An official website of the United States government
18-1224-SAN
Thursday, July 26, 2018
All seven of Oregon’s large counties had employment gains from December 2016 to December 2017, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2016 annual average employment.) Assistant Commissioner for Regional Operations Richard Holden noted that six of the large counties in Oregon had rates of job growth above the 1.5-percent national average. Deschutes County had the largest increase in employment at 3.7 percent, followed by Clackamas County at 2.5 percent. (See table 1.)
Nationally, employment increased in 316 of the 346 largest U.S. counties from December 2016 to December 2017. Midland, Texas, had the largest percentage increase in the country, up 11.5 percent over the year. Shawnee, Kan. and Caddo, La., had the largest decrease among the largest counties in the U.S., with losses of 1.8 percent each.
Among the large counties in Oregon, Multnomah had the highest employment (510,500) in December 2017. Together, the seven large counties accounted for 76.2 percent of Oregon’s total employment. Nationwide, the 346 largest counties made up 73.0 percent of total U.S. employment.
From the fourth quarter of 2016 to the fourth quarter of 2017, Washington County’s 8.1-percent increase in average weekly wages was the highest among Oregon’s large counties. Nationally, the average weekly wage increased 3.9 percent to $1,109 in the fourth quarter of 2017.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 29 counties with employment below 75,000 in Oregon. Wage levels in all of these smaller counties were below the national average. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesAs noted, all of Oregon’s large counties had over-the-year wage increases in December 2017. Washington County’s 8.1-percent wage increase ranked 6th among the 346 large U.S. counties. Five of the 6 other Counties ranked in the top 100 nationwide.
Among the 346 largest U.S. counties, 339 had over-the-year increases in average weekly wages. San Mateo, Calif., and Ada, Idaho, had the largest percentage wage increases among the largest U.S. counties (11.5 percent each). New York, N.Y., followed with an increase of 10.4 percent.
Of the 346 largest counties, 7 experienced an over-the-year decrease in average weekly wages. Clayton, Ga., had the largest percentage decrease in average weekly wages (-6.7 percent), followed by Champaign, Ill. (-1.6 percent); and Benton, Ark. (-1.4 percent).
Large county average weekly wagesAverage weekly wages in Washington County ($1,307, 38th) and Multnomah County ($1,146, 73rd) placed in the top third among the 346 largest U.S. counties. Average weekly wages in the state’s remaining five large counties ranged from $1,023 to $833 in the fourth quarter of 2017.
Nationwide, average weekly wages were above the U.S. average ($1,109) in 95 of the 346 largest counties in the fourth quarter of 2017. Santa Clara, Calif., had the highest average weekly wage at $2,576, followed by New York, N.Y. ($2,439); San Mateo, Calif. ($2,341); and San Francisco, Calif. ($2,232).
Among the largest U.S. counties, 251 had weekly wages below the national average in the fourth quarter of 2017. Cameron, Texas ($652) had the lowest wage, followed by the counties of Hidalgo, Texas ($664); Horry, S.C. ($674); and Webb, Texas ($706).
Average weekly wages in Oregon’s smaller countiesAll of the 29 counties in Oregon with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages lower than the national average of $1,109. Morrow County had the highest wage ($1,029), followed by Benton ($1,000). Wheeler County had the lowest weekly wage in the state, averaging $550 in the fourth quarter of 2017. (See table 2.)
When all 36 counties in Oregon were considered, 3 counties had average weekly wages of $699 or lower, 19 reported wages from $700 to $799, 8 had wages from $800 to $899, 1 had wages from $900 to $999, and 5 had wages at $1,000 or higher. (See chart 1.)
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2016 edition of this publication contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2017 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages 2016 are now available online at https://www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2016/home.htm. The 2017 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2018.
The County Employment and Wages release for first quarter 2018 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, August 22, 2018.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 10.0 million employer reports cover 145.9 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
Area | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2017 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2016-17 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, fourth quarter 2016-17 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | |
United States (4) | 145,921.1 | 1.5 | -- | $1,109 | -- | 3.9 | -- |
Oregon | 1,900.4 | 2.0 | -- | 1,014 | 21 | 4.5 | 7 |
Clackamas, Ore. | 164.5 | 2.5 | 62 | 1,023 | 157 | 3.8 | 98 |
Deschutes, Ore. | 80.9 | 3.7 | 17 | 874 | 294 | 4.3 | 67 |
Jackson, Ore. | 89.3 | 2.4 | 69 | 833 | 318 | 4.0 | 85 |
Lane, Ore. | 156.0 | 1.4 | 144 | 862 | 302 | 2.0 | 270 |
Marion, Ore. | 152.1 | 1.6 | 121 | 901 | 271 | 4.6 | 47 |
Multnomah, Ore. | 510.5 | 1.9 | 96 | 1,146 | 73 | 4.2 | 71 |
Washington, Ore. | 294.7 | 2.4 | 69 | 1,307 | 38 | 8.1 | 6 |
Footnotes: | |||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Employment December 2017 | Average Weekly Wage(1) |
---|---|---|
United States(2) | 145,921,109 | $1,109 |
Oregon | 1,900,352 | 1,014 |
Baker | 5,360 | 708 |
Benton | 38,314 | 1,000 |
Clackamas | 164,489 | 1,023 |
Clatsop | 18,169 | 724 |
Columbia | 11,567 | 769 |
Coos | 23,042 | 752 |
Crook | 6,078 | 890 |
Curry | 6,554 | 702 |
Deschutes | 80,880 | 874 |
Douglas | 38,264 | 804 |
Gilliam | 807 | 790 |
Grant | 2,392 | 748 |
Harney | 2,377 | 696 |
Hood River | 13,700 | 784 |
Jackson | 89,300 | 833 |
Jefferson | 6,535 | 756 |
Josephine | 26,970 | 732 |
Klamath | 23,015 | 766 |
Lake | 2,438 | 760 |
Lane | 156,019 | 862 |
Lincoln | 17,876 | 729 |
Linn | 46,739 | 821 |
Malheur | 12,945 | 690 |
Marion | 152,092 | 901 |
Morrow | 5,714 | 1,029 |
Multnomah | 510,457 | 1,146 |
Polk | 20,158 | 727 |
Sherman | 799 | 866 |
Tillamook | 9,181 | 756 |
Umatilla | 30,024 | 782 |
Union | 10,067 | 752 |
Wallowa | 2,405 | 713 |
Wasco | 11,051 | 780 |
Washington | 294,732 | 1,307 |
Wheeler | 300 | 550 |
Yamhill | 35,527 | 818 |
Footnotes | ||
NOTE: Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary. |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2017 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2016-17 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, fourth quarter 2016-17 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (2) | 145,921.1 | 1.5 | $1,109 | -- | 3.9 | -- |
Alabama | 1,955.3 | 1.1 | 928 | 36 | 2.9 | 32 |
Alaska | 306.7 | -1.2 | 1,052 | 19 | 1.5 | 51 |
Arizona | 2,834.7 | 2.6 | 978 | 25 | 3.5 | 12 |
Arkansas | 1,217.2 | 1.0 | 848 | 48 | 2.5 | 42 |
California | 17,293.0 | 2.1 | 1,346 | 4 | 5.7 | 4 |
Colorado | 2,653.3 | 2.5 | 1,133 | 10 | 4.3 | 9 |
Connecticut | 1,689.7 | 0.3 | 1,317 | 5 | 2.2 | 46 |
Delaware | 444.9 | 0.6 | 1,081 | 15 | 2.6 | 40 |
District of Columbia | 769.0 | 0.9 | 1,812 | 1 | 2.7 | 37 |
Florida | 8,712.0 | 2.0 | 975 | 26 | 3.4 | 16 |
Georgia | 4,425.0 | 1.8 | 1,027 | 20 | 3.4 | 16 |
Hawaii | 664.5 | 0.8 | 984 | 24 | 3.1 | 26 |
Idaho | 712.4 | 3.0 | 857 | 46 | 7.1 | 1 |
Illinois | 6,001.1 | 0.8 | 1,151 | 9 | 2.6 | 40 |
Indiana | 3,057.8 | 1.1 | 915 | 38 | 3.6 | 11 |
Iowa | 1,549.7 | 0.4 | 938 | 32 | 3.0 | 28 |
Kansas | 1,390.3 | 0.4 | 894 | 41 | 1.9 | 49 |
Kentucky | 1,903.8 | 0.5 | 892 | 42 | 2.1 | 47 |
Louisiana | 1,918.8 | 0.4 | 933 | 35 | 2.1 | 47 |
Maine | 610.3 | 1.2 | 884 | 43 | 3.4 | 16 |
Maryland | 2,683.6 | 0.5 | 1,207 | 8 | 3.3 | 22 |
Massachusetts | 3,582.2 | 1.3 | 1,411 | 3 | 4.4 | 8 |
Michigan | 4,321.8 | 0.9 | 1,062 | 17 | 3.4 | 16 |
Minnesota | 2,875.7 | 1.3 | 1,100 | 14 | 3.4 | 16 |
Mississippi | 1,140.6 | 0.5 | 774 | 51 | 2.4 | 45 |
Missouri | 2,809.5 | 1.0 | 945 | 31 | 2.9 | 32 |
Montana | 461.4 | 1.0 | 843 | 50 | 2.7 | 37 |
Nebraska | 980.9 | 0.9 | 901 | 39 | 3.0 | 28 |
Nevada | 1,351.9 | 3.5 | 955 | 29 | 3.2 | 25 |
New Hampshire | 661.3 | 0.7 | 1,132 | 11 | 3.7 | 10 |
New Jersey | 4,106.9 | 1.6 | 1,262 | 6 | 1.8 | 50 |
New Mexico | 816.7 | 0.6 | 865 | 45 | 2.5 | 42 |
New York | 9,465.3 | 1.4 | 1,428 | 2 | 6.4 | 2 |
North Carolina | 4,388.6 | 1.5 | 964 | 28 | 3.3 | 22 |
North Dakota | 416.1 | 0.4 | 1,010 | 22 | 3.3 | 22 |
Ohio | 5,409.2 | 0.8 | 973 | 27 | 3.1 | 26 |
Oklahoma | 1,607.8 | 1.2 | 895 | 40 | 3.5 | 12 |
Oregon | 1,900.4 | 2.0 | 1,014 | 21 | 4.5 | 7 |
Pennsylvania | 5,870.4 | 1.2 | 1,075 | 16 | 3.5 | 12 |
Rhode Island | 483.6 | 1.1 | 1,056 | 18 | 2.7 | 37 |
South Carolina | 2,058.8 | 1.6 | 879 | 44 | 2.8 | 35 |
South Dakota | 423.8 | 0.9 | 856 | 47 | 3.4 | 16 |
Tennessee | 2,984.8 | 1.3 | 1,000 | 23 | 3.0 | 28 |
Texas | 12,207.8 | 2.0 | 1,109 | 13 | 3.5 | 12 |
Utah | 1,465.5 | 3.6 | 936 | 33 | 2.9 | 32 |
Vermont | 314.7 | 0.5 | 919 | 37 | 2.5 | 42 |
Virginia | 3,884.2 | 1.3 | 1,121 | 12 | 2.8 | 35 |
Washington | 3,305.0 | 2.4 | 1,217 | 7 | 5.8 | 3 |
West Virginia | 693.1 | 0.1 | 847 | 49 | 4.7 | 5 |
Wisconsin | 2,872.6 | 1.0 | 951 | 30 | 3.0 | 28 |
Wyoming | 267.5 | 0.6 | 935 | 34 | 4.6 | 6 |
Puerto Rico | 887.0 | -4.4 | 570 | (3) | 2.5 | (3) |
Virgin Islands | 34.3 | -11.1 | 827 | (3) | 7.7 | (3) |
Footnotes: | ||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Thursday, July 26, 2018