An official website of the United States government
14-100-CHI
Friday, January 24, 2014
South Dakota’s only large county, Minnehaha, reported employment growth of 1.8 percent from June 2012 to June 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2012 annual average employment.) Regional Commissioner Charlene Peiffer noted that in June 2013, Minnehaha County’s employment level of 120,100 accounted for 28.8 percent of total employment within the state.
Nationally, employment rose 1.6 percent during this 12-month period, as 288 of the 334 largest U.S. counties gained jobs. Nationwide, the 334 largest counties made up 71.4 percent of total U.S. employment, which stood at 135.1 million in June 2013.
The average weekly wage in Minnehaha County was $772 in the second quarter of 2013, 1.2 percent higher than one year ago. (See table 1.) Nationally, the average weekly wage rose 2.1 percent over the year to $921 in the second quarter of 2013.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 65 counties in South Dakota with employment below 75,000. All 65 of these smaller counties had average weekly wages below the national average. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesMinnehaha County’s 1.2-percent wage growth from the second quarter of 2012 to the second quarter of 2013 ranked 227th nationally. (See table 1.) Among the 334 largest counties in the nation, 304 had over-the-year increases in average weekly wages in the second quarter of 2013. Union, N.J., had the largest wage increase among the largest U.S. counties (8.1 percent). Davidson, Tenn., had the largest average weekly wage decrease with a loss of 2.2 percent.
Large county average weekly wagesMinnehaha County’s $772 average wage placed in the bottom quartile among the 334 large counties, ranking 252nd. Nationally, Santa Clara, Calif., held the top position among the large counties with an average weekly wage of $1,810. New York, N.Y., was second at $1,675, followed by San Mateo, Calif. ($1,632) and Washington, D.C. ($1,575).
Average weekly wages in South Dakota's smaller countiesAll 65 counties in South Dakota with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages lower than the national average of $921. Among these smaller counties, Union County had the highest average weekly wage at $805 and Mellette County had the lowest at $406. (See table 2.)
When all 66 counties in South Dakota were considered, none had wages above the national average of $921. Five reported average weekly wages under $500, 18 had wages from $500 to $549, 14 reported wages from $550 to $599, 14 reported wages from $600 to $649, and 15 had wages of $650 or more. (See chart 1.)
Additional statistics and other informationQuarterly data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit the QCEW Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2012 edition of this publication contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2013 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages 2012 are now available online at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2012/home.htm. The 2013 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available later in September 2014.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 9.2 million employer reports cover 135.1 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons—some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Area | Employment | Average weekly wage (3) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2013 (thousands) | Percent change, June 2012-13 (4) | National ranking by percent change (5) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level (5) | Percent change, second quarter 2012-13 (4) | National ranking by percent change (5) | |
United States (6) |
135,094.0 | 1.6 | -- | $921 | -- | 2.1 | -- |
South Dakota |
417.0 | 1.0 | -- | 689 | 50 | 1.8 | 30 |
Minnehaha, S.D. |
120.1 | 1.8 | 131.0 | 772 | 252 | 1.2 | 227 |
Footnotes: |
Area | Employment June 2013 | Average weekly wage (3) |
---|---|---|
United States (4) |
135,093,963 | $921 |
South Dakota |
416,983 | 689 |
Aurora |
992 | 526 |
Beadle |
8,756 | 644 |
Bennett |
836 | 522 |
Bon Homme |
1,874 | 534 |
Brookings |
16,954 | 711 |
Brown |
21,156 | 684 |
Brule |
2,005 | 511 |
Buffalo |
546 | 671 |
Butte |
2,893 | 550 |
Campbell |
520 | 518 |
Charles Mix |
3,600 | 561 |
Clark |
1,109 | 531 |
Clay |
5,702 | 632 |
Codington |
16,322 | 651 |
Corson |
812 | 624 |
Custer |
3,136 | 547 |
Davison |
12,620 | 635 |
Day |
2,057 | 517 |
Deuel |
1,631 | 615 |
Dewey |
2,157 | 631 |
Douglas |
1,177 | 555 |
Edmunds |
1,322 | 616 |
Fall River |
2,594 | 572 |
Faulk |
638 | 590 |
Grant |
3,875 | 673 |
Gregory |
1,526 | 504 |
Haakon |
775 | 601 |
Hamlin |
1,865 | 570 |
Hand |
1,357 | 539 |
Hanson |
589 | 556 |
Harding |
432 | 704 |
Hughes |
10,703 | 711 |
Hutchinson |
2,667 | 539 |
Hyde |
556 | 667 |
Jackson |
817 | 484 |
Jerauld |
1,645 | 613 |
Jones |
511 | 469 |
Kingsbury |
1,972 | 537 |
Lake |
4,835 | 637 |
Lawrence |
11,839 | 576 |
Lincoln |
18,079 | 769 |
Lyman |
1,505 | 459 |
Marshall |
1,811 | 600 |
McCook |
1,386 | 547 |
McPherson |
647 | 488 |
Meade |
6,448 | 636 |
Mellette |
360 | 406 |
Miner |
742 | 560 |
Minnehaha |
120,077 | 772 |
Moody |
2,400 | 637 |
Pennington |
57,288 | 678 |
Perkins |
1,117 | 535 |
Potter |
926 | 548 |
Roberts |
3,560 | 558 |
Sanborn |
700 | 537 |
Shannon |
3,672 | 722 |
Spink |
2,452 | 599 |
Stanley |
1,425 | 574 |
Sully |
614 | 559 |
Todd |
2,821 | 613 |
Tripp |
2,120 | 596 |
Turner |
2,189 | 533 |
Union |
9,254 | 805 |
Walworth |
2,420 | 528 |
Yankton |
12,678 | 663 |
Ziebach |
276 | 724 |
Footnotes: |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (3) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 2013 (thousands) | Percent change, June 2012-13 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, second quarter 2012-13 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (4) |
135,094.0 | 1.6 | $921 | -- | 2.1 | -- |
Alabama |
1,859.5 | 0.9 | 794 | 35 | 1.4 | 44 |
Alaska |
342.6 | -0.1 | 970 | 9 | 1.6 | 37 |
Arizona |
2,438.1 | 1.8 | 877 | 20 | 1.7 | 32 |
Arkansas |
1,150.4 | -0.6 | 734 | 46 | 2.4 | 10 |
California |
15,485.8 | 2.4 | 1,048 | 6 | 2.0 | 21 |
Colorado |
2,359.4 | 2.9 | 933 | 14 | 1.6 | 37 |
Connecticut |
1,666.3 | 1.0 | 1,128 | 3 | 1.5 | 41 |
Delaware |
417.8 | 1.8 | 966 | 12 | 2.0 | 21 |
District of Columbia |
725.0 | 0.9 | 1,575 | 1 | 2.1 | 19 |
Florida |
7,402.0 | 2.4 | 822 | 29 | 2.0 | 21 |
Georgia |
3,917.2 | 1.7 | 867 | 22 | 2.2 | 17 |
Hawaii |
617.0 | 1.9 | 823 | 28 | 1.6 | 37 |
Idaho |
642.7 | 2.7 | 683 | 51 | 1.9 | 28 |
Illinois |
5,750.0 | 0.8 | 971 | 8 | 1.9 | 28 |
Indiana |
2,863.4 | 1.1 | 776 | 42 | 1.7 | 32 |
Iowa |
1,523.9 | 1.3 | 757 | 43 | 2.0 | 21 |
Kansas |
1,350.0 | 1.2 | 779 | 41 | 2.1 | 19 |
Kentucky |
1,790.6 | 0.6 | 782 | 38 | 1.3 | 46 |
Louisiana |
1,894.7 | 0.9 | 824 | 27 | 2.4 | 10 |
Maine |
604.4 | 0.4 | 732 | 47 | 1.8 | 30 |
Maryland |
2,570.3 | 0.9 | 1,005 | 7 | 1.4 | 44 |
Massachusetts |
3,352.7 | 1.3 | 1,131 | 2 | 2.0 | 21 |
Michigan |
4,073.7 | 2.2 | 875 | 21 | 2.0 | 21 |
Minnesota |
2,745.2 | 1.9 | 929 | 15 | 2.4 | 10 |
Mississippi |
1,094.9 | 0.7 | 691 | 49 | 1.5 | 41 |
Missouri |
2,668.2 | 1.2 | 803 | 33 | 1.6 | 37 |
Montana |
448.4 | 1.5 | 717 | 48 | 2.4 | 10 |
Nebraska |
941.0 | 0.9 | 737 | 45 | 2.6 | 7 |
Nevada |
1,168.3 | 2.3 | 829 | 26 | 1.7 | 32 |
New Hampshire |
629.1 | 0.8 | 916 | 17 | 2.9 | 4 |
New Jersey |
3,917.5 | 1.0 | 1,084 | 5 | 2.6 | 7 |
New Mexico |
795.0 | 0.4 | 781 | 39 | -0.3 | 51 |
New York |
8,804.9 | 1.1 | 1,118 | 4 | 2.0 | 21 |
North Carolina |
3,985.1 | 1.7 | 808 | 31 | 2.5 | 9 |
North Dakota |
433.7 | 3.2 | 887 | 18 | 3.7 | 1 |
Ohio |
5,162.3 | 1.1 | 830 | 25 | 1.7 | 32 |
Oklahoma |
1,560.7 | 0.9 | 794 | 35 | 3.5 | 2 |
Oregon |
1,708.0 | 2.5 | 848 | 23 | 1.3 | 46 |
Pennsylvania |
5,665.9 | 0.3 | 918 | 16 | 2.8 | 5 |
Rhode Island |
465.5 | 1.0 | 880 | 19 | 2.3 | 16 |
South Carolina |
1,864.9 | 1.8 | 747 | 44 | 1.5 | 41 |
South Dakota |
417.0 | 1.0 | 689 | 50 | 1.8 | 30 |
Tennessee |
2,709.3 | 1.5 | 820 | 30 | 0.5 | 49 |
Texas |
11,078.8 | 2.7 | 944 | 13 | 2.4 | 10 |
Utah |
1,259.7 | 2.8 | 783 | 37 | 2.2 | 17 |
Vermont |
303.1 | 0.3 | 808 | 31 | 2.7 | 6 |
Virginia |
3,685.4 | 0.7 | 968 | 11 | 1.7 | 32 |
Washington |
3,013.3 | 2.2 | 969 | 10 | 2.4 | 10 |
West Virginia |
713.1 | -0.1 | 781 | 39 | 0.6 | 48 |
Wisconsin |
2,768.2 | 0.6 | 801 | 34 | 3.0 | 3 |
Wyoming |
290.4 | 0.4 | 845 | 24 | 0.5 | 49 |
Puerto Rico |
926.1 | -1.1 | 503 | (5) | 1.0 | (5) |
Virgin Islands |
38.9 | -3.0 | 706 | (5) | -13.8 | (5) |
Footnotes: |
Last Modified Date: Friday, January 24, 2014