An official website of the United States government
18-369-ATL
Wednesday, March 21, 2018
Employment increased in six of South Carolina’s seven large counties from September 2016 to September 2017, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with 2016 annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more.) Regional Commissioner Janet S. Rankin noted that York and Spartanburg Counties had the largest employment growth among South Carolina’s largest counties, increasing 3.6 and 3.5 percent, respectively. (See table 1.)
Nationally, employment advanced 1.0 percent from September 2016 to September 2017 as 283 of the 346 largest U.S. counties registered increases. Midland, Texas, had the largest percentage increase in the country, up 10.4 percent over the year. Collier, Fla., had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment among the largest counties in the U.S., with a loss of 5.2 percent.
Among the seven largest counties in South Carolina, employment was highest in Greenville County (266,100) in September 2017. Two other counties, Charleston and Richland, had employment levels above 200,000. Together, South Carolina’s large counties accounted for 59.6 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 346 largest counties made up 72.7 percent of total U.S. employment, which stood at 144.5 million in September 2017.
From the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2017, five large South Carolina counties had over-the-year decreases in average weekly wages. (See table 1.) Richland County was the only large county to register an increase in average weekly wages, up 0.8 percent. Charleston County recorded the highest average weekly wage among the state’s large counties at $902. Nationally, the average weekly wage declined 0.6 percent to $1,021 during the year ending in the third quarter of 2017.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 39 counties in South Carolina with employment levels below 75,000. Average weekly wages in these counties ranged from $1,191 to $556. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesFive of South Carolina’s seven large counties had over-the-year decreases in average weekly wages. Greenville and Lexington Counties had the largest decreases in average weekly wages (-1.6 percent each). Average weekly wages in Horry County were unchanged for the year, while average weekly wages in Richland County were up 0.8 percent. (See table 1.)
Nationally, 265 of the 346 largest counties registered over-the-year decreases in average weekly wages. Mercer, N.J., had the largest wage decline, down 8.8 percent from the third quarter of 2016, followed by Wyandotte, Kan. (-6.0 percent).
Among the largest U.S. counties, 71 experienced an over-the-year increase in average weekly wages. Midland, Texas, had the largest percentage increase in average weekly wages (8.4 percent), followed by Union, N.J (8.2 percent); Elkhart, Ind. (6.5 percent); Forsyth, N.C. (5.3 percent); and Maui + Kalawao, Hawaii (4.6 percent).
Large county average weekly wagesEach of South Carolina’s seven large counties had average weekly wages below the national average of $1,021 in September 2017. Charleston, Richland, and Greenville Counties, with average weekly wages of $902, $893, and $877, respectively, placed in the middle third of the national ranking among the 346 largest U.S. counties in the third quarter of 2017. Average weekly wages in South Carolina’s four other large counties placed in the bottom third of the national ranking. (See table 1.)
Nationally, 96 large counties had average weekly wages above the U.S. average of $1,021 in the third quarter of 2017. Santa Clara, Calif., had the highest average weekly wage at $2,320, followed by San Mateo, Calif. ($2,123); and San Francisco, Calif. ($1,954).
Among the largest U.S. counties, 250 had weekly wages below the national average in the third quarter of 2017. Cameron, Texas, had the lowest wage ($612), followed by Horry, S.C. ($633); and Hidalgo, Texas ($649).
Average weekly wages in South Carolina’s smaller countiesAmong the 39 smaller counties in South Carolina with employment below 75,000, Fairfield ($1,191) was the only county with an average weekly wage above the $1,021 national average. Clarendon County had the lowest weekly wage among all the counties in the state, averaging $556 in the third quarter of 2017. (See table 2.)
When all 46 counties in South Carolina were considered, 14 had wages below $699, 19 had wages from $700-$799, 9 had wages from $800-$899, and 4 had average weekly wages above $900. (See chart 1.)
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2016 edition of this publication contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2017 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages 2016 are now available online at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2016/home.htm. The 2017 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2018.
The County Employment and Wages release for fourth quarter 2017 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, May 23, 2018.
The national QCEW publication process is accelerating for a more timely release. Beginning with the fourth quarter 2017 release, QCEW data will be published in two parts. The current County Employment and Wages news release and associated data will be accelerated and published first. The full QCEW data release will occur two weeks later, accompanied by a data release notice.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 9.9 million employer reports cover 144.5 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
Area | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 2017 (thousands) | Percent change, September 2016-17 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, third quarter 2016-17 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | |
United States (4) | 144,464.4 | 1.0 | -- | $1,021 | -- | -0.6 | -- |
South Carolina | 2,027.2 | 0.8 | -- | 828 | 43 | -0.5 | 16 |
Charleston, S.C. | 244.7 | 0.4 | 233 | 902 | 197 | -1.4 | 195 |
Greenville, S.C. | 266.1 | 1.4 | 104 | 877 | 230 | -1.6 | 217 |
Horry, S.C. | 127.8 | 1.3 | 114 | 633 | 345 | 0.0 | 72 |
Lexington, S.C. | 118.5 | 2.2 | 52 | 778 | 323 | -1.6 | 217 |
Richland, S.C. | 218.1 | -0.6 | 311 | 893 | 209 | 0.8 | 38 |
Spartanburg, S.C. | 138.4 | 3.5 | 13 | 856 | 254 | -1.0 | 156 |
York, S.C. | 93.7 | 3.6 | 11 | 825 | 283 | -0.5 | 111 |
Footnotes: | |||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Employment September 2017 | Average weekly wage(1) |
---|---|---|
United States(2) | 144,464,425 | $1,021 |
South Carolina | 2,027,228 | 828 |
Abbeville | 5,402 | 707 |
Aiken | 59,210 | 920 |
Allendale | 2,843 | 794 |
Anderson | 64,455 | 747 |
Bamberg | 3,772 | 636 |
Barnwell | 5,119 | 640 |
Beaufort | 63,644 | 719 |
Berkeley | 49,632 | 924 |
Calhoun | 4,538 | 794 |
Charleston | 244,703 | 902 |
Cherokee | 19,792 | 682 |
Chester | 8,589 | 814 |
Chesterfield | 14,730 | 715 |
Clarendon | 6,819 | 556 |
Colleton | 10,506 | 625 |
Darlington | 20,071 | 815 |
Dillon | 8,627 | 596 |
Dorchester | 34,448 | 695 |
Edgefield | 5,220 | 733 |
Fairfield | 6,528 | 1,191 |
Florence | 62,738 | 725 |
Georgetown | 23,151 | 773 |
Greenville | 266,107 | 877 |
Greenwood | 27,697 | 824 |
Hampton | 4,609 | 712 |
Horry | 127,800 | 633 |
Jasper | 8,954 | 700 |
Kershaw | 17,400 | 732 |
Lancaster | 23,846 | 879 |
Laurens | 22,404 | 767 |
Lee | 3,464 | 709 |
Lexington | 118,454 | 778 |
McCormick | 1,745 | 669 |
Marion | 6,437 | 626 |
Marlboro | 6,779 | 793 |
Newberry | 13,692 | 691 |
Oconee | 23,470 | 844 |
Orangeburg | 28,668 | 711 |
Pickens | 35,648 | 761 |
Richland | 218,058 | 893 |
Saluda | 4,586 | 608 |
Spartanburg | 138,409 | 856 |
Sumter | 36,809 | 712 |
Union | 7,682 | 666 |
Williamsburg | 9,182 | 694 |
York | 93,724 | 825 |
Footnotes | ||
NOTE: Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary. |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 2017 (thousands) | Percent change, September 2016-17 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, third quarter 2016-17 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (2) | 144,464.4 | 1.0 | $1,021 | -- | -0.6 | -- |
Alabama | 1,941.1 | 0.8 | 859 | 37 | -1.3 | 38 |
Alaska | 335.4 | -0.7 | 1,025 | 15 | -2.8 | 50 |
Arizona | 2,760.1 | 2.4 | 948 | 24 | -0.2 | 10 |
Arkansas | 1,213.0 | 0.6 | 788 | 49 | -0.6 | 19 |
California | 17,153.4 | 1.7 | 1,215 | 4 | 0.5 | 4 |
Colorado | 2,625.9 | 1.9 | 1,067 | 9 | 0.5 | 4 |
Connecticut | 1,676.3 | 0.1 | 1,179 | 6 | -2.2 | 47 |
Delaware | 443.0 | 0.4 | 1,026 | 14 | 0.4 | 6 |
District of Columbia | 764.7 | 0.7 | 1,759 | 1 | 1.3 | 2 |
Florida | 8,305.8 | -0.2 | 896 | 29 | -1.1 | 31 |
Georgia | 4,343.5 | 1.3 | 961 | 21 | -0.9 | 27 |
Hawaii | 652.5 | 0.4 | 953 | 22 | -0.3 | 13 |
Idaho | 722.3 | 2.7 | 778 | 50 | -0.5 | 16 |
Illinois | 5,969.6 | 0.5 | 1,057 | 10 | -0.3 | 13 |
Indiana | 3,044.0 | 0.6 | 861 | 36 | -0.6 | 19 |
Iowa | 1,546.1 | -0.2 | 855 | 38 | -2.2 | 47 |
Kansas | 1,376.4 | -0.1 | 839 | 41 | -2.1 | 46 |
Kentucky | 1,890.4 | 0.5 | 837 | 42 | -2.4 | 49 |
Louisiana | 1,904.3 | -0.1 | 869 | 33 | -1.7 | 42 |
Maine | 621.9 | 0.7 | 821 | 46 | -0.5 | 16 |
Maryland | 2,661.8 | 0.5 | 1,105 | 8 | -1.7 | 42 |
Massachusetts | 3,568.0 | 0.9 | 1,265 | 2 | -0.9 | 27 |
Michigan | 4,334.3 | 0.9 | 964 | 20 | -1.1 | 31 |
Minnesota | 2,883.0 | 1.1 | 1,030 | 13 | -2.0 | 45 |
Mississippi | 1,129.1 | -0.1 | 729 | 51 | -1.4 | 39 |
Missouri | 2,805.8 | 0.9 | 878 | 31 | -1.2 | 34 |
Montana | 468.6 | 0.9 | 793 | 48 | 0.1 | 8 |
Nebraska | 973.3 | -0.2 | 850 | 39 | -0.8 | 23 |
Nevada | 1,337.7 | 2.9 | 914 | 26 | -3.8 | 51 |
New Hampshire | 659.1 | 0.6 | 1,022 | 16 | -0.4 | 15 |
New Jersey | 4,043.6 | 1.1 | 1,156 | 7 | -1.5 | 41 |
New Mexico | 816.0 | 0.3 | 823 | 45 | -0.8 | 23 |
New York | 9,329.8 | 1.2 | 1,219 | 3 | -0.2 | 10 |
North Carolina | 4,348.0 | 1.3 | 904 | 27 | -0.7 | 21 |
North Dakota | 419.2 | -1.0 | 953 | 22 | -1.2 | 34 |
Ohio | 5,383.6 | 0.6 | 920 | 25 | -0.8 | 23 |
Oklahoma | 1,593.3 | 0.7 | 843 | 40 | -1.2 | 34 |
Oregon | 1,905.3 | 1.8 | 969 | 19 | -0.1 | 9 |
Pennsylvania | 5,836.5 | 1.0 | 1,002 | 17 | -1.1 | 31 |
Rhode Island | 484.5 | 0.8 | 973 | 18 | -1.8 | 44 |
South Carolina | 2,027.2 | 0.8 | 828 | 43 | -0.5 | 16 |
South Dakota | 426.2 | 0.4 | 803 | 47 | -0.7 | 21 |
Tennessee | 2,953.3 | 1.1 | 903 | 28 | -1.2 | 34 |
Texas | 12,008.9 | 1.4 | 1,032 | 12 | -1.0 | 29 |
Utah | 1,444.1 | 2.6 | 879 | 30 | -0.2 | 10 |
Vermont | 310.3 | 0.1 | 869 | 33 | -1.4 | 39 |
Virginia | 3,843.6 | 1.0 | 1,053 | 11 | -0.8 | 23 |
Washington | 3,343.4 | 2.0 | 1,208 | 5 | 1.7 | 1 |
West Virginia | 694.0 | 0.2 | 826 | 44 | 1.1 | 3 |
Wisconsin | 2,866.9 | 0.5 | 876 | 32 | -1.0 | 29 |
Wyoming | 276.2 | 0.3 | 868 | 35 | 0.3 | 7 |
Puerto Rico | 862.8 | -3.1 | 509 | (3) | -2.7 | (3) |
Virgin Islands | 36.9 | -1.1 | 763 | (3) | -1.9 | (3) |
Footnotes: | ||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Wednesday, March 21, 2018