
An official website of the United States government
In the section on “Large county average weekly wages,” New York County's average weekly wage was incorrect. It has been corrected to $2,025.
19-25-NEW
Monday, January 07, 2019
Average weekly wages in all 18 large counties in New York increased from the second quarter of 2017 to the second quarter of 2018, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or greater as measured by 2017 annual average employment.) Chief Regional Economist Martin Kohli noted that New York County had the largest growth in average weekly wages, 4.4 percent, followed by Saratoga County, 4.3 percent, and Albany County, 4.2 percent. (See chart 1 and table 1.)
Seven of New York’s large counties reported average weekly wages above the $1,055 national average in the second quarter of 2018. Average weekly wages in New York and Westchester Counties exceeded $1,300.
Seventeen of the 18 large counties in New York had employment gains from June 2017 to June 2018. Saratoga County had the largest gain, up 2.7 percent, while Oneida and Suffolk Counties had the smallest gains, each at 0.1 percent. Employment was unchanged in Monroe County. Nationally, employment grew 1.5 percent from June 2017 to June 2018 as 309 of the 349 largest U.S. counties added jobs. (See chart 2.)
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 44 counties in New York with employment levels below 75,000. Average wages in all but two of these smaller counties were below the national average in the second quarter of 2018. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesSeven of New York’s large counties had average weekly wage growth above the national average of 3.4 percent from the second quarter of 2017 to the second quarter of 2018. (See table 1.) New York County ranked 44th with an over-the-year wage gain of 4.4 percent. Saratoga County ranked 50th and Albany County 59th among the 349 large counties in the nation with over-the-year wage increases of 4.3 and 4.2 percent, respectively. Four other New York counties had annual wage gains of at least 3.5 percent and placed in the top third of the national ranking: Orange, Queens, Broome, and Onondaga.
Nationally, 340 of the 349 largest counties had over-the-year increases in average weekly wages. Marin, CA, had the largest second quarter over-the-year wage gain at 11.7 percent. King, WA, and Lake, IL, tied for the second largest increase, each at 9.3 percent.
Eight large U.S. counties registered wage declines over the year. New Hanover, NC, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in average weekly wages with a loss of 6.4 percent.
Large county average weekly wagesNew York County had the highest average weekly wage in the state at $2,025 and ranked fourth among the 349 largest U.S. counties. Westchester County ($1,353) ranked 21st. Five additional counties (Albany, Bronx, Nassau, Queens, and Suffolk) had average weekly wages that placed them in the top 100 nationwide. Broome ($866) and Oneida ($833) reported the lowest average weekly wages among the state’s large counties and ranked 273rd and 302nd, respectively.
Nationally, average weekly wages were higher than average in 94 of the largest 349 counties. Santa Clara, CA, held the top position among the highest-paid large counties with an average weekly wage of $2,573. San Mateo, CA, was second at $2,357, followed by San Francisco, CA ($2,083), and New York, NY ($2,025).
Among the 255 counties with an average weekly wage below the U.S. average in the second quarter of 2018, Horry County, SC ($625) reported the lowest wage, followed by Cameron ($642) and Hidalgo ($645) Counties in Texas. Average wages in the lowest-ranked county, Horry, TX, were less than one-quarter of the wages reported for the highest-ranked county, Santa Clara, CA.
Large county employmentEmployment rose in 17 of the 18 largest counties in New York from June 2017 to June 2018. Five counties (Saratoga, Kings, Queens, Rockland, and Orange) had employment growth above the national rate of 1.5 percent.
Nationally, employment grew in 309 of the 349 largest counties nationwide. Midland, TX, had the largest over-the-year percentage increase in employment (11.6 percent).McLean, IL, experienced the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment, with a loss of 2.0 percent.
In New York, employment was highest in New York County (2,474,700) followed by Kings (772,500), Queens (708,100), Suffolk (688,300), and Nassau (647,200). Altogether, New York’s large counties accounted for 85.7 percent of total state employment. Nationwide, the 349 largest counties made up 72.9 percent of total U.S. employment.
Average weekly wages in New York’s smaller countiesForty-two of New York’s 44 counties with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages below the national average of $1,055. Schenectady ($1,076) and Steuben ($1,055) were the exceptions. (See table 2.) Yates and Hamilton Counties reported the lowest average weekly wages at $679 and $694, respectively.
When all 62 counties in New York were considered, all but 13 had wages below $1,000. Twelve counties reported average weekly wages less than $800, 26 had wages from $800 to $899, and 11 had wages from $900 to $999. Eleven of the 13 counties with an average weekly wage at or above $1,000 were in the eastern part of the state. The counties with the lowest average weekly wage, under $800, were primarily located in the northern and western parts of the state. (See chart 3.)
Additional statistics and other informationQuarterly data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2017 edition of this publication, which was published in September 2018, contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2018 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Online Annual Averages 2017 are now available online at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2017/home.htm. The 2018 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2019.
The County Employment and Wages release for third quarter 2018 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, February 20, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. (ET).
Data BLS has partnered with the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of the Chief Information Officer to develop a new mobile app for iPhones. The BLS Local Data app is ideal for customers, such as jobseekers and economic and workforce development professionals, who want to know more about local labor markets. For more information, please go to: https://www.bls.gov/blog/2018/new-bls-local-data-app-now-available.htm.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
Area | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2018 (thousands) | Percent change, June 2017-18 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Second quarter 2018 | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, second quarter 2017-18 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | |
United States (4) |
147,431.2 | 1.5 | -- | $1,055 | -- | 3.4 | -- |
New York |
9,579.2 | 1.7 | -- | 1,297 | 3 | 4.5 | 4 |
Albany, NY |
235.5 | 0.4 | 271 | 1,138 | 61 | 4.2 | 59 |
Bronx, NY |
322.2 | 1.2 | 176 | 1,058 | 94 | 2.3 | 244 |
Broome, NY |
87.9 | 0.7 | 235 | 866 | 273 | 3.7 | 93 |
Dutchess, NY |
114.5 | 0.7 | 235 | 1,038 | 106 | 1.4 | 307 |
Erie, NY |
475.0 | 0.4 | 271 | 949 | 183 | 3.2 | 150 |
Kings, NY |
772.5 | 2.5 | 63 | 918 | 208 | 2.2 | 253 |
Monroe, NY |
391.6 | 0.0 | 310 | 996 | 149 | 3.1 | 160 |
Nassau, NY |
647.2 | 0.5 | 257 | 1,175 | 51 | 2.5 | 225 |
New York, NY |
2,474.7 | 0.7 | 235 | 2,025 | 4 | 4.4 | 44 |
Oneida, NY |
107.4 | 0.1 | 303 | 833 | 302 | 2.6 | 216 |
Onondaga, NY |
249.4 | 0.5 | 257 | 984 | 161 | 3.7 | 93 |
Orange, NY |
148.5 | 1.8 | 110 | 941 | 190 | 4.0 | 69 |
Queens, NY |
708.1 | 2.1 | 82 | 1,062 | 91 | 3.9 | 77 |
Richmond, NY |
124.0 | 1.4 | 144 | 997 | 148 | 3.4 | 124 |
Rockland, NY |
129.3 | 2.0 | 94 | 1,016 | 126 | 2.6 | 216 |
Saratoga, NY |
92.7 | 2.7 | 48 | 995 | 150 | 4.3 | 50 |
Suffolk, NY |
688.3 | 0.1 | 303 | 1,134 | 65 | 3.4 | 124 |
Westchester, NY |
441.9 | 0.9 | 206 | 1,353 | 21 | 1.4 | 307 |
Footnotes: |
|||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Employment June 2018 |
Average weekly wage(1) |
---|---|---|
United States(2) |
147,431,154 | $1,055 |
New York |
9,579,225 | 1,297 |
Albany |
235,483 | 1,138 |
Allegany |
13,069 | 804 |
Bronx |
322,205 | 1,058 |
Broome |
87,930 | 866 |
Cattaraugus |
29,325 | 789 |
Cayuga |
26,685 | 860 |
Chautauqua |
50,049 | 778 |
Chemung |
35,893 | 894 |
Chenango |
17,886 | 869 |
Clinton |
34,801 | 867 |
Columbia |
22,878 | 791 |
Cortland |
18,036 | 808 |
Delaware |
15,107 | 853 |
Dutchess |
114,485 | 1,038 |
Erie |
474,972 | 949 |
Essex |
15,295 | 816 |
Franklin |
18,672 | 863 |
Fulton |
17,378 | 787 |
Genesee |
24,926 | 777 |
Greene |
15,642 | 797 |
Hamilton |
1,977 | 694 |
Herkimer |
17,698 | 777 |
Jefferson |
43,066 | 800 |
Kings |
772,476 | 918 |
Lewis |
6,911 | 807 |
Livingston |
21,273 | 799 |
Madison |
21,783 | 805 |
Monroe |
391,582 | 996 |
Montgomery |
19,997 | 783 |
Nassau |
647,173 | 1,175 |
New York |
2,474,658 | 2,025 |
Niagara |
74,696 | 810 |
Oneida |
107,437 | 833 |
Onondaga |
249,426 | 984 |
Ontario |
55,101 | 912 |
Orange |
148,523 | 941 |
Orleans |
12,536 | 834 |
Oswego |
34,408 | 929 |
Otsego |
24,672 | 846 |
Putnam |
27,600 | 1,036 |
Queens |
708,088 | 1,062 |
Rensselaer |
55,320 | 978 |
Richmond |
123,985 | 997 |
Rockland |
129,324 | 1,016 |
Saratoga |
92,711 | 995 |
Schenectady |
64,367 | 1,076 |
Schoharie |
9,351 | 809 |
Schuyler |
5,461 | 763 |
Seneca |
13,159 | 831 |
St. Lawrence |
36,134 | 891 |
Steuben |
38,335 | 1,055 |
Suffolk |
688,312 | 1,134 |
Sullivan |
29,690 | 826 |
Tioga |
13,984 | 997 |
Tompkins |
51,220 | 1,014 |
Ulster |
62,679 | 860 |
Warren |
41,437 | 817 |
Washington |
16,038 | 838 |
Wayne |
29,108 | 823 |
Westchester |
441,882 | 1,353 |
Wyoming |
14,268 | 809 |
Yates |
7,296 | 679 |
Footnotes |
||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2018 (thousands) | Percent change, June 2017-18 | Second quarter 2018 | National ranking by level | Percent change, second quarter 2017-18 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (2) |
147,431.2 | 1.5 | $1,055 | -- | 3.4 | -- |
Alabama |
1,969.9 | 1.2 | 882 | 37 | 2.8 | 35 |
Alaska |
335.8 | -0.9 | 1,043 | 15 | 3.7 | 9 |
Arizona |
2,770.8 | 2.6 | 973 | 23 | 3.3 | 19 |
Arkansas |
1,214.6 | 0.7 | 824 | 47 | 1.7 | 47 |
California |
17,473.1 | 1.9 | 1,265 | 4 | 4.6 | 3 |
Colorado |
2,704.4 | 2.4 | 1,075 | 10 | 3.2 | 27 |
Connecticut |
1,704.5 | 0.3 | 1,218 | 5 | 0.1 | 50 |
Delaware |
454.3 | 1.3 | 1,023 | 17 | 1.4 | 49 |
District of Columbia |
777.3 | 1.3 | 1,713 | 1 | 2.6 | 39 |
Florida |
8,568.9 | 2.1 | 931 | 28 | 2.9 | 32 |
Georgia |
4,440.5 | 2.0 | 979 | 22 | 2.3 | 43 |
Hawaii |
658.3 | 0.5 | 956 | 24 | 2.5 | 41 |
Idaho |
745.3 | 3.1 | 794 | 50 | 3.8 | 8 |
Illinois |
6,061.1 | 0.8 | 1,097 | 9 | 3.4 | 14 |
Indiana |
3,075.8 | 1.1 | 883 | 36 | 2.8 | 35 |
Iowa |
1,583.7 | 0.8 | 880 | 39 | 3.3 | 19 |
Kansas |
1,393.3 | 1.0 | 879 | 40 | 3.4 | 14 |
Kentucky |
1,905.9 | 0.9 | 882 | 37 | 2.3 | 43 |
Louisiana |
1,918.6 | 0.4 | 901 | 33 | 3.7 | 9 |
Maine |
636.8 | 1.0 | 843 | 45 | 3.6 | 11 |
Maryland |
2,712.0 | 0.7 | 1,141 | 8 | 3.4 | 14 |
Massachusetts |
3,650.1 | 1.0 | 1,322 | 2 | 3.5 | 12 |
Michigan |
4,424.7 | 1.3 | 997 | 20 | 2.9 | 32 |
Minnesota |
2,925.6 | 0.8 | 1,072 | 12 | 3.3 | 19 |
Mississippi |
1,130.7 | 0.2 | 752 | 51 | 2.7 | 38 |
Missouri |
2,829.0 | 0.5 | 924 | 30 | 3.9 | 7 |
Montana |
478.7 | 1.1 | 817 | 48 | 2.5 | 41 |
Nebraska |
990.8 | 0.6 | 859 | 43 | 3.1 | 29 |
Nevada |
1,372.4 | 3.1 | 931 | 28 | 3.3 | 19 |
New Hampshire |
670.8 | 0.8 | 1,049 | 14 | 3.3 | 19 |
New Jersey |
4,157.0 | 0.9 | 1,201 | 7 | 2.3 | 43 |
New Mexico |
823.6 | 1.0 | 852 | 44 | 3.5 | 12 |
New York |
9,579.2 | 1.7 | 1,297 | 3 | 4.5 | 4 |
North Carolina |
4,450.2 | 2.2 | 933 | 25 | 3.3 | 19 |
North Dakota |
426.1 | 0.8 | 986 | 21 | 3.4 | 14 |
Ohio |
5,461.3 | 0.7 | 933 | 25 | 2.3 | 43 |
Oklahoma |
1,606.4 | 1.2 | 875 | 41 | 3.2 | 27 |
Oregon |
1,947.3 | 1.5 | 999 | 18 | 3.3 | 19 |
Pennsylvania |
5,924.9 | 1.1 | 1,031 | 16 | 3.1 | 29 |
Rhode Island |
491.0 | 0.7 | 998 | 19 | 1.7 | 47 |
South Carolina |
2,126.5 | 3.4 | 833 | 46 | 0.0 | 51 |
South Dakota |
439.7 | 0.9 | 807 | 49 | 2.8 | 35 |
Tennessee |
2,994.1 | 1.6 | 932 | 27 | 2.9 | 32 |
Texas |
12,326.3 | 2.2 | 1,062 | 13 | 3.4 | 14 |
Utah |
1,483.9 | 3.4 | 899 | 35 | 4.3 | 5 |
Vermont |
312.4 | -0.8 | 907 | 31 | 4.3 | 5 |
Virginia |
3,941.0 | 1.3 | 1,073 | 11 | 2.6 | 39 |
Washington |
3,444.1 | 2.7 | 1,218 | 5 | 6.9 | 1 |
West Virginia |
702.9 | 1.6 | 868 | 42 | 4.8 | 2 |
Wisconsin |
2,933.5 | 0.9 | 904 | 32 | 3.3 | 19 |
Wyoming |
282.2 | 0.5 | 901 | 33 | 3.0 | 31 |
Puerto Rico |
853.5 | -2.3 | 543 | (3) | 5.2 | (3) |
Virgin Islands |
33.4 | -14.4 | 838 | (3) | 12.8 | (3) |
Footnotes: |
||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Monday, January 07, 2019