Department of Labor Logo United States Department of Labor
Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

News Release Information

22-42-SAN
Tuesday, January 11, 2022

Contacts Technical information: Media contact:
  • (415) 625-2270

County Employment and Wages in Arizona – Second Quarter 2021

Employment rose in Arizona’s two largest counties from June 2020 to June 2021, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are those with annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more in 2020.) Regional Commissioner Chris Rosenlund noted that Maricopa County had the larger over-the-year increase in employment with a gain of 5.4 percent. (See chart 1 and table 1.)

Chart 1. Over-the-year percent change in covered employment among the largest counties in Arizona, June 2021

National employment increased 6.7 percent over the year, with 339 of the 343 largest U.S. counties reporting gains. Atlantic, NJ, had the largest over-the-year increase in employment with a gain of 36.8 percent. Calcasieu, LA, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment with a loss of 0.9 percent.

Among Arizona’s two large counties, employment was higher in Maricopa (2,031,400) in June 2021. Together, Maricopa and Pima Counties accounted for 83.7 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 343 largest counties made up 72.2 percent of total U.S. employment.

Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 13 counties in Arizona with employment below 75,000. Wage levels in 12 of the 13 smaller counties were below the national average of $1,241 in the second quarter of 2021. (See table 2.)

Large county wage changes

Average weekly wages in Maricopa County increased 6.1 percent from the second quarter of 2020 to the second quarter of 2021, above the national average of 4.5 percent. Pima County had a 4.0-percent increase in average weekly wages. (See chart 2.) 

Chart 2. Over-the-year percent change in covered average weekly wages among the largest counties in Arizona, second quarter 2021

Among the 343 largest counties in the United States, 302 had over-the-year wage increases. San Francisco, CA, had the largest percentage wage increase (+29.7 percent). Atlantic, NJ, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease (-7.4 percent).

Large county average weekly wages

Average weekly wages in Maricopa County ($1,209) and Pima County ($1,028) were below the U.S. average of $1,241 and ranked 104th and 234th nationwide, respectively, in the second quarter of 2021.

Among the largest U.S. counties, 90 reported average weekly wages above the U.S. average in the second quarter of 2021. Santa Clara, CA, had the highest average weekly wage at $3,516. Average weekly wages were at or below the national average in the remaining 253 counties. At $728 a week, Hidalgo, TX, had the lowest average weekly wage.

Average weekly wages in Arizona’s smaller counties

Among the 13 smaller counties in Arizona —those with employment below 75,000—Greenlee ($1,377) had an average weekly wage above the national average of $1,241. La Paz County ($833) had the lowest average weekly wage in the state.

When all 15 counties in Arizona were considered, 3 had average weekly wages below $900, 7 had wages from $900 to $999, and 5 had wages of $1,000 or higher. (See chart 3.)

Additional statistics and other information

QCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.

Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. This publication is typically published in September of the following year of the reference period or shortly after the QCEW first quarter full data update. The Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online is available at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/.

The County Employment and Wages release for third quarter 2021 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, February 23, 2022. The County Employment and Wages full data update for third quarter 2021 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, March 9, 2022.


Technical Note

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS web site at www.bls.gov/cew. However, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s web site.

QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.

Information in this release will be made available to individuals with sensory impairments upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.

Table 1. Covered establishments, employment, and wages in the United States and the two largest counties in Arizona, second quarter 2021
AreaEstablishments,
second quarter
(thousands)
EmploymentAverage weekly wage (1)
June 2021
(thousands)
Percent change,
June
2020–21 (2)
National ranking
by percent change (3)
Second quarter
2021
National ranking
by level (3)
Percent change,
second quarter
2020–21 (2)
National ranking
by percent change (3)

United States (4)

10,863.2144,044.86.7--$1,241--4.5--

Arizona

180.22,857.85.3--1,154205.96

Maricopa

117.02,031.45.42001,2091046.143

Pima

19.9360.82.53241,0282344.0139

Footnotes:
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Percent changes were computed from employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
(3) Ranking does not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
(4) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

 Table 2. Covered establishments, employment, and wages in the United States and all counties in Arizona, second quarter 2021
AreaEstablishmentsEmployment June 2021Average weekly wage (1)

United States (2)

10,863,217144,044,799$1,241

Arizona

180,1862,857,8361,154

Apache

61416,5081,011

Cochise

2,34133,166994

Coconino

3,61759,505916

Gila

1,00814,325927

Graham

5729,475947

Greenlee

945,0301,377

La Paz

3675,717833

Maricopa

117,0242,031,3581,209

Mohave

4,13253,590849

Navajo

1,72026,602901

Pima

19,875360,8021,028

Pinal

3,61462,866964

Santa Cruz

1,15412,7761,058

Yavapai

6,20564,425889

Yuma

3,43760,840934

Footnotes:
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

Table 3. Covered establishments, employment, and wages by state, second quarter 2021
StateEstablishments,
second quarter
(thousands)
EmploymentAverage weekly wage (1)
June 2021
(thousands)
Percent change,
June
2020–21
Second quarter
2021
National ranking
by level (3)
Percent change,
second quarter
2020–21
National ranking
by percent change (3)

United States (2)

10,863.2144,044.86.7$1,241--4.5--

Alabama

137.81,952.04.41,010354.815

Alaska

23.7315.56.71,18117-1.251

Arizona

180.22,857.85.31,154205.96

Arkansas

96.11,205.34.4974455.212

California

1,662.916,992.17.01,57937.55

Colorado

228.92,723.97.11,283104.419

Connecticut

130.11,604.17.91,41160.647

Delaware

35.1440.15.11,165191.741

District of Columbia

44.0724.63.32,09615.48

Florida

782.58,654.06.71,113247.73

Georgia

337.04,453.56.51,139225.96

Hawaii

48.7590.512.71,117230.746

Idaho

76.4801.87.3930505.310

Illinois

394.65,743.56.51,260113.525

Indiana

178.23,011.85.21,013345.48

Iowa

106.11,528.04.8999382.138

Kansas

90.51,356.04.0995412.730

Kentucky

132.41,851.25.6999382.928

Louisiana

142.71,806.65.41,005362.039

Maine

57.0623.08.71,005362.433

Maryland

175.62,599.76.81,31991.044

Massachusetts

277.43,497.010.11,59121.143

Michigan

270.24,175.68.41,143212.532

Minnesota

192.82,814.56.41,240133.326

Mississippi

75.71,107.14.1843513.822

Missouri

221.62,759.35.31,052323.623

Montana

55.1490.77.0959474.518

Nebraska

74.4976.64.8997403.921

Nevada

93.91,353.914.01,106255.310

New Hampshire

58.5657.48.71,345810.61

New Jersey

300.43,993.812.01,38770.845

New Mexico

63.0790.64.3987422.928

New York

667.98,885.49.21,54051.342

North Carolina

311.14,511.37.21,092275.114

North Dakota

32.6407.44.31,067290.647

Ohio

312.45,266.74.31,068283.623

Oklahoma

114.61,568.73.1963462.433

Oregon

169.21,899.65.61,196154.815

Pennsylvania

370.95,674.76.91,193162.039

Rhode Island

42.1472.210.01,16818-0.350

South Carolina

150.12,091.94.9977445.212

South Dakota

36.3442.36.4936492.631

Tennessee

182.33,012.45.91,094267.64

Texas

758.012,466.75.71,210144.717

Utah

119.91,586.07.61,060304.220

Vermont

27.8292.47.51,05331-0.249

Virginia

293.63,854.36.11,257123.227

Washington

263.63,376.75.71,54748.32

West Virginia

52.7663.84.8955482.237

Wisconsin

186.52,845.75.71,037332.335

Wyoming

28.2275.15.6987422.335

Puerto Rico

47.6867.28.6567(3)2.0(3)

Virgin Islands

3.535.70.0923(3)-8.4(3)

Footnotes:
(1) Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
(3) Data not included in the national ranking.
(2) Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.

Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.

Chart 3. Average weekly wages by county in Arizona, second quarter 2021

 

Last Modified Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022