An official website of the United States government
19-1411-SAN
Wednesday, July 31, 2019
All seven of Oregon’s large counties had employment gains from December 2017 to December 2018, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with 2017 annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more.) Assistant Commissioner for Regional Operations Richard Holden noted that four of the large counties in Oregon had rates of job growth above the 1.5-percent national average. Deschutes County had the largest increase in employment at 2.8 percent, followed by Marion County at 2.6 percent. (See table 1.)
Employment increased in 296 of the 349 largest U.S. counties from December 2017 to December 2018. Midland, TX, had the largest percentage increase, with a gain of 10.0 percent over the year. York, SC, had the next-largest percentage increase (5.1 percent), followed by the counties of Atlantic, NJ (4.6 percent) and Utah, UT (4.5 percent). Employment declined in 47 large counties during this period. Bay, FL, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment (-5.6 percent), followed by Kanawha, WV, and Johnson, IA (-1.5 percent each).
Among the large counties in Oregon, Multnomah had the highest employment (519,700) in December 2018. Together, the seven large counties accounted for 76.2 percent of Oregon’s total employment. Nationwide, the 349 largest counties made up 73.2 percent of total U.S. employment.
From the fourth quarter of 2017 to the fourth quarter of 2018, average weekly wages increased in all seven of Oregon’s large counties. Multnomah County’s 5.4-percent increase in average weekly wages was the highest among Oregon’s large counties. Nationally, average weekly wages increased 3.2 percent over the year, to $1,144 in the fourth quarter of 2018.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 29 counties with employment below 75,000 in Oregon. Wage levels in all of these smaller counties were below the national average. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesAs noted, all of Oregon’s large counties had over-the-year wage increases in the fourth quarter of 2018. Multnomah County’s 5.4-percent wage increase ranked 37th among the 349 large U.S. counties. Three other large Oregon counties ranked in the top 100 nationwide.
Among the 349 largest U.S. counties, 332 had over-the-year increases in average weekly wages. Tippecanoe, IN, had the largest fourth quarter over-the-year wage gain at 15.1 percent, followed by Williamson, TN (13.1 percent) and Olmstead, MN (13.0 percent).
Of the 349 largest counties, 15 experienced an over-the-year decrease in average weekly wages. Washington, PA, had the largest percentage decrease in average weekly wages (-6.6 percent), followed by Elkhart, IN (-5.0 percent); Muscogee, GA, (-3.7 percent); and Douglas, CO (-3.6 percent).
Large county average weekly wagesAverage weekly wages in Washington County ($1,312, 46th) and Multnomah County ($1,208, 68th) placed in the top third among the 349 largest U.S. counties. Average weekly wages in the state’s remaining five large counties ranged from $1,073 to $843 in the fourth quarter of 2018.
Nationwide, weekly wages were higher than the U.S. average of $1,144 in 94 of the 349 largest counties. Santa Clara, CA, held the top position among the highest-paid large counties in the nation with an average weekly wage of $2,670. San Francisco, CA, was second at $2,452, followed by San Mateo, CA, ($2,410); New York, NY, ($2,400); and Suffolk, MA ($2,055).
Among the largest U.S. counties, 255 had weekly wages below the national average in the fourth quarter of 2018. Hidalgo, TX had the lowest wage at $680, followed by Horry, SC, and Cameron, TX at $685 each.
Average weekly wages in Oregon’s smaller countiesAll of the 29 counties in Oregon with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages lower than the national average of $1,144. Benton County had the highest wage ($1,075), followed by Morrow ($1,065). Wheeler County had the lowest weekly wage in the state, averaging $609 in the fourth quarter of 2018. (See table 2.)
When all 36 counties in Oregon were considered, 1 county had average weekly wages of $699 or lower, 17 reported wages from $700 to $799, 10 had wages from $800 to $899, 3 had wages from $900 to $999, and 5 had wages at $1,000 or higher. (See chart 1.)
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2017 edition of this publication, which was published in September 2018, contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2018 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages 2017 are now available online at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2017/home.htm. The 2018 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2019.
The County Employment and Wages release for first quarter 2019 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, August 21, 2019. The County Employment and Wages full data update for first quarter 2019 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, September 4, 2019.
The BLS Local Data app, first released for iPhones last fall, is now available for Android devices. Search using your current location, a zip code, or a location name to find employment and wage data for detailed industries and occupations. BLS continues to partner with the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of the Chief Information Officer to expand the features and data in the app. For more information please visit: https://www.bls.gov/blog/2019/bls-local-data-app-now-available-for-android-devices.htm
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
Area | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2018 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2017-18 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, fourth quarter 2017-18 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | |
United States (4) |
148,061.8 | 1.5 | -- | $1,144 | -- | 3.2 | -- |
Oregon |
1,935.8 | 1.7 | -- | 1,052 | 22 | 3.7 | 18 |
Clackamas, Ore. |
167.3 | 1.1 | 167 | 1,073 | 144 | 4.7 | 62 |
Deschutes, Ore. |
83.7 | 2.8 | 32 | 916 | 281 | 4.4 | 74 |
Jackson, Ore. |
90.2 | 0.9 | 185 | 843 | 326 | 1.3 | 301 |
Lane, Ore. |
157.7 | 0.7 | 215 | 884 | 305 | 2.6 | 210 |
Marion, Ore. |
156.9 | 2.6 | 41 | 940 | 257 | 4.4 | 74 |
Multnomah, Ore. |
519.7 | 1.8 | 100 | 1,208 | 68 | 5.4 | 37 |
Washington, Ore. |
300.3 | 1.8 | 100 | 1,312 | 46 | 0.4 | 325 |
Footnotes: |
|||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Employment December 2018 | Average Weekly Wage(1) |
---|---|---|
United States(2) |
148,061,773 | $1,144 |
Oregon |
1,935,786 | 1,052 |
Baker |
5,588 | 726 |
Benton |
38,188 | 1,075 |
Clackamas |
167,260 | 1,073 |
Clatsop |
18,496 | 747 |
Columbia |
11,705 | 785 |
Coos |
23,158 | 791 |
Crook |
5,904 | 901 |
Curry |
6,487 | 706 |
Deschutes |
83,681 | 916 |
Douglas |
38,826 | 816 |
Gilliam |
833 | 869 |
Grant |
2,427 | 776 |
Harney |
2,431 | 731 |
Hood River |
13,922 | 826 |
Jackson |
90,220 | 843 |
Jefferson |
6,811 | 790 |
Josephine |
27,688 | 746 |
Klamath |
23,086 | 781 |
Lake |
2,489 | 772 |
Lane |
157,749 | 884 |
Lincoln |
18,117 | 776 |
Linn |
47,954 | 854 |
Malheur |
12,719 | 725 |
Marion |
156,904 | 940 |
Morrow |
6,000 | 1,065 |
Multnomah |
519,736 | 1,208 |
Polk |
20,485 | 763 |
Sherman |
858 | 898 |
Tillamook |
9,599 | 777 |
Umatilla |
30,114 | 805 |
Union |
10,197 | 785 |
Wallowa |
2,461 | 739 |
Wasco |
10,953 | 810 |
Washington |
300,300 | 1,312 |
Wheeler |
284 | 609 |
Yamhill |
36,389 | 860 |
Footnotes |
||
NOTE: Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary. |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2018 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2017-18 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, fourth quarter 2017-18 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (2) |
148,061.8 | 1.5 | $1,144 | -- | 3.2 | -- |
Alabama |
1,986.6 | 1.6 | 957 | 36 | 3.1 | 33 |
Alaska |
308.3 | 0.4 | 1,103 | 16 | 4.9 | 7 |
Arizona |
2,921.1 | 3.0 | 1,017 | 24 | 4.1 | 11 |
Arkansas |
1,227.0 | 0.8 | 869 | 50 | 2.4 | 43 |
California |
17,556.7 | 1.7 | 1,392 | 4 | 3.3 | 26 |
Colorado |
2,713.7 | 2.2 | 1,180 | 10 | 4.1 | 11 |
Connecticut |
1,697.9 | 0.5 | 1,334 | 5 | 1.3 | 49 |
Delaware |
451.2 | 1.1 | 1,107 | 15 | 2.4 | 43 |
District of Columbia |
775.1 | 0.6 | 1,943 | 1 | 7.3 | 2 |
Florida |
8,902.7 | 2.1 | 1,006 | 27 | 3.1 | 33 |
Georgia |
4,499.8 | 1.8 | 1,053 | 21 | 2.4 | 43 |
Hawaii |
669.3 | 0.6 | 1,016 | 25 | 3.3 | 26 |
Idaho |
734.4 | 3.2 | 890 | 47 | 3.6 | 20 |
Illinois |
6,026.0 | 0.3 | 1,189 | 9 | 3.3 | 26 |
Indiana |
3,086.2 | 0.9 | 941 | 38 | 2.8 | 37 |
Iowa |
1,558.4 | 0.5 | 966 | 35 | 3.0 | 35 |
Kansas |
1,402.2 | 0.8 | 927 | 41 | 3.7 | 18 |
Kentucky |
1,914.0 | 0.3 | 924 | 42 | 3.2 | 30 |
Louisiana |
1,934.1 | 0.7 | 968 | 34 | 3.8 | 15 |
Maine |
618.4 | 1.3 | 906 | 44 | 2.5 | 41 |
Maryland |
2,702.5 | 0.8 | 1,228 | 8 | 1.7 | 48 |
Massachusetts |
3,620.3 | 1.0 | 1,457 | 2 | 3.3 | 26 |
Michigan |
4,366.5 | 1.0 | 1,077 | 19 | 1.3 | 49 |
Minnesota |
2,902.3 | 0.9 | 1,140 | 14 | 3.6 | 20 |
Mississippi |
1,144.3 | 0.2 | 793 | 51 | 2.5 | 41 |
Missouri |
2,821.3 | 0.5 | 980 | 31 | 3.6 | 20 |
Montana |
468.8 | 1.6 | 888 | 48 | 5.2 | 5 |
Nebraska |
983.0 | 0.2 | 930 | 40 | 3.2 | 30 |
Nevada |
1,397.4 | 3.3 | 1,006 | 27 | 5.3 | 4 |
New Hampshire |
666.0 | 0.7 | 1,158 | 12 | 2.3 | 46 |
New Jersey |
4,125.6 | 0.8 | 1,298 | 6 | 2.7 | 38 |
New Mexico |
830.2 | 1.5 | 905 | 45 | 4.6 | 9 |
New York |
9,613.2 | 1.5 | 1,445 | 3 | 1.0 | 51 |
North Carolina |
4,458.9 | 1.6 | 1,013 | 26 | 5.1 | 6 |
North Dakota |
422.3 | 1.5 | 1,057 | 20 | 4.7 | 8 |
Ohio |
5,442.9 | 0.5 | 1,006 | 27 | 3.4 | 24 |
Oklahoma |
1,632.3 | 1.5 | 932 | 39 | 4.1 | 11 |
Oregon |
1,935.8 | 1.7 | 1,052 | 22 | 3.7 | 18 |
Pennsylvania |
5,932.5 | 1.0 | 1,103 | 16 | 2.6 | 39 |
Rhode Island |
487.2 | 0.8 | 1,085 | 18 | 2.6 | 39 |
South Carolina |
2,119.6 | 2.8 | 893 | 46 | 1.9 | 47 |
South Dakota |
428.4 | 1.2 | 885 | 49 | 3.4 | 24 |
Tennessee |
3,039.8 | 1.8 | 1,030 | 23 | 3.0 | 35 |
Texas |
12,531.7 | 2.5 | 1,148 | 13 | 3.5 | 23 |
Utah |
1,511.5 | 3.2 | 972 | 33 | 3.8 | 15 |
Vermont |
314.2 | -0.4 | 954 | 37 | 3.2 | 30 |
Virginia |
3,927.2 | 1.1 | 1,164 | 11 | 3.8 | 15 |
Washington |
3,384.2 | 2.4 | 1,292 | 7 | 6.3 | 3 |
West Virginia |
704.2 | 1.5 | 917 | 43 | 8.3 | 1 |
Wisconsin |
2,892.3 | 0.6 | 989 | 30 | 4.0 | 14 |
Wyoming |
272.1 | 1.8 | 978 | 32 | 4.4 | 10 |
Puerto Rico |
896.4 | 0.8 | 576 | (3) | 0.9 | (3) |
Virgin Islands |
34.5 | 0.5 | 925 | (3) | 2.3 | (3) |
Footnotes: |
||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Wednesday, July 31, 2019