
An official website of the United States government
20-1172-DAL
Tuesday, June 09, 2020
In New Mexico’s only large county, Bernalillo, employment rose 1.3 percent from December 2018 to December 2019, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are those with 2018 annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more.) Acting Regional Commissioner Michael Hirniak noted that the rate of employment growth in Bernalillo County ranked 138th among the 355 largest U.S. counties. (See table 1.)
Nationally, employment advanced 1.2 percent from December 2018 to December 2019 with 285 of the 355 largest U.S. counties registering increases. Cleveland. OK, recorded the largest percentage increase in the country, up 5.8 percent over the year. Ector, TX had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment, with a loss of 4.2 percent.
Employment in Bernalillo County stood at 338,400 in December 2019, accounting for 40.1 percent of total employment in New Mexico. Nationwide, the 355 largest counties made up 73.7 percent of total U.S. employment.
The average weekly wage in Bernalillo County was $984 in the fourth quarter of 2019, ranking it 247th. Nationwide, 262 of the 355 large counties reported average weekly wages below the U.S. average of $1,185. Cameron, TX, reported the lowest weekly wage ($701), followed by Hidalgo, TX ($705).
Nationally, 93 large counties registered average weekly wages equal to or above the U.S. average in the fourth quarter of 2019. Santa Clara, CA, held the top position with an average weekly wage of $2,825, followed by San Mateo, CA, at $2,622. The average weekly wage in the highest-ranked county, Santa Clara, CA, was more four times the average weekly wage in the lowest-ranked county, Cameron, TX ($701).
The average weekly wage in Bernalillo County increased 3.9 percent from the fourth quarter of 2018 to the fourth quarter of 2019, ranking 117th among the largest U.S. counties. Nationally, average weekly wages rose 3.5 percent over the year, as 341 of the 355 largest counties registered increases. Santa Cruz, CA, had the largest percentage wage increase (20.7 percent). The remaining 14 large counties had wage declines during the period. Linn, IA, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease (-7.1 percent).
Average weekly wages in New Mexico’s smaller countiesEmployment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 32 counties in New Mexico with employment levels below 75,000. Two of these smaller counties had average weekly wages above the $1,185 national average in the fourth quarter of 2019: Los Alamos ($1,622) and Eddy ($1,301). Catron County had the lowest average wage in the state at $604 per week. (See table 2.)
When all 33 counties in New Mexico were considered, 5 had weekly wages averaging $649 or less, 13 averaged $650 to $749 per week, 8 reported wages from $750 to $849, and 7 had wages averaging $850 or more. (See chart 1.) The counties with the highest average wages were primarily concentrated around the metropolitan areas of Albuquerque, Carlsbad, Farmington, Hobbs, Los Alamos, and Santa Fe.
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2018 edition of this publication, which was published in September 2019, contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2019 version of this news release. Tables and additional content from the 2018 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online are now available at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2018/home.htm. The 2019 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2020.
The County Employment and Wages full data update for first quarter 2020 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, September 2, 2020.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/. However, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
Area | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2019 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2018-19 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, fourth quarter 2018-19 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | |
United States (4) | 149,857.1 | 1.2 | -- | $1,185 | -- | 3.5 | -- |
New Mexico | 844.0 | 1.5 | -- | 942 | 44 | 4.0 | 8 |
Bernalillo, NM | 338.4 | 1.3 | 138 | 984 | 247 | 3.9 | 117 |
Footnotes: | |||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Employment December 2019 | Average weekly wage(1) |
---|---|---|
United States(2) | 149,857,130 | $1,185 |
New Mexico | 844,005 | 942 |
Bernalillo | 338,351 | 984 |
Catron | 604 | 598 |
Chaves | 21,546 | 761 |
Cibola | 7,647 | 726 |
Colfax | 4,260 | 678 |
Curry | 17,257 | 736 |
De Baca | 443 | 777 |
Dona Ana | 74,116 | 792 |
Eddy | 34,179 | 1,301 |
Grant | 9,321 | 799 |
Guadalupe | 1,470 | 607 |
Harding | 166 | 686 |
Hidalgo | 1,539 | 833 |
Lea | 32,645 | 1,104 |
Lincoln | 6,403 | 662 |
Los Alamos | 17,407 | 1,622 |
Luna | 7,387 | 742 |
McKinley | 21,401 | 749 |
Mora | 675 | 638 |
Otero | 17,708 | 785 |
Quay | 2,577 | 676 |
Rio Arriba | 9,751 | 735 |
Roosevelt | 6,075 | 740 |
Sandoval | 32,369 | 875 |
San Juan | 46,249 | 910 |
San Miguel | 8,122 | 644 |
Santa Fe | 63,441 | 978 |
Sierra | 3,428 | 652 |
Socorro | 5,127 | 774 |
Taos | 11,383 | 646 |
Torrance | 3,440 | 724 |
Union | 1,277 | 767 |
Valencia | 15,511 | 732 |
Footnotes | ||
Note: Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary. |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2019 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2018-19 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, fourth quarter 2018-19 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (2) | 149,857.1 | 1.2 | $1,185 | -- | 3.5 | -- |
Alabama | 2,007.9 | 1.0 | 985 | 36 | 2.6 | 39 |
Alaska | 309.9 | 0.6 | 1,139 | 16 | 3.2 | 27 |
Arizona | 2,999.8 | 2.7 | 1,059 | 23 | 4.1 | 7 |
Arkansas | 1,232.9 | 0.5 | 898 | 50 | 3.2 | 27 |
California | 17,836.3 | 1.5 | 1,457 | 4 | 4.7 | 4 |
Colorado | 2,772.6 | 2.2 | 1,227 | 9 | 4.0 | 8 |
Connecticut | 1,687.4 | -0.7 | 1,383 | 5 | 3.8 | 11 |
Delaware | 455.3 | 0.8 | 1,136 | 17 | 2.6 | 39 |
District of Columbia | 782.5 | 0.8 | 1,992 | 1 | 2.5 | 42 |
Florida | 9,085.5 | 2.0 | 1,044 | 26 | 3.6 | 14 |
Georgia | 4,576.1 | 1.7 | 1,090 | 21 | 3.6 | 14 |
Hawaii | 665.1 | -0.8 | 1,053 | 24 | 3.5 | 17 |
Idaho | 756.9 | 3.1 | 918 | 46 | 3.1 | 32 |
Illinois | 6,043.5 | 0.2 | 1,221 | 10 | 2.7 | 38 |
Indiana | 3,106.0 | 0.6 | 969 | 38 | 3.0 | 34 |
Iowa | 1,560.4 | 0.1 | 984 | 37 | 1.9 | 47 |
Kansas | 1,410.7 | 0.6 | 959 | 40 | 3.5 | 17 |
Kentucky | 1,928.3 | 0.8 | 955 | 41 | 3.2 | 27 |
Louisiana | 1,927.7 | -0.5 | 993 | 34 | 2.5 | 42 |
Maine | 620.2 | 0.7 | 955 | 41 | 5.3 | 2 |
Maryland | 2,728.1 | 0.9 | 1,271 | 8 | 3.5 | 17 |
Massachusetts | 3,660.8 | 0.9 | 1,511 | 2 | 3.8 | 11 |
Michigan | 4,385.3 | 0.4 | 1,115 | 18 | 3.4 | 22 |
Minnesota | 2,912.8 | 0.4 | 1,177 | 14 | 3.2 | 27 |
Mississippi | 1,145.0 | 0.0 | 818 | 51 | 3.2 | 27 |
Missouri | 2,846.2 | 0.9 | 1,010 | 32 | 3.0 | 34 |
Montana | 474.1 | 1.1 | 918 | 46 | 3.4 | 22 |
Nebraska | 990.9 | 0.7 | 969 | 38 | 4.2 | 6 |
Nevada | 1,435.5 | 2.7 | 1,030 | 29 | 2.4 | 45 |
New Hampshire | 671.3 | 0.8 | 1,192 | 12 | 2.9 | 37 |
New Jersey | 4,157.4 | 0.8 | 1,332 | 7 | 2.5 | 42 |
New Mexico | 844.0 | 1.5 | 942 | 44 | 4.0 | 8 |
New York | 9,691.0 | 0.8 | 1,499 | 3 | 3.7 | 13 |
North Carolina | 4,546.9 | 1.9 | 1,036 | 28 | 2.4 | 45 |
North Dakota | 424.6 | 0.5 | 1,085 | 22 | 2.6 | 39 |
Ohio | 5,477.2 | 0.5 | 1,037 | 27 | 3.1 | 32 |
Oklahoma | 1,639.4 | 0.3 | 945 | 43 | 1.4 | 49 |
Oregon | 1,969.3 | 1.6 | 1,100 | 19 | 4.6 | 5 |
Pennsylvania | 5,985.9 | 0.8 | 1,143 | 15 | 3.6 | 14 |
Rhode Island | 489.8 | 0.6 | 1,099 | 20 | 1.1 | 50 |
South Carolina | 2,144.8 | 1.2 | 931 | 45 | 4.0 | 8 |
South Dakota | 430.7 | 0.6 | 916 | 48 | 3.5 | 17 |
Tennessee | 3,085.4 | 1.6 | 1,047 | 25 | 1.6 | 48 |
Texas | 12,793.0 | 2.0 | 1,187 | 13 | 3.4 | 22 |
Utah | 1,547.8 | 2.5 | 1,022 | 30 | 5.0 | 3 |
Vermont | 314.0 | -0.4 | 987 | 35 | 3.5 | 17 |
Virginia | 3,978.7 | 1.2 | 1,204 | 11 | 3.4 | 22 |
Washington | 3,457.7 | 2.2 | 1,370 | 6 | 6.4 | 1 |
West Virginia | 690.3 | -2.0 | 904 | 49 | -1.4 | 51 |
Wisconsin | 2,898.0 | 0.2 | 1,022 | 30 | 3.3 | 26 |
Wyoming | 276.3 | 1.4 | 1,007 | 33 | 3.0 | 34 |
Puerto Rico | 910.7 | 1.5 | 575 | (3) | -0.2 | (3) |
Virgin Islands | 39.2 | 10.8 | 1,065 | (3) | 13.5 | (3) |
Footnotes: | ||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Tuesday, June 09, 2020