. Perry County had the lowest weekly wage in the state, averaging $602 in the second quarter of 2017. (See table 2.)
When all 67 counties in Alabama were considered, 37 had average weekly wages below $699, 14 had wages from $700-$799, 11 had wages from $800-$899, 5 had wages $900 or above. (See chart 1.)
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2016 edition of this publication contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2017 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages 2016 are now available online at https://www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2016/home.htm. The 2017 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2018.
The County Employment and Wages release for third quarter 2017 is scheduled to be released on Thursday, March 8, 2018.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 9.9 million employer reports cover 145.2 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
Area | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2017 (thousands) | Percent change, June 2016-17 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, second quarter 2016-17 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | |
United States (4) | 145,186.4 | 1.7 | -- | $1,020 | -- | 3.2 | -- |
Alabama | 1,946.4 | 1.2 | -- | 858 | 38 | 2.8 | 31 |
Jefferson, Ala. | 345.1 | 1.2 | 212 | 1,008 | 108 | 4.3 | 71 |
Madison, Ala. | 197.0 | 2.7 | 70 | 1,072 | 73 | 2.3 | 220 |
Mobile, Ala. | 170.3 | -0.1 | 324 | 857 | 255 | 1.4 | 273 |
Montgomery, Ala. | 133.2 | 1.1 | 222 | 840 | 272 | 0.2 | 322 |
Shelby, Ala. | 85.2 | 0.6 | 274 | 948 | 163 | 2.6 | 196 |
Tuscaloosa, Ala. | 91.7 | 0.7 | 264 | 850 | 263 | 4.8 | 48 |
Footnotes: | |||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Employment June 2017 | Average Weekly Wage(1) |
---|---|---|
United States(2) | 145,186,369 | $1,020 |
Alabama | 1,946,409 | 858 |
Autauga | 10,975 | 687 |
Baldwin | 74,905 | 666 |
Barbour | 8,029 | 683 |
Bibb | 4,155 | 757 |
Blount | 8,388 | 649 |
Bullock | 2,987 | 634 |
Butler | 6,815 | 635 |
Calhoun | 44,252 | 733 |
Chambers | 8,310 | 693 |
Cherokee | 5,084 | 643 |
Chilton | 9,415 | 683 |
Choctaw | 3,460 | 864 |
Clarke | 8,144 | 721 |
Clay | 4,041 | 632 |
Cleburne | 2,161 | 825 |
Coffee | 15,859 | 637 |
Colbert | 23,938 | 826 |
Conecuh | 3,454 | 676 |
Coosa | 1,345 | 639 |
Covington | 12,580 | 668 |
Crenshaw | 3,764 | 680 |
Cullman | 28,990 | 715 |
Dale | 16,849 | 970 |
Dallas | 12,389 | 678 |
DeKalb | 21,073 | 671 |
Elmore | 20,138 | 646 |
Escambia | 12,967 | 729 |
Etowah | 36,544 | 686 |
Fayette | 4,086 | 648 |
Franklin | 10,637 | 665 |
Geneva | 4,936 | 615 |
Greene | 1,762 | 683 |
Hale | 2,732 | 676 |
Henry | 3,252 | 696 |
Houston | 47,778 | 754 |
Jackson | 15,860 | 673 |
Jefferson | 345,146 | 1,008 |
Lamar | 3,495 | 707 |
Lauderdale | 29,577 | 648 |
Lawrence | 4,794 | 631 |
Lee | 58,252 | 728 |
Limestone | 22,843 | 896 |
Lowndes | 2,322 | 862 |
Macon | 4,750 | 801 |
Madison | 197,040 | 1,072 |
Marengo | 7,169 | 720 |
Marion | 9,986 | 655 |
Marshall | 37,021 | 667 |
Mobile | 170,288 | 857 |
Monroe | 6,194 | 782 |
Montgomery | 133,212 | 840 |
Morgan | 48,026 | 831 |
Perry | 2,055 | 602 |
Pickens | 3,837 | 692 |
Pike | 14,314 | 762 |
Randolph | 4,837 | 622 |
Russell | 14,138 | 681 |
St. Clair | 19,856 | 692 |
Shelby | 85,247 | 948 |
Sumter | 2,996 | 745 |
Talladega | 29,325 | 861 |
Tallapoosa | 13,585 | 700 |
Tuscaloosa | 91,715 | 850 |
Walker | 18,228 | 687 |
Washington | 3,568 | 1,119 |
Wilcox | 2,881 | 783 |
Winston | 7,837 | 662 |
Footnotes | ||
NOTE: Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary. |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2017 (thousands) | Percent change, June 2016-17 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, second quarter 2016-17 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (2) | 145,186.4 | 1.7 | $1,020 | -- | 3.2 | -- |
Alabama | 1,946.4 | 1.2 | 858 | 38 | 2.8 | 31 |
Alaska | 338.4 | -0.7 | 1,005 | 16 | -0.5 | 51 |
Arizona | 2,699.6 | 2.9 | 943 | 23 | 2.5 | 35 |
Arkansas | 1,206.0 | 0.7 | 810 | 47 | 3.2 | 22 |
California | 17,150.9 | 2.2 | 1,210 | 5 | 4.7 | 3 |
Colorado | 2,638.8 | 2.5 | 1,042 | 11 | 4.2 | 5 |
Connecticut | 1,701.2 | 0.6 | 1,216 | 4 | 0.4 | 50 |
Delaware | 446.6 | 0.6 | 1,012 | 15 | 2.2 | 43 |
District of Columbia | 766.5 | 1.0 | 1,675 | 1 | 3.3 | 19 |
Florida | 8,390.6 | 2.8 | 905 | 27 | 2.5 | 35 |
Georgia | 4,357.8 | 2.1 | 956 | 21 | 2.9 | 27 |
Hawaii | 653.0 | 1.0 | 935 | 24 | 3.5 | 13 |
Idaho | 723.5 | 3.4 | 765 | 50 | 3.4 | 16 |
Illinois | 6,006.6 | 0.9 | 1,062 | 9 | 2.4 | 39 |
Indiana | 3,041.0 | 1.5 | 859 | 37 | 3.7 | 9 |
Iowa | 1,571.4 | 0.4 | 853 | 39 | 3.3 | 19 |
Kansas | 1,377.8 | -0.1 | 849 | 40 | 2.4 | 39 |
Kentucky | 1,889.4 | 0.8 | 862 | 35 | 2.9 | 27 |
Louisiana | 1,907.7 | 0.0 | 869 | 34 | 2.0 | 46 |
Maine | 629.1 | 0.9 | 814 | 46 | 2.5 | 35 |
Maryland | 2,694.8 | 1.4 | 1,103 | 8 | 3.1 | 23 |
Massachusetts | 3,604.5 | 1.6 | 1,278 | 2 | 3.6 | 11 |
Michigan | 4,365.3 | 1.6 | 969 | 19 | 2.9 | 27 |
Minnesota | 2,902.1 | 2.0 | 1,037 | 12 | 3.9 | 6 |
Mississippi | 1,128.9 | 0.7 | 732 | 51 | 0.8 | 49 |
Missouri | 2,818.7 | 1.2 | 889 | 30 | 3.0 | 25 |
Montana | 473.6 | 1.3 | 797 | 48 | 3.9 | 6 |
Nebraska | 984.0 | 0.4 | 833 | 43 | 3.5 | 13 |
Nevada | 1,333.5 | 3.4 | 900 | 29 | 2.9 | 27 |
New Hampshire | 665.4 | 1.6 | 1,015 | 14 | 1.2 | 48 |
New Jersey | 4,123.5 | 1.8 | 1,173 | 6 | 2.3 | 41 |
New Mexico | 815.4 | 0.7 | 823 | 45 | 1.5 | 47 |
New York | 9,417.4 | 1.6 | 1,237 | 3 | 2.2 | 43 |
North Carolina | 4,361.4 | 1.8 | 902 | 28 | 4.3 | 4 |
North Dakota | 422.7 | -0.2 | 953 | 22 | 5.0 | 2 |
Ohio | 5,422.8 | 1.2 | 912 | 25 | 3.3 | 19 |
Oklahoma | 1,583.8 | 0.8 | 845 | 41 | 2.5 | 35 |
Oregon | 1,912.6 | 2.2 | 967 | 20 | 3.8 | 8 |
Pennsylvania | 5,859.4 | 1.3 | 1,000 | 17 | 3.0 | 25 |
Rhode Island | 487.3 | 1.0 | 980 | 18 | 2.6 | 33 |
South Carolina | 2,053.9 | 2.0 | 834 | 42 | 3.6 | 11 |
South Dakota | 435.5 | 0.6 | 785 | 49 | 3.4 | 16 |
Tennessee | 2,948.1 | 1.8 | 906 | 26 | 3.5 | 13 |
Texas | 12,059.6 | 2.1 | 1,027 | 13 | 2.7 | 32 |
Utah | 1,440.3 | 3.4 | 862 | 35 | 2.6 | 33 |
Vermont | 314.2 | 1.0 | 870 | 33 | 2.1 | 45 |
Virginia | 3,886.6 | 1.5 | 1,047 | 10 | 3.7 | 9 |
Washington | 3,352.5 | 2.2 | 1,141 | 7 | 5.6 | 1 |
West Virginia | 690.9 | -0.3 | 828 | 44 | 3.4 | 16 |
Wisconsin | 2,905.3 | 1.1 | 876 | 31 | 2.3 | 41 |
Wyoming | 280.2 | -0.7 | 875 | 32 | 3.1 | 23 |
Puerto Rico | 873.6 | -1.0 | 515 | (3) | 1.2 | (3) |
Virgin Islands | 38.6 | 0.4 | 762 | (3) | 2.6 | (3) |
Footnotes: | ||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Wednesday, December 20, 2017