Department of Labor Logo United States Department of Labor
Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

News Release Information

16-2142-PHI
Monday, November 07, 2016

Contacts Technical information: Media contact:

Consumer Expenditures for the Washington Metropolitan Area: 2014-15

Households in the Washington, D.C.-Md.-Va.-W.Va., metropolitan area spent an average of $81,293 per year in 2014–15, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Regional Commissioner Sheila Watkins noted that this figure was significantly higher than the $54,715 average expenditure level for households in the United States. Washington-area households allocated their dollars differently among most of the nine major categories, with six differing significantly from the U.S. average. For example, the share of expenditures for healthcare, which accounted for 6.8 percent of the average household’s budget in the Washington area, was significantly lower than the national average of 7.9 percent. (See chart 1 and table 1.)

Highlights of the Washington area’s 2014–15 spending patterns:

  • Housing: Households in the Washington, D.C.-Md.-Va.-W.Va., metropolitan area spent an average of $81,293 per year in 2014–15, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Regional Commissioner Sheila Watkins noted that this figure was significantly higher than the $54,715 average expenditure level for households in the United States. Washington-area households allocated their dollars differently among most of the nine major categories, with six differing significantly from the U.S. average. For example, the share of expenditures for healthcare, which accounted for 6.8 percent of the average household’s budget in the Washington area, was significantly lower than the national average of 7.9 percent. (See table 2.)
  • Transportation: Washington-area households spent 15.7 percent on transportation, not significantly different from the national average of 17.0 percent. Of the $12,744 in annual transportation expenditures in Washington, 89.0 percent was spent buying and maintaining private vehicles; this compared to the national average of 93.3 percent.
  • Personal insurance and pensions: Washington households spent 13.0 percent ($10,532) of their annual budget on personal insurance and pensions, making this the third-largest expenditure category for the area’s households. The portion a local-area household spent on personal insurance and pensions was significantly above the national average of 11.0 percent.
  • Food: The portion of a Washington household’s budget spent on food, 9.6 percent, was significantly lower than the 12.6-percent U.S. average. In fact, Washington’s portion of the budget spent on food was the lowest among the 16 published metropolitan areas. Washington-area households spent $4,114, or 52.5 percent, of their food dollars on food at home and $3,726 (47.5 percent) on food .away from home. The average U.S. household spent 57.9 percent of its food budget on food at home and 42.1 percent on food away from home.

Additional Information

Data in this release are from the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE), which the U.S. Census Bureau conducts for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data in this release were averaged over a 2-year period, 2014 and 2015.

A household in the CE survey is defined as a consumer unit which consists of members related by blood, marriage, adoption, or other legal arrangement; a single person living alone or sharing a household with others but who is financially independent; or two or more persons living together who share responsibility for at least 2 out of 3 major types of expenses – food, housing, and other expenses. The terms household or consumer unit are used interchangeably for convenience.

Differences in spending among metropolitan areas may reflect differences in the cost of living, but they also may reflect other causes. Spending differences may result from different consumer preferences or variations in demographic characteristics, such as household size, age, or income levels. However, expenditure shares, or the percentage of a household’s budget spent on a particular category, can be used to compare spending patterns across areas. Sample sizes for the metropolitan areas are much smaller than for the nation, so the U.S. estimates and year-to-year changes are more reliable than those for the metropolitan areas. Users should also keep in mind that prices for many goods and services have changed since the survey was conducted.

A value that is statistically different from another does not necessarily mean that the difference has economic or practical significance. Statistical significance is concerned with our ability to make confident statements about a universe based on a sample. A large difference between two values may not be statistically significant, while a small difference could be significant; both the sample size and the variation among the values in the sample affect the relative error of the estimates.

For additional technical and related information, see www.bls.gov/opub/hom/pdf/homch16.pdf. Data for the nation, the four geographic regions of the U.S., and 16 metropolitan areas nationwide are available at www.bls.gov/cex/tables.htm. Metropolitan definitions used in the survey are available at https://www.bls.gov/cex/ce_msa_201415.pdf. The metropolitan area discussed in this release is the Washington, D.C.-Md.-Va.-W.Va. MSA, which includes the District of Columbia; Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George’s Counties in Maryland; Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Fredericksburg, Manassas, and Manassas Park cities and Arlington, Clarke, Culpeper, Fairfax, Fauquier, Loudoun, Prince William, Rappahannock, Spotsylvania, Stafford, and Warren Counties in Virginia; and Jefferson County in West Virginia. Metropolitan area news releases for the Consumer Expenditure Survey are available at www.bls.gov/regions/subjects/consumer-spending.htm.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; Federal Relay Service: 800-877-8339.

Changes to Consumer Expenditures Survey Data

The Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) underwent a sample change in 2015. Estimates for the Cleveland Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) will no longer be produced, as the population for the MSA was below the threshold necessary to qualify as a publishable MSA. The geographical boundaries of the Boston MSA have changed significantly such that estimates are not comparable to estimates for 2014. Thus, both Cleveland and Boston are not represented in the 2014-2015 tables. Boston will return in the 2015-2016 tables when two years of data based on the new boundaries become available.

Table 1. Average annual expenditures, characteristics and percent distribution, United States and Washington metropolitan area, 2014-15
CategoryUnited StatesWashington
Consumer unit characteristics:  

Income before taxes

$68,316$115,258

Age of reference person

50.449.6
Average number in consumer unit:  

People

2.5

2.7

Children under 18

0.6

0.6

Adults 65 and older

0.4

0.3

Earners

1.3

1.6

Vehicles

1.9

1.9

Percent homeowner

63

65

Average annual expenditures

$54,715$81,293*
Percent distribution  

Total

100.0

100.0

Food

12.69.6*

Alcoholic beverages

0.9

0.8

Housing

33.136.6*

Apparel and services

3.3

2.8

Transportation

17.0

15.7

Healthcare

7.96.8*

Entertainment

5.13.9*

Personal care products and services

1.21.0*

Reading

0.2

0.3

Education

2.3

2.8

Tobacco products and smoking supplies

0.60.3*

Miscellaneous

1.5

1.2

Cash contributions

3.35.1*

Personal insurance and pensions

11.013.0*

Note: An asterisk (*) represents a statistically significant difference from the U.S. average at the 95-percent confidence interval.
 

Table 2. Percent share of average annual expenditures for housing, transportation, and food, United States and 16 metropolitan areas, 2014-15
AreaHousingTransportationFood

United States

33.1

17.0

12.6

Atlanta

33.2

16.1

11.1*

Baltimore

34.9

15.8

11.4

Chicago

34.5*

15.6

12.4

Dallas

32.8

17.7

12.9

Detroit

30.3*

18.8

12.2

Houston

32.3

20.0*

12.5

Los Angeles

37.4*

15.1*

12.4

Miami

36.2*

18.1

13.8

Minneapolis

32.2

16.7

11.2*

New York

39.6*

12.7*

11.0*

Philadelphia

35.0*

15.9

11.2*

Phoenix

33.3

16.3

13.0

San Diego

35.8*

15.5

10.5*

San Francisco

37.1*

13.9*

12.1

Seattle

34.4

14.2*

12.9

Washington

36.6*

15.7

9.6*

Note: An asterisk (*) represents a statistically significant difference from the U.S. average at the 95-percent confidence interval.
 

 

Last Modified Date: Monday, November 07, 2016