An official website of the United States government
14-1515-SAN
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
Employment rose in all six large counties in Oregon from December 2012 to December 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2012 annual average employment.) Regional Commissioner Richard J. Holden noted that employment increases ranged from 4.3 percent in Marion County to 0.7 percent in Clackamas County.
Nationally, employment increased 1.8 percent from December 2012 to December 2013 as 292 of the 334 largest U.S. counties registered increases. Weld, Colo., recorded the largest percentage increase in the country, up 6.0 percent over the year. St. Clair, Ill., registered the largest percentage employment decline, down 3.1 percent.
Among the large counties in Oregon, Multnomah County reported the largest employment (461,100) in December 2013. Together, the six large counties accounted for 72.0 percent of Oregon’s total employment. Nationwide, the largest 334 counties made up 71.7 percent of total U.S. employment, which stood at 136.1 million in December 2013.
From the fourth quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2013, Washington County recorded the largest rate of increase in average weekly wages among Oregon’s largest counties, registering a gain of 5.9 percent. Washington County also recorded the highest average weekly wage among the six large Oregon counties at $1,163 per week. Nationally, the average weekly wage was unchanged over the year, remaining at $1,000 in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 30 counties with employment below 75,000 in Oregon. Wage levels in all these counties were below the national average. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesAll 6 of Oregon’s large counties recorded over-the-year wage gains that ranked in the top 50 nationwide in the fourth quarter of 2013. Apart from Washington County’s 5.9-percent gain, the remaining five counties posted wage gains between 2.4 and 2.0 percent. (See table 1.)
Nationwide, 185 large counties experienced over-the-year increases in average weekly wages. Santa Cruz, Calif., had the largest wage gain (6.5 percent). Ada, Idaho, had the second largest increase (6.4 percent), followed by Washington, Ore. (5.9 percent).
Among the 334 largest U.S. counties, 140 had over-the-year decreases in average weekly wages in the fourth quarter of 2013. Douglas, Colo., had the largest average weekly wage decline with a loss of 29.7 percent, followed by the counties of San Mateo, Calif. (-15.8 percent), and Virginia Beach City, Va. (-10.0 percent).
Large county average weekly wagesAverage weekly wages in Washington County ($1,163, 45th), Multnomah County ($1,006, 93rd), and Clackamas County ($914, 159th) placed in the top half of the national ranking among the 334 largest counties nationwide. Average weekly wages in the state’s remaining three large counties ranged from $778 to $722 in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Average weekly wages were higher than the national average in 98 of the largest 334 U.S. counties. San Mateo, Calif., held the top position among the highest-paid large counties with a wage of $2,724. New York, N.Y., was second at $2,041, followed by Santa Clara, Calif. ($1,972).
There were 235 counties with an average weekly wage below the national average in the fourth quarter of 2013. The lowest average weekly wage was reported in Horry, S.C. ($587), followed by the counties of Cameron, Texas ($598); and Hidalgo, Texas ($620).
Average weekly wages in Oregon’s smaller countiesAll 30 smaller counties in Oregon, those with employment below 75,000, had average weekly wages lower than the national average of $1,000. Benton reported the highest weekly wage ($916) followed by Morrow ($831). Wheeler County reported the lowest weekly wage in the state, averaging $493 in the fourth quarter of 2013. (See table 2.)
When all 36 counties in Oregon were considered, 1 county reported average weekly wages under $600, 19 reported wages from $600 to $699, 11 reported wages from $700 to $799, 1 reported wages from $800 to $899, and 4 reported wages above $900.
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2012 edition of this publication contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2013 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages 2012 are now available online at https://www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2012/home.htm. The 2013 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2014.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 9.3 million employer reports cover 136.1 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised (see Technical Note below) and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; Federal Relay Service: 1-800-877-8339.
Area | Employment | Average Weekly Wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2013 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2012-13 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, fourth quarter 2012-13 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | |
United States (4) |
136,129.4 | 1.8 | -- | $1,000 | -- | 0.0 | -- |
Oregon |
1,699.6 | 2.5 | -- | 894 | 25 | 2.6 | 3 |
Clackamas, Ore. |
143.8 | 0.7 | 230 | 914 | 159 | 2.1 | 43 |
Jackson, Ore. |
79.9 | 2.0 | 122 | 722 | 320 | 2.0 | 47 |
Lane, Ore. |
141.1 | 1.3 | 175 | 772 | 299 | 2.3 | 36 |
Marion, Ore. |
135.8 | 4.3 | 17 | 778 | 294 | 2.4 | 31 |
Multnomah, Ore. |
461.1 | 2.8 | 76 | 1,006 | 93 | 2.0 | 47 |
Washington, Ore. |
262.6 | 3.7 | 34 | 1,163 | 45 | 5.9 | 3 |
Footnotes: |
|||||||
NOTE: Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary. |
Area | Employment December 2013 | Average Weekly Wage (1) |
---|---|---|
United States (2) |
136,129,407 | $1,000 |
Oregon |
1,699,640 | 894 |
Baker |
4,958 | 633 |
Benton |
34,684 | 916 |
Clackamas |
143,821 | 914 |
Clatsop |
16,405 | 651 |
Columbia |
9,925 | 675 |
Coos |
21,742 | 659 |
Crook |
5,815 | 765 |
Curry |
6,003 | 632 |
Deschutes |
64,247 | 762 |
Douglas |
34,817 | 703 |
Gilliam |
731 | 753 |
Grant |
2,271 | 641 |
Harney |
2,125 | 634 |
Hood River |
12,468 | 632 |
Jackson |
79,866 | 722 |
Jefferson |
6,010 | 697 |
Josephine |
22,725 | 627 |
Klamath |
21,408 | 668 |
Lake |
2,348 | 680 |
Lane |
141,066 | 772 |
Lincoln |
16,944 | 633 |
Linn |
41,395 | 741 |
Malheur |
12,272 | 639 |
Marion |
135,777 | 778 |
Morrow |
4,760 | 831 |
Multnomah |
461,119 | 1,006 |
Polk |
17,599 | 642 |
Sherman |
742 | 794 |
Tillamook |
8,292 | 650 |
Umatilla |
28,541 | 688 |
Union |
9,621 | 658 |
Wallowa |
2,268 | 605 |
Wasco |
10,138 | 704 |
Washington |
262,627 | 1,163 |
Wheeler |
307 | 493 |
Yamhill |
32,057 | 731 |
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data. |
||
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands. |
||
Data are preliminary. |
||
NOTE: Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2013 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2012-13 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, fourth quarter 2012-13 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (2) |
136,129.4 | 1.8 | $1,000 | -- | 0.0 | -- |
Alabama |
1,866.5 | 1.0 | 851 | 34 | -0.5 | 39 |
Alaska |
315.1 | 0.0 | 1,022 | 14 | 1.6 | 7 |
Arizona |
2,571.0 | 2.4 | 906 | 23 | -0.5 | 39 |
Arkansas |
1,154.3 | -0.5 | 771 | 47 | 0.4 | 22 |
California |
15,650.3 | 2.8 | 1,175 | 6 | -0.9 | 43 |
Colorado |
2,383.9 | 3.1 | 1,023 | 13 | -0.9 | 43 |
Connecticut |
1,661.2 | 0.3 | 1,238 | 4 | -1.3 | 49 |
Delaware |
419.6 | 1.8 | 1,035 | 9 | -0.6 | 41 |
District of Columbia |
727.3 | 0.6 | 1,638 | 1 | -3.9 | 51 |
Florida |
7,739.5 | 2.7 | 883 | 29 | 0.2 | 27 |
Georgia |
3,986.9 | 2.5 | 924 | 21 | -0.1 | 32 |
Hawaii |
632.9 | 1.7 | 871 | 30 | 0.3 | 25 |
Idaho |
634.5 | 2.6 | 754 | 50 | 3.0 | 2 |
Illinois |
5,758.9 | 1.0 | 1,060 | 8 | 0.2 | 27 |
Indiana |
2,896.9 | 1.6 | 814 | 40 | -0.2 | 35 |
Iowa |
1,510.9 | 1.4 | 834 | 38 | 1.6 | 7 |
Kansas |
1,359.5 | 1.6 | 832 | 39 | -0.4 | 38 |
Kentucky |
1,818.0 | 1.2 | 804 | 42 | 0.2 | 27 |
Louisiana |
1,911.6 | 0.9 | 889 | 26 | 0.5 | 20 |
Maine |
586.8 | 0.8 | 786 | 46 | 1.7 | 5 |
Maryland |
2,555.1 | 0.4 | 1,076 | 7 | -0.9 | 43 |
Massachusetts |
3,332.9 | 1.5 | 1,258 | 3 | 0.8 | 17 |
Michigan |
4,072.4 | 2.0 | 952 | 20 | -0.2 | 35 |
Minnesota |
2,720.6 | 1.7 | 988 | 16 | 0.3 | 25 |
Mississippi |
1,108.1 | 1.1 | 729 | 51 | 1.3 | 11 |
Missouri |
2,670.4 | 1.1 | 861 | 32 | -0.2 | 35 |
Montana |
440.0 | 1.3 | 760 | 48 | 0.4 | 22 |
Nebraska |
944.3 | 1.4 | 796 | 43 | -0.1 | 32 |
Nevada |
1,180.5 | 3.0 | 884 | 28 | 0.7 | 18 |
New Hampshire |
629.3 | 1.4 | 1,017 | 15 | -0.8 | 42 |
New Jersey |
3,887.5 | 1.2 | 1,186 | 5 | 1.1 | 14 |
New Mexico |
796.2 | -0.1 | 814 | 40 | 1.4 | 10 |
New York |
8,888.6 | 1.7 | 1,266 | 2 | -1.1 | 48 |
North Carolina |
4,045.5 | 1.9 | 860 | 33 | 0.7 | 18 |
North Dakota |
435.0 | 3.3 | 980 | 17 | 3.8 | 1 |
Ohio |
5,175.4 | 1.4 | 887 | 27 | 0.0 | 30 |
Oklahoma |
1,581.3 | 0.6 | 851 | 34 | -0.1 | 32 |
Oregon |
1,699.6 | 2.5 | 894 | 25 | 2.6 | 3 |
Pennsylvania |
5,650.3 | 0.4 | 976 | 18 | 0.4 | 22 |
Rhode Island |
462.7 | 1.4 | 960 | 19 | 1.5 | 9 |
South Carolina |
1,875.8 | 2.3 | 793 | 44 | 1.0 | 15 |
South Dakota |
407.1 | 1.3 | 759 | 49 | 1.3 | 11 |
Tennessee |
2,758.3 | 1.8 | 895 | 24 | -0.9 | 43 |
Texas |
11,246.3 | 2.6 | 1,027 | 12 | 0.0 | 30 |
Utah |
1,284.7 | 3.1 | 836 | 37 | -0.9 | 43 |
Vermont |
308.5 | 0.6 | 848 | 36 | 2.3 | 4 |
Virginia |
3,670.0 | 0.1 | 1,028 | 11 | -1.3 | 49 |
Washington |
2,976.0 | 2.5 | 1,034 | 10 | 1.7 | 5 |
West Virginia |
710.1 | -0.6 | 792 | 45 | 0.5 | 20 |
Wisconsin |
2,751.8 | 1.0 | 865 | 31 | 1.2 | 13 |
Wyoming |
279.2 | 0.6 | 917 | 22 | 1.0 | 15 |
Puerto Rico |
958.3 | -2.3 | 551 | (3) | 0.2 | (3) |
Virgin Islands |
38.5 | -3.6 | 754 | (3) | 2.4 | (3) |
Footnotes: |
||||||
NOTE: Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary. |
Last Modified Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2014